SO, adverb (Latin sic, contracted) - "answering to as"...reaction to enacting represents the contract aka the need to adapt to being moved, while answering implies the choice to want to question the needed solution.
Guybrush Threepwood: "I want to ask you about all of perceivable reality"
All of perceivable reality: "expresses indigestion"
How? It (cobbelstone) ain't got no so-called feet (to stand).
Pick it up; let it fall; do it again until you notice the inclination to fall on a specific side...that represents lying down; which implies the other side to represent standing up.
Issues pop up when ignoring perceivable differences for suggested likeness; hence attempting to chisel away the inspiration all form within flow expresses; while tempting others to ignore.
The Re-s can cancel out.
Can the living (reaction) cancel the process of dying (enacting)? How could a reaction exist outside an enacting system? How to cancel energy? "Hi, is this the tech-support for the whole? I'm the partial and would like to cancel my subscription"
drive to seek
That represents ones choice to want to drive to seek; which ignores the need to adapt to being driven by everything that could be found. "seek and you shall find" represents suggested progressivism luring forwards.
Usually make mine (choice) within complements
COMPLETE (whole) MIND (partial response within whole)...a deliberate contradiction in terms; which the ignorant many compliment each other with.
the words mutate so rapidly...
...because the sound underneath flows steadily.
difficult to keep up...
...because living within the process of dying is about resisting perceivable; not about keeping up with fleeting suggestions.
what kinda diacritic would I have to put on
DIACRITICAL, adjective - "to separate". One doesn't have to put on separation; one needs to express differentiation as the partial within the whole.
"Seeking agreement from others about ones existence, instead of growing self discernment"...I just have to smile at this. A magnificent summation of a major modern malady indeed.
a) adding to this...self discernment can't be suggested to others, it has to be grown within perceivable by oneself.
b) modern malady? More like modus operandi for the struggle of growth (living) within loss (inception towards death). Imagine being within an externally controlled environment where all your needs are being nourished; then you get ripped out of there, your supply chain gets cut; your lungs burn while attempting to deal with the atmosphere; everything is way too bright for your eyes and you have no other defense than screaming from whatever hands you around...that's how nature inspires the growth of self discernment.
Maybe they're all just masochists
Masochism (pleasure from being hurt) is being suggested to distract from the pleasure (living) while being hurt (process of dying). Suggested sadomasochism (pleasure from hurting) is being suggested to tempt the want to control by hurting, hence cultivating the process of dying among the consenting living.
And like always...both -isms imply the contract law of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion).
deliberately choose the most awkwardly difficult and roundabout ways to their destination
a) destination is predefined (death); resistance is fertile (living).
b) the struggle to sustain living happens within the temptation of dying. Ignoring to resist represents the easy way of going with the flow. Lack of self discernment implies shirking of response-ability (choice) to resist. The many are still resisting (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering) but willingly ignore to apply the implications thereof onto everything else; which would represent growth of self discernment; comprehension of perceivable and resistance within temptation.
it's only themselves that they're tying into knots.
Yep, and the natural order (process of dying) will untie those knots (ignorance to sustain living) effortlessly while moving on.
this metaphor breaks down when posed to the kind of fella who might be so-called a shaman
Which would represent suggestion (I see dead people) over perceivable (lack of suggestions by dead people). I get the racket behind shamanism and how to CONJURE, verb transitive [Latin , to swear together, to conspire., but as long as Swayze doesn't show up for pottery, I'm gonna utilize the foundation to comprehend communication (dead or alive...you're inspiring me).
Does it count if they were singing that song? "I just wanna live!
Wow...that just blew my mind for a moment. What if perceivable sound represents flow state of the dead communicating; while simultaneously representing the inspiration for the living to adapt to?
Then I snapped out of it; because flow implies before form, hence before the living can die.
"conflict of reason"...Conflict of decision, more like.
a) the decision to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want) was made before reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested. Reasoning represents ignorance within a suggested hamster-wheel knocking itself out over and over again.
b) reasoning over suggested likeness (information) tempts to ignore implication of perceivable differences (inspiration).
Motionless for a Momentum
Momentum exists within motion; which allows those within momentum to perceive more and less of (re)movement aka the mental response to being moved and the physical response to wander (space) among others (alien).
The differentiation of form within the momentum of flow allows less motion than others to be perceivable within the ever changing moment.
the gateway to real ultimate power
Whole represents "real ultimate power"; the flow-state thereof represents the way and the gate represents forms resisting choice.
Sleight of hand from Ghostbusters: "I am the gatekeeper (consenting choice); you're the keymaster (suggesting choice); together we prepare for the coming of Gozer; the destructor (process of dying)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNnIbFFzpD8
Stealth Mode
Repression (loss) over expression (growth).
The root of number, being nem means both "to give" and "to take". Surprisingly balanced word, that.
Hence ONEs free will of choice. Adapt to inspiration given for sustenance or take the temptation luring you away.
Typical transmutations are mixing and distillation.
Living (partial) within the process of dying (whole) represents distillation; while mixing tempts the impurity of the distilled. What most ignore is that the cauldron (momentum) represents purity (need) and impurity (want) for the transmuted choice at the center.
Like if one worries about all the stuff then one's gonna go wall to wall-nuts.
WORRY, verb - "to tease; to trouble; to harass with importunity"...the process of dying represents that for each one living within; hence the need to adapt while struggling to resist temptation.
The parasitic few mimic the process of dying by teasing; troubling and harassing the many with important suggestions; while tempting them into the process of dying with the suggested.
POLITICS! From the Greek, of course: Poly meaning "many", and Tics meaning "bloodsucking insects"!
a) classic
b) those bloodsucking ticks respond parasitically to the host weakness of ignorance.
c) INSECT aka IN (within) SECTA; SECO (to separate)
The power supply, of course, sees alternating current, and speaks direct current. Not even the kernel truly knows this translation.
The power supply represents flow (velocity) to form (resistance); both meeting within the kernel of momentum; while the transmuted form (life) is directed by the transmuting flow (inception towards death).
The derivations of direct current (alternating; pulsating; variable) represent the magnetic reactions of form to the electric current of flow; shaped by frequency of choice for adaptation...or something like that.
"higher (flow) and lower (form)"...They seem the other way around from where I'm sitting
From your perspective...living (higher growth); dying (lower loss). Adding lack of self discernment (choice at the center of balance) to your perspective...form (low) within the momentum (center) of flow (high).
Both are in coexistence with each other and the foundation underneath that...all represents one in energy.
proper keys that don't need their own key-batteries to function
Now apply "gain of function" through planned obsolesce and subscription based ingredient supply and it functions just as intended by the parasitic few. Promoting the "planned obsolesce" rhetoric upon consumer goods also represents indoctrination for "planned obsolescence" of consumers (entrance transhumanism).
I'm willing to deal with the occasional spot of pain in order to get a better connection with the ground.
That's what "will" represents...want (temptation) as inspiration for need (resistance) aka no pain (resistance) no gain (growth). Frequency (choice) of resisting (living) velocity (process of dying) represents grounding.
Greek prographo -"I set forth as a public notice"...perhaps it would be better to call them logiciel via logic from logos "reckoning, computation".
COMPUTE, verb - "to think, count, reckon; to cast up; to number"...that's the issue...others set forth suggested information; which tempts one to count numbers instead of being one (perceiving); while expressing oneness (perceivable).
In other words...perceivable inspiration represents ones calling for adaptation; calling perceivable by suggested information tempts one to ignore that.
"suggested information"...if it's just been left out, in the open like...
Moving differences (perceivable inspiration) and the temptation to hold onto the moved (suggestible information) are both "left out in the open" for choice to be able to react to enacting balance (need/want).
problem with deep thinking: crush depth.
What if consent to suggested information burden memory; hence one feeling crushed by accumulated? What if only letting go of accumulated repression(information) clears memory cache required for expression to ongoing (inspiration)?
long thinking: belabours the point.
Hence only having a moment (um) to think within and to adapt to...
meaning means meaning
MEAN, adjective [Latin communis, vulgus, minor and minuo.] - "Wanting dignity of mind; low minded; base; destitute of honor; spiritless".
What if meaning is predefined (perceivable inspiration); while wanting it (suggested information) tempts one to ignore how to get it (adaptation to inspiration, while resisting temptation of suggested)?
people have been trying to solve it.
While ignoring to exist temporary (living) within an ongoing solvent (process of dying); hence in need to resist being dissolved.
consent: ha! as if I've signed a form! As if I've a form! As if I've a sign! Ha ha ha ha! (it's a kind of signature)
One represents the form (life) within flow (inception towards death) and choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the SIGN, noun [Latin signum; Gr. deicnumt.] - "indicating the existence of something else" to submit to the form of another.
Why do things exist?
If energy (inherent; internal power); then self sustenance for the things within. That's why.
I'll unthink of nothing!
That represents a suggested outcome; which ignores adaptation to perceivable origin (everything). Adaption to everything (perceivable) grows (comprehension) within onething (perceiving); which clears the mind of suggested nothing.
the actual "structure of a boat" is rarely referred to as such
Could it be that the structure of a formed vessel (living) is rarely referred to (suggested) since it's implied within momentum (perceivable) as the process of dying for those struggling to sustain self within?
the transmutation of broken bits of bowl back into a functional bowl
-ATION (through action) implies the whole functional (process of dying); TRANSMUTE (reaction shaped out of enacting) implies the partial dysfunctional (living) aka DIS (separated) FUNGOR (to perform) -ATION (through action).
One (partial) lacks to comprehend function (whole); hence being able to grow it (need) or ignore it (loss).
gluing together makes me think of the same thing
Which represents you ignoring to be the perceiving partial within the perceivable whole (differentiation) for suggested sameness (aggregation of likeness).
The few suggest "we" to glue each "one" of the consenting many together; which in return tempts the many to ignore apartheid and the need to sustain it, by resisting the suggested temptation to sniff the glue of others.
HEC'TIC, noun - "habitual fever; remitting heat" aka being the temporary response within ongoing emitted heat aka the living habitually agitated through the process of dying.
This stone-abuse is fast bordering on masonry.
What if ignoring being used (process of dying) represents self abuse (living)?
"How to cancel energy?"...Rx
How can informal (rx) cancel anything while being influential; when both flow and form represent the internal power of energy?
1pt Energy...1pt The Opposite of Energy
Energy represents the external whole for the internal partial within aka a self sustaining system of coexisting opposites....ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable).
Mix thoroughly, bake at 0 degrees for 1 eternity.
a) energy (whole) self differentiates into apartheid (partial)...mixing represents the choice to ignore apartheid.
b) suggested dualism (0 vs 1) ignores being able to perceive (one) perceivable (ones); hence being partial within whole.
do like prince buddha did and think oneself out of existence
Out of essence (existence) implies into substance (matter)...thinking implies as matter within existence.
Suggested Buddhism tempts one to ignore that.
There are two ways
If one can perceive a "there" and suggest a "two"; then one represents a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying)...one within the way of oneness.
to master the claw-machine
Resisting the temptation to spend for getting allows you to buy a claw-machine to tempt others to spend; while they give to you...a master masters the slave by suggesting the tool for slavery.
Seek what though? The question is the question.
The question (wanted outcome) represents the temptation to ignore perceivable solution (needed origin). The process of dying represents the solution for the problem of living; hence the problem with resisting dissolution.
choice is just nature post-hoc justifying itself to itself
Flow represents that which just-is (justice); formed choice represents the opportunity to shape it at will...temporarily within ongoing consequences.
As for the self....energy represents sustenance; the differentiated power within represents the self that temporarily can be sustained by adapting to being set into sustenance.
Given a choice between a choice and choice, I'd choose choosin
Hence expressing whole (balance) through partial (choice) for the sustenance of self.
Choice between suggested choices (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore choice within perceivable balance (need/want).
can't seem to figure out how feet work
One gotta comprehend work (energy) to discern where (momentum) formed (figure) feet work.
"One doesn't have to put on separation"...Don't have to do, no; but most of things, owing to the compulsions of their nature, will do do as they do, same as it's ever done.
"things" implies partial (something) within whole (everything); hence already separated. Furthermore; things can't "do"; only redo aka respond to being (partial) done by (whole).
Suggest? Forget "suggest" - you've gone and written them a complete walkthrough here. Will they follow it?
That represents the predicament...following suggested tempts one to ignore resisting perceivable. Only resisting perceivable (inspiration) grows comprehension thereof.
A suggested complete walkthrough tempts the partial to ignore the complete whole; hence not expressing it through self; which leads to walking in response to suggested aims (progressivism).
And there was no internet social-media bulletin board to complain to...
"who did this?"..."who wrote pompeians sux; caesarians rule into the sand?"...and what does this suppose to mean "caesar's salad...too pompous for some"?
Funny thing about death is that it's sometimes less of a destination and more of a... truck-stop.
TRUCK (to exchange) STOP (cessation of motion)...living represents the EX (expressed) CHANGE (difference) within motion (process of dying)....suggested "stop" tempts one to ignore that, so "keep on truckin".
There are various vicissitudes of fate...
FATE, noun [Latin fatum, from for, fari, to speak, whence fatus.] aka suggested information tempting ignorance of perceivable inspiration. Nature doesn't utter words much; nor does it have to articulate (artificial) sound (natural).
It's a large mechanism, to be sure.
What if suggested mechanism (Greek; machine) - "artificial work to regulate moving power" tempts one to ignore being an engine (machine) aka the instrument (living) of force (process of dying)?
There's a big difference between seeing dead people, and just having words with them
What if all that was is expressed within all that is? What if one carries ones kin within; while expressing them outwards? Ever had a moment like "where did that come from; I didn't know I had that in me?"...
"flow"...Gets everywhere.
Only into momentum and for every form within.
I like that liquid.
To like (want) or not like (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to resist its momentum.
subconscious
Only the subjected (perceiving) can be conscious of the objectifying (perceivable).
Also don't they look like a hoot?
Besides these clickbait hustlers with motorized wheels and their flying hamster compilations on the web...I watched enough gerbils flying around whenever the kids go hunting in the barn with sling-shots and pellet-rifles.
got a temper so short it's a 1d diagram
The more ones resistance grows; the more one can resist the "temp"tation of impressing velocity....stay cool; stay alive longer.
out there's somebody busy fucking up
Out there (process of dying); in here (living) aka fucking to sustain self in here while getting fucked out there. It's the suggestions of "somebody" which tempts one to ignore communication between perceivable (process of dying) and perceiving (living).
My other prime mover's a locomotive.
Locomotion as suggested (engine to generate flow for locomotion of form) only directs forwards and has to stop to direct backwards. This tempts one to ignore perceivable aka momentum representing the place (loco) within motion for the resistance within....a resisting form with free will of choice over direction; while within locomotion.
The suggested locomotion is all about "the little engine that could"; while the perceivable locomotion sets reactions into its center. If only the little engine tries hard enough it can reach its destination; meanwhile reaction needs to adapt to sustain self before reaching final destination.
Your perspective or mine?
If all represents one in energy; then the whole objectifies; which allows the partial subjects a different perspective. From ones perspective; everyone else represents inspiration to adapt (need) and temptation to ignore (want).
Suggested "yours" and "mine" represents ignorance (want) of perceivable source (need).
the perspective has to do with the slope of the hill, for that is the angle for the liquids to use
PER (forwards; hence through) + SPEK (to observe)...the former implies flow (process of dying) through form (living); the latter implies observing (perceiving) observable (perceivable).
The hills; slopes and liquids represent form (reused) within flow (use); while the angle implies forms perspective within flow; hence one representing a point (line within momentum) within every perceivable angle.
Where there's a will, there's a what.
If will implies want; then what represents the quest to want answers; while ignoring the need to adapt to ongoing solution.
If who (choice) grows discernment about where (balance); then resisting the temptation of what would be easier.
"Moving differences"...Are they headed in the right direction?
Direction (inception towards death) implies the directed (living); hence the partial (differences) within the whole (sameness). Right implies versus wrong; hence suggested reasoning; while ignoring perceivable implication of being directed.
unlearning
Try "trimming while growing". One can only learn (growth) within knowledge (loss); hence while adapting to perceivable inspiration. The more one does that; the weaker suggested information becomes until it fells off. Trimming information while adapting to inspiration represents a learnable skill.
water, at least, submits to the form of its container
Flow (process of dying) contains form (living)...living resists submitting to the process of dying.
But "energy" is "work"
If energy moves (works); then something is being moved. "is" implies "to be" aka that which is moves towards being; hence to be implying being moved by.
Use only the original Nothing.
a) suggested creationism implies "nothing" as the origin of everything. Meanwhile; everything uses; which allows those within to reuse everything.
b) only original implies that there's more than the original; hence giving the option of "only".
Accept no substitutes.
a) to accept implies as substitute choice within dominating balance.
b) no (nothing) substitutes to nothing? The good ol' attempt of making a positive out of two negatives...
one can contemplate that all structures are built
Flow (process of dying) represents the structure of form (living) aka potentiality represents the structure of potential. Only within whole can the partial build structures.
only a small subset thereof are anointed building
Each partial within a whole represents the anointed (set apart) one.
SO, adverb (Latin sic, contracted) - "answering to as"...reaction to enacting represents the contract aka the need to adapt to being moved, while answering implies the choice to want to question the needed solution.
Guybrush Threepwood: "I want to ask you about all of perceivable reality"
All of perceivable reality: "expresses indigestion"
Pick it up; let it fall; do it again until you notice the inclination to fall on a specific side...that represents lying down; which implies the other side to represent standing up.
Issues pop up when ignoring perceivable differences for suggested likeness; hence attempting to chisel away the inspiration all form within flow expresses; while tempting others to ignore.
Can the living (reaction) cancel the process of dying (enacting)? How could a reaction exist outside an enacting system? How to cancel energy? "Hi, is this the tech-support for the whole? I'm the partial and would like to cancel my subscription"
That represents ones choice to want to drive to seek; which ignores the need to adapt to being driven by everything that could be found. "seek and you shall find" represents suggested progressivism luring forwards.
COMPLETE (whole) MIND (partial response within whole)...a deliberate contradiction in terms; which the ignorant many compliment each other with.
...because the sound underneath flows steadily.
...because living within the process of dying is about resisting perceivable; not about keeping up with fleeting suggestions.
DIACRITICAL, adjective - "to separate". One doesn't have to put on separation; one needs to express differentiation as the partial within the whole.
a) adding to this...self discernment can't be suggested to others, it has to be grown within perceivable by oneself.
b) modern malady? More like modus operandi for the struggle of growth (living) within loss (inception towards death). Imagine being within an externally controlled environment where all your needs are being nourished; then you get ripped out of there, your supply chain gets cut; your lungs burn while attempting to deal with the atmosphere; everything is way too bright for your eyes and you have no other defense than screaming from whatever hands you around...that's how nature inspires the growth of self discernment.
Masochism (pleasure from being hurt) is being suggested to distract from the pleasure (living) while being hurt (process of dying). Suggested sadomasochism (pleasure from hurting) is being suggested to tempt the want to control by hurting, hence cultivating the process of dying among the consenting living.
And like always...both -isms imply the contract law of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion).
a) destination is predefined (death); resistance is fertile (living).
b) the struggle to sustain living happens within the temptation of dying. Ignoring to resist represents the easy way of going with the flow. Lack of self discernment implies shirking of response-ability (choice) to resist. The many are still resisting (breathing; drinking; eating; sheltering) but willingly ignore to apply the implications thereof onto everything else; which would represent growth of self discernment; comprehension of perceivable and resistance within temptation.
Yep, and the natural order (process of dying) will untie those knots (ignorance to sustain living) effortlessly while moving on.
Which would represent suggestion (I see dead people) over perceivable (lack of suggestions by dead people). I get the racket behind shamanism and how to CONJURE, verb transitive [Latin , to swear together, to conspire., but as long as Swayze doesn't show up for pottery, I'm gonna utilize the foundation to comprehend communication (dead or alive...you're inspiring me).
Wow...that just blew my mind for a moment. What if perceivable sound represents flow state of the dead communicating; while simultaneously representing the inspiration for the living to adapt to?
Then I snapped out of it; because flow implies before form, hence before the living can die.
a) the decision to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want) was made before reasoning (want vs not want) over suggested. Reasoning represents ignorance within a suggested hamster-wheel knocking itself out over and over again.
b) reasoning over suggested likeness (information) tempts to ignore implication of perceivable differences (inspiration).
Momentum exists within motion; which allows those within momentum to perceive more and less of (re)movement aka the mental response to being moved and the physical response to wander (space) among others (alien).
The differentiation of form within the momentum of flow allows less motion than others to be perceivable within the ever changing moment.
Whole represents "real ultimate power"; the flow-state thereof represents the way and the gate represents forms resisting choice.
Sleight of hand from Ghostbusters: "I am the gatekeeper (consenting choice); you're the keymaster (suggesting choice); together we prepare for the coming of Gozer; the destructor (process of dying)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNnIbFFzpD8
Repression (loss) over expression (growth).
Hence ONEs free will of choice. Adapt to inspiration given for sustenance or take the temptation luring you away.
Living (partial) within the process of dying (whole) represents distillation; while mixing tempts the impurity of the distilled. What most ignore is that the cauldron (momentum) represents purity (need) and impurity (want) for the transmuted choice at the center.
WORRY, verb - "to tease; to trouble; to harass with importunity"...the process of dying represents that for each one living within; hence the need to adapt while struggling to resist temptation.
The parasitic few mimic the process of dying by teasing; troubling and harassing the many with important suggestions; while tempting them into the process of dying with the suggested.
a) classic
b) those bloodsucking ticks respond parasitically to the host weakness of ignorance.
c) INSECT aka IN (within) SECTA; SECO (to separate)
The power supply represents flow (velocity) to form (resistance); both meeting within the kernel of momentum; while the transmuted form (life) is directed by the transmuting flow (inception towards death).
The derivations of direct current (alternating; pulsating; variable) represent the magnetic reactions of form to the electric current of flow; shaped by frequency of choice for adaptation...or something like that.
From your perspective...living (higher growth); dying (lower loss). Adding lack of self discernment (choice at the center of balance) to your perspective...form (low) within the momentum (center) of flow (high).
Both are in coexistence with each other and the foundation underneath that...all represents one in energy.
Now apply "gain of function" through planned obsolesce and subscription based ingredient supply and it functions just as intended by the parasitic few. Promoting the "planned obsolesce" rhetoric upon consumer goods also represents indoctrination for "planned obsolescence" of consumers (entrance transhumanism).
That's what "will" represents...want (temptation) as inspiration for need (resistance) aka no pain (resistance) no gain (growth). Frequency (choice) of resisting (living) velocity (process of dying) represents grounding.
COMPUTE, verb - "to think, count, reckon; to cast up; to number"...that's the issue...others set forth suggested information; which tempts one to count numbers instead of being one (perceiving); while expressing oneness (perceivable).
In other words...perceivable inspiration represents ones calling for adaptation; calling perceivable by suggested information tempts one to ignore that.
Moving differences (perceivable inspiration) and the temptation to hold onto the moved (suggestible information) are both "left out in the open" for choice to be able to react to enacting balance (need/want).
What if consent to suggested information burden memory; hence one feeling crushed by accumulated? What if only letting go of accumulated repression(information) clears memory cache required for expression to ongoing (inspiration)?
Hence only having a moment (um) to think within and to adapt to...
MEAN, adjective [Latin communis, vulgus, minor and minuo.] - "Wanting dignity of mind; low minded; base; destitute of honor; spiritless".
What if meaning is predefined (perceivable inspiration); while wanting it (suggested information) tempts one to ignore how to get it (adaptation to inspiration, while resisting temptation of suggested)?
While ignoring to exist temporary (living) within an ongoing solvent (process of dying); hence in need to resist being dissolved.
One represents the form (life) within flow (inception towards death) and choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents the SIGN, noun [Latin signum; Gr. deicnumt.] - "indicating the existence of something else" to submit to the form of another.
If energy (inherent; internal power); then self sustenance for the things within. That's why.
That represents a suggested outcome; which ignores adaptation to perceivable origin (everything). Adaption to everything (perceivable) grows (comprehension) within onething (perceiving); which clears the mind of suggested nothing.
Could it be that the structure of a formed vessel (living) is rarely referred to (suggested) since it's implied within momentum (perceivable) as the process of dying for those struggling to sustain self within?
-ATION (through action) implies the whole functional (process of dying); TRANSMUTE (reaction shaped out of enacting) implies the partial dysfunctional (living) aka DIS (separated) FUNGOR (to perform) -ATION (through action).
One (partial) lacks to comprehend function (whole); hence being able to grow it (need) or ignore it (loss).
Which represents you ignoring to be the perceiving partial within the perceivable whole (differentiation) for suggested sameness (aggregation of likeness).
The few suggest "we" to glue each "one" of the consenting many together; which in return tempts the many to ignore apartheid and the need to sustain it, by resisting the suggested temptation to sniff the glue of others.
HEC'TIC, noun - "habitual fever; remitting heat" aka being the temporary response within ongoing emitted heat aka the living habitually agitated through the process of dying.
What if ignoring being used (process of dying) represents self abuse (living)?
How can informal (rx) cancel anything while being influential; when both flow and form represent the internal power of energy?
Energy represents the external whole for the internal partial within aka a self sustaining system of coexisting opposites....ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable).
a) energy (whole) self differentiates into apartheid (partial)...mixing represents the choice to ignore apartheid.
b) suggested dualism (0 vs 1) ignores being able to perceive (one) perceivable (ones); hence being partial within whole.
Out of essence (existence) implies into substance (matter)...thinking implies as matter within existence.
Suggested Buddhism tempts one to ignore that.
If one can perceive a "there" and suggest a "two"; then one represents a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying)...one within the way of oneness.
Resisting the temptation to spend for getting allows you to buy a claw-machine to tempt others to spend; while they give to you...a master masters the slave by suggesting the tool for slavery.
The question (wanted outcome) represents the temptation to ignore perceivable solution (needed origin). The process of dying represents the solution for the problem of living; hence the problem with resisting dissolution.
Flow represents that which just-is (justice); formed choice represents the opportunity to shape it at will...temporarily within ongoing consequences.
As for the self....energy represents sustenance; the differentiated power within represents the self that temporarily can be sustained by adapting to being set into sustenance.
Hence expressing whole (balance) through partial (choice) for the sustenance of self.
Choice between suggested choices (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore choice within perceivable balance (need/want).
One gotta comprehend work (energy) to discern where (momentum) formed (figure) feet work.
"things" implies partial (something) within whole (everything); hence already separated. Furthermore; things can't "do"; only redo aka respond to being (partial) done by (whole).
That represents the predicament...following suggested tempts one to ignore resisting perceivable. Only resisting perceivable (inspiration) grows comprehension thereof.
A suggested complete walkthrough tempts the partial to ignore the complete whole; hence not expressing it through self; which leads to walking in response to suggested aims (progressivism).
"who did this?"..."who wrote pompeians sux; caesarians rule into the sand?"...and what does this suppose to mean "caesar's salad...too pompous for some"?
TRUCK (to exchange) STOP (cessation of motion)...living represents the EX (expressed) CHANGE (difference) within motion (process of dying)....suggested "stop" tempts one to ignore that, so "keep on truckin".
FATE, noun [Latin fatum, from for, fari, to speak, whence fatus.] aka suggested information tempting ignorance of perceivable inspiration. Nature doesn't utter words much; nor does it have to articulate (artificial) sound (natural).
What if suggested mechanism (Greek; machine) - "artificial work to regulate moving power" tempts one to ignore being an engine (machine) aka the instrument (living) of force (process of dying)?
What if all that was is expressed within all that is? What if one carries ones kin within; while expressing them outwards? Ever had a moment like "where did that come from; I didn't know I had that in me?"...
Only into momentum and for every form within.
To like (want) or not like (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to resist its momentum.
Only the subjected (perceiving) can be conscious of the objectifying (perceivable).
Besides these clickbait hustlers with motorized wheels and their flying hamster compilations on the web...I watched enough gerbils flying around whenever the kids go hunting in the barn with sling-shots and pellet-rifles.
The more ones resistance grows; the more one can resist the "temp"tation of impressing velocity....stay cool; stay alive longer.
Out there (process of dying); in here (living) aka fucking to sustain self in here while getting fucked out there. It's the suggestions of "somebody" which tempts one to ignore communication between perceivable (process of dying) and perceiving (living).
Locomotion as suggested (engine to generate flow for locomotion of form) only directs forwards and has to stop to direct backwards. This tempts one to ignore perceivable aka momentum representing the place (loco) within motion for the resistance within....a resisting form with free will of choice over direction; while within locomotion.
The suggested locomotion is all about "the little engine that could"; while the perceivable locomotion sets reactions into its center. If only the little engine tries hard enough it can reach its destination; meanwhile reaction needs to adapt to sustain self before reaching final destination.
If all represents one in energy; then the whole objectifies; which allows the partial subjects a different perspective. From ones perspective; everyone else represents inspiration to adapt (need) and temptation to ignore (want).
Suggested "yours" and "mine" represents ignorance (want) of perceivable source (need).
PER (forwards; hence through) + SPEK (to observe)...the former implies flow (process of dying) through form (living); the latter implies observing (perceiving) observable (perceivable).
The hills; slopes and liquids represent form (reused) within flow (use); while the angle implies forms perspective within flow; hence one representing a point (line within momentum) within every perceivable angle.
If will implies want; then what represents the quest to want answers; while ignoring the need to adapt to ongoing solution.
If who (choice) grows discernment about where (balance); then resisting the temptation of what would be easier.
Direction (inception towards death) implies the directed (living); hence the partial (differences) within the whole (sameness). Right implies versus wrong; hence suggested reasoning; while ignoring perceivable implication of being directed.
Try "trimming while growing". One can only learn (growth) within knowledge (loss); hence while adapting to perceivable inspiration. The more one does that; the weaker suggested information becomes until it fells off. Trimming information while adapting to inspiration represents a learnable skill.
Flow (process of dying) contains form (living)...living resists submitting to the process of dying.
If energy moves (works); then something is being moved. "is" implies "to be" aka that which is moves towards being; hence to be implying being moved by.
a) suggested creationism implies "nothing" as the origin of everything. Meanwhile; everything uses; which allows those within to reuse everything.
b) only original implies that there's more than the original; hence giving the option of "only".
a) to accept implies as substitute choice within dominating balance.
b) no (nothing) substitutes to nothing? The good ol' attempt of making a positive out of two negatives...
Flow (process of dying) represents the structure of form (living) aka potentiality represents the structure of potential. Only within whole can the partial build structures.
Each partial within a whole represents the anointed (set apart) one.