Do "flat earthers" believe that 1 + 1 = 2 ?
None of them are willing to go on the record with this simple question.
It seems like they are fucked either way:
If they say "yes", then they believe in the basis of all science; and therefor, "the brainwashing".
If they say "no", then ... well...lol... i mean.. if they don't believe 1 + 1 = 2 ... then... lol , riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight....
3
thank you for answer - finally.
are you a flat earther?
Well, I kinda like pancakes. Does that count?
hmmm probably not.
ok... so... basically that means still not one flat earthers has managed to answer my 1 + 1 = 2 question.
interesting.
Flat earth debates are not able to be discussed on flat screen devices because you need 3d TV to explain it.
Flat earth is true. In Islam it is explained that on the day of judgement, the Earth will be rendered flat
https://hadeethenc.com/en/browse/hadith/8345
So both answers are true. When the Earth is suspended within the container of time, the curvature of time itself causes the Earth to appear round (which is an illusion that is caused by the force of gravity itself). But in the eternal dimension where the force of time is suspended, once you suspend time all matter "flattens out" and so once the Earth enters back into the eternal plane, it flattens out. So the answer to your question? The Earth is both round and flat at the same time (depending upon its physical location within the eternal multiverse). I hope that answers your question. And now back to my pancakes YUMMY
i.e., not flat - until day of judgement.
Yes you can say it like that. BUT. Earth exists in three different dimensions at the same time (just like all matter). There are three Earths. The one that existed at the moment of the big bang (as a point), the one that exists as you see it today (as a curve), and the one that exists in the dimension of the day of judgement (as a plane). So since all three versions of Earth exist at the same time ... Earth is round and flat at the same time.
And when stars and planets die, they die in the same order that they were created, and each one flattens out into its own flat plane. And then they are stacked, like pancakes, in the order of creation. THE END
not me. islam said it like that.
Flat Earthers have flatheads. It's a birth defect where they're far too stupid to believe in anything else like round heads. Oh know. The planet is a square, and it has a cube around it. It's another simulation of Minecraft. There's a hollow Earth in the Middle. Water just freezes on the sides.
Keep watching your fake images of Earth and teslas floating in space. Just don't get confused when you see more convincing sci-fi movies, those are fake ad well.
Orbiter 9 is a good movie.
Sameness aka equality aka " = " can't be perceived; because everything perceivable has to be different (diverse) as to be discernible from one another.
The 1+1=2 suggestion implies choice (suggestion of solution) towards choice (consent to solution) contract law; which tempts one to ignore being the problem (living) within the solution (process of dying); hence the struggle of the living to resist the temptation of dying.
In short...to count differences (1+1) doesn't make them same (=2)...it tempts the ones counting to ignore differences aka perceivable inspiration (reality) for suggested information (fiction).
OK, so... huh?
Sorry for my confusion - my question is pretty simply... not sure why you feel the need to dance around the bush with long-winded responses that include comments about "reality vs fiction".
correct me if i am wrong... but through all your noise, are you saying "one plus plus does not equal two" ?
Why can't you commit to a simple answer? It's a simple question.
a) show me any "two" things that are equal...each "one" of them exists within a different position; hence being perceivable.
b) "does not" aka "doing nothing" also represents a suggestion (nothing) in ignorance of perceivable (everything). Show me "something" that does "nothing"? Try explaining to me in your own words the origin of "nothing"? Where did you got it from and why does it feel so easy to use no; not; none; nothing; nothingness?
wow you are really bending over backwards to avoid such a simple question. still no answer - just a challenge to produce two identical things. ...lol and then and definitional analysis of "does not".
hahahah you sound like Bill Clinton... "well... it depends on your definition of 'is'".
incredible.
1 + 1 = 2, by the way...
it's observational.
in one hand you have a pineapple.
in another hand you have a coconut.
someone asks: "how many hands do you have"
a flat earthers response is:
well.... first, prove to me that i am real.
#facepalm
bitch, you have TWO (2) hands. 1 hand holds a pineapple + 1 hand holds a coconut = 2 hands.
it's observational science.
folks, they will argue with you about - literally - anything.
QUEST, noun (Latin quaero, quaestus) - "the act of seeking". What if I resist the temptation to seek (want) what others suggest for response-ability to perceivable origin (need)?
Those within everything cannot define what "is" ; only adapt (perceiving) to what was (perceivable).
DEFINITE (having certain limits) - ATION (through action)...If alive (reaction) then limited in-between inception and death (enacting) aka temporary living within the ongoing process of dying.
In short...to be implies out of; within and in response to.
OBSERVO (to keep; hold) -ATION (through action)...that represents the choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable). What one perceives represents ongoing inspiration; what other ones suggest represents temporary information.
In short...the many are tricked by the suggestions of the few to ignore the perceivable "moving" system (sound) for affixed brands (words) slapped onto the moving system.
Well; one coconut and one pineapple plus the one holding them and the one suggesting to count them. Still each one different from one another...not the same.
Ask yourself if the coconut and the pineapple are perceivable without the suggested brands "coconut" and "pineapple"? Next ask yourself if counting perceivable is "needed" or if others suggest you to "want" to count?
What if all represents one in energy? What if being ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable) represents self differentiation of whole (process of dying) into partial (living)?
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one"
How many EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" could there be?
What came first...living or the process of dying to live within?
How could temporary existence within ongoing change prove itself to others?
"I am whatever you say I am; because if I wasn't; then why would I say "I am"? In other words...does one need to suggest to others that "I am" or does being already imply the who; where; what and why of existence?
Who has "two" hands? One has one left hand and one right hand. Mimicking each other (ambidextrous) requires ongoing effort to keep the differences alike...yet once again never the same.
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] + KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" aka perceivable inspiration. The parasitic few suggest scientism to tempt the many who ignore perceivable to understand (stand under) suggested information.
oh nice,,, i love the analysis paralysis bot - not dumb as fuck at all :)
Let's re-cap:
I ASKED A QUESTION:
1 + 1 = 2
True or False
FLAT EARTHER RESPONDS:
SUMMARY OF EVENTS:
...ok so... i asked "how many hands do you have", and the flat earther responds:
define: have, and prove to me that i exist
they are just trolls.
#enoughsaid
Your suggestion tempts other to ignore perceivable. Life isn't outcome oriented (a quest); but the resisting response to origin.
Those represent a rebranding of want vs not want reasoning over suggested information; which tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
Nature doesn't communicate true or false information; it moves everything as to communicate perceivable inspiration for adaptation.
Does "breathing" represents true or false...or does one need to adapt to being moved by breathing anyway? Does "breathing" require a label for anyone to be able to breathe?
a) where did I consent to the suggested label "flat earther"?
b) choice represents the response to perceivable balance; while being tempted to ignore this for suggested choices.
Temporary (living) cannot posses (have) within ongoing (process of dying)...only utilize while being alive.
suck a dick xir
The earth is a fuckin petri dish. Shaped like a pretzel, in a raindrop, orbiting a flashlight. It's a squirrel.
There aren’t really any flat earthers. That’s a heavily advertised (i.e. funded) psyop, which is why you think they are real and offensively stupid.
There are flat earth researchers (those that study the subject, related topics, and the psyop), however. Many (if not most) of us try very hard to keep belief and knowledge separate and distinct. If you believe that the world is round, flat, or any other shape (just like if you believe that 1 + 1 = 2) then you have faith NOT fact.
Personally, i’m happy to have a conversation about the subject with most anyone who is earnestly interested in it (including those who vehemently and irrationally hate it).
If you agree that what you meant was actually : “Do people who consider that the world may be or is not spherical the way we are taught also know that 1 + 1 = 2?” Then the answer is obviously yes.
Mathematics is in no way the basis of all science. This is a common modern misconception, but historically and scientifically absurd and unsupported.
Science is a branch of philosophy (called natural philosophy), and the language employed for it (be it english, french, mathematics, or ancient greek etc.) is largely irrelevant.
Technically, they shouldn’t believe such things! Only a fool believes what they should know. Fundamentally this is why it is so easy to “flip” (i.e. convince/manipulate) many people into believing the world is flat. It’s because they never knew what the shape of the world was to begin with - they merely believed and repeated it. When you know and you know how you know - you are a lot harder to f*** about!
I encourage you to join us on flatearthresearch to further explore the subject and exchange perspectives assuming you are earnestly interested!
...said the flat earther.
Why do you think i am a flat earther?
I am a flat earth researcher, but people who study the subject have many different views on the shape of the earth - including spherical!