Can the living "refuse to go along" with the process of dying or does being alive imply being temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (dying)?
What if accepting (want) vs refusing (not want) suggested implies the ignorance of perceivable (need) for suggested (want)?
a) need (adaptation to perceivable) over want (temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested).
b) the few suggest the many to ask questions as to tempt them to want to seek answers...a quest towards an answer implies outcome orientation.
Meanwhile; being problem (living) within solution (process of dying) implies the need to resist origin through adaptation. Life represents the response to perceivable origin, while being tempted with suggested outcomes.
c) Latin to Pig-Latin (English) represents ongoing revisionism under the e pluribus unum agenda (out of many, one) aka "out of the ignorant many; the chosen ones".
The foundation for all languages represents spell-craft aka the suggesting few crafting the spelling of the consenting many with the suggested word (fiction) over the perceivable sound (reality).
Example...the few suggest "insane person" to tempt the many to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by; out of and in response to the perceivable source of sound.
Are you trying to argue predestination.
a) your consent to suggested (information) over perceivable (inspiration) tempts you to reason (argue) about suggested meaning; while ignoring predefined meaning. Furthermore, your ignorance of perceivable origin tempts you to seek meaning within suggested destination.
b) DESTINY (necessity) -ATION (through action) implies wanted reaction (living) within enacting need (process of dying).
c) inception predefines death for all life within.
d) choose to hold your breath...now try to reason/argue (want vs not want) about suggested until you will be forced by perceivable to adapt (need).
Suggestion represents the temptation to ignore perceivable. One doesn't need to argue over anything suggested within nature; one needs to adapt to perceivable NATURE, noun - "born, produced" hence adaptation (living) to origin (process of dying).
absence of free will
a) suggested AB'SENCE, noun (Latin absens, from absum, abesse, to be away) tempts one to ignore that to be (life) implies within way (inception towards death).
b) free will of choice aka FREE (implies temporary free within ongoing dominance) WILL (aka want implies reaction to enacting need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies at the center of balance).
c) choice represents the center of a balance based system (need/want), while choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) tempts one to ignore balance (need/want) for imbalance (want vs not want).
d) as the center (living) of everything (process of dying) one can be tempted off-center by others. Resisting (living) temptation (dying) represents the status quo of being aka self sustenance of temporary growth within ongoing loss through adaptation.
Can the living "refuse to go along" with the process of dying or does being alive imply being temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (dying)?
What if accepting (want) vs refusing (not want) suggested implies the ignorance of perceivable (need) for suggested (want)?
You want to ask in English?
Are you trying to argue predestination and absence of free will?
a) need (adaptation to perceivable) over want (temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested).
b) the few suggest the many to ask questions as to tempt them to want to seek answers...a quest towards an answer implies outcome orientation.
Meanwhile; being problem (living) within solution (process of dying) implies the need to resist origin through adaptation. Life represents the response to perceivable origin, while being tempted with suggested outcomes.
c) Latin to Pig-Latin (English) represents ongoing revisionism under the e pluribus unum agenda (out of many, one) aka "out of the ignorant many; the chosen ones".
The foundation for all languages represents spell-craft aka the suggesting few crafting the spelling of the consenting many with the suggested word (fiction) over the perceivable sound (reality).
Example...the few suggest "insane person" to tempt the many to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by; out of and in response to the perceivable source of sound.
a) your consent to suggested (information) over perceivable (inspiration) tempts you to reason (argue) about suggested meaning; while ignoring predefined meaning. Furthermore, your ignorance of perceivable origin tempts you to seek meaning within suggested destination.
b) DESTINY (necessity) -ATION (through action) implies wanted reaction (living) within enacting need (process of dying).
c) inception predefines death for all life within.
d) choose to hold your breath...now try to reason/argue (want vs not want) about suggested until you will be forced by perceivable to adapt (need).
Suggestion represents the temptation to ignore perceivable. One doesn't need to argue over anything suggested within nature; one needs to adapt to perceivable NATURE, noun - "born, produced" hence adaptation (living) to origin (process of dying).
a) suggested AB'SENCE, noun (Latin absens, from absum, abesse, to be away) tempts one to ignore that to be (life) implies within way (inception towards death).
b) free will of choice aka FREE (implies temporary free within ongoing dominance) WILL (aka want implies reaction to enacting need) OF (implies out of) CHOICE (implies at the center of balance).
c) choice represents the center of a balance based system (need/want), while choosing want (suggested) over need (perceivable) tempts one to ignore balance (need/want) for imbalance (want vs not want).
d) as the center (living) of everything (process of dying) one can be tempted off-center by others. Resisting (living) temptation (dying) represents the status quo of being aka self sustenance of temporary growth within ongoing loss through adaptation.