I was gonna downvote this because I've seen it before and seemed like bs, but after that rebuttal, yeah I woudn't put it past the medical industry to hide it.
Let's say he was injured by a vaxx. Ok then how did he know about the other 200K people and what happened to them? Short answer is he wouldn't. And how did it take 9 years for him to say anything? It is still very suspect.
The only thing I could think was back then Mrna shots were not the holy grail, that which you may not speak evil about - No one knew about them. If he did suffer as he said he did from the medication he took, he needed a lot of surgery and attention from doctors, and those doctors would likely have been provided by the Pharma Co. who ran the botched trial, doctors who knew what was going on so they could treat him. And they may have talked to him about other participants of the trial in a general way since the situation was so extreme and unique. Told him how lucky he was etc.
As to why he didn't speak out till recently... ignorant? selfish? Given a large settlement from the Pharma co agreeing not to speak about it... maybe gag order had a time limit... or maybe he's risking being suit now...
I don't know. He really needs to do more than a couple of 1 minute tiktok videos.
Clinical trials are publicly registered and assigned a registration number.
The Mrna platform had deep ties to the intelligence community and DOD from the very beginning - Malone even said from the beginning he was working along side CIA heads and spooks when researching Mrna. Just saying, that these are not usual medical interventions with a usual backstory.
I'm just taking him at face value, and playing devils advocate somewhat. Also I'm a conspiracy head, and over time the "they could never have kept it a secret" argument just seems weaker and weaker to the point where it seems naive. Many very large conspiracies have been kept secret to great degree, despite the involvement of many people in them. Compartmentalization, need-to-know, hierarchy, NDAs etc.
I will say that usually very few of the people involved seem to know the whole story, which is still the part where I'm suspicious of this guy, since he seems to be saying a Doctor involved told him all this.
Well that sounds like a load of horseshit. 200,000 people all dying in a trial? I don't think they had that kind of juice to cover that up at the time. And where was this guy for 9 years not talking about it?
...yet. Consenting to suggested represents self destruction within a perceivable system. Others have nothing to offer; they can only shape everything already offered into a suggestion (fiction) which tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality) if consented to.
I hear that and would agree, I can't go into detail about bots(they're prob watching hahaha) but this one doesnt meet some criteria I've noticed. At the same time I could be fooled idk, nothing suprises me anymore.
Meaning for living is predefined by the process of dying; hence to be (alive) implies out of; within and in response to (dying). His consent to the suggested temptation by others; represents his choice to ignore sustaining self and the consequences thereof represent a corrupted life; which he allegedly is already experiencing.
He destroyed his own life by consenting to others who tempted him with the suggestion to do so. Dying represents the constant temptation for the living to ignore resisting...if one ignores that; then why wouldn't others be tempted to exploit ignorance of perceivable with suggestions?
If perception represents a trial/test; then choosing to ignore it for suggestion represents failing it.
TESTA (Latin testis; witness) MENT (Latin mens; mind; Greek memory)...oneself represents the witness to ones memory unless consenting to uphold the suggested information by others within memory; because then those others can define; redefine and contradict the meaning of the suggested at their will within ones consenting mind. That represents the test the many failing over and over again.
People accused him of lying and he made this reply video:
https://twitter.com/Censored4sure/status/1559573354809626629
I was gonna downvote this because I've seen it before and seemed like bs, but after that rebuttal, yeah I woudn't put it past the medical industry to hide it.
They've done far worse, and have no shame at all. Spiral out dude.
claims without evidence can be dismissed without consideration.
Let's say he was injured by a vaxx. Ok then how did he know about the other 200K people and what happened to them? Short answer is he wouldn't. And how did it take 9 years for him to say anything? It is still very suspect.
The only thing I could think was back then Mrna shots were not the holy grail, that which you may not speak evil about - No one knew about them. If he did suffer as he said he did from the medication he took, he needed a lot of surgery and attention from doctors, and those doctors would likely have been provided by the Pharma Co. who ran the botched trial, doctors who knew what was going on so they could treat him. And they may have talked to him about other participants of the trial in a general way since the situation was so extreme and unique. Told him how lucky he was etc.
As to why he didn't speak out till recently... ignorant? selfish? Given a large settlement from the Pharma co agreeing not to speak about it... maybe gag order had a time limit... or maybe he's risking being suit now...
I don't know. He really needs to do more than a couple of 1 minute tiktok videos.
An inconvenient truth? Where are the fact checkers on this one?
It's not enough evidence to share, let alone factcheck.
Maybe if he doesn't mention the name of the company or the drug, he technically doesn't breach his NDA...
The Mrna platform had deep ties to the intelligence community and DOD from the very beginning - Malone even said from the beginning he was working along side CIA heads and spooks when researching Mrna. Just saying, that these are not usual medical interventions with a usual backstory.
I'm just taking him at face value, and playing devils advocate somewhat. Also I'm a conspiracy head, and over time the "they could never have kept it a secret" argument just seems weaker and weaker to the point where it seems naive. Many very large conspiracies have been kept secret to great degree, despite the involvement of many people in them. Compartmentalization, need-to-know, hierarchy, NDAs etc.
I will say that usually very few of the people involved seem to know the whole story, which is still the part where I'm suspicious of this guy, since he seems to be saying a Doctor involved told him all this.
Or a deliberate disinfo agent.
It wouldn’t surprise me at all if this was true.
Well that sounds like a load of horseshit. 200,000 people all dying in a trial? I don't think they had that kind of juice to cover that up at the time. And where was this guy for 9 years not talking about it?
So he personally knows what happened in 200,000 participants.
Sure...
Absolutely believable knowing the history of gov/pharma experiments on the serfs.
Maybe believable. Definitely unverifiable right now.
Good TikTok click whore
...yet. Consenting to suggested represents self destruction within a perceivable system. Others have nothing to offer; they can only shape everything already offered into a suggestion (fiction) which tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality) if consented to.
He means he didn't kill himself.
You're talking to a bot
Not a bot. Hard to believe, I know.
I don't feel botish. I really think free will is more bored than bot but hey, whaddaiknow.
You can't convince me of that.
I don't feel the need to, there's bots everywhere, I've watched this one and I don't see it, that's all.
Ok, I disagree, it seems like a bot that looks at words in the post it replies to and has some script to make up semi logical nonsense.
I hear that and would agree, I can't go into detail about bots(they're prob watching hahaha) but this one doesnt meet some criteria I've noticed. At the same time I could be fooled idk, nothing suprises me anymore.
Meaning for living is predefined by the process of dying; hence to be (alive) implies out of; within and in response to (dying). His consent to the suggested temptation by others; represents his choice to ignore sustaining self and the consequences thereof represent a corrupted life; which he allegedly is already experiencing.
He destroyed his own life by consenting to others who tempted him with the suggestion to do so. Dying represents the constant temptation for the living to ignore resisting...if one ignores that; then why wouldn't others be tempted to exploit ignorance of perceivable with suggestions?
If perception represents a trial/test; then choosing to ignore it for suggestion represents failing it.
TESTA (Latin testis; witness) MENT (Latin mens; mind; Greek memory)...oneself represents the witness to ones memory unless consenting to uphold the suggested information by others within memory; because then those others can define; redefine and contradict the meaning of the suggested at their will within ones consenting mind. That represents the test the many failing over and over again.