This is another good question which there are already threads about over on flatearthresearch. Check em out!
In my view, gravity is caused by the interplay between an object and a displaced media which weighs less than it. It is not an attractive force of any kind, nor is “spacetime” real or in any way “warped”.
There is a lot more to discuss on this topic if you are interested!
The earth is flat (with terrain obviously). But it is not a floating disk in space. Space as we are told, does not exist. The north pole is the center of our earth, and Antarctica is the encircling land mass, some use the term ice wall. What is beyond Antarctica is speculation because it is impossible to explore there independently due to the Antarctic treaty, and logistic impossibilities. Personally I've seen evidence that indicates Biblical cosmology is correct (along with many other ancient cosmologies that are similar). Go deep enough into Antarctica and you will hit the "Firmament" or whatever structure is at its base. The Firmament is a solid dome over our earth of unknown thickness or material. There seems to be a layer of some sort of liquid before you hit the solid firmament. You can see rockets that hit the firmament go through a liquid layer, and skip off the solid part.
What is under the earth? No one can say because the deepest hole ever dug is less than 8 miles. But biblical cosmology suggests that Sheol is inside earth, and bellow that is more water, pillars and foundation of the earth. When God created the earth he separated the waters above, from the waters below with the firmament, so we are surrounded by water.
There are no satellites in space, no living human has ever escaped our dome earth, except Jesus when he left. The closest thing to satellites are high altitude balloons with solar powered tech hanging from them, these are easy to research.
3 biggest lies that are meant to hide the existence of our creator and turn people atheist:
-Gravity and theory of relativety
-Big bang theory
-Evolutionary theory
Flat earth causes these three theories to collapse which is why they are trying to hide it and brainwash everyone from birth.
I actually grew up a believing in God, so you are right many people do have faith while also believing those 3 things. However I came to realize the earth was flat a few years ago, after scoffing at the idea any time I heard it. I was eventually convinced of flat earth for scientific reasons, not biblical reasons. I actually grew up never realizing the Bible describes a flat domed earth. I finally gave flat earth a chance when various Flat earthers made videos that convinced me the moon landing and International space station is fake. I was impressed with their reasoning and proof, so I got curious how they can believe the earth is flat. There are hundreds of reasons why I think the earth is flat but to keep it simple I will give you my top 3:
First I am a Mariner and have often observed objects or landmarks far further than I should with earth curve geometry. There are atmospheric affects that can bend light or create mirage, but the sightings I am referring to are far below the curve of the earth and appear as though you are seeing it on a flat plane. These sightings are best done over water so terrain heights can't interfere. All you need to know is your height of eye, the objects height, and the distance and you can calculate how much curve should block your sight.
2nd, Airplanes set their gyroscopes before they take off so the pilot knows exactly which way down is no matter what maneuvers take place. Gyroscopes are unaffected by gravity, acceleration, deceleration, inertia or any other motion, they maintain their orientation. If you flew from USA to Australia your Gyroscope would tell you the plane is upside down by the time you got around a spherical earth. In addition earth is spinning over 1000 mph at the equator, so that motion would throw the gyro off too. Let's not forget we are orbiting the sun, and the sun is orbiting the milky way (allegedly). Gyroscopes can only work on a flat stationary plane that doesn't move. Also a plane flying 600mph would have to dive 2400 feet every 6 min in order to not fly off into space, according to earth curve geometry. That doesn't make any sense.
Finally Antarctica. If I were able to fly from Buenos Aires Argentina to Perth Australia, the shortest route would be straight over the middle of Antarctica. I picked those cities cause the are prominent and line up well. They are 7840 miles apart, totally doable flight. No one has ever flown across or used Antarctica to circumnavigate because it's impossible. Look up flights in the southern hemisphere, they make zero sense on a sphere, but perfect sense on flat earth. People circumnavigate east to west all the time (they are really doing a circle around the north pole), but no one can do a north south circumnavigation. The Buenos Aires to Perth flight would convince me I'm wrong if we can do it in one flight over Antarctica. I'm not picky though any city from south America to Australia that takes us over Antarctica would do. But it's impossible cause Antarctica is not a pole.
In your learned view, the view in this picture is caused by the “curve of the earth” getting in the way of the bottom of the windmills.
In my view, refraction through the standard density gradient (tending to cause light to curve convexly towards the water/ground) is responsible for the effect.
You may be interested in discussing / exploring differing views as well as exchanging your own over on flatearthresearch!
Good question, I'm glad you asked. Below i linked you a Playlist of videos that address that exact topic. Please check it out as the visual aid makes it far more comprehensible. But to state it in my own words, if I were to watch a vessel sail off into the horizon until it vanishes, due to the limits of our vision it will vanish as if it's melting into the horizon. However with the semi recent invention of cameras with high zoom capability while recording, these objects can be brought back into full view after apparently vanishing over the horizon.
Earth curve playlist:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyHwsN1Rg4IrRn4efSuyOl4AkEmcvrCMo
Here is a good example the media tried to explain away with an atmospheric phenomina known as refraction. Temperature differences over land or water can actually bend light allowing you to see things you shouldn't. However the image it produces should be scattered, warped, and disproportionate; maybe even inverted like some mirages. And refraction had a very limited effect. This is a case of downtown Chicago being viewed from 60 miles away across lake Michigan. The tallest building in Chicago is 1451 ft plus a little more over the lake. The observer, depending on their height of eye which is obviously close to the lake, should have had Chicago obscured by hundreds of feet of earth curve, even the tallest building.
https://youtu.be/SADAiC6DNFg
Verify my claims by simply googling an earth curve calculator online, though I can do these calculations on my own.
Please let me know if you want me to go into more detail for the math behind any of my claims, and appreciate your inquisitiveness.
If you want a answer: it is because most of what people think is done by satellites, is ground based, like the GPS, satellite TV and undersea fiber cables. Besides that, they use high altitude drones, and weather balloons, to do the functions of satellites.
Or you can look up at the Sky and see the satellites. They're really rather obvious. You can increasingly see them in the night sky. They are not Stars or Planets. Try it.
Since Sarlink. They're having a much bigger negative affect. Much harder not seeing the Satellites.
Satellites, wandering stars, stars don't wander. Unless it's a shooting star, but that's a meteorite. The universe moves as we rotate, sure, and over time positions different to our observations, 5 thousand years ago was different than today. But aren't stars, fixed, the North star will always be North, etc.
Satellites however are quite different, and you can see them move. They aren't planets or stars. How pray tell, did you come up with, they dont exist?
I didn't admit shit. You fucking dumbass. In fact I said where is its location I have no idea. Not looking it up online either. Go to an observatory with a bigger telescope.
You are a peak retard. literally you are all fucking dumb. Every damn flathead earther. You try putting words in my mouth. I didn't say shit you did. All dumb people do. Say shit. It's their genetic disposition saying shit. Because they're dumb. Being dumb comes from having a flattened head. Everybody else has round heads. Not flat earthers. They're born dumber. You can't make them smart either. Their heads are flat. Sometimes they develop flathead later in life, they were smarter suddenly they're so much dumber. It must be hard on them, real hard.
Flathead syndrome. In adults, it's generally the result of cranium damage. They got knocked on their head. Babies it's a defect, where they have huge development difficulties sometimes causing death, similar with Zika. But it all stems from the very sad fact they've got a flathead.
If you've been a victim of flathead, please call the Earth is Round hotline immediately.
So drones are moving in the night sky above us? But the Satellites aren't. Hahaha. Where do you come up with this, and how. Look at that sky you can see them move. No stars don't do this, like that. Unless they're shooting stars, whoosh gone, because that's a meteorite. Satellites aren't that quick, but there's movement in that sky.
I explained the universe moves as we rotate. Observations as if you took a picture from when you were born, and now today, would look slightly different, and over thousands of years, there's a bigger difference. But the stars like the North Star will still point you North upon locating it. Orion is still under the pyramids. Despite other constellations around it drifting.
I am not hot on an explanation, but my rudimentary knowledge is easily proving you wrong. Real simple what's that shit moving above our heads, you can easily observe them and they're not drones. The reason I am not hot on this topic. I am in a stinking city full of light pollution. But I can see the freaking satellites. Sometimes I can see quite a few more stars, planets, and things. No where near to being out in the open night sky, seeing the cosmos. It's becoming a thing of the past today. Europe has largely become a light polluting shithole. Rurally still get a glimpse, when it's clear, but it ain't somewhere where there's much better observation.
If you look up at the night sky, and see a small light moving across the sky, it is either a wandering star, or a drone. Any proof that it is a satellite, does not exist.
Small light, moving quickly often with a tail is a shooting star, or meteorite.
Proof satellites don't exist. You have been bonked on the fucking head. You fell out of the stupid tree and hit every branch on the way down. Until you see whatever you want, it's probably the stars spinning.
Seriously so when they launch all that shit, they're doing this almost daily, it's because it doesn't exist? What about when they start shooting it down. They built these special rockets to target satellites. It's because they don't exist, and the rockets are firecrackers? What about when they hack the satellites. They're smashing broadcast towers into the planet? How have we got the GPS? Global positioning satellite. It ain't a satellite\s, it's a flock of geese? Underwater cables and radio signals. Why have I got a satellite dish? It's because it's picking up a cellphone tower. No, I have a satellite dish. Not just a cellphone.
As I said you contradict yourself. They're space geese, or wandering stars. What are their names, just the space geese, the ancients didn't name them, because they migrated every night. What? There's entire archives of information with a better explanation than me on a forum. Read it. No proof. Thick as a plank. How? Talking to you, you contradict yourself, it's ironic.
There are many views on this. In my view the answer is balloons (or a more esoteric method), and orbit (as we know it) began as and remains complete fiction.
If you are interested in further exchanging and exploring alternative views on this, please join us on flatearthresearch! There is already a thread or two about this question, though you are more than welcome to create a new one if you wish.
So flatness causes increased gravity? How does this Question work inside your head?
This is another good question which there are already threads about over on flatearthresearch. Check em out!
In my view, gravity is caused by the interplay between an object and a displaced media which weighs less than it. It is not an attractive force of any kind, nor is “spacetime” real or in any way “warped”.
There is a lot more to discuss on this topic if you are interested!
I dont see that community, have a link?
Gravity is clearly caused by country gravy. The more gravy, the more gravity. You're welcome.
The earth is flat (with terrain obviously). But it is not a floating disk in space. Space as we are told, does not exist. The north pole is the center of our earth, and Antarctica is the encircling land mass, some use the term ice wall. What is beyond Antarctica is speculation because it is impossible to explore there independently due to the Antarctic treaty, and logistic impossibilities. Personally I've seen evidence that indicates Biblical cosmology is correct (along with many other ancient cosmologies that are similar). Go deep enough into Antarctica and you will hit the "Firmament" or whatever structure is at its base. The Firmament is a solid dome over our earth of unknown thickness or material. There seems to be a layer of some sort of liquid before you hit the solid firmament. You can see rockets that hit the firmament go through a liquid layer, and skip off the solid part.
What is under the earth? No one can say because the deepest hole ever dug is less than 8 miles. But biblical cosmology suggests that Sheol is inside earth, and bellow that is more water, pillars and foundation of the earth. When God created the earth he separated the waters above, from the waters below with the firmament, so we are surrounded by water.
There are no satellites in space, no living human has ever escaped our dome earth, except Jesus when he left. The closest thing to satellites are high altitude balloons with solar powered tech hanging from them, these are easy to research.
3 biggest lies that are meant to hide the existence of our creator and turn people atheist: -Gravity and theory of relativety -Big bang theory -Evolutionary theory Flat earth causes these three theories to collapse which is why they are trying to hide it and brainwash everyone from birth.
I actually grew up a believing in God, so you are right many people do have faith while also believing those 3 things. However I came to realize the earth was flat a few years ago, after scoffing at the idea any time I heard it. I was eventually convinced of flat earth for scientific reasons, not biblical reasons. I actually grew up never realizing the Bible describes a flat domed earth. I finally gave flat earth a chance when various Flat earthers made videos that convinced me the moon landing and International space station is fake. I was impressed with their reasoning and proof, so I got curious how they can believe the earth is flat. There are hundreds of reasons why I think the earth is flat but to keep it simple I will give you my top 3:
First I am a Mariner and have often observed objects or landmarks far further than I should with earth curve geometry. There are atmospheric affects that can bend light or create mirage, but the sightings I am referring to are far below the curve of the earth and appear as though you are seeing it on a flat plane. These sightings are best done over water so terrain heights can't interfere. All you need to know is your height of eye, the objects height, and the distance and you can calculate how much curve should block your sight.
2nd, Airplanes set their gyroscopes before they take off so the pilot knows exactly which way down is no matter what maneuvers take place. Gyroscopes are unaffected by gravity, acceleration, deceleration, inertia or any other motion, they maintain their orientation. If you flew from USA to Australia your Gyroscope would tell you the plane is upside down by the time you got around a spherical earth. In addition earth is spinning over 1000 mph at the equator, so that motion would throw the gyro off too. Let's not forget we are orbiting the sun, and the sun is orbiting the milky way (allegedly). Gyroscopes can only work on a flat stationary plane that doesn't move. Also a plane flying 600mph would have to dive 2400 feet every 6 min in order to not fly off into space, according to earth curve geometry. That doesn't make any sense.
Finally Antarctica. If I were able to fly from Buenos Aires Argentina to Perth Australia, the shortest route would be straight over the middle of Antarctica. I picked those cities cause the are prominent and line up well. They are 7840 miles apart, totally doable flight. No one has ever flown across or used Antarctica to circumnavigate because it's impossible. Look up flights in the southern hemisphere, they make zero sense on a sphere, but perfect sense on flat earth. People circumnavigate east to west all the time (they are really doing a circle around the north pole), but no one can do a north south circumnavigation. The Buenos Aires to Perth flight would convince me I'm wrong if we can do it in one flight over Antarctica. I'm not picky though any city from south America to Australia that takes us over Antarctica would do. But it's impossible cause Antarctica is not a pole.
You don’t refute reality / a sound observation!
You merely understand it differently.
In your learned view, the view in this picture is caused by the “curve of the earth” getting in the way of the bottom of the windmills.
In my view, refraction through the standard density gradient (tending to cause light to curve convexly towards the water/ground) is responsible for the effect.
You may be interested in discussing / exploring differing views as well as exchanging your own over on flatearthresearch!
Good question, I'm glad you asked. Below i linked you a Playlist of videos that address that exact topic. Please check it out as the visual aid makes it far more comprehensible. But to state it in my own words, if I were to watch a vessel sail off into the horizon until it vanishes, due to the limits of our vision it will vanish as if it's melting into the horizon. However with the semi recent invention of cameras with high zoom capability while recording, these objects can be brought back into full view after apparently vanishing over the horizon. Earth curve playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyHwsN1Rg4IrRn4efSuyOl4AkEmcvrCMo
Here is a good example the media tried to explain away with an atmospheric phenomina known as refraction. Temperature differences over land or water can actually bend light allowing you to see things you shouldn't. However the image it produces should be scattered, warped, and disproportionate; maybe even inverted like some mirages. And refraction had a very limited effect. This is a case of downtown Chicago being viewed from 60 miles away across lake Michigan. The tallest building in Chicago is 1451 ft plus a little more over the lake. The observer, depending on their height of eye which is obviously close to the lake, should have had Chicago obscured by hundreds of feet of earth curve, even the tallest building. https://youtu.be/SADAiC6DNFg
Verify my claims by simply googling an earth curve calculator online, though I can do these calculations on my own.
Please let me know if you want me to go into more detail for the math behind any of my claims, and appreciate your inquisitiveness.
If you want a answer: it is because most of what people think is done by satellites, is ground based, like the GPS, satellite TV and undersea fiber cables. Besides that, they use high altitude drones, and weather balloons, to do the functions of satellites.
Or you can look up at the Sky and see the satellites. They're really rather obvious. You can increasingly see them in the night sky. They are not Stars or Planets. Try it.
Since Sarlink. They're having a much bigger negative affect. Much harder not seeing the Satellites.
Sure, typically they where known as wandering stars, back in time.
Satellites, wandering stars, stars don't wander. Unless it's a shooting star, but that's a meteorite. The universe moves as we rotate, sure, and over time positions different to our observations, 5 thousand years ago was different than today. But aren't stars, fixed, the North star will always be North, etc.
Satellites however are quite different, and you can see them move. They aren't planets or stars. How pray tell, did you come up with, they dont exist?
So take a picture of your telescope viewing the Hubble, for instance. Ill wait.
No. But you can look at satellites, pin pointing hubble you'd have to be in an observatory knowing its exact location.
Either you're trying to be clever. But it ain't if you don't believe satellites are real.
Here is a supposed ancient satellite. https://www.gaia.com/article/black-knight-satellite-mystery-decoded
Here is the Wiki attempting to debunk it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Knight_satellite_conspiracy_theory
As far as real satellites go look at that press.
So you are admitting you cant see the most famous satellite ever?
Okay. Lets do the ISS then?
Hell. You take your telescope and find me a Verizon or Att satellite even.
You can see the ISS.
https://www.space.com/6870-spot-satellites.html
https://earthsky.org/space/how-to-see-satellites-your-night-sky/
Third brightest object in the night sky.
I didn't admit shit. You fucking dumbass. In fact I said where is its location I have no idea. Not looking it up online either. Go to an observatory with a bigger telescope.
You are a peak retard. literally you are all fucking dumb. Every damn flathead earther. You try putting words in my mouth. I didn't say shit you did. All dumb people do. Say shit. It's their genetic disposition saying shit. Because they're dumb. Being dumb comes from having a flattened head. Everybody else has round heads. Not flat earthers. They're born dumber. You can't make them smart either. Their heads are flat. Sometimes they develop flathead later in life, they were smarter suddenly they're so much dumber. It must be hard on them, real hard.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiocephaly
Flathead syndrome. In adults, it's generally the result of cranium damage. They got knocked on their head. Babies it's a defect, where they have huge development difficulties sometimes causing death, similar with Zika. But it all stems from the very sad fact they've got a flathead.
If you've been a victim of flathead, please call the Earth is Round hotline immediately.
Stars wandering is not a new concept, they been observed to wander as far back as 2000 years ago.
Another explanation is that what you might see moving at the night sky, is drones.
So drones are moving in the night sky above us? But the Satellites aren't. Hahaha. Where do you come up with this, and how. Look at that sky you can see them move. No stars don't do this, like that. Unless they're shooting stars, whoosh gone, because that's a meteorite. Satellites aren't that quick, but there's movement in that sky.
I explained the universe moves as we rotate. Observations as if you took a picture from when you were born, and now today, would look slightly different, and over thousands of years, there's a bigger difference. But the stars like the North Star will still point you North upon locating it. Orion is still under the pyramids. Despite other constellations around it drifting.
I am not hot on an explanation, but my rudimentary knowledge is easily proving you wrong. Real simple what's that shit moving above our heads, you can easily observe them and they're not drones. The reason I am not hot on this topic. I am in a stinking city full of light pollution. But I can see the freaking satellites. Sometimes I can see quite a few more stars, planets, and things. No where near to being out in the open night sky, seeing the cosmos. It's becoming a thing of the past today. Europe has largely become a light polluting shithole. Rurally still get a glimpse, when it's clear, but it ain't somewhere where there's much better observation.
If you look up at the night sky, and see a small light moving across the sky, it is either a wandering star, or a drone. Any proof that it is a satellite, does not exist.
Small light, moving quickly often with a tail is a shooting star, or meteorite.
Proof satellites don't exist. You have been bonked on the fucking head. You fell out of the stupid tree and hit every branch on the way down. Until you see whatever you want, it's probably the stars spinning.
Seriously so when they launch all that shit, they're doing this almost daily, it's because it doesn't exist? What about when they start shooting it down. They built these special rockets to target satellites. It's because they don't exist, and the rockets are firecrackers? What about when they hack the satellites. They're smashing broadcast towers into the planet? How have we got the GPS? Global positioning satellite. It ain't a satellite\s, it's a flock of geese? Underwater cables and radio signals. Why have I got a satellite dish? It's because it's picking up a cellphone tower. No, I have a satellite dish. Not just a cellphone.
As I said you contradict yourself. They're space geese, or wandering stars. What are their names, just the space geese, the ancients didn't name them, because they migrated every night. What? There's entire archives of information with a better explanation than me on a forum. Read it. No proof. Thick as a plank. How? Talking to you, you contradict yourself, it's ironic.
cus NASA says so obviously
There are many views on this. In my view the answer is balloons (or a more esoteric method), and orbit (as we know it) began as and remains complete fiction.
If you are interested in further exchanging and exploring alternative views on this, please join us on flatearthresearch! There is already a thread or two about this question, though you are more than welcome to create a new one if you wish.
https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=30&h0=10&unit=imperial
Does the official formula match what you see?
Ever seen a cityscape or landscspe tilting backwards?