Needs more tinfoil ( AS16-122-19533 )
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
I don't believe in flat earth theory, but shit like this is why people question NASA and the space program. We found out the CDC is clown world and makes shit up as they go and uses vaccines and other tech to harm citizens or purposely deceives them with propaganda campaigns and works in collusion with corporations and universities in collaboration and in pursuit of foreign political agendas. Then it wouldn't be much stretch to suggest NASA and the space program aren't the super geniuses we were told in folklore. These super smart guys in lab coats might just be frauds on acid and hucksters.
Believing (wanting suggested) vs not believing (not wanting suggested) both represent consent to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
If you find yourself in a conflict of reason; then both sides are reasoning about a suggestion made by an outside party. That party uses suggestion to cause division (reason).
Try using implication (if/then) instead of reason (want vs not want; believing vs not believing; true vs false etc.) as to avoid the conflicts others tempt you to consent to.
What if others cannot define reality for you; only tempt you with fiction (suggested) to ignore predefined reality (perceivable). If I suggest "this is a tree"; then that implies that "this" was perceivable before I could make a suggestion about it. It's your response-ability (choice) to discern the difference; while others will exploit your lack of discernment.
What if every suggestion the make up as they go aims to get your consent to either want or not want it? What if without consent, every suggestion represents a temptation to ignore perceivable (inspiration) for suggested (information)?
What if your consent represents a 50% ingredient to their 50% suggestions of made up shit? What if choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law binds them together into a fiction the few suggest; while the many respond to it as if it represents reality?
What if one cannot make anything up (suggested creationism) but can only shape everything already in existence (perceivable transmutation)? Try creating any new information without shaping it out of already perceivable inspiration...can you?
How could you defend yourself from suggestion by propagating suggestions to others? Suggestion represents a pyramid scheme; which self perpetuates exponentially among those consenting to it.
The few represent the parasitic consequence to the ignorance of the many as the consenting host to the parasitic vector of suggestion. The few tempt the many to ignore reality (perceivable inspiration); which when consented to gives the few the power to shape fiction (suggested information) at their will.
Those who consent to suggested are willingly ignoring perceivable ; hence lacking to comprehend what's going on.