I don't believe that Jews would conspire to mass inject people with poison under the guise of a fraudulent pandemic in which 99.9% of people survive if they do nothing and just go on with their lives. Nor would they utilize mass censorship and collude with governments and corporations to implement a multi-billion marketing scheme to brainwash subjects into voluntarily taking the poison. Nor would they use threats such as terminating your employment unless you agree to getting injected with said poison.
All of those things have actual motive. Moreover, I believe there are two types of conspiracies:
Where things are set in motion and loosely guided by those in power. But a crucial part of propaganda is the general public accepting it and spreading it in their own forms. Not everyone who spreads propaganda is "in on it." The vast majority aren't.
Where something happens, and then those in power control the narrative around it. We see this a lot, for example, with shootings. I don't believe many shootings are explicitly staged. It's far easier to wait for a shootings to happen, then broadcast the ones that fit your narrative and suppress the ones that don't.
I don't believe that Jews would conspire to mass inject people with poison under the guise of a fraudulent pandemic in which 99.9% of people survive if they do nothing and just go on with their lives. Nor would they utilize mass censorship and collude with governments and corporations to implement a multi-billion marketing scheme to brainwash subjects into voluntarily taking the poison. Nor would they use threats such as terminating your employment unless you agree to getting injected with said poison.
Oh, wait....
All of those things have actual motive. Moreover, I believe there are two types of conspiracies:
Where things are set in motion and loosely guided by those in power. But a crucial part of propaganda is the general public accepting it and spreading it in their own forms. Not everyone who spreads propaganda is "in on it." The vast majority aren't.
Where something happens, and then those in power control the narrative around it. We see this a lot, for example, with shootings. I don't believe many shootings are explicitly staged. It's far easier to wait for a shootings to happen, then broadcast the ones that fit your narrative and suppress the ones that don't.
Why do you think the people "in power" have direct oversight over Balenciaga ad campaigns?
Do you really think they are constantly keeping tabs on that?