First, you need to take into account that very few people want to listen. There are several problems like:
They are busy with their own life.
They are sick of doomsday news.
They believe only authority because of the educational system.
So, just review who is ready to listen. You will find out how little people care about the future of the world.
Second, instead of proposing your theory, make them question the current theory they have a.k.a. what is proposed on the news. You gave examples of people, who opened your eyes, whose main topic was "doubt the system". Only then, when people are realizing that the current theory is broken, you can propose your own theories. And if you think about it, you can see that making someone doubt the current paradigm will create a conflict in their mind because they MUST have a working paradigm. That's how the mind works. Two different paradigms that are self-exclusive will force the subject to research enough to prove one and dismiss the other, but the two can never coexist. See how far you've come by only doubting the system. The information you've found is still there, but it appears only to those who look for it.
Third, if you target groups like in forums or similar sites, you will see how many shills and bots will appear out of nowhere. Most common sites are monitored by Israeli propaganda sites. They use a lot of people and AI to learn the algorithms of shilling. But the solution is pretty simple if you can answer this simple question correctly - do you reply more frequently to a hateful or dismissive comment in a similar way OR do you save your energy for those who seem to be asking honestly for more information?
But, in the case that you are really willing to make a grand push for truth, I have a small team that can help with many different things. I do need a video-editor though, but they can help with sources, data, and so much knowledge that we basically figured out the point of life itself. Or you can make your own team. Safety comes in numbers, and apparently also - greater results. It is so valuable to have someone to understand you and support you in these difficult times, even with a single comment "Do not give up the fight for truth".
I feel like the moonlanding hoaxes are a big turning point. It's a good conspiracy to show them because the evidence is undeniable unless you are hopelessly brainwashed. And the implications of such are world view shattering. It means you have to question your knowledge of space and cosmology from the ground up. How much math and science is horseshit? How psychopathic is our government to keep the hoax alive for 50 years? What else have they lied about? Basically if you accept this hoax you will snap your mind out of the matrix and you will find even greater truths.
made his brother live reality "backwards" from some arbitrary point in the future; and he spoke backwards…
Wow.
Yeah lsd was an experiment that got out/was released for better and worse. Brit agent Michael Hollingshead "turned on" Leary. Double meaning with that phrase. Wesson a key man too.
Am glad when someone says theyve taken a trip or two.
Adds insight on life. Talked to a physics guy recently. Without tripping at least once it's all "dry theory".
Prisoners for milennia. With only a narrow gate to the exits. God dreaming. Satan real. Holy jesus.
Perception (moving inspiration) over Suggestion (affixed information).
Rapid Undoctrination Methods
RAP'ID, adjective - "advancing with speed" + METH'OD, noun [Latin methodus; Gr. with, and way.]...that represents living within the process of dying aka resistance (life) being advanced by velocity (inception towards death) aka being with-in (living) the way (process of dying).
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) represents the real teacher (doctrine); while suggested information tempts one to stand under (understanding) those suggesting it.
As resistance (living) within temptation (dying); one needs to frequently (rapid use of choice) adapt to the ongoing flow of inspiration; which allows the expression of growth (living) within loss (process of dying). Consenting to any suggested information represses growth, and tempts one to go with the flow, while ignoring to resist, hence being a follower of suggested orders instead of the resistance within the natural order.
IN (within) DOCTRINE (to teach) - ATION (through action)...one represents the reaction within an enacting system; while being taught by it how to adapt to it.
betrayals by my government
To consent by free will of choice to suggested GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind) through the representative choices of others represents willing delivery into the hands of an enemy one shapes by ignoring response-ability (choice).
One cannot give free will of choice away to others; only ignore being free will of choice at the center of a balance based system; hence in need for adaptation by choice.
Culture is not your friend
Perceivable CULTIVATE, verb - "to advance the growth of" + -ATION (through action) implies being the reacting growth (living) within the enacting loss (process of dying) which advances every life within from inception towards death.
Suggested culturism tempts the many to advance the growth of weakness within others (humanitarianism); while ignoring to grow their own temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (process of dying). In other words...the parasitic few tempt the ignorant many to cultivate death among the living, and the many are willingly consenting to the suggestions of the few by either wanting or not wanting them.
the evil of the art
Artificial (in opposition to natural) represents suggestion (information) tempting the ignorance of perception (inspiration). Those who ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested); are causing want versus not want conflicts (reasoning) among each other. Consenting to want or not want anything suggested, gives the ones suggesting it the power to rebrand want vs not want into for example...good vs evil.
abstract expressionist
a) ABSTRACT', verb [Latin abstraho] - "to draw from, or to separate"...the perceiving ones represent the separated within all perceivable; which in return allows each one to draw from all for "expression"
b) the parasitic few suggest "impression" and "expression" under the umbrella of artificial as to tempt the many to ignore the naturally perceivable (impressing); which when adapted to, allows growth of resistance (expression).
Alchemy -- the fact it's practiced....to-day
Perceiving out of perceivable; choice out of balance; partial out of whole; reaction out of enacting; form (life) out of flow (inception towards death); living out of the process of dying etc. implies ingredient transmuted out of base. The status quo of existing within energy implies alchemy.
In short...TRANSMU'TE, verb [Latin transmuto; trans and muto, to change.] That's where one exists...within constant change.
The parasitic few suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to tempt the many to ignore transmutation (implies out of everything). The inversion of perceivable through suggestion.
suggestions about questioning the status quo
Does the perceivable status quo make suggestions? Has perceivable nature ever suggested you any information or are your senses perceiving moving differences aka inspiration for adaptation?
Does nature suggest words; or does nature inspire through perceivable sound?
Neo in the Matrix
NEO (new)...there's nothing new within perceivable (whole) for those perceiving (partial); cause everything is already perceivable.
The momentum of motion (balance) represents the MATRIX (womb for matter); while those within represent MORPHEUS (Greek morphē; "form, shape, figure). Those who ignore perceivable everything (form within the balance of flow aka being morpheus within matrix) are tempted to consent to suggested nothingness (new; neo).
As for agent smith...A'GENT, noun - "an actor; sustaining action" represents the suggested inversion of being reaction (living) within generating direction (process of dying); hence struggling to sustain self by adaptation.
SMITH, verb - "to forge" + FORGE, verb - "to falsify; to counterfeit; to make in the likeness of something else". The rhetoric of BLACK-SMITH aka smithy of black represents making ignorance (darkness) in the likeness of comprehension (light) by shaping perceivable (inspiration) through suggested (information) as a mason of free will of choice.
Contrastive facts (ie illustrating hypocrisy) used to be the best approach. Lately I'd argue that accelerationism is more effective. Essentially advocate for the most extreme, ridiculous point of view that's morally consistent with their flawed reasoning. For example, obviously white people should not be allowed to own property just as is the case in a South Africa. This will wake people up. You will need to be able to follow it up with an explanation that enables understanding such as "I'm not serious but you need to realize this is consistent with wokeness"
Poetry of the Vorlons. Another form to fill in for the inspectorate of does fuck all but wastes your time making you complete another form for the department of nonsense and after being passed around and filling in all the forms, they're stacking up by now, finally to be recited with some very bad poetry, until your ears are bleeding from the nonsensical script. How did these people even get a job. They have no imagination, completely programmed by an assumption of importance that somehow and mysteriously they're magically providing a service. What did they even do, nothing, at all, except recite some very bad poetry. Welcome to another government department of it doesn't know its ass from its face.
Careful about waking others. Compassion first.
Agree with this
Yep. In other words. Dont tell grandpa the ballgame is rigged. If he doesn't know by now...
But it's ok to tell little Jimmy that King Charles killed good Queen Diana, to marry a witch.
Whatever the method, the most important redpill is this: The media is there to manipulate you, and honest journalism has been dead for decades.
Accept this, and everything else follows.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6x14p3dUvgy3/
First, you need to take into account that very few people want to listen. There are several problems like:
So, just review who is ready to listen. You will find out how little people care about the future of the world.
Second, instead of proposing your theory, make them question the current theory they have a.k.a. what is proposed on the news. You gave examples of people, who opened your eyes, whose main topic was "doubt the system". Only then, when people are realizing that the current theory is broken, you can propose your own theories. And if you think about it, you can see that making someone doubt the current paradigm will create a conflict in their mind because they MUST have a working paradigm. That's how the mind works. Two different paradigms that are self-exclusive will force the subject to research enough to prove one and dismiss the other, but the two can never coexist. See how far you've come by only doubting the system. The information you've found is still there, but it appears only to those who look for it.
Third, if you target groups like in forums or similar sites, you will see how many shills and bots will appear out of nowhere. Most common sites are monitored by Israeli propaganda sites. They use a lot of people and AI to learn the algorithms of shilling. But the solution is pretty simple if you can answer this simple question correctly - do you reply more frequently to a hateful or dismissive comment in a similar way OR do you save your energy for those who seem to be asking honestly for more information?
But, in the case that you are really willing to make a grand push for truth, I have a small team that can help with many different things. I do need a video-editor though, but they can help with sources, data, and so much knowledge that we basically figured out the point of life itself. Or you can make your own team. Safety comes in numbers, and apparently also - greater results. It is so valuable to have someone to understand you and support you in these difficult times, even with a single comment "Do not give up the fight for truth".
I feel like the moonlanding hoaxes are a big turning point. It's a good conspiracy to show them because the evidence is undeniable unless you are hopelessly brainwashed. And the implications of such are world view shattering. It means you have to question your knowledge of space and cosmology from the ground up. How much math and science is horseshit? How psychopathic is our government to keep the hoax alive for 50 years? What else have they lied about? Basically if you accept this hoax you will snap your mind out of the matrix and you will find even greater truths.
To wake someone up, they have to want to wake up- and sadly most people are more than happy to stay asleep.
Mckenna admitted to being an agent.
Modern art is a rockefeller, Harvard (the FOGG museum school) invention.
Skulls at yale too.
And london.
Yeah i dealt with irvin too. Concur.
Wow.
Yeah lsd was an experiment that got out/was released for better and worse. Brit agent Michael Hollingshead "turned on" Leary. Double meaning with that phrase. Wesson a key man too.
Am glad when someone says theyve taken a trip or two.
Adds insight on life. Talked to a physics guy recently. Without tripping at least once it's all "dry theory".
Prisoners for milennia. With only a narrow gate to the exits. God dreaming. Satan real. Holy jesus.
Spoke with a physics guy yesterday.
Said he had not taken psychedelics.
So for him it is all mind game and words without true understanding.
If. Psychedelics might be part of sophomore year?? Or junior year.
Perception (moving inspiration) over Suggestion (affixed information).
RAP'ID, adjective - "advancing with speed" + METH'OD, noun [Latin methodus; Gr. with, and way.]...that represents living within the process of dying aka resistance (life) being advanced by velocity (inception towards death) aka being with-in (living) the way (process of dying).
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) represents the real teacher (doctrine); while suggested information tempts one to stand under (understanding) those suggesting it.
As resistance (living) within temptation (dying); one needs to frequently (rapid use of choice) adapt to the ongoing flow of inspiration; which allows the expression of growth (living) within loss (process of dying). Consenting to any suggested information represses growth, and tempts one to go with the flow, while ignoring to resist, hence being a follower of suggested orders instead of the resistance within the natural order.
IN (within) DOCTRINE (to teach) - ATION (through action)...one represents the reaction within an enacting system; while being taught by it how to adapt to it.
To consent by free will of choice to suggested GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind) through the representative choices of others represents willing delivery into the hands of an enemy one shapes by ignoring response-ability (choice).
One cannot give free will of choice away to others; only ignore being free will of choice at the center of a balance based system; hence in need for adaptation by choice.
Perceivable CULTIVATE, verb - "to advance the growth of" + -ATION (through action) implies being the reacting growth (living) within the enacting loss (process of dying) which advances every life within from inception towards death.
Suggested culturism tempts the many to advance the growth of weakness within others (humanitarianism); while ignoring to grow their own temporary resistance (living) within ongoing temptation (process of dying). In other words...the parasitic few tempt the ignorant many to cultivate death among the living, and the many are willingly consenting to the suggestions of the few by either wanting or not wanting them.
Artificial (in opposition to natural) represents suggestion (information) tempting the ignorance of perception (inspiration). Those who ignore need (perceivable) for want (suggested); are causing want versus not want conflicts (reasoning) among each other. Consenting to want or not want anything suggested, gives the ones suggesting it the power to rebrand want vs not want into for example...good vs evil.
a) ABSTRACT', verb [Latin abstraho] - "to draw from, or to separate"...the perceiving ones represent the separated within all perceivable; which in return allows each one to draw from all for "expression"
b) the parasitic few suggest "impression" and "expression" under the umbrella of artificial as to tempt the many to ignore the naturally perceivable (impressing); which when adapted to, allows growth of resistance (expression).
Perceiving out of perceivable; choice out of balance; partial out of whole; reaction out of enacting; form (life) out of flow (inception towards death); living out of the process of dying etc. implies ingredient transmuted out of base. The status quo of existing within energy implies alchemy.
In short...TRANSMU'TE, verb [Latin transmuto; trans and muto, to change.] That's where one exists...within constant change.
The parasitic few suggest creationism (implies out of nothing) to tempt the many to ignore transmutation (implies out of everything). The inversion of perceivable through suggestion.
Does the perceivable status quo make suggestions? Has perceivable nature ever suggested you any information or are your senses perceiving moving differences aka inspiration for adaptation?
Does nature suggest words; or does nature inspire through perceivable sound?
NEO (new)...there's nothing new within perceivable (whole) for those perceiving (partial); cause everything is already perceivable.
The momentum of motion (balance) represents the MATRIX (womb for matter); while those within represent MORPHEUS (Greek morphē; "form, shape, figure). Those who ignore perceivable everything (form within the balance of flow aka being morpheus within matrix) are tempted to consent to suggested nothingness (new; neo).
As for agent smith...A'GENT, noun - "an actor; sustaining action" represents the suggested inversion of being reaction (living) within generating direction (process of dying); hence struggling to sustain self by adaptation.
SMITH, verb - "to forge" + FORGE, verb - "to falsify; to counterfeit; to make in the likeness of something else". The rhetoric of BLACK-SMITH aka smithy of black represents making ignorance (darkness) in the likeness of comprehension (light) by shaping perceivable (inspiration) through suggested (information) as a mason of free will of choice.
Contrastive facts (ie illustrating hypocrisy) used to be the best approach. Lately I'd argue that accelerationism is more effective. Essentially advocate for the most extreme, ridiculous point of view that's morally consistent with their flawed reasoning. For example, obviously white people should not be allowed to own property just as is the case in a South Africa. This will wake people up. You will need to be able to follow it up with an explanation that enables understanding such as "I'm not serious but you need to realize this is consistent with wokeness"
Poetry of the Vorlons. Another form to fill in for the inspectorate of does fuck all but wastes your time making you complete another form for the department of nonsense and after being passed around and filling in all the forms, they're stacking up by now, finally to be recited with some very bad poetry, until your ears are bleeding from the nonsensical script. How did these people even get a job. They have no imagination, completely programmed by an assumption of importance that somehow and mysteriously they're magically providing a service. What did they even do, nothing, at all, except recite some very bad poetry. Welcome to another government department of it doesn't know its ass from its face.
I'm sorry were we talking about art?