Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

14
posted 3 years ago by Boomer_Supreme 3 years ago by Boomer_Supreme +20 / -6
28 comments share
28 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (28)
sorted by:
▲ 5 ▼
– EnoughOfYourLies 5 points 3 years ago +6 / -1

I like much of Ben's work. But I think you are maybe chubbing out to the fear mongering presented in the catastrophe cycle a bit much.

The most important things to point out are:

  • nothing confirms anything expected can hit the planet
  • many such cycles have passed with no issue
  • tons of ducks need to be in a row for this result
  • odds are if it does occur, it will only hit a slice of the planet
permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– DogGod81 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Always good stuff. The world needs a great reset. Maybe a micro nova, maybe a solar flare. Maybe just the magnetic poles reverse. Part of the world is scorched, oceans are evaporated. Earth is covered in dense cloud formation and immediately flashes into an ice age. See ya wouldn't wanna be ya. It's all happened before. Peat and repeat sitting in a tree peat falls out, who's left..repeat. peat and repeat sitting in a tree.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TallestSkil 3 points 3 years ago +4 / -1
  1. There’s no evidence whatsoever that a G2 star can do this.
  2. Why would they bother killing everyone before an event that will kill everyone?
permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Negentropy369 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Have you actually looked to see if there's evidence, or are you just regurgitating your programming from our childhood indoctrination camps?

If you go to that channel and watch the playlist at the top of the playlist tab, you will see there is plenty of evidence, studies from all over the world. Ben has been doing daily videos for years, all of them reference the constant release of new scientific studies/papers which validate what he has been saying for years.

Your second point is reasonable.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– TallestSkil 0 points 3 years ago +2 / -2

Have you actually looked to see if there's evidence

Not my claim. Not my responsibility. Also yes.

programming from our childhood indoctrination camps

None of which said a damn thing about the viability of novae in stars…

there is plenty of evidence, studies from all over the world.

Micronovae can happen on white dwarfs. They’re outside the main sequence for a reason.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Negentropy369 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

If you aren't willing to look into information contrary to what establishment tells us, why are you here?

You seem to think our understanding of any aspect of cosmology is settled. It's not, the very idea that it could be is anti-scientific. Our ability to observe the cosmos is unfathomably limited in the dimensions of space and time. There have been many observations in the last few decades that force us to reorient our understanding of the cosmos, we have observed micro and recurrent novae on stars that we previously believed couldn't novae, because we hadn't observed it yet.

This is the whole problem with many fields of science, it falls into dogma through its attachment to foundational theories even in the face of observations that dispute them. Instead of stepping back and reexamining according to the scientific method, we fabricate imaginary things to force new information to fit into old theories. "Dark matter" is a perfect example. Our ability to observe expanded and gravity could no longer account for superstructures in the universe, instead of reexamination of gravity's role in the organization of matter, they simply said there's a bunch of matter we can't observe because it's blasphemy to question gravity. It's a essentially a religion, Scientism.

Whatever though, you do you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– HEXEN 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1

You just championed two paragraphs that said absolutely nothing. No refutation, no actual facts, just some opinionated wisps about why people have bias.

But please, continue to talk about low IQs lol

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– jack445566778899 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Agreed.

However, without that same worship of gravity (and other unvalidated assumption required for inference of size of the star) there is no way to determine the size of these “micronova-ing” stars in the first place - which sort of undoes the premise.

Furthermore the worship of gravity and fusion powering stars are both required for the speculation on the cause of supernova in any case.

There isn’t even any solid evidence that the sun is a star. That’s merely another dogma of that same mythological/religious belief structure of scientism you mentioned.

You may be interested to join us on flatearthresearch to further explore and exchange our views!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Helloworld0 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

https://youtu.be/udGWkQjWhtA

Yes, the Diebold Foundation has several videos on what happened in the past, what will happen and what the govt is doing.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +2 / -1
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– jack445566778899 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The sky is falling chicken little!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– cxivv 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Ben makes a bunch of very interesting points and I feel like I have to agree on some of his musings.

Sad he at times adds stuff like giants built walls because they knew what was coming.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1
▲ 2 ▼
– aaarrrrjunas1 2 points 3 years ago +3 / -1

install rocket boosters on rando edge of flat-earth;

ignite boosters;

flip dat bitch;

problem solved;

gtfo;

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 3 years ago +2 / -2
▲ 1 ▼
– aaarrrrjunas1 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

BRO-TARD, cook a pizza upside down... wut do?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LouisIX 1 point 3 years ago +3 / -2

People will believe and create the most fantastic ideas before they consider the most simple answer: There's a certain tribe your ancestors have been warning about for thousands of years. This tribe is hellbent on ruling the world by any means possible. If that means destroying the world, and everyone in it, then so be it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– jack445566778899 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Must everyone be a fag obsessed with “flipping/switching” poles?

God, it’s always pole (-smoking) this and ball (-fondling) that.

There is no evidence to support any pole shift. It is fear porn propaganda.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– deleted -1 points 3 years ago +2 / -3
▲ 1 ▼
– Oldmancountry17 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Still, the outer edge critters could use it to kill the center people.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy