a) creationism (out of nothing) is being suggested to tempt one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything) aka the living (partial) transmuted out of the process of dying (whole).
b) true (want) vs false (not want) towards suggested tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable (change).
c) fear originates in not wanting the suggested outcome of death. It's ones willing outcome orientation; while ignoring to adapt to origin, which shapes fear into the "mind-killer".
Living (growth) implies within the process of dying (loss)...the few tempt the many to be afraid of that (process of dying) which generates the living.
to sell products
NATURE, noun - "born, produced"...that's the only producer for everything perceivable inside. One has to first ignore this to give others the power to sell perceivable reality as suggested fiction.
For example...this represents value (perceivable) for evaluation (perceiving); while this "money" represents suggested values tempting one to ignore perceivable value. What happens if one consents to suggested values? Others define; redefine and contradict values at will; which they can then use to buy; steal and claim the entire world from those ignorant enough to believe suggested price-tags upon not just a moving system; but upon the process of dying.
The few managed to trick the many to pay for the privilege to die in ignorance of reality. Instead of resisting the process of dying; the living many are paying the few to get access to the temptations which destroy them faster.
problems that don't exist
a) choice can only exist within perceivable balance (need/want); the choice to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested) shapes the want vs not want conflict of reason (imbalance).
b) perceivable reality moves on; while those who ignore it for suggested fiction; perceive the reality through the lens of fiction. So one can say that suggested fiction doesn't exist; yet those who consent to it are behaving as if it existed, which causes trouble for everyone.
The value of suggested money doesn't exist; yet all those who evaluate suggested money will do anything to get the suggested value of money, which allows the few who suggest money to control; to direct; to shape; to utilize; to destroy; to rebuild etc. the consenting many.
Pointing the finger at money doesn't change the underlying problem; which represents consent to suggested over adaptation to perceivable.
Boomers still rely heavily on TV programming, which is completely propaganda by now.
Boomers also seem to get stuck in the mainstream channels of the internet, getting most of their news from Microsoft MSNBC websites or Yahoo News or letting Google curate their search results and feel them the lies and fake fact checker bullshit. Keeps naive boomers in the wikipedia cage of the internet.
Nature offers everything as perceivable inspiration towards every ones free will of choice aka free to react to.
Ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration for the want to consent to suggested information represents a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law and b) the foundation for marketing reality (perceivable) as fiction (suggested).
Want represents the temptation to ignore the need to resist; hence the few making suggestions to control the many representing "happy merchants" of temptation.
tl;dr...the few can only market suggested if the many willingly ignore perceivable..suggested words are shaped out of perceivable sound.
Seems like a person sometimes. Right down there it says no idea where I am; but I don't like what I see, so get me the fuck out of here Haha! Seems like a guy that lets the bot go and then he adds to it. Just a guess though. A couple of times they/it has had one sentence answers clearly from a person. There is a dude in there too, right?
M'ARKET, noun [Latin mercatus, from mercor, to buy.]...ask yourself if perceivable reality is for sale or available for "free" will of choice?
Suggestion represents the temptation to market perceivable aka to put a fictitious price-tag on reality. The foundation for that implies the living holding onto the process of dying instead of resisting it.
Suggested escapism represents the sales-pitch for suggested progressivism...the price for both represents reduction of life.
Another aspect of of wanting to escape represents the lack of self discernment about ones position (partial within whole). It's like "no idea where I am; but I don't like what I see, so get me the fuck out of here". What would inspire someone with such a perspective to grow within origin instead of withering away in hopes for better outcomes?
Sadly, its human nature to want to escape reality and im sure one of the first tasks of the first humans was to figure out how to get wasted.
Life kind of sucks and is way too much bad mixed with entirely too little and very fleeting good. Fuck being human. You can quote me on that.
Im starting to agree about the "threat" aspect of CBDC and WEF/Gatesie in general.
a) creationism (out of nothing) is being suggested to tempt one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything) aka the living (partial) transmuted out of the process of dying (whole).
b) true (want) vs false (not want) towards suggested tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable (change).
c) fear originates in not wanting the suggested outcome of death. It's ones willing outcome orientation; while ignoring to adapt to origin, which shapes fear into the "mind-killer".
Living (growth) implies within the process of dying (loss)...the few tempt the many to be afraid of that (process of dying) which generates the living.
NATURE, noun - "born, produced"...that's the only producer for everything perceivable inside. One has to first ignore this to give others the power to sell perceivable reality as suggested fiction.
For example...this represents value (perceivable) for evaluation (perceiving); while this "money" represents suggested values tempting one to ignore perceivable value. What happens if one consents to suggested values? Others define; redefine and contradict values at will; which they can then use to buy; steal and claim the entire world from those ignorant enough to believe suggested price-tags upon not just a moving system; but upon the process of dying.
The few managed to trick the many to pay for the privilege to die in ignorance of reality. Instead of resisting the process of dying; the living many are paying the few to get access to the temptations which destroy them faster.
a) choice can only exist within perceivable balance (need/want); the choice to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested) shapes the want vs not want conflict of reason (imbalance).
b) perceivable reality moves on; while those who ignore it for suggested fiction; perceive the reality through the lens of fiction. So one can say that suggested fiction doesn't exist; yet those who consent to it are behaving as if it existed, which causes trouble for everyone.
The value of suggested money doesn't exist; yet all those who evaluate suggested money will do anything to get the suggested value of money, which allows the few who suggest money to control; to direct; to shape; to utilize; to destroy; to rebuild etc. the consenting many.
Pointing the finger at money doesn't change the underlying problem; which represents consent to suggested over adaptation to perceivable.
Boomers still rely heavily on TV programming, which is completely propaganda by now.
Boomers also seem to get stuck in the mainstream channels of the internet, getting most of their news from Microsoft MSNBC websites or Yahoo News or letting Google curate their search results and feel them the lies and fake fact checker bullshit. Keeps naive boomers in the wikipedia cage of the internet.
Nature offers everything as perceivable inspiration towards every ones free will of choice aka free to react to.
Ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration for the want to consent to suggested information represents a) choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law and b) the foundation for marketing reality (perceivable) as fiction (suggested).
Want represents the temptation to ignore the need to resist; hence the few making suggestions to control the many representing "happy merchants" of temptation.
tl;dr...the few can only market suggested if the many willingly ignore perceivable..suggested words are shaped out of perceivable sound.
You feel strongly about this. That's interesting to see.
Seems like a person sometimes. Right down there it says no idea where I am; but I don't like what I see, so get me the fuck out of here Haha! Seems like a guy that lets the bot go and then he adds to it. Just a guess though. A couple of times they/it has had one sentence answers clearly from a person. There is a dude in there too, right?
How about this.
free-will-of-choice, are you a bot, a person, or both?
Lets see what happens,.if anything. Haha!
M'ARKET, noun [Latin mercatus, from mercor, to buy.]...ask yourself if perceivable reality is for sale or available for "free" will of choice?
Suggestion represents the temptation to market perceivable aka to put a fictitious price-tag on reality. The foundation for that implies the living holding onto the process of dying instead of resisting it.
I only see price tags on ESCAPES from reality. 🤣😂🤣
Suggested escapism represents the sales-pitch for suggested progressivism...the price for both represents reduction of life.
Another aspect of of wanting to escape represents the lack of self discernment about ones position (partial within whole). It's like "no idea where I am; but I don't like what I see, so get me the fuck out of here". What would inspire someone with such a perspective to grow within origin instead of withering away in hopes for better outcomes?
Sadly, its human nature to want to escape reality and im sure one of the first tasks of the first humans was to figure out how to get wasted. Life kind of sucks and is way too much bad mixed with entirely too little and very fleeting good. Fuck being human. You can quote me on that.