As a christian, im tired of humanity's inability to move beyond Jerusalem, Israel and jews.
"as a christian" implies as one willingly consenting to suggested Christianity; hence bound to the will of others aka RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew". Submission to the suggestions of others represents the source of inability to express free will of choice, and the tool of the suggesting few to tire out the consenting many.
That's the whole point of being a Christian, you surrender yourself to Jesus Christ as your Lord and Saviour. Out of my own free will, I accept Jesus. That's what faith is.
I submit to Him, not "the suggestion of others". Religion, is "binding anew" man and God. The relationship you have with Christ is profoundly personal, which is why there's (280?) versions of Christian denominations. No one binds themselves to a bunch of old patriarchs from 1000 years ago, which is what people who get all butthurt about "religion" think.
Your incessant "free will" semantic games are Satanic, actually. Satan was the first creation to reject God and pursue his own will. Neuro-linguistically reprogramming yourself to recognize your own agency won't save you.
Jesus said
"not my will, but Yours [God] be done" - Luke 22:42
As well as the original prayer 101 instructions He gave, known as The Lord's Prayer:
Our Father in heaven,
hallowed be your name,
your kingdom come,
your will be done,
as Earth as it is in Heaven
Matthew 6:9-10
But never fear, anon. What you have is a spiritual gift that is simply misdirected. How wonderful it would be for you to pour over The Word with such vigor. Not only that, but you don't have to know all the answers. Christ is sufficient and when you surrender to Him, he gives you exactly what it is you really need. Because He loves you and created you. The adversary only seeks to kill, steal and destroy and there is no life in that.
Direction (inception towards death) for reaction (life). Even ignorance cannot misdirect; only tempt to ignore reactions.
How wonderful it would be for you to pour over The Word with such vigor.
The foundation for ones strength (vigor) represents the perceivable (sound) underneath the suggested (word), which implies the choice to resist darkness (ignorance) for light (comprehension).
Instead of pouring over suggested information; I express the impressing flow of perceivable inspiration, by choosing to compress it momentarily.
All the temporary words can be defined; redefined and contradicted at will; but only the perceivable sound remains ongoing. May the many build their tower of BABEL (confusion; disorder) out of suggested words...no matter how often it collapses upon itself, the foundation of perceivable sound remains.
you don't have to know all
Each one already knows (perceives) all (perceivable)...it's the lack of comprehension that needs to be grown; while tempted to want to be ignored.
to kill, steal and destroy and there is no life in that.
Everything perceivable has to be alive to kill; steal from and destroy it...suggested "no" (nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable everything.
a) to be (living) implies resisting origin (process of dying).
b) to be (partial) implies within (whole).
c) a point (end of a sentence) represents suggested progressivism (want for outcome)...which tempts one to ignore resisting (living) temptation (dying).
you surrender yourself to Jesus Christ
a) one shirks response-ability (choice) over self when consenting to Christianity as suggested in the name of (e nomine) others.
b) before access to "patris, et filii, et spiritus sancti" comes consent to those suggesting it "e nomine"; which represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, which was industrialized by the suggesting few to gain control over the consenting many as RELIGION (Latin religo) - "to bind anew".
c) the natural bond between perceivable (enacting process of dying) and perceiving (reaction of the living) is being ignored when consenting to being "bound anew" under choice to choice contract law.
Choice can only exist at the center of balance (need/want); others tempt choice to ignore balance for imbalance (want vs not want). They then call this conflict "reasoning".
d) The perceivable implication of "patris, et filii, et spiritus sancti" represents PADRI (whole) FILII (partial) SPIRITUS (Latin spirit; to breath aka adaptation of partial to whole).
your lord (master)
a) nature sets "free" (will of choice) into the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom; hence being temporary free (living) within ongoing dominance (process of dying).
b) the lord others are suggesting represents the free will of choice of those suggesting for those consenting to suggested, hence the suggesting few controlling the consenting many.
c) within a balance based system (the momentum of motion)...the responding choice has to be "free", otherwise it couldn't balance between need (perceivable inspiration) and want (suggested information).
From a different perspective...living within the process of dying implies being temporary growth within ongoing loss aka resistance (need) within temptation (want) aka the balance for each ones free will of choice, situated at the center.
Loss inspires growth to struggle for sustenance (need); while simultaneously tempting growth with loss to ignore the struggle (want).
In other words....everyone perceiving represents "Jesus Christ"; everything perceivable represents "God" and adaptation of perceiving to perceivable represents the "Holy Spirit".
This adaptation as perceiving (partial) to perceivable (whole) implies as free will of choice; which one is being tempted to ignore when consenting to the suggestions of other choices. Furthermore; the "Jesus on the cross" allegory represents ones choice within perceivable (need/want) being tempted on the crossroads (want vs not want); hence nailed to the cross of reasoning over suggested. Ones consent to the suggestions of others represents the "contract with the devil at the crossroads" allegory, and the road represents the only way for all life...inception towards death.
Out of my own free will
a) free will of choice implies out of; within and therefore in response to perceivable balance...while being tempted to consent to the suggested choices of others.
b) nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving) at every moment (um)...that represents the "need" for those within to adapt to. Meanwhile; to "own" represents your free will of choice to want (suggested information) more than need (perceivable inspiration) offers.
c) temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying) cannot "own" anything; only utilize everything for the temporary sustenance of self. The parasitic few suggest "ownership" to tempts the vessel (life) within flow (inception towards death) to ignore flow (perceivable) for another vessel (suggested)...that's the foundation for all the piracy allegories aka ones consent to the suggestions of others allows others to carper ones vessel on the high sea. That's what maritime admiralty law and the whole banking system is based about.
That's what faith is
a) partial cannot define what "is" without ignoring that whole "was" before one could suggest definitions.
b) DEF-INITION aka DEAF PHOENICIAN represents those who ignore perceivable (sound) for suggested (words)...hence those falling for spell-craft.
c) faithful vs faithless represents a rebranding of agreeing vs disagreeing with suggested information aka want vs not want suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt perceivable; while resisting the want to be tempted by suggested.
d) nature doesn't require faith (agreement)...it demands adaptation. To be within implies to be expression (reaction) within impressing (enacting).
I submit to Him, not "the suggestion of others"
a) others represent those who suggest you the language used to submit. Nature doesn't communicate words from perceivable to perceiving...it communicates sound. It requires choice to shape a suggestible word out of perceivable sound.
Perceivable to perceiving represents communication (reality); perceiving ignoring perceivable for suggested represents miscommunication (fiction). The few suggest fiction to shape the reality of the consenting many aka crafting their spelling for miscommunication.
b) living within the process of dying represents female (expressing) within male (impressing); hence Fe (minine) male and Wo (mb) man implying coexistence.
Sleight of hand...ADAM (male flow) RIP (momentum) EVE (female form). Momentum (balance of motion) also represents the allegories womb; matrix; mother earth; gaia etc.)
c) SUBMIT', verb [Latin submitto; sub, under, and mitto, to send.] - "to let down; to cause to sink or lower". The few suggest the many to submit (Islam for example); which tempts them to ignore resisting (living) within solution (process of dying) before drowning (death).
One needs to grow resistance (living) within temptation (dying)...not consent to sink.
personal
Aka PER SONOS (by sound); which implies being the reaction to enacting sound aka the resonance (need) or dissonance (want) to sound, hence adapting to perceivable (inspiration) representing resonance; while consenting to suggested (information) represents dissonance.
Religion, is "binding anew" man and God.
Sleight of hand..."there's nothing new under the sun". Everything (perceivable) already exists for everyone (perceiving) within. There can't be anything new for partials within whole.
The trick....suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) over perceivable transmutation (implies out of; within and in response to everything). As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...transmutation of ingredient out of base alchemy implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death).
The so called new bound represents ones willing ignorance of the one and only bond between action and reaction; whole and partial; ongoing and temporary; potentiality and potential; balance and choice; male and female; electric and magnetic; cause and effect; perceivable and perceiving; process of dying and living etc.
"new, néwos, now" implies the perceivable ever changing moment (um) by those perceiving it from within...not something "newly" created.
which is why there's 280...
a) NUMBER - the designation of a unit" + UNIT (Latin unitas; unus) - "one".
b) all represents one in energy, hence "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one". Being partial (living) within whole (process of dying) implies being ones within oneness.
c) other ones suggest one to count other ones as "two; three; four etc." There exist no perceivable state of "two" in nature..dualism is being suggested as the inversion of perceivable oneness (self differentiation of whole into partial).
What one is looking at represents differentiation (diversity) within the momentum of sameness (equality)...the few suggest the many the inversion thereof...equality (sameness) through diversity (differentiation).
No one binds themselves to a bunch of old patriarchs from 1000 years ago
a) your consent to suggested his-story represents the bond of your choice to those suggesting it.
b) choice can only exist within balance, while balance (momentum) can only exist within motion. The few suggest past; present and future to tempt each one of the many to ignore the only position of existence...within the ever changing moment.
Each one represents the accumulation of all that was; the expression for all that is and the potential to shape all that will be.
c) every choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable) represents a bond among choices; because nature already offers everything needed; which implies that ones choice to want represents the temptation to get it from others within nature.
The few suggest the fiction of past; while the consent of the many represents the self inflicted trauma of upholding loss within memory. Consent to future represents the self inflicted trauma of hope/fear towards outcomes, and consent to present shapes the self inflicted trauma of stress out of mixing both loss and hope/fear.
It's the suggestions of the few which shape loss (his-story); hope (religion); fear (news) and stress (contractual obligations to others) within the minds of the consenting many.
Your incessant "free will" semantic games are Satanic, actually.
a) responding to suggested information by others implies by free will of choice. I adapt to perceivable inspiration as free will of choice, not in response to what others are suggesting.
b) what you call incessant represents frequency of adaptation as resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying). Doing that grows resistance, while ignoring it for reasoning over suggested information represents the loss of resistance. Hence most feeling spend when reasoning against others; while adaptation to inspiration refreshes the consciousness.
c) a suggested game implies outcome orientation (win); which implies ones consent to a conflict (winning vs losing). Consenting to such tempts one to ignore that being represents the highest value in existence (temporary evaluation within ongoing value).
d) SATAN (adverse; counteracting) implies being the reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) aka the resistance within temptation. If one consents to suggested "satan" over perceivable "adverse; counteracting"; then one uses reason (want vs not want) over implication (if/then); hence viewing reality through a fictitious lens of conflict.
The living aren't in conflict with the conflict of dying; they represent the opportunity to grow within loss aka the sinus curvature within a base-line, hence having both choices of growing and losing available momentarily.
Those who consent to the suggested brands "god" and "satan" willingly ignore perceivable oneness (balance) for suggested dualism (imbalance), hence always choosing sides; instead of growing self discernment of being the choice at the center of balance...not within a conflict.
Life isn't a game; you already won existence and now need to struggle to sustain your temporary price of being growth (living) within loss (process of dying).
pursue his own will
a) pursuit implies the choice to want to own, while ignoring the need to resist the temptation of want. The more one resist want; the more one grows within need.
b) will implies the choice within need/want balance.
to know all the answers
a) to know aka "towards knowledge" ignores that knowledge (perceivable inspiration) is enacting towards ones perceiving reaction.
b) the want for answers implies ones quest for wanted outcomes; which ignores being the problem (living) within solution (process of dying), hence struggling to sustain self.
Whatever answer one is looking for...nature already supplies the solution, and whatever question one seeks others to answer, only tempts one further into the ignorance of the available solution aka the solution which dissolves ones existence unless resisted.
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) represents the opportunity to grow comprehension of perceivable, hence growing the perceiving partial within the perceivable whole by means of adaptation....whatever ones seeks from others only tempts one to stand under (understanding) them; while ignoring to grow comprehension of perceivable.
One doesn't need to seek for knowledge, for it's inherent within everything perceivable. One needs to resist the temptation to ignore perceivable for the suggestions by others, then comprehension becomes inherent within self.
Neuro-linguistically reprogramming yourself
a) Instead of trying to play the strings (neuro) of suggested languages (lingua); I represent INSTURO (to prepare) MENT (mind; memory) within perceivable sound.
b) instead of responding (re) to suggested writing (programma); I adapt to perceivable inspiration within the momentum of motion, hence...the suggested meaning of the words others write are temptation to me; while what they express within a moving system inspires me to adapt.
I don't want to write 15k words for others; I need to express the impressing inspiration for the sustenance of self.
your own agency
a) agent (process of dying) to regent (living). One cannot act; only react to enacting. Others can suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt one to ignore perceivable "reaction" implied.
b) OWN, adjective - "belonging to; possessed"...to "belong" ignore sto be short (living) within long (process of dying), and possession represents repression (loss) of expression (growth). Holding onto spends resistance; while letting go allows growth of resistance while being moved by.
a spiritual gift
a) GIFT (German; poison) aka the sleight of hand for suggested "present" while ignoring perceivable momentum. The remedy for suggested poison (gift) represents resisting the temptation to consent to suggested. Notice how the few keep suggesting "gift-cards" to the many...
b) spirit (to breathe) implies the response-ability (choice) to adapt to impressing as the expression. While doing that; choice has the opportunity to compress the impressing before expression. The more one compresses; the more ones resistance within impressing grows.
Instead of breathing in and out...inhale until chest is filled; then compress by filling the lungs, and then exhale by emptying both. This is btw hidden underneath the transliteration of words such as Yahweh aka YHWH aka YODH - HE - WAW. Pronounce those sounds while breathing as mentioned and there's your spirit being exercised within perceivable sound; instead of being self repressed by suggested words.
Sleight of hand..."express yourself, don't repress yourself"..."and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
save you
SAVE, verb - "to preserve from injury"...living within the process of dying represents temporary injury within ongoing health, hence the struggle to stay healthy while dying.
I know the definition of my own words, you didn't need to do all that. You are completely missing the point. The message of Jesus is so simple that even a child can understand. You don't need to pour over your etymology dictionary because the meaning is clear.
Man and world are fallen. Our own will and strength will never correct our fallen condition. God knows this, because He was there when it happened. We weren't supposed to live this way. But instead of destroying mankind for our transgression, in His infinite Mercy, God gave us a saviour in the form of Jesus Christ.
Your FREE WILL and CHOICE, which are gifts from God, are provided so that you can accept this Saviour or not. God will not force you to accept Him.
The ransom has already been paid for you, FWoC. You can repent (have a change of heart) RIGHT NOW and surrender yourself to Jesus.
THAT is the only way to save yourself.
"I am the Way, the Truth, and The Life. No man comes to the Father except through me" Jesus, in John 14:6
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...words represent suggested information; sound represents perceivable inspiration. Consenting to the former tempts one to ignore the origin of the latter.
b) the words you believe to own, are shaped out of the language suggested to you. Those who suggest languages gain ownership over those who consent to shape words within that controlled environment. Your beliefs are owned by others; to which you are contractually bound aka choice (consent to use words) to choice (suggested language) contract law.
Articulating sound (words) implies ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural".
c) a chosen word cannot define anything; it suggests a redefined layer upon predefined inspiration aka an affixed brand upon a moving system aka an artificial representation of naturally presented aka a partially suggested explanation for a self explanatory, wholly perceivable system.
d) a reaction cannot define the source of action.
e) DEFINE, verb (Latin finis; end) - "to end, to limit"....you are still going on (living); hence limited by what gets you going (process of dying).
you didn't need to do all that.
a) nature predefines need/want (balance)...those within nature represents the choice in-between need (sustenance of life) and want (temptations luring towards death).
b) why do you use "didn't" (aka did nothing) when making suggestions about the needs of others? Why do you think that your free will of choice has the power to negate the free will of choice by others? Next...try to take step back from suggesting negation and allow yourself to question if you can negate perceivable reality?
Can your suggested "nothing" negate the perceivable; ongoing everything representing nature? In other words...can a partial within a whole negate anything of the whole?
c) ask yourself why I can draw so much inspiration perceived out of so little information suggested?
You are completely missing the point.
a) as a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying) everything represents incomplete within complete, hence the opportunity to grow within loss. Lack of self discernment represents one such aspect of incompleteness; while perceivable inspiration represents the offered completeness; ripped for the picking.
b) "missing the point" would imply that I consented to suggested points by you...where did I do that? A point represents a limit terminating a line; while being alive implies still being within the line (inception towards death); struggling to survive predefined termination.
c) to point something out (by suggestion) tempts one to ignore that this something is already being communicated by motion (towards perceiving senses). Try expressing what's going on within; instead of pointing out...find out if you will comprehend a difference in perspective.
The message
A message implies transmission from communicator (perceivable) to a receiver (perceiving), while TRANS (transmutation aka transmuted out of action) MISSION (Latin mitto; to send) implies action (process of dying) sending reaction (living); hence transmutation of reaction out of action.
Only nature communicates; while everything within nature represents the recipients (perceiving) of the only source of communication (perceivable)...suggestion represents the choice to ignore source for substitute aka natural for artificial aka reality for fiction.
The only message communicated by nature to every recipient within represents inspiration for adaptation...by simply moving them.
even a child can understand
a) a child lacks self discernment; hence hasn't developed growth of comprehension; nor resistance to temptation yet. Entrance suggested information to tempt the child to ignore perceivable inspiration aka domestication of free will of choice by others using repetitive suggested choices to tempt the child to consent to "stand under" (understanding) those who make suggestions.
This starts with suggesting the child a name (fictitious identity) and thereby a language (spell-craft) as a controlled environment for miscommunication by suggested information, defined (idolatry); redefined (revisionism) and contradicted on purpose (talmudic reasoning) by those suggesting it or through the followers of suggested orders (parents).
b) if I give a dog a name it's called domesticating; yet if I give my child a name it's called civilizing...why is that? Also; why are civilizations keep being snuffed out by an ignorant many who somehow are being domesticated by a parasitic few?
c) why is it so easy to tempt others to consent to suggested information (24/7 msm seems to be enough for most); yet inspiring others to resist the temptation of holding onto already consented to information seems to be impossible?
d) what if childhood represents the opportunity to grow discernment about free will of choice, before entering adulthood; while suggesting the child to understand by consenting to stand under what adults suggest represents the perpetuated slavery of the infant-like many under the sadistic; child-abusive few; who pretend to be the adults over them?
You don't need to pour over your etymology dictionary because the meaning is clear.
a) I try to rip etymology apart until words dissolve back into sound, and I try to rip suggested symbolism apart until only perceivable symmetry remains. The suggested dictionaries of others don't dictate me anything; because I resist the temptation to consent to the suggestions of dictators. Everyone represents a resistor within a generator; while being tempted to waste resistance upon each other...I express resistance within that temptation.
b) only comprehension represents clarity; while understanding represents ignorance. Clearing ones mind requires the struggle to let go of suggested information; while resisting the temptation to keep holding onto more and more of them.
Memory needs to be used for adaptation to perceivable inspiration (like a ram); yet wants to be misused for accumulation for suggested information (like a hard-drive). If you fill up your ram; then your processor (comprehension) can't handle input (perceivable) anymore; hence slowing you down (ignorance shaping lack of comprehension).
The words that others suggest as idols to define reality; represent your memory filled with upheld fiction aka the "ego"; which constantly tempts one to ignore adaptation to perceivable for contemplation of suggested, hence ignoring outside (reality) for inside (fiction).
Grab your son, then remember his birth...while you remember (respond to memory) you are willingly ignoring the boy in your arms, hence ignoring that which is for that which isn't anymore. You choose to uphold such memories; because you keep falling for the temptation to do so; which would require a struggle to resist. The parasitic few exploit that by suggesting the ignorant many to consent to uphold suggested information within their memories...information shaped by the suggestions of the few, while the many ignore perceivable reality for the suggested fiction within the memories.
Works like a charm and is nearly impossible to penetrate; since ignorance represents ones choice of want over need; while already consenting to the choice of those who suggest the wanted.
Man and world are fallen.
The fall (process of dying) generates the rise (living). Others curtail the rise by suggesting the fall. Also, tell a boy he's fallen and watch him stand up and rise again with a smile on his face.
Our own will and strength will never correct our fallen condition
a) free will of choice implies singular reaction (living) to plural action (process of dying). It ain't ours; it represents ones response-ability. Others suggest "our" to tempt "one" to shirk response-ability onto others; which allows the suggesting others to wield free will of choice over them.
b) strength (process of dying) generates weakness (living); while ones choice to resist weakness (temptation) increases ones strength (resistance)....a balance based system of coexisting opposites (loss/growth) as the internal/inherent power of energy.
c) fallen implies onto the ground; yet ones condition (growth within loss) allows one to both rise higher and fall deeper, because one is still falling; hence representing the temporary rise (living) within the ongoing fall (process of dying).
when it happened
a) "when" implies a measurement aka mind (ment) choosing to measure, while measuring implies the whole (perceivable) from the perspective of the partial (perceiving).
b) HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance" + CHANCE, noun - "the effect of an unknown cause"...being able to perceive represents the effect of perceivable aka knowledge.
c) if all represents one in energy; then the cause makes itself known through every effect within. Willing ignorance doesn't change availability of knowledge.
We weren't supposed to live this way.
a) the way (inception towards death) self differentiates from whole (oneness) into partial (ones), while each one within (life) represents the differentiated self.
Suggested "we" (plural) tempts "one" to ignore oneself (singular).
b) SUPPOSE, verb - "proposition or fact that may exist or be true"...it's the one proposing by suggestion and the one consenting to suggested, that represent perceivable existence and being able to perceive...not whatever "facts" they're suggesting to each other.
One doesn't have to suppose; one has to be within the source of existence.
c) consenting to suggested (want) over perceivable (need) implies ignoring to sustain life for the temptation luring towards death.
transgression
Aggression within transmutation isn't against the base; but among the ingredients who ignore the base solution, while spending resistance against each other, hence grinding themselves down into the base quicker.
savior
The few suggest the many to seek salvation (aka SIEG HEIL) as to tempt them to ignore being within the solution aka within the ongoing source of healing for every temporary sickness within. The process of dying giveth to (inception) and taketh from (death) the life within.
Preservation of temporary (living) within ongoing (process dying) implies the perpetuation of one through "intercourse" with another one for offspring aka that which remains of form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
Instead of looking for saviors...preserve self by planting seeds into soil. If you still want a savior; then look into the eyes of your child until you see yourself. A child saves both parents just by being.
FREE WILL and CHOICE
a) free implies within dominance
b) will (want) implies within need.
c) of implies out of, hence within.
d) choice implies within balance.
They all imply each others coexistence. The parasitic few suggest "free will" without "of choice"; because their free will of choice is used to shape the suggestion towards your free will of choice, and consenting to it implies ignoring to have a choice. In other words...free will without choice allows others to suggest choices of liberty and freedom.
so that you can accept
Hold your breath...does it matter if you accept (want) or reject (not want) breathing or will you be forced to breathe (need) anyway? Where does nature suggest you to accept or reject anything?
Jesus is both historically documented and described as a White person.
The Roman historian and senator Tacitus referred to Jesus, his execution by Pontius Pilate, and the existence of early Christians in Rome in his final work, Annals (written ca. AD 116), book 15, chapter 44" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Jesus
Such indeed were the precautions of human wisdom. The next thing was to seek means of propitiating the gods, and recourse was had to the Sibylline books, by the direction of which prayers were offered to Vulcanus, Ceres, and Proserpina. Juno, too, was entreated by the matrons, first, in the Capitol, then on the nearest part of the coast, whence water was procured to sprinkle the fane and image of the goddess. And there were sacred banquets and nightly vigils celebrated by married women. But all human efforts, all the lavish gifts of the emperor, and the propitiations of the gods, did not banish the sinister belief that the conflagration was the result of an order.
Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind.
Mockery of every sort was added to their deaths. Covered with the skins of beasts, they were torn by dogs and perished, or were nailed to crosses, or were doomed to the flames and burnt, to serve as a nightly illumination, when daylight had expired. Nero offered his gardens for the spectacle, and was exhibiting a show in the circus, while he mingled with the people in the dress of a charioteer or stood aloft on a car. Hence, even for criminals who deserved extreme and exemplary punishment, there arose a feeling of compassion; for it was not, as it seemed, for the public good, but to glut one man’s cruelty, that they were being destroyed.
Further,
Publius Lentullus, President of Judea, wrote the following epistle to the Senate, under the rule of Tiberius Caesar, concerning the Nazarene called Jesus:
There appeared in these our days a man, of the Jewish Nation, of great virtue, named Yeshua [Jesus], who is yet living among us, and of the Gentiles is accepted for a Prophet of truth, but His own disciples call Him the Son of God- He raiseth the dead and cureth all manner of diseases. A man of stature somewhat tall, and comely, with very reverent countenance, such as the beholders may both love and fear, ** his hair of (the colour of) the chestnut**, full ripe, plain to His ears, whence downwards it is more orient and curling and wavering about His shoulders. In the midst of His head is a seam or partition in His hair, after the manner of the Nazarenes. His forehead plain and very delicate; His face without spot or wrinkle, beautified with a lovely red; His nose and mouth so formed as nothing can be reprehended; His beard thickish, in colour like His hair, not very long, but forked; His look innocent and mature; His eyes grey, clear, and quick- In reproving hypocrisy He is terrible; in admonishing, courteous and fair spoken; pleasant in conversation, mixed with gravity. It cannot be remembered that any have seen Him Laugh, but many have seen Him Weep. In proportion of body, most excellent; His hands and arms delicate to behold. In speaking, very temperate, modest, and wise. A man, for His singular beauty, surpassing the children of men."
Hair- long, curling chestnut parted in the middle
Beard the same color
Ruddy complexion
Grey eyes
Sounds exactly like those old school paintings that hung on Grandma's wall to me!
This sort of slams the lid on anyone who might have held the barest glimmer of the thought that "Black Hebrew Israelites" was an authentic organization.
Nice
There are similar arguments that "jews" stole the title from white Europeans who are the real "Jews" of the bible, I thought that was a strong case.
As a christian, im tired of humanity's inability to move beyond Jerusalem, Israel and Jews.
"as a christian" implies as one willingly consenting to suggested Christianity; hence bound to the will of others aka RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew". Submission to the suggestions of others represents the source of inability to express free will of choice, and the tool of the suggesting few to tire out the consenting many.
That's the whole point of being a Christian, you surrender yourself to Jesus Christ as your Lord and Saviour. Out of my own free will, I accept Jesus. That's what faith is.
I submit to Him, not "the suggestion of others". Religion, is "binding anew" man and God. The relationship you have with Christ is profoundly personal, which is why there's (280?) versions of Christian denominations. No one binds themselves to a bunch of old patriarchs from 1000 years ago, which is what people who get all butthurt about "religion" think.
Your incessant "free will" semantic games are Satanic, actually. Satan was the first creation to reject God and pursue his own will. Neuro-linguistically reprogramming yourself to recognize your own agency won't save you.
Jesus said "not my will, but Yours [God] be done" - Luke 22:42 As well as the original prayer 101 instructions He gave, known as The Lord's Prayer: Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name, your kingdom come, your will be done, as Earth as it is in Heaven
But never fear, anon. What you have is a spiritual gift that is simply misdirected. How wonderful it would be for you to pour over The Word with such vigor. Not only that, but you don't have to know all the answers. Christ is sufficient and when you surrender to Him, he gives you exactly what it is you really need. Because He loves you and created you. The adversary only seeks to kill, steal and destroy and there is no life in that.
I will be praying for you!
Direction (inception towards death) for reaction (life). Even ignorance cannot misdirect; only tempt to ignore reactions.
The foundation for ones strength (vigor) represents the perceivable (sound) underneath the suggested (word), which implies the choice to resist darkness (ignorance) for light (comprehension).
Instead of pouring over suggested information; I express the impressing flow of perceivable inspiration, by choosing to compress it momentarily.
All the temporary words can be defined; redefined and contradicted at will; but only the perceivable sound remains ongoing. May the many build their tower of BABEL (confusion; disorder) out of suggested words...no matter how often it collapses upon itself, the foundation of perceivable sound remains.
Each one already knows (perceives) all (perceivable)...it's the lack of comprehension that needs to be grown; while tempted to want to be ignored.
Everything perceivable has to be alive to kill; steal from and destroy it...suggested "no" (nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable everything.
a) to be (living) implies resisting origin (process of dying).
b) to be (partial) implies within (whole).
c) a point (end of a sentence) represents suggested progressivism (want for outcome)...which tempts one to ignore resisting (living) temptation (dying).
a) one shirks response-ability (choice) over self when consenting to Christianity as suggested in the name of (e nomine) others.
b) before access to "patris, et filii, et spiritus sancti" comes consent to those suggesting it "e nomine"; which represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law, which was industrialized by the suggesting few to gain control over the consenting many as RELIGION (Latin religo) - "to bind anew".
c) the natural bond between perceivable (enacting process of dying) and perceiving (reaction of the living) is being ignored when consenting to being "bound anew" under choice to choice contract law.
Choice can only exist at the center of balance (need/want); others tempt choice to ignore balance for imbalance (want vs not want). They then call this conflict "reasoning".
d) The perceivable implication of "patris, et filii, et spiritus sancti" represents PADRI (whole) FILII (partial) SPIRITUS (Latin spirit; to breath aka adaptation of partial to whole).
a) nature sets "free" (will of choice) into the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom; hence being temporary free (living) within ongoing dominance (process of dying).
b) the lord others are suggesting represents the free will of choice of those suggesting for those consenting to suggested, hence the suggesting few controlling the consenting many.
c) within a balance based system (the momentum of motion)...the responding choice has to be "free", otherwise it couldn't balance between need (perceivable inspiration) and want (suggested information).
From a different perspective...living within the process of dying implies being temporary growth within ongoing loss aka resistance (need) within temptation (want) aka the balance for each ones free will of choice, situated at the center.
Loss inspires growth to struggle for sustenance (need); while simultaneously tempting growth with loss to ignore the struggle (want).
In other words....everyone perceiving represents "Jesus Christ"; everything perceivable represents "God" and adaptation of perceiving to perceivable represents the "Holy Spirit".
This adaptation as perceiving (partial) to perceivable (whole) implies as free will of choice; which one is being tempted to ignore when consenting to the suggestions of other choices. Furthermore; the "Jesus on the cross" allegory represents ones choice within perceivable (need/want) being tempted on the crossroads (want vs not want); hence nailed to the cross of reasoning over suggested. Ones consent to the suggestions of others represents the "contract with the devil at the crossroads" allegory, and the road represents the only way for all life...inception towards death.
a) free will of choice implies out of; within and therefore in response to perceivable balance...while being tempted to consent to the suggested choices of others.
b) nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving) at every moment (um)...that represents the "need" for those within to adapt to. Meanwhile; to "own" represents your free will of choice to want (suggested information) more than need (perceivable inspiration) offers.
c) temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying) cannot "own" anything; only utilize everything for the temporary sustenance of self. The parasitic few suggest "ownership" to tempts the vessel (life) within flow (inception towards death) to ignore flow (perceivable) for another vessel (suggested)...that's the foundation for all the piracy allegories aka ones consent to the suggestions of others allows others to carper ones vessel on the high sea. That's what maritime admiralty law and the whole banking system is based about.
a) partial cannot define what "is" without ignoring that whole "was" before one could suggest definitions.
b) DEF-INITION aka DEAF PHOENICIAN represents those who ignore perceivable (sound) for suggested (words)...hence those falling for spell-craft.
c) faithful vs faithless represents a rebranding of agreeing vs disagreeing with suggested information aka want vs not want suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt perceivable; while resisting the want to be tempted by suggested.
d) nature doesn't require faith (agreement)...it demands adaptation. To be within implies to be expression (reaction) within impressing (enacting).
a) others represent those who suggest you the language used to submit. Nature doesn't communicate words from perceivable to perceiving...it communicates sound. It requires choice to shape a suggestible word out of perceivable sound.
Perceivable to perceiving represents communication (reality); perceiving ignoring perceivable for suggested represents miscommunication (fiction). The few suggest fiction to shape the reality of the consenting many aka crafting their spelling for miscommunication.
b) living within the process of dying represents female (expressing) within male (impressing); hence Fe (minine) male and Wo (mb) man implying coexistence.
Sleight of hand...ADAM (male flow) RIP (momentum) EVE (female form). Momentum (balance of motion) also represents the allegories womb; matrix; mother earth; gaia etc.)
c) SUBMIT', verb [Latin submitto; sub, under, and mitto, to send.] - "to let down; to cause to sink or lower". The few suggest the many to submit (Islam for example); which tempts them to ignore resisting (living) within solution (process of dying) before drowning (death).
One needs to grow resistance (living) within temptation (dying)...not consent to sink.
Aka PER SONOS (by sound); which implies being the reaction to enacting sound aka the resonance (need) or dissonance (want) to sound, hence adapting to perceivable (inspiration) representing resonance; while consenting to suggested (information) represents dissonance.
Sleight of hand..."there's nothing new under the sun". Everything (perceivable) already exists for everyone (perceiving) within. There can't be anything new for partials within whole.
The trick....suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) over perceivable transmutation (implies out of; within and in response to everything). As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...transmutation of ingredient out of base alchemy implies flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death).
The so called new bound represents ones willing ignorance of the one and only bond between action and reaction; whole and partial; ongoing and temporary; potentiality and potential; balance and choice; male and female; electric and magnetic; cause and effect; perceivable and perceiving; process of dying and living etc.
"new, néwos, now" implies the perceivable ever changing moment (um) by those perceiving it from within...not something "newly" created.
a) NUMBER - the designation of a unit" + UNIT (Latin unitas; unus) - "one".
b) all represents one in energy, hence "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one". Being partial (living) within whole (process of dying) implies being ones within oneness.
c) other ones suggest one to count other ones as "two; three; four etc." There exist no perceivable state of "two" in nature..dualism is being suggested as the inversion of perceivable oneness (self differentiation of whole into partial).
What one is looking at represents differentiation (diversity) within the momentum of sameness (equality)...the few suggest the many the inversion thereof...equality (sameness) through diversity (differentiation).
a) your consent to suggested his-story represents the bond of your choice to those suggesting it.
b) choice can only exist within balance, while balance (momentum) can only exist within motion. The few suggest past; present and future to tempt each one of the many to ignore the only position of existence...within the ever changing moment.
Each one represents the accumulation of all that was; the expression for all that is and the potential to shape all that will be.
c) every choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable) represents a bond among choices; because nature already offers everything needed; which implies that ones choice to want represents the temptation to get it from others within nature.
The few suggest the fiction of past; while the consent of the many represents the self inflicted trauma of upholding loss within memory. Consent to future represents the self inflicted trauma of hope/fear towards outcomes, and consent to present shapes the self inflicted trauma of stress out of mixing both loss and hope/fear.
It's the suggestions of the few which shape loss (his-story); hope (religion); fear (news) and stress (contractual obligations to others) within the minds of the consenting many.
a) responding to suggested information by others implies by free will of choice. I adapt to perceivable inspiration as free will of choice, not in response to what others are suggesting.
b) what you call incessant represents frequency of adaptation as resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying). Doing that grows resistance, while ignoring it for reasoning over suggested information represents the loss of resistance. Hence most feeling spend when reasoning against others; while adaptation to inspiration refreshes the consciousness.
c) a suggested game implies outcome orientation (win); which implies ones consent to a conflict (winning vs losing). Consenting to such tempts one to ignore that being represents the highest value in existence (temporary evaluation within ongoing value).
d) SATAN (adverse; counteracting) implies being the reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) aka the resistance within temptation. If one consents to suggested "satan" over perceivable "adverse; counteracting"; then one uses reason (want vs not want) over implication (if/then); hence viewing reality through a fictitious lens of conflict.
The living aren't in conflict with the conflict of dying; they represent the opportunity to grow within loss aka the sinus curvature within a base-line, hence having both choices of growing and losing available momentarily.
Those who consent to the suggested brands "god" and "satan" willingly ignore perceivable oneness (balance) for suggested dualism (imbalance), hence always choosing sides; instead of growing self discernment of being the choice at the center of balance...not within a conflict.
Life isn't a game; you already won existence and now need to struggle to sustain your temporary price of being growth (living) within loss (process of dying).
a) pursuit implies the choice to want to own, while ignoring the need to resist the temptation of want. The more one resist want; the more one grows within need.
b) will implies the choice within need/want balance.
a) to know aka "towards knowledge" ignores that knowledge (perceivable inspiration) is enacting towards ones perceiving reaction.
b) the want for answers implies ones quest for wanted outcomes; which ignores being the problem (living) within solution (process of dying), hence struggling to sustain self.
Whatever answer one is looking for...nature already supplies the solution, and whatever question one seeks others to answer, only tempts one further into the ignorance of the available solution aka the solution which dissolves ones existence unless resisted.
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) represents the opportunity to grow comprehension of perceivable, hence growing the perceiving partial within the perceivable whole by means of adaptation....whatever ones seeks from others only tempts one to stand under (understanding) them; while ignoring to grow comprehension of perceivable.
One doesn't need to seek for knowledge, for it's inherent within everything perceivable. One needs to resist the temptation to ignore perceivable for the suggestions by others, then comprehension becomes inherent within self.
a) Instead of trying to play the strings (neuro) of suggested languages (lingua); I represent INSTURO (to prepare) MENT (mind; memory) within perceivable sound.
b) instead of responding (re) to suggested writing (programma); I adapt to perceivable inspiration within the momentum of motion, hence...the suggested meaning of the words others write are temptation to me; while what they express within a moving system inspires me to adapt.
I don't want to write 15k words for others; I need to express the impressing inspiration for the sustenance of self.
a) agent (process of dying) to regent (living). One cannot act; only react to enacting. Others can suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt one to ignore perceivable "reaction" implied.
b) OWN, adjective - "belonging to; possessed"...to "belong" ignore sto be short (living) within long (process of dying), and possession represents repression (loss) of expression (growth). Holding onto spends resistance; while letting go allows growth of resistance while being moved by.
a) GIFT (German; poison) aka the sleight of hand for suggested "present" while ignoring perceivable momentum. The remedy for suggested poison (gift) represents resisting the temptation to consent to suggested. Notice how the few keep suggesting "gift-cards" to the many...
b) spirit (to breathe) implies the response-ability (choice) to adapt to impressing as the expression. While doing that; choice has the opportunity to compress the impressing before expression. The more one compresses; the more ones resistance within impressing grows.
Instead of breathing in and out...inhale until chest is filled; then compress by filling the lungs, and then exhale by emptying both. This is btw hidden underneath the transliteration of words such as Yahweh aka YHWH aka YODH - HE - WAW. Pronounce those sounds while breathing as mentioned and there's your spirit being exercised within perceivable sound; instead of being self repressed by suggested words.
Sleight of hand..."express yourself, don't repress yourself"..."and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
SAVE, verb - "to preserve from injury"...living within the process of dying represents temporary injury within ongoing health, hence the struggle to stay healthy while dying.
I know the definition of my own words, you didn't need to do all that. You are completely missing the point. The message of Jesus is so simple that even a child can understand. You don't need to pour over your etymology dictionary because the meaning is clear.
Man and world are fallen. Our own will and strength will never correct our fallen condition. God knows this, because He was there when it happened. We weren't supposed to live this way. But instead of destroying mankind for our transgression, in His infinite Mercy, God gave us a saviour in the form of Jesus Christ.
Your FREE WILL and CHOICE, which are gifts from God, are provided so that you can accept this Saviour or not. God will not force you to accept Him.
The ransom has already been paid for you, FWoC. You can repent (have a change of heart) RIGHT NOW and surrender yourself to Jesus.
THAT is the only way to save yourself.
"I am the Way, the Truth, and The Life. No man comes to the Father except through me" Jesus, in John 14:6
a) KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...words represent suggested information; sound represents perceivable inspiration. Consenting to the former tempts one to ignore the origin of the latter.
b) the words you believe to own, are shaped out of the language suggested to you. Those who suggest languages gain ownership over those who consent to shape words within that controlled environment. Your beliefs are owned by others; to which you are contractually bound aka choice (consent to use words) to choice (suggested language) contract law.
Articulating sound (words) implies ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural".
c) a chosen word cannot define anything; it suggests a redefined layer upon predefined inspiration aka an affixed brand upon a moving system aka an artificial representation of naturally presented aka a partially suggested explanation for a self explanatory, wholly perceivable system.
d) a reaction cannot define the source of action.
e) DEFINE, verb (Latin finis; end) - "to end, to limit"....you are still going on (living); hence limited by what gets you going (process of dying).
a) nature predefines need/want (balance)...those within nature represents the choice in-between need (sustenance of life) and want (temptations luring towards death).
b) why do you use "didn't" (aka did nothing) when making suggestions about the needs of others? Why do you think that your free will of choice has the power to negate the free will of choice by others? Next...try to take step back from suggesting negation and allow yourself to question if you can negate perceivable reality?
Can your suggested "nothing" negate the perceivable; ongoing everything representing nature? In other words...can a partial within a whole negate anything of the whole?
c) ask yourself why I can draw so much inspiration perceived out of so little information suggested?
a) as a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying) everything represents incomplete within complete, hence the opportunity to grow within loss. Lack of self discernment represents one such aspect of incompleteness; while perceivable inspiration represents the offered completeness; ripped for the picking.
b) "missing the point" would imply that I consented to suggested points by you...where did I do that? A point represents a limit terminating a line; while being alive implies still being within the line (inception towards death); struggling to survive predefined termination.
c) to point something out (by suggestion) tempts one to ignore that this something is already being communicated by motion (towards perceiving senses). Try expressing what's going on within; instead of pointing out...find out if you will comprehend a difference in perspective.
A message implies transmission from communicator (perceivable) to a receiver (perceiving), while TRANS (transmutation aka transmuted out of action) MISSION (Latin mitto; to send) implies action (process of dying) sending reaction (living); hence transmutation of reaction out of action.
Only nature communicates; while everything within nature represents the recipients (perceiving) of the only source of communication (perceivable)...suggestion represents the choice to ignore source for substitute aka natural for artificial aka reality for fiction.
The only message communicated by nature to every recipient within represents inspiration for adaptation...by simply moving them.
a) a child lacks self discernment; hence hasn't developed growth of comprehension; nor resistance to temptation yet. Entrance suggested information to tempt the child to ignore perceivable inspiration aka domestication of free will of choice by others using repetitive suggested choices to tempt the child to consent to "stand under" (understanding) those who make suggestions.
This starts with suggesting the child a name (fictitious identity) and thereby a language (spell-craft) as a controlled environment for miscommunication by suggested information, defined (idolatry); redefined (revisionism) and contradicted on purpose (talmudic reasoning) by those suggesting it or through the followers of suggested orders (parents).
b) if I give a dog a name it's called domesticating; yet if I give my child a name it's called civilizing...why is that? Also; why are civilizations keep being snuffed out by an ignorant many who somehow are being domesticated by a parasitic few?
c) why is it so easy to tempt others to consent to suggested information (24/7 msm seems to be enough for most); yet inspiring others to resist the temptation of holding onto already consented to information seems to be impossible?
d) what if childhood represents the opportunity to grow discernment about free will of choice, before entering adulthood; while suggesting the child to understand by consenting to stand under what adults suggest represents the perpetuated slavery of the infant-like many under the sadistic; child-abusive few; who pretend to be the adults over them?
a) I try to rip etymology apart until words dissolve back into sound, and I try to rip suggested symbolism apart until only perceivable symmetry remains. The suggested dictionaries of others don't dictate me anything; because I resist the temptation to consent to the suggestions of dictators. Everyone represents a resistor within a generator; while being tempted to waste resistance upon each other...I express resistance within that temptation.
b) only comprehension represents clarity; while understanding represents ignorance. Clearing ones mind requires the struggle to let go of suggested information; while resisting the temptation to keep holding onto more and more of them.
Memory needs to be used for adaptation to perceivable inspiration (like a ram); yet wants to be misused for accumulation for suggested information (like a hard-drive). If you fill up your ram; then your processor (comprehension) can't handle input (perceivable) anymore; hence slowing you down (ignorance shaping lack of comprehension).
The words that others suggest as idols to define reality; represent your memory filled with upheld fiction aka the "ego"; which constantly tempts one to ignore adaptation to perceivable for contemplation of suggested, hence ignoring outside (reality) for inside (fiction).
Grab your son, then remember his birth...while you remember (respond to memory) you are willingly ignoring the boy in your arms, hence ignoring that which is for that which isn't anymore. You choose to uphold such memories; because you keep falling for the temptation to do so; which would require a struggle to resist. The parasitic few exploit that by suggesting the ignorant many to consent to uphold suggested information within their memories...information shaped by the suggestions of the few, while the many ignore perceivable reality for the suggested fiction within the memories.
Works like a charm and is nearly impossible to penetrate; since ignorance represents ones choice of want over need; while already consenting to the choice of those who suggest the wanted.
The fall (process of dying) generates the rise (living). Others curtail the rise by suggesting the fall. Also, tell a boy he's fallen and watch him stand up and rise again with a smile on his face.
a) free will of choice implies singular reaction (living) to plural action (process of dying). It ain't ours; it represents ones response-ability. Others suggest "our" to tempt "one" to shirk response-ability onto others; which allows the suggesting others to wield free will of choice over them.
b) strength (process of dying) generates weakness (living); while ones choice to resist weakness (temptation) increases ones strength (resistance)....a balance based system of coexisting opposites (loss/growth) as the internal/inherent power of energy.
c) fallen implies onto the ground; yet ones condition (growth within loss) allows one to both rise higher and fall deeper, because one is still falling; hence representing the temporary rise (living) within the ongoing fall (process of dying).
a) "when" implies a measurement aka mind (ment) choosing to measure, while measuring implies the whole (perceivable) from the perspective of the partial (perceiving).
b) HAP'PEN, verb - "to come by chance" + CHANCE, noun - "the effect of an unknown cause"...being able to perceive represents the effect of perceivable aka knowledge.
c) if all represents one in energy; then the cause makes itself known through every effect within. Willing ignorance doesn't change availability of knowledge.
a) the way (inception towards death) self differentiates from whole (oneness) into partial (ones), while each one within (life) represents the differentiated self.
Suggested "we" (plural) tempts "one" to ignore oneself (singular).
b) SUPPOSE, verb - "proposition or fact that may exist or be true"...it's the one proposing by suggestion and the one consenting to suggested, that represent perceivable existence and being able to perceive...not whatever "facts" they're suggesting to each other.
One doesn't have to suppose; one has to be within the source of existence.
c) consenting to suggested (want) over perceivable (need) implies ignoring to sustain life for the temptation luring towards death.
Aggression within transmutation isn't against the base; but among the ingredients who ignore the base solution, while spending resistance against each other, hence grinding themselves down into the base quicker.
The few suggest the many to seek salvation (aka SIEG HEIL) as to tempt them to ignore being within the solution aka within the ongoing source of healing for every temporary sickness within. The process of dying giveth to (inception) and taketh from (death) the life within.
Preservation of temporary (living) within ongoing (process dying) implies the perpetuation of one through "intercourse" with another one for offspring aka that which remains of form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
Instead of looking for saviors...preserve self by planting seeds into soil. If you still want a savior; then look into the eyes of your child until you see yourself. A child saves both parents just by being.
a) free implies within dominance
b) will (want) implies within need.
c) of implies out of, hence within.
d) choice implies within balance.
They all imply each others coexistence. The parasitic few suggest "free will" without "of choice"; because their free will of choice is used to shape the suggestion towards your free will of choice, and consenting to it implies ignoring to have a choice. In other words...free will without choice allows others to suggest choices of liberty and freedom.
Hold your breath...does it matter if you accept (want) or reject (not want) breathing or will you be forced to breathe (need) anyway? Where does nature suggest you to accept or reject anything?
Jesus is both historically documented and described as a White person.
The Roman historian and senator Tacitus referred to Jesus, his execution by Pontius Pilate, and the existence of early Christians in Rome in his final work, Annals (written ca. AD 116), book 15, chapter 44" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacitus_on_Jesus
Further,
Publius Lentullus, President of Judea, wrote the following epistle to the Senate, under the rule of Tiberius Caesar, concerning the Nazarene called Jesus:
Hair- long, curling chestnut parted in the middle Beard the same color Ruddy complexion Grey eyes
Sounds exactly like those old school paintings that hung on Grandma's wall to me!
https://www.google.com/search?q=sallman+head+of+christ&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjenfeG4L_7AhVjQUIHHVJuDHsQ2-cCegQIABAC&oq=sallman+head&gs_lcp=ChJtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1pbWcQARgAMgUIABCABDIFCAAQgAQyBggAEAUQHjoECCMQJzoFCAAQogQ6BwgjEOoCECc6BAgAEEM6BwgAELEDEEM6BAgAEANQjgxYySFg0iloAnAAeACAAasBiAH7CpIBAzYuN5gBAKABAbABBcABAQ&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-img&ei=2657Y57EIuOCieoP0tyx2Ac&bih=791&biw=412&prmd=isvn#imgrc=sv-549699452-534100860749_234508100267
This sort of slams the lid on anyone who might have held the barest glimmer of the thought that "Black Hebrew Israelites" was an authentic organization.
Moses married Zipporah, a black Cushite.