Hmm, but the legal authority resides entirely in the president, therefore, all the rest of your verbiage is based on a false premise. While it may be perfectly logical, it's a house built on sand.
No it doesn't. The Supreme Court, can declare executive orders unconstitutional. Congress can prevent war. File impeachment.
D'oh. Stop down voting me. It proves your obvious intelligence. I haven't been wrong. You're making erratic claims.
You state the president is. No. There is a process. I have provided examples. You won't accept, question, or even acknowledge. But something is wrong with your claims.
The president is primarily responsible for the army. Defending the nation. That's kinda of how it was set up under Washington. But of course his office is supposed to uphold the citizen's vote, policy which got them elected. But there is a ton of litigation prior. A process of passing executive orders into law. The president isn't an Emperor. He doesn't decree anything and it magically appears. He signs an order. It can be challenged.
We were talking about Secrets in any event. It had drifted into, god forbid. But it is another process, I tried to explain, one they also took an oath to uphold.
You are way out in left field an very off topic. Yes, there are checks and balances, but no, none of those have ever been put to the test like you say with regard to the classification powers of the president.
They have. Simple UFOs what happened there. It went to the Senate first before being released, and then they came out with, they're UFOs, more proof is needed. Umm gee chuck, well darn it. Drops a few files, and they've been redacted, or member when we got paid, it was great, because we saw something, something it is, and umm we just can't prove or disprove them, but they just need some more pictures and some more taxes. Or every enthusiast will claim they're being invaded by phenomenon. So we'll just open up another agency to really search more for them so they can release what's needed for the increased taxes. And we can call it, skinwalker ranch. It's a wolf but it could be a shape-shifter, a few more aliens are needed. What about JFK. Redacted. So if it was the Nukes. Not happening.
Classification, is an oath. Or it's a bunch of files often on what hamper was eaten at the office picnic. They had lunch on the lawn. It is top secret. Or poor Boris.
I get it, there is difference between law on the books and law on the ground.
But you're still wrong in this instance on the technical legal matter.
Moreover:
In the WSJ, David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. Casey argue persuasively that the Presidential Records Act give Trump the right to access his own papers, thereby nullifying the crap bullshit the FBI got their warrant on.
Hmm, but the legal authority resides entirely in the president, therefore, all the rest of your verbiage is based on a false premise. While it may be perfectly logical, it's a house built on sand.
No it doesn't. The Supreme Court, can declare executive orders unconstitutional. Congress can prevent war. File impeachment.
D'oh. Stop down voting me. It proves your obvious intelligence. I haven't been wrong. You're making erratic claims.
You state the president is. No. There is a process. I have provided examples. You won't accept, question, or even acknowledge. But something is wrong with your claims.
The president is primarily responsible for the army. Defending the nation. That's kinda of how it was set up under Washington. But of course his office is supposed to uphold the citizen's vote, policy which got them elected. But there is a ton of litigation prior. A process of passing executive orders into law. The president isn't an Emperor. He doesn't decree anything and it magically appears. He signs an order. It can be challenged.
We were talking about Secrets in any event. It had drifted into, god forbid. But it is another process, I tried to explain, one they also took an oath to uphold.
You are way out in left field an very off topic. Yes, there are checks and balances, but no, none of those have ever been put to the test like you say with regard to the classification powers of the president.
They have. Simple UFOs what happened there. It went to the Senate first before being released, and then they came out with, they're UFOs, more proof is needed. Umm gee chuck, well darn it. Drops a few files, and they've been redacted, or member when we got paid, it was great, because we saw something, something it is, and umm we just can't prove or disprove them, but they just need some more pictures and some more taxes. Or every enthusiast will claim they're being invaded by phenomenon. So we'll just open up another agency to really search more for them so they can release what's needed for the increased taxes. And we can call it, skinwalker ranch. It's a wolf but it could be a shape-shifter, a few more aliens are needed. What about JFK. Redacted. So if it was the Nukes. Not happening.
Classification, is an oath. Or it's a bunch of files often on what hamper was eaten at the office picnic. They had lunch on the lawn. It is top secret. Or poor Boris.
I get it, there is difference between law on the books and law on the ground.
But you're still wrong in this instance on the technical legal matter.
Moreover:
In the WSJ, David B. Rivkin Jr. and Lee A. Casey argue persuasively that the Presidential Records Act give Trump the right to access his own papers, thereby nullifying the crap bullshit the FBI got their warrant on.
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/the-trump-warrant-had-no-legal-basis-mar-a-lago-affidavit-presidential-records-act-archivist-custody-classified-fbi-garland-11661170684