What UNESCO fails to acknowledge is the fact that the CIA coined the term, conspiracy theorist/ theories.
This action also demonstrates their fear of losing control of the narrative because the conspiracy theorists are actually accurate and correct in what we have been vocal about for a long time.
UNESCO doing this is a win for the conspiracy theory community.
Consent by the many to the suggestions of the few allows the few to suggest and control narratives.
coined the term
To suggest value (coin) for a TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary.] tempts "free" will of choice to ignore the "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom...the boundary of dominace (process of dying) for the free (living) within.
Consenting to a suggested limit; limits the one consenting; while allowing the one suggesting to define; redefine and contradict the limits at will.
a win
Those who think they can win are being tempted to play a game they can only lose. The highest value (perceivable) represents evaluation (perceiving)...which one already represents. No game; just response-ability (choice) to origin (balance).
What UNESCO fails to acknowledge is the fact that the CIA coined the term, conspiracy theorist/ theories.
This action also demonstrates their fear of losing control of the narrative because the conspiracy theorists are actually accurate and correct in what we have been vocal about for a long time.
UNESCO doing this is a win for the conspiracy theory community.
Yes, if it really were that dumb, they wouldnt try to defend themselves ánd attacking us in the same moment.
“No matter how hard you try, you can’t stop us now.”
throws Rage Against the Machine’s CD in the fire
Consent by the many to the suggestions of the few allows the few to suggest and control narratives.
To suggest value (coin) for a TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary.] tempts "free" will of choice to ignore the "dom" inance of balance aka free-dom...the boundary of dominace (process of dying) for the free (living) within.
Consenting to a suggested limit; limits the one consenting; while allowing the one suggesting to define; redefine and contradict the limits at will.
Those who think they can win are being tempted to play a game they can only lose. The highest value (perceivable) represents evaluation (perceiving)...which one already represents. No game; just response-ability (choice) to origin (balance).
It's getting people ready for China Model online censorship.
I read a bunch of threats to the demonocracy! LOL!
The UN is making up bullshit again.
When I see bullshit terms like don't want to reduce their carbon footprint, the UN are full of shit.
Biggest oxymoron on this Planet.