a) creationism (out of nothing) is being suggested to tempt one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything) aka the living (partial) transmuted out of the process of dying (whole).
b) true (want) vs false (not want) towards suggested tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable (change).
c) fear originates in not wanting the suggested outcome of death. It's ones willing outcome orientation; while ignoring to adapt to origin, which shapes fear into the "mind-killer".
Living (growth) implies within the process of dying (loss)...the few tempt the many to be afraid of that (process of dying) which generates the living.
to sell products
NATURE, noun - "born, produced"...that's the only producer for everything perceivable inside. One has to first ignore this to give others the power to sell perceivable reality as suggested fiction.
For example...this represents value (perceivable) for evaluation (perceiving); while this "money" represents suggested values tempting one to ignore perceivable value. What happens if one consents to suggested values? Others define; redefine and contradict values at will; which they can then use to buy; steal and claim the entire world from those ignorant enough to believe suggested price-tags upon not just a moving system; but upon the process of dying.
The few managed to trick the many to pay for the privilege to die in ignorance of reality. Instead of resisting the process of dying; the living many are paying the few to get access to the temptations which destroy them faster.
problems that don't exist
a) choice can only exist within perceivable balance (need/want); the choice to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested) shapes the want vs not want conflict of reason (imbalance).
b) perceivable reality moves on; while those who ignore it for suggested fiction; perceive the reality through the lens of fiction. So one can say that suggested fiction doesn't exist; yet those who consent to it are behaving as if it existed, which causes trouble for everyone.
The value of suggested money doesn't exist; yet all those who evaluate suggested money will do anything to get the suggested value of money, which allows the few who suggest money to control; to direct; to shape; to utilize; to destroy; to rebuild etc. the consenting many.
Pointing the finger at money doesn't change the underlying problem; which represents consent to suggested over adaptation to perceivable.
a) creationism (out of nothing) is being suggested to tempt one to ignore perceivable transmutation (out of everything) aka the living (partial) transmuted out of the process of dying (whole).
b) true (want) vs false (not want) towards suggested tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable (change).
c) fear originates in not wanting the suggested outcome of death. It's ones willing outcome orientation; while ignoring to adapt to origin, which shapes fear into the "mind-killer".
Living (growth) implies within the process of dying (loss)...the few tempt the many to be afraid of that (process of dying) which generates the living.
NATURE, noun - "born, produced"...that's the only producer for everything perceivable inside. One has to first ignore this to give others the power to sell perceivable reality as suggested fiction.
For example...this represents value (perceivable) for evaluation (perceiving); while this "money" represents suggested values tempting one to ignore perceivable value. What happens if one consents to suggested values? Others define; redefine and contradict values at will; which they can then use to buy; steal and claim the entire world from those ignorant enough to believe suggested price-tags upon not just a moving system; but upon the process of dying.
The few managed to trick the many to pay for the privilege to die in ignorance of reality. Instead of resisting the process of dying; the living many are paying the few to get access to the temptations which destroy them faster.
a) choice can only exist within perceivable balance (need/want); the choice to ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested) shapes the want vs not want conflict of reason (imbalance).
b) perceivable reality moves on; while those who ignore it for suggested fiction; perceive the reality through the lens of fiction. So one can say that suggested fiction doesn't exist; yet those who consent to it are behaving as if it existed, which causes trouble for everyone.
The value of suggested money doesn't exist; yet all those who evaluate suggested money will do anything to get the suggested value of money, which allows the few who suggest money to control; to direct; to shape; to utilize; to destroy; to rebuild etc. the consenting many.
Pointing the finger at money doesn't change the underlying problem; which represents consent to suggested over adaptation to perceivable.