Needs more tinfoil ( AS16-122-19533 )
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
Looks like they ran out of aluminum foil...said fuck it....and went with butchers wrap...! 😂
Apparently this is a real photo
Brought to you by Reynolds Aluminum
LOL
Looks like a job by someone who got fired from the HVAC company because they were too dumb and clumsy to do residential duct work.
I'm sure this high quality craft, the flimsy aluminum paneling, will withstand the high atmospheric pressure at high altitude. No problem.
I know. The construction is absolutely baffling. Was it made like that? Did it get damage from lift off? But the closer you look at it the less it makes any sense.
"There's no way that meth heads tree fort went anywhere!"
~ Owen Benjamin about the Lem (named after JFK's sodomite boyfriend Kirk LeMoyne "Lem" Billings).
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xMpcQENTIEO8/
I don't believe in flat earth theory, but shit like this is why people question NASA and the space program. We found out the CDC is clown world and makes shit up as they go and uses vaccines and other tech to harm citizens or purposely deceives them with propaganda campaigns and works in collusion with corporations and universities in collaboration and in pursuit of foreign political agendas. Then it wouldn't be much stretch to suggest NASA and the space program aren't the super geniuses we were told in folklore. These super smart guys in lab coats might just be frauds on acid and hucksters.
Believing (wanting suggested) vs not believing (not wanting suggested) both represent consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
If you find yourself in a conflict of reason; then both sides are reasoning about a suggestion made by an outside party. That party uses suggestion to cause division (reason).
Try using implication (if/then) instead of reason (want vs not want; believing vs not believing; true vs false etc.) as to avoid the conflicts others tempt you to consent to.
What if others cannot define reality for you; only tempt you with fiction (suggested) to ignore predefined reality (perceivable). If I suggest "this is a tree"; then that implies that "this" was perceivable before I could make a suggestion about it. It's your response-ability (choice) to discern the difference; while others will exploit your lack of discernment.
What if every suggestion the make up as they go aims to get your consent to either want or not want it? What if without consent, every suggestion represents a temptation to ignore perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information)?
What if your consent represents a 50% ingredient to their 50% suggestions of made up shit? What if choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law binds them together into a fiction the few suggest; while the many respond to it as if it represents reality?
What if one cannot make anything up (suggested creationism) but can only shape everything already in existence (perceivable transmutation)? Try creating any new information without shaping it out of already perceivable inspiration...can you?
How could you defend yourself from suggestion by propagating suggestions to others? Suggestion represents a pyramid scheme; which self perpetuates exponentially among those consenting to it.
The few represent the parasitic consequence to the ignorance of the many as the consenting host to the parasitic vector of suggestion. The few tempt the many to ignore reality (perceivable inspiration); which when consented to gives the few the power to shape fiction (suggested information) at their will.
Those who consent to suggested are willingly ignoring perceivable ; hence lacking to comprehend what's going on.
jesus..i made better looking models with my friends at 7 years old in my backyard than this shit LOL
I like the brown construction paper flappy things the best.
R15 paperback wall insulation?
That's parchment paper, asshole! What if it starts raining MEATBALLS, huh? Then what? Just make a little quip about it and hope they don't get into the curricular flotsam jets? Literitate yourself, bud.
SOURCE : used to work at the NASA caferteria
On a serious note though : ain't NO conspiracy theories getting through that tinfoil!
I love the clip-on fan just above the direct tv dish
Thanks for pointing that out, i would have missed it. Its nice how they shopped out the Direct TV logo.
The graphics are awesome in space
OP is a lazy faggot for not knowing this;
Folks- all you have to do is watch the AS-16 lunar liftoff TV images and you can see it happen. I noticed it live on TV back in 1972 (and I was just a 14 year old space nut then)... today you can see it on the Spacecraft Films Apollo 16 DVD set- disk 5. Oddly, over they years I've read it described as "mysterious damage." ... there's no big mystery at all.
The Apollo 16 post-mission report does discuss the damage to these panels. It concludes that ascent engine plume effects caused the panels to lift up from the riser attachments at the bottom of the lower panels, and speculates (because of surface images) that those panels were loose prior to ascent. In addition, if you look at the Apollo 16 LM ascent video carefully, you can actually see these panels lift up and start flapping in the plume as it ascends from the descent stage.
LOW IQ GAY CONSPIRACY FAGS STRIKE AGAIN.
Oh, that explains everything. Hahaha!
Why yes, yes it does. Do you know why? Because it's true.
OK MAN.