HEC'TIC, noun - "habitual fever; remitting heat" aka being the temporary response within ongoing emitted heat aka the living habitually agitated through the process of dying.
This stone-abuse is fast bordering on masonry.
What if ignoring being used (process of dying) represents self abuse (living)?
"How to cancel energy?"...Rx
How can informal (rx) cancel anything while being influential; when both flow and form represent the internal power of energy?
1pt Energy...1pt The Opposite of Energy
Energy represents the external whole for the internal partial within aka a self sustaining system of coexisting opposites....ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable).
Mix thoroughly, bake at 0 degrees for 1 eternity.
a) energy (whole) self differentiates into apartheid (partial)...mixing represents the choice to ignore apartheid.
b) suggested dualism (0 vs 1) ignores being able to perceive (one) perceivable (ones); hence being partial within whole.
do like prince buddha did and think oneself out of existence
Out of essence (existence) implies into substance (matter)...thinking implies as matter within existence.
Suggested Buddhism tempts one to ignore that.
There are two ways
If one can perceive a "there" and suggest a "two"; then one represents a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying)...one within the way of oneness.
to master the claw-machine
Resisting the temptation to spend for getting allows you to buy a claw-machine to tempt others to spend; while they give to you...a master masters the slave by suggesting the tool for slavery.
Seek what though? The question is the question.
The question (wanted outcome) represents the temptation to ignore perceivable solution (needed origin). The process of dying represents the solution for the problem of living; hence the problem with resisting dissolution.
choice is just nature post-hoc justifying itself to itself
Flow represents that which just-is (justice); formed choice represents the opportunity to shape it at will...temporarily within ongoing consequences.
As for the self....energy represents sustenance; the differentiated power within represents the self that temporarily can be sustained by adapting to being set into sustenance.
Given a choice between a choice and choice, I'd choose choosin
Hence expressing whole (balance) through partial (choice) for the sustenance of self.
Choice between suggested choices (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore choice within perceivable balance (need/want).
can't seem to figure out how feet work
One gotta comprehend work (energy) to discern where (momentum) formed (figure) feet work.
"One doesn't have to put on separation"...Don't have to do, no; but most of things, owing to the compulsions of their nature, will do do as they do, same as it's ever done.
"things" implies partial (something) within whole (everything); hence already separated. Furthermore; things can't "do"; only redo aka respond to being (partial) done by (whole).
Suggest? Forget "suggest" - you've gone and written them a complete walkthrough here. Will they follow it?
That represents the predicament...following suggested tempts one to ignore resisting perceivable. Only resisting perceivable (inspiration) grows comprehension thereof.
A suggested complete walkthrough tempts the partial to ignore the complete whole; hence not expressing it through self; which leads to walking in response to suggested aims (progressivism).
And there was no internet social-media bulletin board to complain to...
"who did this?"..."who wrote pompeians sux; caesarians rule into the sand?"...and what does this suppose to mean "caesar's salad...too pompous for some"?
Funny thing about death is that it's sometimes less of a destination and more of a... truck-stop.
TRUCK (to exchange) STOP (cessation of motion)...living represents the EX (expressed) CHANGE (difference) within motion (process of dying)....suggested "stop" tempts one to ignore that, so "keep on truckin".
There are various vicissitudes of fate...
FATE, noun [Latin fatum, from for, fari, to speak, whence fatus.] aka suggested information tempting ignorance of perceivable inspiration. Nature doesn't utter words much; nor does it have to articulate (artificial) sound (natural).
It's a large mechanism, to be sure.
What if suggested mechanism (Greek; machine) - "artificial work to regulate moving power" tempts one to ignore being an engine (machine) aka the instrument (living) of force (process of dying)?
There's a big difference between seeing dead people, and just having words with them
What if all that was is expressed within all that is? What if one carries ones kin within; while expressing them outwards? Ever had a moment like "where did that come from; I didn't know I had that in me?"...
"flow"...Gets everywhere.
Only into momentum and for every form within.
I like that liquid.
To like (want) or not like (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to resist its momentum.
subconscious
Only the subjected (perceiving) can be conscious of the objectifying (perceivable).
Also don't they look like a hoot?
Besides these clickbait hustlers with motorized wheels and their flying hamster compilations on the web...I watched enough gerbils flying around whenever the kids go hunting in the barn with sling-shots and pellet-rifles.
got a temper so short it's a 1d diagram
The more ones resistance grows; the more one can resist the "temp"tation of impressing velocity....stay cool; stay alive longer.
out there's somebody busy fucking up
Out there (process of dying); in here (living) aka fucking to sustain self in here while getting fucked out there. It's the suggestions of "somebody" which tempts one to ignore communication between perceivable (process of dying) and perceiving (living).
My other prime mover's a locomotive.
Locomotion as suggested (engine to generate flow for locomotion of form) only directs forwards and has to stop to direct backwards. This tempts one to ignore perceivable aka momentum representing the place (loco) within motion for the resistance within....a resisting form with free will of choice over direction; while within locomotion.
The suggested locomotion is all about "the little engine that could"; while the perceivable locomotion sets reactions into its center. If only the little engine tries hard enough it can reach its destination; meanwhile reaction needs to adapt to sustain self before reaching final destination.
Your perspective or mine?
If all represents one in energy; then the whole objectifies; which allows the partial subjects a different perspective. From ones perspective; everyone else represents inspiration to adapt (need) and temptation to ignore (want).
Suggested "yours" and "mine" represents ignorance (want) of perceivable source (need).
the perspective has to do with the slope of the hill, for that is the angle for the liquids to use
PER (forwards; hence through) + SPEK (to observe)...the former implies flow (process of dying) through form (living); the latter implies observing (perceiving) observable (perceivable).
The hills; slopes and liquids represent form (reused) within flow (use); while the angle implies forms perspective within flow; hence one representing a point (line within momentum) within every perceivable angle.
Where there's a will, there's a what.
If will implies want; then what represents the quest to want answers; while ignoring the need to adapt to ongoing solution.
If who (choice) grows discernment about where (balance); then resisting the temptation of what would be easier.
"Moving differences"...Are they headed in the right direction?
Direction (inception towards death) implies the directed (living); hence the partial (differences) within the whole (sameness). Right implies versus wrong; hence suggested reasoning; while ignoring perceivable implication of being directed.
unlearning
Try "trimming while growing". One can only learn (growth) within knowledge (loss); hence while adapting to perceivable inspiration. The more one does that; the weaker suggested information becomes until it fells off. Trimming information while adapting to inspiration represents a learnable skill.
water, at least, submits to the form of its container
Flow (process of dying) contains form (living)...living resists submitting to the process of dying.
But "energy" is "work"
If energy moves (works); then something is being moved. "is" implies "to be" aka that which is moves towards being; hence to be implying being moved by.
Use only the original Nothing.
a) suggested creationism implies "nothing" as the origin of everything. Meanwhile; everything uses; which allows those within to reuse everything.
b) only original implies that there's more than the original; hence giving the option of "only".
Accept no substitutes.
a) to accept implies as substitute choice within dominating balance.
b) no (nothing) substitutes to nothing? The good ol' attempt of making a positive out of two negatives...
one can contemplate that all structures are built
Flow (process of dying) represents the structure of form (living) aka potentiality represents the structure of potential. Only within whole can the partial build structures.
only a small subset thereof are anointed building
Each partial within a whole represents the anointed (set apart) one.
HEC'TIC, noun - "habitual fever; remitting heat" aka being the temporary response within ongoing emitted heat aka the living habitually agitated through the process of dying.
What if ignoring being used (process of dying) represents self abuse (living)?
How can informal (rx) cancel anything while being influential; when both flow and form represent the internal power of energy?
Energy represents the external whole for the internal partial within aka a self sustaining system of coexisting opposites....ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable).
a) energy (whole) self differentiates into apartheid (partial)...mixing represents the choice to ignore apartheid.
b) suggested dualism (0 vs 1) ignores being able to perceive (one) perceivable (ones); hence being partial within whole.
Out of essence (existence) implies into substance (matter)...thinking implies as matter within existence.
Suggested Buddhism tempts one to ignore that.
If one can perceive a "there" and suggest a "two"; then one represents a partial (living) within a whole (process of dying)...one within the way of oneness.
Resisting the temptation to spend for getting allows you to buy a claw-machine to tempt others to spend; while they give to you...a master masters the slave by suggesting the tool for slavery.
The question (wanted outcome) represents the temptation to ignore perceivable solution (needed origin). The process of dying represents the solution for the problem of living; hence the problem with resisting dissolution.
Flow represents that which just-is (justice); formed choice represents the opportunity to shape it at will...temporarily within ongoing consequences.
As for the self....energy represents sustenance; the differentiated power within represents the self that temporarily can be sustained by adapting to being set into sustenance.
Hence expressing whole (balance) through partial (choice) for the sustenance of self.
Choice between suggested choices (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore choice within perceivable balance (need/want).
One gotta comprehend work (energy) to discern where (momentum) formed (figure) feet work.
"things" implies partial (something) within whole (everything); hence already separated. Furthermore; things can't "do"; only redo aka respond to being (partial) done by (whole).
That represents the predicament...following suggested tempts one to ignore resisting perceivable. Only resisting perceivable (inspiration) grows comprehension thereof.
A suggested complete walkthrough tempts the partial to ignore the complete whole; hence not expressing it through self; which leads to walking in response to suggested aims (progressivism).
"who did this?"..."who wrote pompeians sux; caesarians rule into the sand?"...and what does this suppose to mean "caesar's salad...too pompous for some"?
TRUCK (to exchange) STOP (cessation of motion)...living represents the EX (expressed) CHANGE (difference) within motion (process of dying)....suggested "stop" tempts one to ignore that, so "keep on truckin".
FATE, noun [Latin fatum, from for, fari, to speak, whence fatus.] aka suggested information tempting ignorance of perceivable inspiration. Nature doesn't utter words much; nor does it have to articulate (artificial) sound (natural).
What if suggested mechanism (Greek; machine) - "artificial work to regulate moving power" tempts one to ignore being an engine (machine) aka the instrument (living) of force (process of dying)?
What if all that was is expressed within all that is? What if one carries ones kin within; while expressing them outwards? Ever had a moment like "where did that come from; I didn't know I had that in me?"...
Only into momentum and for every form within.
To like (want) or not like (not want) tempts one to ignore the need to resist its momentum.
Only the subjected (perceiving) can be conscious of the objectifying (perceivable).
Besides these clickbait hustlers with motorized wheels and their flying hamster compilations on the web...I watched enough gerbils flying around whenever the kids go hunting in the barn with sling-shots and pellet-rifles.
The more ones resistance grows; the more one can resist the "temp"tation of impressing velocity....stay cool; stay alive longer.
Out there (process of dying); in here (living) aka fucking to sustain self in here while getting fucked out there. It's the suggestions of "somebody" which tempts one to ignore communication between perceivable (process of dying) and perceiving (living).
Locomotion as suggested (engine to generate flow for locomotion of form) only directs forwards and has to stop to direct backwards. This tempts one to ignore perceivable aka momentum representing the place (loco) within motion for the resistance within....a resisting form with free will of choice over direction; while within locomotion.
The suggested locomotion is all about "the little engine that could"; while the perceivable locomotion sets reactions into its center. If only the little engine tries hard enough it can reach its destination; meanwhile reaction needs to adapt to sustain self before reaching final destination.
If all represents one in energy; then the whole objectifies; which allows the partial subjects a different perspective. From ones perspective; everyone else represents inspiration to adapt (need) and temptation to ignore (want).
Suggested "yours" and "mine" represents ignorance (want) of perceivable source (need).
PER (forwards; hence through) + SPEK (to observe)...the former implies flow (process of dying) through form (living); the latter implies observing (perceiving) observable (perceivable).
The hills; slopes and liquids represent form (reused) within flow (use); while the angle implies forms perspective within flow; hence one representing a point (line within momentum) within every perceivable angle.
If will implies want; then what represents the quest to want answers; while ignoring the need to adapt to ongoing solution.
If who (choice) grows discernment about where (balance); then resisting the temptation of what would be easier.
Direction (inception towards death) implies the directed (living); hence the partial (differences) within the whole (sameness). Right implies versus wrong; hence suggested reasoning; while ignoring perceivable implication of being directed.
Try "trimming while growing". One can only learn (growth) within knowledge (loss); hence while adapting to perceivable inspiration. The more one does that; the weaker suggested information becomes until it fells off. Trimming information while adapting to inspiration represents a learnable skill.
Flow (process of dying) contains form (living)...living resists submitting to the process of dying.
If energy moves (works); then something is being moved. "is" implies "to be" aka that which is moves towards being; hence to be implying being moved by.
a) suggested creationism implies "nothing" as the origin of everything. Meanwhile; everything uses; which allows those within to reuse everything.
b) only original implies that there's more than the original; hence giving the option of "only".
a) to accept implies as substitute choice within dominating balance.
b) no (nothing) substitutes to nothing? The good ol' attempt of making a positive out of two negatives...
Flow (process of dying) represents the structure of form (living) aka potentiality represents the structure of potential. Only within whole can the partial build structures.
Each partial within a whole represents the anointed (set apart) one.