Anything pointing at your belief system is skewed .. Christian dominated country RULED BY CRIMINALS << ALL Christians need to answer for this .. The BS We're seeing now is at least out in the open and been in hiding for a long time
GEN (genus; generation) ALL (whole) -ATION (through action) implies the partial reaction (living) generated within the enacting whole (process of dying).
Those within generation cannot generate; only regenerate aka respond (living) to being generated by (process of dying).
If we compare religion...
a) if implies then (implication of perceivable) which when applied to suggested (want vs not want conflict) contradicts the suggested.
b) "we" (plural) represents suggested; "one" (singular) represents perceivable. Without "one" choosing to count other "ones" and suggesting it as "we"...there's no perceivable "we" in nature.
c) bringing together (compare) tempts one to ignore that nature (whole process of dying) sets apart (partial living). Perceivable apartheid (moving differences) represents communicated inspiration for adaptation, yet requires ones resistance to the temptation of wanting to put it back together.
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to put everything together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) thereby corrupting perceivable inspiration (apartheid) with accumulated information (togetherness).
In short...you represent "one" being tempted by the suggested brand "we" to perpetuate suggestions in the name of others, hence perpetuating the pyramid scheme of religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) aka choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law.
state
Being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies the state of fluidity....every affixed suggestion (information) tempts one to ignore the perceivable fluidity (inspiration).
monopoly of force
Mono (singular) Poly (plural)...the suggested inversion of perceivable UNITY; noun (Latin unitas; unus) - ones (living) within oneness (process of dying) for all represents one in energy.
Sleight of hand..."all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one".
As for force...ongoing force of velocity (inception towards death) causing a momentum for the temporary force of resistance (life) within aka loss/growth as the internal power of energy.
Can the living "refuse to go along" with the process of dying or does being alive imply being temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (dying)?
What if accepting (want) vs refusing (not want) suggested implies the ignorance of perceivable (need) for suggested (want)?
a) need (adaptation to perceivable) over want (temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested).
b) the few suggest the many to ask questions as to tempt them to want to seek answers...a quest towards an answer implies outcome orientation.
Meanwhile; being problem (living) within solution (process of dying) implies the need to resist origin through adaptation. Life represents the response to perceivable origin, while being tempted with suggested outcomes.
c) Latin to Pig-Latin (English) represents ongoing revisionism under the e pluribus unum agenda (out of many, one) aka "out of the ignorant many; the chosen ones".
The foundation for all languages represents spell-craft aka the suggesting few crafting the spelling of the consenting many with the suggested word (fiction) over the perceivable sound (reality).
Example...the few suggest "insane person" to tempt the many to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by; out of and in response to the perceivable source of sound.
Are you trying to argue predestination.
a) your consent to suggested (information) over perceivable (inspiration) tempts you to reason (argue) about suggested meaning; while ignoring predefined meaning. Furthermore, your ignorance of perceivable origin tempts you to seek meaning within suggested destination.
b) DESTINY (necessity) -ATION (through action) implies wanted reaction (living) within enacting need (process of dying).
c) inception predefines death for all life within.
d) choose to hold your breath...now try to reason/argue (want vs not want) about suggested until you will be forced by perceivable to adapt (need).
Suggestion represents the temptation to ignore perceivable. One doesn't need to argue over anything suggested within nature; one needs to adapt to perceivable NATURE, noun - "born, produced" hence adaptation (living) to origin (process of dying).
absence of free will
a) suggested AB'SENCE, noun (Latin absens, from absum, abesse, to be away) tempts one to ignore that to be (life) implies within way (inception towards death).
b) free will of choice aka FREE (implies temporary free within ongoing dominance) WILL (aka want implies reaction to enacting need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies at the center of balance).
c) choice represents the center of a balance based system (need/want), while choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) tempts one to ignore balance (need/want) for imbalance (want vs not want).
d) as the center (living) of everything (process of dying) one can be tempted off-center by others. Resisting (living) temptation (dying) represents the status quo of being aka self sustenance of temporary growth within ongoing loss through adaptation.
“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” Matthew 7:15
“For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.” Jude 1:4
Churches are like governments and businesses. Some fell for the covid trap, and some did not.
If anyone is interested in old school original Christianity, whose decentralized power is inherently resistant to things like bad government, covid, and fallible human actions; check out Eastern Orthodoxy.
Abraham is from India The Brahmins ---The Brahmins held the most power in Hindu society , they were priests, otherwise known as the spiritual and intellectual leaders of the society. “They devoted their time to studying, teaching, performing sacrifices, and officiating religious services” (Nigosian
GOOD...ALWAYS RULED OVER BY CRIMINALS...What's wrong with...
a) good implies vs bad; crime implies versus law; wrong implies vs right...each of these represents a rebranding of wanting vs not wanting the suggestions of others.
b) all these conflicts are called "reasoning" and represent ones choice to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want). Choice (reaction) can only exist at the center of balance (enacting momentum of motion).
c) nature communicates itself from perceivable (whole) to perceiving (partial) aka from the same process of dying to each living differential within. Those within can be tempted to ignore perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information), which gives those suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at will.
d) the perceivable natural order (life being moved from inception towards death) implies being resistance (living) within temptation (dying). The inversion thereof represents suggested orders to follow, hence being tempted to go with the flow (dying) while ignoring to resist (living).
e) the few suggest moralism (good vs bad; right vs wrong; lawful vs criminal etc.) to tempt the many to ignore response-ability (if enacting balance; then reacting choice). Consenting to anything suggested implies ignoring perceivable balance as choice; while shaping suggested imbalance within self (aka reasoning over suggested information within ones memory).
religion
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law as the inversion of balance (enacting) to choice (reaction) natural law.
If one is reasoning (want vs not want; true vs false; believing vs not believing; good vs evil; Christian vs Muslim; us vs them; rich vs poor; left-wing vs right-wing; communism vs capitalism; nationalism vs internationalism; soccer vs football; Pepsi vs Coke; pro-life vs pro-choice; vaxxed vs unwaxxed; Trump vs Biden; jew vs gentile; black vs white; flat vs heliocentric; Nintendo vs Sega; digital vs physical; crypto vs cash; democrat vs republican, Russia vs Ukraine; orthodox vs unorthodox; liberal vs conservative; Smacks vs Frosties and so on...), then one consents to the suggestions of others, hence being bound by them, hence giving them the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will, and the power to speak in the name of (in nomine) the suggested (fiction), while everyone consenting is ignoring the perceivable (reality).
To submit to the suggesting choice of another represents shirking of ones response-ability (choice) within a balance based system, hence shaping a chain of command under every suggestion; which is how the suggesting few gain willingly control over the consenting many.
always ruled
Living within the process of dying implies being temporary ruled by ongoing always. Those who ignore this for the suggested rules by others find themselves being temporary ruled by them.
crime
Natural law represents justice aka that (process of dying) which "just is" for those (living) within. All the suggested laws of men represents rules of behavior to domesticate "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of a balance based system aka free-dom....free (living) within dominance (process of dying).
Ones consent to rules of behavior as suggested by others represents the foundation for self inflicted slavery, hence choice willingly submitting to the choice of another as a master of self.
Choice exist at the center of balance, hence form (life) existing within the momentum (balance) of motion (inception towards death)...not under the choices of others. Consenting to understand what others suggest represents consent to "stand under" those suggesting.
Anything pointing at your belief system is skewed .. Christian dominated country RULED BY CRIMINALS << ALL Christians need to answer for this .. The BS We're seeing now is at least out in the open and been in hiding for a long time
GEN (genus; generation) ALL (whole) -ATION (through action) implies the partial reaction (living) generated within the enacting whole (process of dying).
Those within generation cannot generate; only regenerate aka respond (living) to being generated by (process of dying).
a) if implies then (implication of perceivable) which when applied to suggested (want vs not want conflict) contradicts the suggested.
b) "we" (plural) represents suggested; "one" (singular) represents perceivable. Without "one" choosing to count other "ones" and suggesting it as "we"...there's no perceivable "we" in nature.
c) bringing together (compare) tempts one to ignore that nature (whole process of dying) sets apart (partial living). Perceivable apartheid (moving differences) represents communicated inspiration for adaptation, yet requires ones resistance to the temptation of wanting to put it back together.
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to put everything together aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) thereby corrupting perceivable inspiration (apartheid) with accumulated information (togetherness).
In short...you represent "one" being tempted by the suggested brand "we" to perpetuate suggestions in the name of others, hence perpetuating the pyramid scheme of religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) aka choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law.
Being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies the state of fluidity....every affixed suggestion (information) tempts one to ignore the perceivable fluidity (inspiration).
Mono (singular) Poly (plural)...the suggested inversion of perceivable UNITY; noun (Latin unitas; unus) - ones (living) within oneness (process of dying) for all represents one in energy.
Sleight of hand..."all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one".
As for force...ongoing force of velocity (inception towards death) causing a momentum for the temporary force of resistance (life) within aka loss/growth as the internal power of energy.
We can also look at Pastor Artur who refused to go along. Or all the other churches that did that too.
Can the living "refuse to go along" with the process of dying or does being alive imply being temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (dying)?
What if accepting (want) vs refusing (not want) suggested implies the ignorance of perceivable (need) for suggested (want)?
You want to ask in English?
Are you trying to argue predestination and absence of free will?
a) need (adaptation to perceivable) over want (temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested).
b) the few suggest the many to ask questions as to tempt them to want to seek answers...a quest towards an answer implies outcome orientation.
Meanwhile; being problem (living) within solution (process of dying) implies the need to resist origin through adaptation. Life represents the response to perceivable origin, while being tempted with suggested outcomes.
c) Latin to Pig-Latin (English) represents ongoing revisionism under the e pluribus unum agenda (out of many, one) aka "out of the ignorant many; the chosen ones".
The foundation for all languages represents spell-craft aka the suggesting few crafting the spelling of the consenting many with the suggested word (fiction) over the perceivable sound (reality).
Example...the few suggest "insane person" to tempt the many to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by; out of and in response to the perceivable source of sound.
a) your consent to suggested (information) over perceivable (inspiration) tempts you to reason (argue) about suggested meaning; while ignoring predefined meaning. Furthermore, your ignorance of perceivable origin tempts you to seek meaning within suggested destination.
b) DESTINY (necessity) -ATION (through action) implies wanted reaction (living) within enacting need (process of dying).
c) inception predefines death for all life within.
d) choose to hold your breath...now try to reason/argue (want vs not want) about suggested until you will be forced by perceivable to adapt (need).
Suggestion represents the temptation to ignore perceivable. One doesn't need to argue over anything suggested within nature; one needs to adapt to perceivable NATURE, noun - "born, produced" hence adaptation (living) to origin (process of dying).
a) suggested AB'SENCE, noun (Latin absens, from absum, abesse, to be away) tempts one to ignore that to be (life) implies within way (inception towards death).
b) free will of choice aka FREE (implies temporary free within ongoing dominance) WILL (aka want implies reaction to enacting need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies at the center of balance).
c) choice represents the center of a balance based system (need/want), while choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) tempts one to ignore balance (need/want) for imbalance (want vs not want).
d) as the center (living) of everything (process of dying) one can be tempted off-center by others. Resisting (living) temptation (dying) represents the status quo of being aka self sustenance of temporary growth within ongoing loss through adaptation.
Leadership.
“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” Matthew 7:15
“For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.” Jude 1:4
What does the Bible advise you to do about False Prophets?? Just beware and let them screw over others?
Churches are like governments and businesses. Some fell for the covid trap, and some did not.
If anyone is interested in old school original Christianity, whose decentralized power is inherently resistant to things like bad government, covid, and fallible human actions; check out Eastern Orthodoxy.
What does Eastern Orthodoxy advise about WHAT THE FLOCK should do about 2020 voter fraud??
What do you think decentralized means?
Decentralize the Cabal will just BUY out whatever suits their agenda ..
Christianity is a heresy of Judaism thats whats wrong
Why are jews overpowering society like they do and Christians do nothing about it? Not a good look
Abraham is from India The Brahmins ---The Brahmins held the most power in Hindu society , they were priests, otherwise known as the spiritual and intellectual leaders of the society. “They devoted their time to studying, teaching, performing sacrifices, and officiating religious services” (Nigosian
a) good implies vs bad; crime implies versus law; wrong implies vs right...each of these represents a rebranding of wanting vs not wanting the suggestions of others.
b) all these conflicts are called "reasoning" and represent ones choice to ignore perceivable balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want). Choice (reaction) can only exist at the center of balance (enacting momentum of motion).
c) nature communicates itself from perceivable (whole) to perceiving (partial) aka from the same process of dying to each living differential within. Those within can be tempted to ignore perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information), which gives those suggesting the power to define; redefine and contradict the suggested at will.
d) the perceivable natural order (life being moved from inception towards death) implies being resistance (living) within temptation (dying). The inversion thereof represents suggested orders to follow, hence being tempted to go with the flow (dying) while ignoring to resist (living).
e) the few suggest moralism (good vs bad; right vs wrong; lawful vs criminal etc.) to tempt the many to ignore response-ability (if enacting balance; then reacting choice). Consenting to anything suggested implies ignoring perceivable balance as choice; while shaping suggested imbalance within self (aka reasoning over suggested information within ones memory).
RELIGION; noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law as the inversion of balance (enacting) to choice (reaction) natural law.
If one is reasoning (want vs not want; true vs false; believing vs not believing; good vs evil; Christian vs Muslim; us vs them; rich vs poor; left-wing vs right-wing; communism vs capitalism; nationalism vs internationalism; soccer vs football; Pepsi vs Coke; pro-life vs pro-choice; vaxxed vs unwaxxed; Trump vs Biden; jew vs gentile; black vs white; flat vs heliocentric; Nintendo vs Sega; digital vs physical; crypto vs cash; democrat vs republican, Russia vs Ukraine; orthodox vs unorthodox; liberal vs conservative; Smacks vs Frosties and so on...), then one consents to the suggestions of others, hence being bound by them, hence giving them the power to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested at will, and the power to speak in the name of (in nomine) the suggested (fiction), while everyone consenting is ignoring the perceivable (reality).
To submit to the suggesting choice of another represents shirking of ones response-ability (choice) within a balance based system, hence shaping a chain of command under every suggestion; which is how the suggesting few gain willingly control over the consenting many.
Living within the process of dying implies being temporary ruled by ongoing always. Those who ignore this for the suggested rules by others find themselves being temporary ruled by them.
Natural law represents justice aka that (process of dying) which "just is" for those (living) within. All the suggested laws of men represents rules of behavior to domesticate "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of a balance based system aka free-dom....free (living) within dominance (process of dying).
Ones consent to rules of behavior as suggested by others represents the foundation for self inflicted slavery, hence choice willingly submitting to the choice of another as a master of self.
Choice exist at the center of balance, hence form (life) existing within the momentum (balance) of motion (inception towards death)...not under the choices of others. Consenting to understand what others suggest represents consent to "stand under" those suggesting.