Understanding represents your choice to "stand under" suggested information by others...suggested information such as the label "cobblestone" for perceivable form within flow.
As form within the momentum of flow; one is surrounded by moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation...that's what a so called cobblestone reacts to. Furthermore; the choices of others can shape the form of a "cobblestone"; hence it reacting to being shaped. This reacting to enacting represents being evaluation within value.
Understanding tempts one to view the suggested label "cobblestone" as value onto which one attaches more and more suggested values. Meanwhile...form represents a reaction to enacting flow; hence an expression of impressing, so an expressed evaluation (reaction) to impressing value (enacting).
One cannot define value by suggestion; only react to predefined value within perceivable...motion. One doesn't move; one represents RE (response to) MOVE (being moved); hence living; while struggling to sustain self within the process of dying...a generating (inception) and removal (death) process for everything within.
tl; dr...maybe if you stand a cobblestone upright and then sit on it while making choices...it understands (stands under) value?
it turns out that all the wisdom of life is "too intangible" and "doesn't convert" and that they need "something more real".
"is; too; doesn't; more" is being suggested (want) by the perceiving onto the perceivable (need). It's this choice of want over need; which tempts one to want more out of everything needed.
WISDOM, noun - "use or exercise of knowledge" aka adaptation of the perceiving to the perceivable; hence the response-ability of choice.
's like when I evaluated the masons' requests...and chose the course of action
If you REact to a suggested REquest; then why call it an action?
arsy versy
Only within balance (momentum of motion) can there be a choice within opposites to arsy versy; topsy turvy; head over heals; as above so below; upside-down and vice versa.
I haven't yet invented the symbols needed to write them down
Down from the ongoing symmetry one tempts others to ignore with temporary symbolism?
signals just go out into the aether and gives no damns as to who picks them up
a) the aether represents the flow of inspiration for everything within. Everyone receives; yet picking up the perceivable implies choice of adaptation from those perceiving it.
AETHER; ETHER (Latin oether) - "to burn; shine" represents the impression caused by flow (velocity) meeting form (resistance) within momentum.
b) SIG'NAL, adjective - "eminent; remarkable; memorable; distinguished from what is ordinary"...this represents the temptation of suggested information. Seeking agreement from others about ones existence, instead of growing self discernment. This also ignores that the natural order (process of dying) distinguishes everyone (living) within, hence from whole (perceivable) into partial (perceiving).
understanding the signal is where complexity comes in
Because standing under others allows them to define; redefine and contradict suggested meaning at will; hence shaping a simple foundation (process of dying) into a complex headache (living).
so many of them are speaking their own little languages and dialects
Either suggested to them by the few or in response to distinct themselves from the suggestions of the few. Perceivable sound represents an offer for "free" will of choice; suggested words tempt one to not just own them; but to brand perceivable while suggesting ownership over it.
Sleight of hand using Bon Jovi..."It's my life, it's now or never...I ain't gonna live forever...I just want to live while I'm alive" aka the want to claim the temporary while willingly ignoring the ongoing. Ever heard a dead guy suggest "I just want to live..."? Meanwhile; no issue perceiving those alive singing along with ignorance based contradictions about their very existence.
they do this to make sure that they're only communicating with the right - however they should define such a thing - receivers.
a) the right (want) implies vs the wrong (not want)...a conflict of reason shaped by consenting to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
b) REceiver aka reaction (living); which implies to enacting (process of dying). Before one can receive; one perceives; which implies one being by; within; out of perceivable.
motionless for a moment
Add the implied "-um" and the "less" becomes a contradiction of the momentum of motion for those within it.
decoded by whatever decoders they have on hand into who-knows-what
Aka decoding (comprehension) the encoded (perceivable) for expression (growth) or repression (loss). Those who choose to repress themselves are being tempted by suggested encodes (numerology underneath the spoken languages and symbolism) to decode (understanding aka standing under) suggested information.
How to establish numerology? Tempt the perceiving ONE within perceivable ONEness to count others as numbers; while ignoring NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit (unitas; one; oneness)". Next step; branding them by suggested inversion aka "I am a name not a number".
the pure and simple reason
a) balance (need/want) represents the pure; imbalance (want vs not want) represent impure...for the choice in-between.
b) SIM'PLE aka SINE (without) PLICA (folding) tempts one to ignore being within self differentiated; hence representing the unfolded ones (partial) within the folded oneness (whole).
c) implication (if/then) trumps reason (want vs not want) within motion.
Recent sleight of hand...suggesting trump vs someone unreasonable (biden) tempts others to choose trump as the side of reason, while ignoring the implications (imbalance) of consenting to conflict (reasoning).
Life does not support chroot jails on account of that there is no kernel-level...
Perceiving kernel (choice) within perceivable root (balance). Meanwhile suggested CROOT - "an operation that changes the apparent root directory for the current running process" tempts one to ignore the directing current required to sustain momentum (balance) for the kernels (choice) within.
Suggested "no kernel-level" or perceivable kernel (choice) within level (balance)?
As for jail...being "free" will of choice implies at the center of "dom"inating balance aka free-dom. The few suggest confinement to tempt the many to ignore that the mind is being confined within the flow of inspiration.
the containerization has to happen on a higher level of abstraction.
ABSTRACT' aka ABSTRAHO (to draw from; to separate) - TION (through action)...level (balance aka momentum) represents the separation of higher (flow) and lower (form) and it's the separated reaction (choice) which represents the opportunity to draw from by being within.
It's these formed choices which represent the vessels (container).
scattering car-keys across the floor, to be later trod on like post-urban caltrops
Modern urbanization slaves carry flimsy flip key remotes around...so stepping on them only disables the electronics within. A bunch of Lego makes way more efficient caltrops and your hatrack would also scatter them everywhere, hence adding minefield capability to it.
"justice"...Wouldn't that be just ice?
As in melting (process of dying) those (living) within or what about losing flavor (differentiation) during the process (sameness) unless refreshing (adaptation)?
How did Vanilla Ice put it..."If there was a problem (living), yo, I'll (process of dying) solve it"..."Check out (consent to) the hook (suggested information) while D-Shay revolves (transmutation of form back to flow aka revolution) it". Also; D-Shay aka DJ aka DISK (to throw; exterior/surface aka perceivable inspiration) JOCKEY (to cheat; to trick; to deceive in trade aka suggested information).
"Word (suggested information) to your mother (matrix; womb; source; origin aka perceivable inspiration".
I'm still calling them "programs".
PROGRAM'MA, noun - "a letter sealed with the king's seal" aka suggested information sealing ones comprehension away from perceivable inspiration by the choice (king) to consent to suggested.
cultural touchstone...pre-cast building bricks.
Cultivated dependency to shape with what others are suggesting instead of shaping as choice within perceivable.
"ones within oneness"...Ah, a Threeness.
Only if one within oneness chooses to count other ones and suggest the counted ones as "three" or a trinity.
"Everything happens"...Though never with uniform distribution. It's no doubt a function of currents; those clever motions.
Each one (uni) represents the distributed form within the momentum of the distributing flow (current). Equality (process of dying) distributes diversity (living). The suggested inversion thereof represents diversity for equality.
Try implication...if within current and motion; then recurrent and remotion (removal) aka recurrent (living) removal (dying).
Do we try to point anything out though?
All suggested information points out affixed meaning within moving inspiration, hence contradicting the line with a point.
I kinda read the posts, and as I go I jot down notes of whatever comes to mind, this being later parsed into vaguely-english and then posted.
Jotting down what comes to mind represents memorizing suggested information; then remembering (respond to memorized); while shaping within the confines of suggested among mostly ignored inspiration perceivable.
I read until something inspires; then I adapt on the fly to it; while resisting the temptation to memorize anything. It's my less restricted consciousness which more and more efficiently draws from inspiration whatever necessary for adaptation.
Consenting to suggested information and then withdrawing into memory, while working with it, represents atrophy of conscious adaptation to perceivable. It's the mass accumulation of suggested information which tempts one to pretend that working within your ego server farm represents adaptation of perceiving (reaction) to perceivable (enacting).
Example...imagine you accumulated all the good shit from the web on hard-drives so that you can privately dive into it. Do this for a while and go back on the web..."boy; does the public web sucks". Online offer (perceivable inspiration) tempts offline accumulation (suggested information) and since the world wide web represents suggested information; the few have to mimic the perceivable inspiration with "always online" for the many aka "the internet of things".
Words in, Words out
Suggested words (want) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound (need), and choosing want (temptation) while ignoring need (resistance) tempts one to want more. Consented words come in easy; while requiring more and more effort to let go of. It's what "catchphrases" are exploiting. Also; HOOK (suggested) LINE (perceivable) SINKER (consenting choice)...fishing for consent.
the issue there is bolting words to words and ducttaping definitions
Your consent to the word (want) over the behavior of motion (need) bolts them; hence shapes idols of meaning out of suggested information; which then tempts you to duct tape them as partial information within your memory; while ignoring the "whole" flow of inspiration (the predefined meaning for those reacting to it).
Suggested information tempts one to puzzle meaning together; while ignoring that the picture (perceiving) on the box (perceivable) already represents the solution (process of dying) for the problem (living).
The few suggest nature as the problem and those within as the solution; which represents the inversion of being the problem (temporary) within the solution (ongoing).
"the whole composition"...I like that. (I've called it a symphony before, as well)
SYM'PHONY, noun [Latin symphonia; Greek with, and voice.] aka WITH (the whole composition) + VOICE (the partial instrument). Yet partial within whole implies separation through momentum (balance); which allows choice at the center of resonance (need) and dissonance (want).
So much of the composition seems to be off; because so many of the instruments willingly operate in dissonance; while ignoring to resonate.
Every moment looks like each moment
The same momentum supplies each and every different perspective within, yet also the choice to ignore perceivable differences (inspiration) for suggested sameness (information).
The more one ignores differences; the more one ignores the differentiating momentum, hence lacking comprehension about the ongoing motion causing it.
Can't do much wrong the man what that ignores any thing that should be put in front of him.
Everything (perceivable) is put in front of one (perceiving)...ignorance represents consent to what others suggest it means. Right vs wrong reasoning implies consent to suggested over perceivable.
they forget that instead of being entertained by the thing, they could entertain themselves with the thing
They refuse to grow themselves "within" everything; which requires resisting the temptation to be tamed by others.
beast of burden
That represents the suggested inversion of being burden (form) within beast (animal; animation; flow) aka living (burden of resistance) within the process of dying (beast of temptation).
the shock on their faces, when they find that all they're left with are things
I held the cool hands of plenty who let go off all things until the warmth of another life was enough to embrace death. Then there were also those who cling until last breath to their possessions and obligations. My mother was one of those; her last words were: "what about the laundry?"
Not out of Nothing - out of An Egg
An egg implies a shell for the inside from the outside. Everything (energy) was before the egg (balance) can hatch the chicken (choice).
Everything....came later
Came into what? What's the foundation for everything to come into and where's the implied outside everything came from? Suggested creationism tempts one into this loop of thinking inside and outside (dualism); which tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation aka being partial within whole, differentiated by the momentum of the ongoing whole.
Partial came later than whole, yet within its center; hence out of the whole. Not side (in) by side (out) dualism; but one within oneness transmutation.
Only then did the unpacking truly commence and the transmutation was packed in
Transmutation (ingredient out of base) is required for an ingredient to unpack from the base. Transmutation cannot be unpacked; since the "one" unpacking implies being the transmuted partial within the transmuting whole.
Self segregation of whole into partial represents transmutation.
SO, adverb (Latin sic, contracted) - "answering to as"...reaction to enacting represents the contract aka the need to adapt to being moved, while answering implies the choice to want to question the needed solution.
Guybrush Threepwood: "I want to ask you about all of perceivable reality"
All of perceivable reality: "expresses indigestion"
How? It (cobbelstone) ain't got no so-called feet (to stand).
Pick it up; let it fall; do it again until you notice the inclination to fall on a specific side...that represents lying down; which implies the other side to represent standing up.
Issues pop up when ignoring perceivable differences for suggested likeness; hence attempting to chisel away the inspiration all form within flow expresses; while tempting others to ignore.
The Re-s can cancel out.
Can the living (reaction) cancel the process of dying (enacting)? How could a reaction exist outside an enacting system? How to cancel energy? "Hi, is this the tech-support for the whole? I'm the partial and would like to cancel my subscription"
drive to seek
That represents ones choice to want to drive to seek; which ignores the need to adapt to being driven by everything that could be found. "seek and you shall find" represents suggested progressivism luring forwards.
Usually make mine (choice) within complements
COMPLETE (whole) MIND (partial response within whole)...a deliberate contradiction in terms; which the ignorant many compliment each other with.
the words mutate so rapidly...
...because the sound underneath flows steadily.
difficult to keep up...
...because living within the process of dying is about resisting perceivable; not about keeping up with fleeting suggestions.
what kinda diacritic would I have to put on
DIACRITICAL, adjective - "to separate". One doesn't have to put on separation; one needs to express differentiation as the partial within the whole.
"Seeking agreement from others about ones existence, instead of growing self discernment"...I just have to smile at this. A magnificent summation of a major modern malady indeed.
a) adding to this...self discernment can't be suggested to others, it has to be grown within perceivable by oneself.
b) modern malady? More like modus operandi for the struggle of growth (living) within loss (inception towards death). Imagine being within an externally controlled environment where all your needs are being nourished; then you get ripped out of there, your supply chain gets cut; your lungs burn while attempting to deal with the atmosphere; everything is way too bright for your eyes and you have no other defense than screaming from whatever hands you around...that's how nature inspires the growth of self discernment.
Maybe they're all just masochists
Masochism (pleasure from being hurt) is being suggested to distract from the pleasure (living) while being hurt (process of dying). Suggested sadomasochism (pleasure from hurting) is being suggested to tempt the want to control by hurting, hence cultivating the process of dying among the consenting living.
And like always...both -isms imply the contract law of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion).
deliberately choose the most awkwardly difficult and roundabout ways to their destination
a) destination is predefined (death); resistance is fertile (living).
b) the struggle to sustain living happens within the temptation of dying. Ignoring to resist represents the easy way of going with the flow. Lack of self discernment implies shirking of response-ability (choice) to resist. The many are still resisting (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering) but willingly ignore to apply the implications thereof onto everything else; which would represent growth of self discernment; comprehension of perceivable and resistance within temptation.
it's only themselves that they're tying into knots.
Yep, and the natural order (process of dying) will untie those knots (ignorance to sustain living) effortlessly while moving on.
this metaphor breaks down when posed to the kind of fella who might be so-called a shaman
Which would represent suggestion (I see dead people) over perceivable (lack of suggestions by dead people). I get the racket behind shamanism and how to CONJURE, verb transitive [Latin , to swear together, to conspire., but as long as Swayze doesn't show up for pottery, I'm gonna utilize the foundation to comprehend communication (dead or alive...you're inspiring me).
Does it count if they were singing that song? "I just wanna live!
Wow...that just blew my mind for a moment. What if perceivable sound represents flow state of the dead communicating; while simultaneously representing the inspiration for the living to adapt to?
Then I snapped out of it; because flow implies before form, hence before the living can die.
"conflict of reason"...Conflict of decision, more like.
a) the decision to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want) was made before reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested. Reasoning represents ignorance within a suggested hamster-wheel knocking itself out over and over again.
b) reasoning over suggested likeness (information) tempts to ignore implication of perceivable differences (inspiration).
Motionless for a Momentum
Momentum exists within motion; which allows those within momentum to perceive more and less of (re)movement aka the mental response to being moved and the physical response to wander (space) among others (alien).
The differentiation of form within the momentum of flow allows less motion than others to be perceivable within the ever changing moment.
the gateway to real ultimate power
Whole represents "real ultimate power"; the flow-state thereof represents the way and the gate represents forms resisting choice.
Sleight of hand from Ghostbusters: "I am the gatekeeper (consenting choice); you're the keymaster (suggesting choice); together we prepare for the coming of Gozer; the destructor (process of dying)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNnIbFFzpD8
Stealth Mode
Repression (loss) over expression (growth).
The root of number, being nem means both "to give" and "to take". Surprisingly balanced word, that.
Hence ONEs free will of choice. Adapt to inspiration given for sustenance or take the temptation luring you away.
Typical transmutations are mixing and distillation.
Living (partial) within the process of dying (whole) represents distillation; while mixing tempts the impurity of the distilled. What most ignore is that the cauldron (momentum) represents purity (need) and impurity (want) for the transmuted choice at the center.
Like if one worries about all the stuff then one's gonna go wall to wall-nuts.
WORRY, verb - "to tease; to trouble; to harass with importunity"...the process of dying represents that for each one living within; hence the need to adapt while struggling to resist temptation.
The parasitic few mimic the process of dying by teasing; troubling and harassing the many with important suggestions; while tempting them into the process of dying with the suggested.
POLITICS! From the Greek, of course: Poly meaning "many", and Tics meaning "bloodsucking insects"!
a) classic
b) those bloodsucking ticks respond parasitically to the host weakness of ignorance.
c) INSECT aka IN (within) SECTA; SECO (to separate)
The power supply, of course, sees alternating current, and speaks direct current. Not even the kernel truly knows this translation.
The power supply represents flow (velocity) to form (resistance); both meeting within the kernel of momentum; while the transmuted form (life) is directed by the transmuting flow (inception towards death).
The derivations of direct current (alternating; pulsating; variable) represent the magnetic reactions of form to the electric current of flow; shaped by frequency of choice for adaptation...or something like that.
"higher (flow) and lower (form)"...They seem the other way around from where I'm sitting
From your perspective...living (higher growth); dying (lower loss). Adding lack of self discernment (choice at the center of balance) to your perspective...form (low) within the momentum (center) of flow (high).
Both are in coexistence with each other and the foundation underneath that...all represents one in energy.
proper keys that don't need their own key-batteries to function
Now apply "gain of function" through planned obsolesce and subscription based ingredient supply and it functions just as intended by the parasitic few. Promoting the "planned obsolesce" rhetoric upon consumer goods also represents indoctrination for "planned obsolescence" of consumers (entrance transhumanism).
I'm willing to deal with the occasional spot of pain in order to get a better connection with the ground.
That's what "will" represents...want (temptation) as inspiration for need (resistance) aka no pain (resistance) no gain (growth). Frequency (choice) of resisting (living) velocity (process of dying) represents grounding.
Greek prographo -"I set forth as a public notice"...perhaps it would be better to call them logiciel via logic from logos "reckoning, computation".
COMPUTE, verb - "to think, count, reckon; to cast up; to number"...that's the issue...others set forth suggested information; which tempts one to count numbers instead of being one (perceiving); while expressing oneness (perceivable).
In other words...perceivable inspiration represents ones calling for adaptation; calling perceivable by suggested information tempts one to ignore that.
"suggested information"...if it's just been left out, in the open like...
Moving differences (perceivable inspiration) and the temptation to hold onto the moved (suggestible information) are both "left out in the open" for choice to be able to react to enacting balance (need/want).
problem with deep thinking: crush depth.
What if consent to suggested information burden memory; hence one feeling crushed by accumulated? What if only letting go of accumulated repression(information) clears memory cache required for expression to ongoing (inspiration)?
long thinking: belabours the point.
Hence only having a moment (um) to think within and to adapt to...
meaning means meaning
MEAN, adjective [Latin communis, vulgus, minor and minuo.] - "Wanting dignity of mind; low minded; base; destitute of honor; spiritless".
What if meaning is predefined (perceivable inspiration); while wanting it (suggested information) tempts one to ignore how to get it (adaptation to inspiration, while resisting temptation of suggested)?
people have been trying to solve it.
While ignoring to exist temporary (living) within an ongoing solvent (process of dying); hence in need to resist being dissolved.
consent: ha! as if I've signed a form! As if I've a form! As if I've a sign! Ha ha ha ha! (it's a kind of signature)
One represents the form (life) within flow (inception towards death) and choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the SIGN, noun [Latin signum; Gr. deicnumt.] - "indicating the existence of something else" to submit to the form of another.
Why do things exist?
If energy (inherent; internal power); then self sustenance for the things within. That's why.
I'll unthink of nothing!
That represents a suggested outcome; which ignores adaptation to perceivable origin (everything). Adaption to everything (perceivable) grows (comprehension) within onething (perceiving); which clears the mind of suggested nothing.
the actual "structure of a boat" is rarely referred to as such
Could it be that the structure of a formed vessel (living) is rarely referred to (suggested) since it's implied within momentum (perceivable) as the process of dying for those struggling to sustain self within?
the transmutation of broken bits of bowl back into a functional bowl
-ATION (through action) implies the whole functional (process of dying); TRANSMUTE (reaction shaped out of enacting) implies the partial dysfunctional (living) aka DIS (separated) FUNGOR (to perform) -ATION (through action).
One (partial) lacks to comprehend function (whole); hence being able to grow it (need) or ignore it (loss).
gluing together makes me think of the same thing
Which represents you ignoring to be the perceiving partial within the perceivable whole (differentiation) for suggested sameness (aggregation of likeness).
The few suggest "we" to glue each "one" of the consenting many together; which in return tempts the many to ignore apartheid and the need to sustain it, by resisting the suggested temptation to sniff the glue of others.
HEC'TIC, noun - "habitual fever; remitting heat" aka being the temporary response within ongoing emitted heat aka the living habitually agitated through the process of dying.
This stone-abuse is fast bordering on masonry.
What if ignoring being used (process of dying) represents self abuse (living)?
"How to cancel energy?"...Rx
How can informal (rx) cancel anything while being influential; when both flow and form represent the internal power of energy?
1pt Energy...1pt The Opposite of Energy
Energy represents the external whole for the internal partial within aka a self sustaining system of coexisting opposites....ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable).
Mix thoroughly, bake at 0 degrees for 1 eternity.
a) energy (whole) self differentiates into apartheid (partial)...mixing represents the choice to ignore apartheid.
b) suggested dualism (0 vs 1) ignores being able to perceive (one) perceivable (ones); hence being partial within whole.
do like prince buddha did and think oneself out of existence
Out of essence (existence) implies into substance (matter)...thinking implies as matter within existence.
Suggested Buddhism tempts one to ignore that.
There are two ways
If one can perceive a "there" and suggest a "two"; then one represents a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying)...one within the way of oneness.
to master the claw-machine
Resisting the temptation to spend for getting allows you to buy a claw-machine to tempt others to spend; while they give to you...a master masters the slave by suggesting the tool for slavery.
Seek what though? The question is the question.
The question (wanted outcome) represents the temptation to ignore perceivable solution (needed origin). The process of dying represents the solution for the problem of living; hence the problem with resisting dissolution.
choice is just nature post-hoc justifying itself to itself
Flow represents that which just-is (justice); formed choice represents the opportunity to shape it at will...temporarily within ongoing consequences.
As for the self....energy represents sustenance; the differentiated power within represents the self that temporarily can be sustained by adapting to being set into sustenance.
Given a choice between a choice and choice, I'd choose choosin
Hence expressing whole (balance) through partial (choice) for the sustenance of self.
Choice between suggested choices (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore choice within perceivable balance (need/want).
can't seem to figure out how feet work
One gotta comprehend work (energy) to discern where (momentum) formed (figure) feet work.
"One doesn't have to put on separation"...Don't have to do, no; but most of things, owing to the compulsions of their nature, will do do as they do, same as it's ever done.
"things" implies partial (something) within whole (everything); hence already separated. Furthermore; things can't "do"; only redo aka respond to being (partial) done by (whole).
Suggest? Forget "suggest" - you've gone and written them a complete walkthrough here. Will they follow it?
That represents the predicament...following suggested tempts one to ignore resisting perceivable. Only resisting perceivable (inspiration) grows comprehension thereof.
A suggested complete walkthrough tempts the partial to ignore the complete whole; hence not expressing it through self; which leads to walking in response to suggested aims (progressivism).
And there was no internet social-media bulletin board to complain to...
"who did this?"..."who wrote pompeians sux; caesarians rule into the sand?"...and what does this suppose to mean "caesar's salad...too pompous for some"?
Funny thing about death is that it's sometimes less of a destination and more of a... truck-stop.
TRUCK (to exchange) STOP (cessation of motion)...living represents the EX (expressed) CHANGE (difference) within motion (process of dying)....suggested "stop" tempts one to ignore that, so "keep on truckin".
There are various vicissitudes of fate...
FATE, noun [Latin fatum, from for, fari, to speak, whence fatus.] aka suggested information tempting ignorance of perceivable inspiration. Nature doesn't utter words much; nor does it have to articulate (artificial) sound (natural).
It's a large mechanism, to be sure.
What if suggested mechanism (Greek; machine) - "artificial work to regulate moving power" tempts one to ignore being an engine (machine) aka the instrument (living) of force (process of dying)?
There's a big difference between seeing dead people, and just having words with them
What if all that was is expressed within all that is? What if one carries ones kin within; while expressing them outwards? Ever had a moment like "where did that come from; I didn't know I had that in me?"...
"flow"...Gets everywhere.
Only into momentum and for every form within.
I like that liquid.
To like (want) or not like (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to resist its momentum.
subconscious
Only the subjected (perceiving) can be conscious of the objectifying (perceivable).
Also don't they look like a hoot?
Besides these clickbait hustlers with motorized wheels and their flying hamster compilations on the web...I watched enough gerbils flying around whenever the kids go hunting in the barn with sling-shots and pellet-rifles.
got a temper so short it's a 1d diagram
The more ones resistance grows; the more one can resist the "temp"tation of impressing velocity....stay cool; stay alive longer.
out there's somebody busy fucking up
Out there (process of dying); in here (living) aka fucking to sustain self in here while getting fucked out there. It's the suggestions of "somebody" which tempts one to ignore communication between perceivable (process of dying) and perceiving (living).
My other prime mover's a locomotive.
Locomotion as suggested (engine to generate flow for locomotion of form) only directs forwards and has to stop to direct backwards. This tempts one to ignore perceivable aka momentum representing the place (loco) within motion for the resistance within....a resisting form with free will of choice over direction; while within locomotion.
The suggested locomotion is all about "the little engine that could"; while the perceivable locomotion sets reactions into its center. If only the little engine tries hard enough it can reach its destination; meanwhile reaction needs to adapt to sustain self before reaching final destination.
Your perspective or mine?
If all represents one in energy; then the whole objectifies; which allows the partial subjects a different perspective. From ones perspective; everyone else represents inspiration to adapt (need) and temptation to ignore (want).
Suggested "yours" and "mine" represents ignorance (want) of perceivable source (need).
the perspective has to do with the slope of the hill, for that is the angle for the liquids to use
PER (forwards; hence through) + SPEK (to observe)...the former implies flow (process of dying) through form (living); the latter implies observing (perceiving) observable (perceivable).
The hills; slopes and liquids represent form (reused) within flow (use); while the angle implies forms perspective within flow; hence one representing a point (line within momentum) within every perceivable angle.
Where there's a will, there's a what.
If will implies want; then what represents the quest to want answers; while ignoring the need to adapt to ongoing solution.
If who (choice) grows discernment about where (balance); then resisting the temptation of what would be easier.
"Moving differences"...Are they headed in the right direction?
Direction (inception towards death) implies the directed (living); hence the partial (differences) within the whole (sameness). Right implies versus wrong; hence suggested reasoning; while ignoring perceivable implication of being directed.
unlearning
Try "trimming while growing". One can only learn (growth) within knowledge (loss); hence while adapting to perceivable inspiration. The more one does that; the weaker suggested information becomes until it fells off. Trimming information while adapting to inspiration represents a learnable skill.
water, at least, submits to the form of its container
Flow (process of dying) contains form (living)...living resists submitting to the process of dying.
But "energy" is "work"
If energy moves (works); then something is being moved. "is" implies "to be" aka that which is moves towards being; hence to be implying being moved by.
Use only the original Nothing.
a) suggested creationism implies "nothing" as the origin of everything. Meanwhile; everything uses; which allows those within to reuse everything.
b) only original implies that there's more than the original; hence giving the option of "only".
Accept no substitutes.
a) to accept implies as substitute choice within dominating balance.
b) no (nothing) substitutes to nothing? The good ol' attempt of making a positive out of two negatives...
one can contemplate that all structures are built
Flow (process of dying) represents the structure of form (living) aka potentiality represents the structure of potential. Only within whole can the partial build structures.
only a small subset thereof are anointed building
Each partial within a whole represents the anointed (set apart) one.
Understanding represents your choice to "stand under" suggested information by others...suggested information such as the label "cobblestone" for perceivable form within flow.
As form within the momentum of flow; one is surrounded by moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation...that's what a so called cobblestone reacts to. Furthermore; the choices of others can shape the form of a "cobblestone"; hence it reacting to being shaped. This reacting to enacting represents being evaluation within value.
Understanding tempts one to view the suggested label "cobblestone" as value onto which one attaches more and more suggested values. Meanwhile...form represents a reaction to enacting flow; hence an expression of impressing, so an expressed evaluation (reaction) to impressing value (enacting).
One cannot define value by suggestion; only react to predefined value within perceivable...motion. One doesn't move; one represents RE (response to) MOVE (being moved); hence living; while struggling to sustain self within the process of dying...a generating (inception) and removal (death) process for everything within.
tl; dr...maybe if you stand a cobblestone upright and then sit on it while making choices...it understands (stands under) value?
"is; too; doesn't; more" is being suggested (want) by the perceiving onto the perceivable (need). It's this choice of want over need; which tempts one to want more out of everything needed.
WISDOM, noun - "use or exercise of knowledge" aka adaptation of the perceiving to the perceivable; hence the response-ability of choice.
If you REact to a suggested REquest; then why call it an action?
Only within balance (momentum of motion) can there be a choice within opposites to arsy versy; topsy turvy; head over heals; as above so below; upside-down and vice versa.
Down from the ongoing symmetry one tempts others to ignore with temporary symbolism?
a) the aether represents the flow of inspiration for everything within. Everyone receives; yet picking up the perceivable implies choice of adaptation from those perceiving it.
AETHER; ETHER (Latin oether) - "to burn; shine" represents the impression caused by flow (velocity) meeting form (resistance) within momentum.
b) SIG'NAL, adjective - "eminent; remarkable; memorable; distinguished from what is ordinary"...this represents the temptation of suggested information. Seeking agreement from others about ones existence, instead of growing self discernment. This also ignores that the natural order (process of dying) distinguishes everyone (living) within, hence from whole (perceivable) into partial (perceiving).
Because standing under others allows them to define; redefine and contradict suggested meaning at will; hence shaping a simple foundation (process of dying) into a complex headache (living).
Either suggested to them by the few or in response to distinct themselves from the suggestions of the few. Perceivable sound represents an offer for "free" will of choice; suggested words tempt one to not just own them; but to brand perceivable while suggesting ownership over it.
Sleight of hand using Bon Jovi..."It's my life, it's now or never...I ain't gonna live forever...I just want to live while I'm alive" aka the want to claim the temporary while willingly ignoring the ongoing. Ever heard a dead guy suggest "I just want to live..."? Meanwhile; no issue perceiving those alive singing along with ignorance based contradictions about their very existence.
a) the right (want) implies vs the wrong (not want)...a conflict of reason shaped by consenting to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
b) REceiver aka reaction (living); which implies to enacting (process of dying). Before one can receive; one perceives; which implies one being by; within; out of perceivable.
Add the implied "-um" and the "less" becomes a contradiction of the momentum of motion for those within it.
Aka decoding (comprehension) the encoded (perceivable) for expression (growth) or repression (loss). Those who choose to repress themselves are being tempted by suggested encodes (numerology underneath the spoken languages and symbolism) to decode (understanding aka standing under) suggested information.
How to establish numerology? Tempt the perceiving ONE within perceivable ONEness to count others as numbers; while ignoring NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit (unitas; one; oneness)". Next step; branding them by suggested inversion aka "I am a name not a number".
a) balance (need/want) represents the pure; imbalance (want vs not want) represent impure...for the choice in-between.
b) SIM'PLE aka SINE (without) PLICA (folding) tempts one to ignore being within self differentiated; hence representing the unfolded ones (partial) within the folded oneness (whole).
c) implication (if/then) trumps reason (want vs not want) within motion.
Recent sleight of hand...suggesting trump vs someone unreasonable (biden) tempts others to choose trump as the side of reason, while ignoring the implications (imbalance) of consenting to conflict (reasoning).
Perceiving kernel (choice) within perceivable root (balance). Meanwhile suggested CROOT - "an operation that changes the apparent root directory for the current running process" tempts one to ignore the directing current required to sustain momentum (balance) for the kernels (choice) within.
Suggested "no kernel-level" or perceivable kernel (choice) within level (balance)?
As for jail...being "free" will of choice implies at the center of "dom"inating balance aka free-dom. The few suggest confinement to tempt the many to ignore that the mind is being confined within the flow of inspiration.
ABSTRACT' aka ABSTRAHO (to draw from; to separate) - TION (through action)...level (balance aka momentum) represents the separation of higher (flow) and lower (form) and it's the separated reaction (choice) which represents the opportunity to draw from by being within.
It's these formed choices which represent the vessels (container).
Modern urbanization slaves carry flimsy flip key remotes around...so stepping on them only disables the electronics within. A bunch of Lego makes way more efficient caltrops and your hatrack would also scatter them everywhere, hence adding minefield capability to it.
As in melting (process of dying) those (living) within or what about losing flavor (differentiation) during the process (sameness) unless refreshing (adaptation)?
How did Vanilla Ice put it..."If there was a problem (living), yo, I'll (process of dying) solve it"..."Check out (consent to) the hook (suggested information) while D-Shay revolves (transmutation of form back to flow aka revolution) it". Also; D-Shay aka DJ aka DISK (to throw; exterior/surface aka perceivable inspiration) JOCKEY (to cheat; to trick; to deceive in trade aka suggested information).
"Word (suggested information) to your mother (matrix; womb; source; origin aka perceivable inspiration".
PROGRAM'MA, noun - "a letter sealed with the king's seal" aka suggested information sealing ones comprehension away from perceivable inspiration by the choice (king) to consent to suggested.
Cultivated dependency to shape with what others are suggesting instead of shaping as choice within perceivable.
Only if one within oneness chooses to count other ones and suggest the counted ones as "three" or a trinity.
Each one (uni) represents the distributed form within the momentum of the distributing flow (current). Equality (process of dying) distributes diversity (living). The suggested inversion thereof represents diversity for equality.
Try implication...if within current and motion; then recurrent and remotion (removal) aka recurrent (living) removal (dying).
All suggested information points out affixed meaning within moving inspiration, hence contradicting the line with a point.
Jotting down what comes to mind represents memorizing suggested information; then remembering (respond to memorized); while shaping within the confines of suggested among mostly ignored inspiration perceivable.
I read until something inspires; then I adapt on the fly to it; while resisting the temptation to memorize anything. It's my less restricted consciousness which more and more efficiently draws from inspiration whatever necessary for adaptation.
Consenting to suggested information and then withdrawing into memory, while working with it, represents atrophy of conscious adaptation to perceivable. It's the mass accumulation of suggested information which tempts one to pretend that working within your ego server farm represents adaptation of perceiving (reaction) to perceivable (enacting).
Example...imagine you accumulated all the good shit from the web on hard-drives so that you can privately dive into it. Do this for a while and go back on the web..."boy; does the public web sucks". Online offer (perceivable inspiration) tempts offline accumulation (suggested information) and since the world wide web represents suggested information; the few have to mimic the perceivable inspiration with "always online" for the many aka "the internet of things".
Suggested words (want) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound (need), and choosing want (temptation) while ignoring need (resistance) tempts one to want more. Consented words come in easy; while requiring more and more effort to let go of. It's what "catchphrases" are exploiting. Also; HOOK (suggested) LINE (perceivable) SINKER (consenting choice)...fishing for consent.
Your consent to the word (want) over the behavior of motion (need) bolts them; hence shapes idols of meaning out of suggested information; which then tempts you to duct tape them as partial information within your memory; while ignoring the "whole" flow of inspiration (the predefined meaning for those reacting to it).
Suggested information tempts one to puzzle meaning together; while ignoring that the picture (perceiving) on the box (perceivable) already represents the solution (process of dying) for the problem (living).
The few suggest nature as the problem and those within as the solution; which represents the inversion of being the problem (temporary) within the solution (ongoing).
SYM'PHONY, noun [Latin symphonia; Greek with, and voice.] aka WITH (the whole composition) + VOICE (the partial instrument). Yet partial within whole implies separation through momentum (balance); which allows choice at the center of resonance (need) and dissonance (want).
So much of the composition seems to be off; because so many of the instruments willingly operate in dissonance; while ignoring to resonate.
The same momentum supplies each and every different perspective within, yet also the choice to ignore perceivable differences (inspiration) for suggested sameness (information).
The more one ignores differences; the more one ignores the differentiating momentum, hence lacking comprehension about the ongoing motion causing it.
Everything (perceivable) is put in front of one (perceiving)...ignorance represents consent to what others suggest it means. Right vs wrong reasoning implies consent to suggested over perceivable.
They refuse to grow themselves "within" everything; which requires resisting the temptation to be tamed by others.
That represents the suggested inversion of being burden (form) within beast (animal; animation; flow) aka living (burden of resistance) within the process of dying (beast of temptation).
I held the cool hands of plenty who let go off all things until the warmth of another life was enough to embrace death. Then there were also those who cling until last breath to their possessions and obligations. My mother was one of those; her last words were: "what about the laundry?"
An egg implies a shell for the inside from the outside. Everything (energy) was before the egg (balance) can hatch the chicken (choice).
Came into what? What's the foundation for everything to come into and where's the implied outside everything came from? Suggested creationism tempts one into this loop of thinking inside and outside (dualism); which tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation aka being partial within whole, differentiated by the momentum of the ongoing whole.
Partial came later than whole, yet within its center; hence out of the whole. Not side (in) by side (out) dualism; but one within oneness transmutation.
Transmutation (ingredient out of base) is required for an ingredient to unpack from the base. Transmutation cannot be unpacked; since the "one" unpacking implies being the transmuted partial within the transmuting whole.
Self segregation of whole into partial represents transmutation.
SO, adverb (Latin sic, contracted) - "answering to as"...reaction to enacting represents the contract aka the need to adapt to being moved, while answering implies the choice to want to question the needed solution.
Guybrush Threepwood: "I want to ask you about all of perceivable reality"
All of perceivable reality: "expresses indigestion"
Pick it up; let it fall; do it again until you notice the inclination to fall on a specific side...that represents lying down; which implies the other side to represent standing up.
Issues pop up when ignoring perceivable differences for suggested likeness; hence attempting to chisel away the inspiration all form within flow expresses; while tempting others to ignore.
Can the living (reaction) cancel the process of dying (enacting)? How could a reaction exist outside an enacting system? How to cancel energy? "Hi, is this the tech-support for the whole? I'm the partial and would like to cancel my subscription"
That represents ones choice to want to drive to seek; which ignores the need to adapt to being driven by everything that could be found. "seek and you shall find" represents suggested progressivism luring forwards.
COMPLETE (whole) MIND (partial response within whole)...a deliberate contradiction in terms; which the ignorant many compliment each other with.
...because the sound underneath flows steadily.
...because living within the process of dying is about resisting perceivable; not about keeping up with fleeting suggestions.
DIACRITICAL, adjective - "to separate". One doesn't have to put on separation; one needs to express differentiation as the partial within the whole.
a) adding to this...self discernment can't be suggested to others, it has to be grown within perceivable by oneself.
b) modern malady? More like modus operandi for the struggle of growth (living) within loss (inception towards death). Imagine being within an externally controlled environment where all your needs are being nourished; then you get ripped out of there, your supply chain gets cut; your lungs burn while attempting to deal with the atmosphere; everything is way too bright for your eyes and you have no other defense than screaming from whatever hands you around...that's how nature inspires the growth of self discernment.
Masochism (pleasure from being hurt) is being suggested to distract from the pleasure (living) while being hurt (process of dying). Suggested sadomasochism (pleasure from hurting) is being suggested to tempt the want to control by hurting, hence cultivating the process of dying among the consenting living.
And like always...both -isms imply the contract law of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion).
a) destination is predefined (death); resistance is fertile (living).
b) the struggle to sustain living happens within the temptation of dying. Ignoring to resist represents the easy way of going with the flow. Lack of self discernment implies shirking of response-ability (choice) to resist. The many are still resisting (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering) but willingly ignore to apply the implications thereof onto everything else; which would represent growth of self discernment; comprehension of perceivable and resistance within temptation.
Yep, and the natural order (process of dying) will untie those knots (ignorance to sustain living) effortlessly while moving on.
Which would represent suggestion (I see dead people) over perceivable (lack of suggestions by dead people). I get the racket behind shamanism and how to CONJURE, verb transitive [Latin , to swear together, to conspire., but as long as Swayze doesn't show up for pottery, I'm gonna utilize the foundation to comprehend communication (dead or alive...you're inspiring me).
Wow...that just blew my mind for a moment. What if perceivable sound represents flow state of the dead communicating; while simultaneously representing the inspiration for the living to adapt to?
Then I snapped out of it; because flow implies before form, hence before the living can die.
a) the decision to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want) was made before reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested. Reasoning represents ignorance within a suggested hamster-wheel knocking itself out over and over again.
b) reasoning over suggested likeness (information) tempts to ignore implication of perceivable differences (inspiration).
Momentum exists within motion; which allows those within momentum to perceive more and less of (re)movement aka the mental response to being moved and the physical response to wander (space) among others (alien).
The differentiation of form within the momentum of flow allows less motion than others to be perceivable within the ever changing moment.
Whole represents "real ultimate power"; the flow-state thereof represents the way and the gate represents forms resisting choice.
Sleight of hand from Ghostbusters: "I am the gatekeeper (consenting choice); you're the keymaster (suggesting choice); together we prepare for the coming of Gozer; the destructor (process of dying)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNnIbFFzpD8
Repression (loss) over expression (growth).
Hence ONEs free will of choice. Adapt to inspiration given for sustenance or take the temptation luring you away.
Living (partial) within the process of dying (whole) represents distillation; while mixing tempts the impurity of the distilled. What most ignore is that the cauldron (momentum) represents purity (need) and impurity (want) for the transmuted choice at the center.
WORRY, verb - "to tease; to trouble; to harass with importunity"...the process of dying represents that for each one living within; hence the need to adapt while struggling to resist temptation.
The parasitic few mimic the process of dying by teasing; troubling and harassing the many with important suggestions; while tempting them into the process of dying with the suggested.
a) classic
b) those bloodsucking ticks respond parasitically to the host weakness of ignorance.
c) INSECT aka IN (within) SECTA; SECO (to separate)
The power supply represents flow (velocity) to form (resistance); both meeting within the kernel of momentum; while the transmuted form (life) is directed by the transmuting flow (inception towards death).
The derivations of direct current (alternating; pulsating; variable) represent the magnetic reactions of form to the electric current of flow; shaped by frequency of choice for adaptation...or something like that.
From your perspective...living (higher growth); dying (lower loss). Adding lack of self discernment (choice at the center of balance) to your perspective...form (low) within the momentum (center) of flow (high).
Both are in coexistence with each other and the foundation underneath that...all represents one in energy.
Now apply "gain of function" through planned obsolesce and subscription based ingredient supply and it functions just as intended by the parasitic few. Promoting the "planned obsolesce" rhetoric upon consumer goods also represents indoctrination for "planned obsolescence" of consumers (entrance transhumanism).
That's what "will" represents...want (temptation) as inspiration for need (resistance) aka no pain (resistance) no gain (growth). Frequency (choice) of resisting (living) velocity (process of dying) represents grounding.
COMPUTE, verb - "to think, count, reckon; to cast up; to number"...that's the issue...others set forth suggested information; which tempts one to count numbers instead of being one (perceiving); while expressing oneness (perceivable).
In other words...perceivable inspiration represents ones calling for adaptation; calling perceivable by suggested information tempts one to ignore that.
Moving differences (perceivable inspiration) and the temptation to hold onto the moved (suggestible information) are both "left out in the open" for choice to be able to react to enacting balance (need/want).
What if consent to suggested information burden memory; hence one feeling crushed by accumulated? What if only letting go of accumulated repression(information) clears memory cache required for expression to ongoing (inspiration)?
Hence only having a moment (um) to think within and to adapt to...
MEAN, adjective [Latin communis, vulgus, minor and minuo.] - "Wanting dignity of mind; low minded; base; destitute of honor; spiritless".
What if meaning is predefined (perceivable inspiration); while wanting it (suggested information) tempts one to ignore how to get it (adaptation to inspiration, while resisting temptation of suggested)?
While ignoring to exist temporary (living) within an ongoing solvent (process of dying); hence in need to resist being dissolved.
One represents the form (life) within flow (inception towards death) and choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the SIGN, noun [Latin signum; Gr. deicnumt.] - "indicating the existence of something else" to submit to the form of another.
If energy (inherent; internal power); then self sustenance for the things within. That's why.
That represents a suggested outcome; which ignores adaptation to perceivable origin (everything). Adaption to everything (perceivable) grows (comprehension) within onething (perceiving); which clears the mind of suggested nothing.
Could it be that the structure of a formed vessel (living) is rarely referred to (suggested) since it's implied within momentum (perceivable) as the process of dying for those struggling to sustain self within?
-ATION (through action) implies the whole functional (process of dying); TRANSMUTE (reaction shaped out of enacting) implies the partial dysfunctional (living) aka DIS (separated) FUNGOR (to perform) -ATION (through action).
One (partial) lacks to comprehend function (whole); hence being able to grow it (need) or ignore it (loss).
Which represents you ignoring to be the perceiving partial within the perceivable whole (differentiation) for suggested sameness (aggregation of likeness).
The few suggest "we" to glue each "one" of the consenting many together; which in return tempts the many to ignore apartheid and the need to sustain it, by resisting the suggested temptation to sniff the glue of others.
HEC'TIC, noun - "habitual fever; remitting heat" aka being the temporary response within ongoing emitted heat aka the living habitually agitated through the process of dying.
What if ignoring being used (process of dying) represents self abuse (living)?
How can informal (rx) cancel anything while being influential; when both flow and form represent the internal power of energy?
Energy represents the external whole for the internal partial within aka a self sustaining system of coexisting opposites....ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable).
a) energy (whole) self differentiates into apartheid (partial)...mixing represents the choice to ignore apartheid.
b) suggested dualism (0 vs 1) ignores being able to perceive (one) perceivable (ones); hence being partial within whole.
Out of essence (existence) implies into substance (matter)...thinking implies as matter within existence.
Suggested Buddhism tempts one to ignore that.
If one can perceive a "there" and suggest a "two"; then one represents a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying)...one within the way of oneness.
Resisting the temptation to spend for getting allows you to buy a claw-machine to tempt others to spend; while they give to you...a master masters the slave by suggesting the tool for slavery.
The question (wanted outcome) represents the temptation to ignore perceivable solution (needed origin). The process of dying represents the solution for the problem of living; hence the problem with resisting dissolution.
Flow represents that which just-is (justice); formed choice represents the opportunity to shape it at will...temporarily within ongoing consequences.
As for the self....energy represents sustenance; the differentiated power within represents the self that temporarily can be sustained by adapting to being set into sustenance.
Hence expressing whole (balance) through partial (choice) for the sustenance of self.
Choice between suggested choices (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore choice within perceivable balance (need/want).
One gotta comprehend work (energy) to discern where (momentum) formed (figure) feet work.
"things" implies partial (something) within whole (everything); hence already separated. Furthermore; things can't "do"; only redo aka respond to being (partial) done by (whole).
That represents the predicament...following suggested tempts one to ignore resisting perceivable. Only resisting perceivable (inspiration) grows comprehension thereof.
A suggested complete walkthrough tempts the partial to ignore the complete whole; hence not expressing it through self; which leads to walking in response to suggested aims (progressivism).
"who did this?"..."who wrote pompeians sux; caesarians rule into the sand?"...and what does this suppose to mean "caesar's salad...too pompous for some"?
TRUCK (to exchange) STOP (cessation of motion)...living represents the EX (expressed) CHANGE (difference) within motion (process of dying)....suggested "stop" tempts one to ignore that, so "keep on truckin".
FATE, noun [Latin fatum, from for, fari, to speak, whence fatus.] aka suggested information tempting ignorance of perceivable inspiration. Nature doesn't utter words much; nor does it have to articulate (artificial) sound (natural).
What if suggested mechanism (Greek; machine) - "artificial work to regulate moving power" tempts one to ignore being an engine (machine) aka the instrument (living) of force (process of dying)?
What if all that was is expressed within all that is? What if one carries ones kin within; while expressing them outwards? Ever had a moment like "where did that come from; I didn't know I had that in me?"...
Only into momentum and for every form within.
To like (want) or not like (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to resist its momentum.
Only the subjected (perceiving) can be conscious of the objectifying (perceivable).
Besides these clickbait hustlers with motorized wheels and their flying hamster compilations on the web...I watched enough gerbils flying around whenever the kids go hunting in the barn with sling-shots and pellet-rifles.
The more ones resistance grows; the more one can resist the "temp"tation of impressing velocity....stay cool; stay alive longer.
Out there (process of dying); in here (living) aka fucking to sustain self in here while getting fucked out there. It's the suggestions of "somebody" which tempts one to ignore communication between perceivable (process of dying) and perceiving (living).
Locomotion as suggested (engine to generate flow for locomotion of form) only directs forwards and has to stop to direct backwards. This tempts one to ignore perceivable aka momentum representing the place (loco) within motion for the resistance within....a resisting form with free will of choice over direction; while within locomotion.
The suggested locomotion is all about "the little engine that could"; while the perceivable locomotion sets reactions into its center. If only the little engine tries hard enough it can reach its destination; meanwhile reaction needs to adapt to sustain self before reaching final destination.
If all represents one in energy; then the whole objectifies; which allows the partial subjects a different perspective. From ones perspective; everyone else represents inspiration to adapt (need) and temptation to ignore (want).
Suggested "yours" and "mine" represents ignorance (want) of perceivable source (need).
PER (forwards; hence through) + SPEK (to observe)...the former implies flow (process of dying) through form (living); the latter implies observing (perceiving) observable (perceivable).
The hills; slopes and liquids represent form (reused) within flow (use); while the angle implies forms perspective within flow; hence one representing a point (line within momentum) within every perceivable angle.
If will implies want; then what represents the quest to want answers; while ignoring the need to adapt to ongoing solution.
If who (choice) grows discernment about where (balance); then resisting the temptation of what would be easier.
Direction (inception towards death) implies the directed (living); hence the partial (differences) within the whole (sameness). Right implies versus wrong; hence suggested reasoning; while ignoring perceivable implication of being directed.
Try "trimming while growing". One can only learn (growth) within knowledge (loss); hence while adapting to perceivable inspiration. The more one does that; the weaker suggested information becomes until it fells off. Trimming information while adapting to inspiration represents a learnable skill.
Flow (process of dying) contains form (living)...living resists submitting to the process of dying.
If energy moves (works); then something is being moved. "is" implies "to be" aka that which is moves towards being; hence to be implying being moved by.
a) suggested creationism implies "nothing" as the origin of everything. Meanwhile; everything uses; which allows those within to reuse everything.
b) only original implies that there's more than the original; hence giving the option of "only".
a) to accept implies as substitute choice within dominating balance.
b) no (nothing) substitutes to nothing? The good ol' attempt of making a positive out of two negatives...
Flow (process of dying) represents the structure of form (living) aka potentiality represents the structure of potential. Only within whole can the partial build structures.
Each partial within a whole represents the anointed (set apart) one.