If the Earth is flat - how it’s possible:
You can make the following flights, starting at 9am, finishing at 3pm (or earlier) and staying at the hotel till the next day:
-
London, Uk => New York => Los Angeles => Tokyo => Doha => London, UK
-
The above series of trips starts and ends in the same place.
-
All the time, while flying, you’ve got the Sun on the left hand side.
You can only explain that in 2 ways:
-
Earth is a globe as we know it, or
-
Earth is flat, but then it needs to have a shape of a donut where the sun is in the center of it, so you fly around it.
The second would mean: when you fly South of London you should cross the middle of a donut (which is the Sun) after 12 hours of trip.
Let’s fly towards the sun:
London, UK => South Africa => the Sun.
Unfortunately, after 12 hours you end up in an extremely cold area.
Here is what a flight around the world would look like on a flat map, with the sun staying on the left hand side of the plain the hole way.
https://ibb.co/f9PDsMM
The problem is:In Los Angeles, Tokyo, Doha, you’re changing the direction (straight angle) so you have the sun behind you for most of the trip, not on the left.
Well the sun isn't on your right. I don't see how that's a problem. Just adjust your timing to keep it more or less on your left.
Here is another link, to the same image I made for you.
https://postimg.cc/ThTzMLL6
Same image, problem still the same.
The sun moves along the yellow line I outlined. In 24 hours the sun will be back at its starting point.
That’s what you’ve explained on the image.
The issue is - you’re turning right couple of times, but the sun was supposed to be one left when the plain start and continues the journey. You’re turning right immediately after the start and at that point you have the sun behind you (not on the left) for most of the journey.
The sun also turns right along you. It moves in a circular path. The circular path of the sun is bigger than the square flight path. Considering that the sun takes less time to travel around the earth, than the flight route you proposed, the place the sun will move is ahead of you. If the sun starts behind you, it will over time catch up with your flight, and overtake it.
What makes a person this stupid?
Allas8 answered your question fully, and provided a picture!
The bigger point you are missing is that IF the world is flat then it is obviously possible. Asking how it is possible is largely irrelevant.
IF the world is flat then every observation we make, occurs on a flat earth. Even if we can’t explain why/how (in this case it is easy to explain/imagine/conceptualize how - in any case)
All of them. Every. Single. One.
I know this because I have both a doctorate in photoshop and the free time to analyse every single one.
When that was pointed out to me, the flood gates opened and it's just so obvious. I understand people not noticing because we are brainwashed from birth. But I don't understand the retards that can't see its all fake once someone does point it out.
Lol woops, maybe he will take another look.
Otherwise he will be like all the normies that trusted experts and credentialing to get them through the plandemic.
lol, ha ha, ho hee, that is rich.
It is unfortunate that you keep mocking something you don't even allow an honest shot in investigating. For you, it is always with "simple logic" or some mocking phrase thrown around just to show how arrogant you really are. While the only idea of people who've investigated the topic is to give knowledge for free to people who are willing to investigate it. You are not one of those people. You choose this topic to pretend how superior you are to others. Usually people like you are so neglected in life that their only option is to defend spinning-globe-into-nothing theory online. And by using the dumbest examples no less. Only people who study this subject can reveal the answer, the ignorant choose to make a post like yours. And what is best, you only take out from it that you believe the NASA lies. Congratulations.
You are forgetting it is also hollow inside andin the middle .
Checkmate
Also there are blue blooded reptilian shapeshifters innit
It's a lot simpler than that.
Have you ever seen the sun rise in any direction other than East or travel in any direction than West? Anywhere in the world?
No, you haven't. No one has.
If the Earth was a disc, there would be somewhere on Earth, every day, where the sun rises due south and sets due north, and vice versa, where the sun crosses the "edge".
This has never been observed by anyone, therefore the Earth is not a disc.
There are many government narratives that I don't believe, but FE doesn't make any sense based on observable reality. If the Earth isn't a globe, it's definitively not flat.
If the earth were flat it wouldn't have a core, and so it wouldn't have a magnetic field, and so there wouldn't be a North. Also there wouldn't be an atmosphere because it's the magnetic field that protects it from blowing away with solar winds.
Possibly. Certainly it wouldn’t have a “core” of a sphere, anyway.
This is a leap. Honestly the idea that the molten core is responsible for the magnetic field is incredibly unscientific and stupid - regardless of the true shape of the world. It was simply made up and taught to children. It’s mythology. The geodynamo has been discarded by most all competent geophysicists.
Actually, the problem is far worse than that. Fundamentally there would be no atmosphere because there would be an infinite vaccum directly next to it. The solar wind would have nothing to blow at all if that were the case.
If you have interest in the subject, including critical/against, and want to discuss these ideas further - please join us on flatearthresearch!
It moves in a circle bro, along the equator, therefor it “sets” in the west for everyone. The continents are not aligned like you see in a zoomed out version of google maps. You will also notice on goog maps Antarctica goes over the whole bottom of the map. Why? If this is the case, why is the north pole not depicted in the same way? Because NP is centre and Antarctica is an ice barrier circling the world.
Light from stars travels billions of years yet somehow people on the other side of your flat disc don't see the sun 24 hours a day.
You are seriously a fucking idiot.
Ah, but does it really?! We are certainly taught that it does, and required to repeat it in order to matriculate...
Right, because the sun isn’t bright enough AND there is too much matter in the way.
I recommend viciously attacking the thought, but never the thinker. Ad hominem is the last resort of the intellectually feeble. Your ideas/positions should stand on their own merits, and not require such mudslinging.
There are other views than your own, and everyone who considers them is not automatically an idiot for doing so.
Yeah, based on the physics of parallax & trigonometry. Something your little brain did not study, so you think it's all fake. If you want to argue against the physics of light, you go right ahead.
BTW, odd that you should use the word matriculate since you are claiming things without any empirical evidence, which is the fundamental basis of science.
So sure, claim anything you want, but until you provide such evidence, you're just a wanker with a keyboard.
I don't argue with people who think rationally and can provide facts to support their claims. I argue with low-IQ morons who think they are smarter than those that matriculate. Lol.
So we are taught. But there are many unvalidated assumptions baked into such calculations. Astronomy is rife with them.
No, i have concluded it is wrong; slightly different.
The physics of light doesn’t prove nor measure a distance to a star.
Like what? If you are looking for empirical evidence, just ask!
Agreed.
Personally, i don’t think you should argue at all. It’s for fools. But if you had to - people who think rationally and can provide evidence for their claims would be more interesting than others, surely.
That is very sad. Arguing with idiots makes you even stupider (and belligerent) than they are :( I urge you to reconsider. Capable students prefer earnest discussion and research, and the intelligent have no need to argue with fools to feel better about themselves.
You can validate those assumptions with a pencil, paper, ruler, compass, and protractor. Or you can look up the proofs, as I'm sure they're on the Internet somewhere. Just search for "euclidean geometry". Once you understand triangles, you and a friend can simultaneously measure the angle to the sun from two places that are far enough apart. Then you can complete the triangle to find the distance. If the Sun is small and local, you shouldn't need to be all that far apart to have a detectable angular difference.
The same technique can be used to measure the distance to anything, whether it's a mountain in the distance, or a tree in your neighbor's back yard.
No, you can’t. The assumption of the earths orbit (and its correct diameter) around the sun yearly is baked into such calculations - for one.
Proofs do not exist outside of mathematics in an objective way. Proof is subjective.
I’m telling you that i have seen the “proofs” and they rely on unvalidated assumption.
I think this is a reasonable assumption. Many have completed this procedure and calculated the sun to be a few thousand miles away. Of course, for such calculations to be correct also requires the unvalidated (and easily refuted) assumption that the matter between the sun and observers does not alter its apparent path/position in any way. Because of air, for one, the sun often appears to be somewhere different than it actually is. Optics are tricky..
True, but the further you are from such observed points, the less accurate and dependable the procedure - for the same reasons above, and others.
The concept is clearly above your IQ level. Maybe try figuring out the conspiracy about bert and ernie being accused of stealing the cookies while cookie monster is covered in crumbs.
Dude is Mr Round Earth if there was ever such a thing. He's a great guy who cusses everyone he meets. I hope to get him drunk one day, he'd be a blast.
This is a mistake caused by you conflating two incompatible worldviews. If the earth is a disc and has an edge, there is no reason to assume that the sun would cross over that edge. You are probably imagining a flat disc “floating through space” - which is what i mean by conflating incompatible worldviews.
True (as far as i am aware).
False, it just means the sun always rises in the east and sets in the west regardless of where you are on earth. It doesn’t prove (nor depend on) the earth’s shape in any way.
If you’d like to understand it / have it make sense - please join us to discuss it on flatearthresearch! Of course, simply because something makes sense doesn’t make it correct and vice versa.
Possibly. In my personal view, assuming it is covered in 70+% liquid water, it is surely mostly flat.
kek. My iq 137. Post yours please.
globetards are double digit iq