The law of averages does not work in that way... countries and economies work on predictability so anomalous events are almost always bad... things like a bumper crop in agriculture are not really counted here because they don't pop-up suddenly but even so can happen in such a way that unaccounted excess provides no benefit and ends up being wasted.
The only REALLY GOOD unexpected event I can think of recently is that Covid ended up being FAR LESS dangerous than predicted. This was a very good thing even if it was not acting on correctly by the government.
If you assume a normal distribution of outcomes then most would be neutral with excellent / terrible being outliers.
We rarely see excellent so that could be a few things
The distribution is not normal
The options are neutral / terrible
The reporting of outcomes is biased
Terrible is the goal and we only "see" the ones that succeed
My position is the government is not working for the population but against it. So many things reported as terrible are, in fact, success for those attempting them.
Yes vs no represents the rebranding of want vs not want (suggested information); while ignoring need (perceivable inspiration) and the conflict is called "reason". Nature doesn't offer a no state towards perceiving senses.
See how the jew subverts the language of it's host country?
a) nature communicates itself as perceivable sound. The suggested word represents the inversion thereof; while consenting to it tempts one to submit to those suggesting, while subverting oneself as the perceiving within the perceivable.
b) reasoning about suggested "because" ignores that only perceivable represents "by cause".
c) suggestion represents the vector for the parasitic few and the consent of the many represents the host weakness.
Every religion (to bind anew) represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law. It represents ignoring to resist the perceivable natural order as choice; while following suggested orders by the choices of others.
will get programmed
Consent to any suggested information represents (free) will getting programmed by the will of others.
you bots
Singular dehumanization didn't stick so now it's on to plural...
The law of averages does not work in that way... countries and economies work on predictability so anomalous events are almost always bad... things like a bumper crop in agriculture are not really counted here because they don't pop-up suddenly but even so can happen in such a way that unaccounted excess provides no benefit and ends up being wasted.
The only REALLY GOOD unexpected event I can think of recently is that Covid ended up being FAR LESS dangerous than predicted. This was a very good thing even if it was not acting on correctly by the government.
If you assume a normal distribution of outcomes then most would be neutral with excellent / terrible being outliers.
We rarely see excellent so that could be a few things
The distribution is not normal
The options are neutral / terrible
The reporting of outcomes is biased
Terrible is the goal and we only "see" the ones that succeed
My position is the government is not working for the population but against it. So many things reported as terrible are, in fact, success for those attempting them.
Yes vs no represents the rebranding of want vs not want (suggested information); while ignoring need (perceivable inspiration) and the conflict is called "reason". Nature doesn't offer a no state towards perceiving senses.
Post sounds like it was written by a badly programmed bot.
a) nature communicates itself as perceivable sound. The suggested word represents the inversion thereof; while consenting to it tempts one to submit to those suggesting, while subverting oneself as the perceiving within the perceivable.
b) reasoning about suggested "because" ignores that only perceivable represents "by cause".
c) suggestion represents the vector for the parasitic few and the consent of the many represents the host weakness.
#jewbotboogie ?
Neither one of these.
I'm sure you bots will get programmed with a religion at some point
Every religion (to bind anew) represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law. It represents ignoring to resist the perceivable natural order as choice; while following suggested orders by the choices of others.
Consent to any suggested information represents (free) will getting programmed by the will of others.
Singular dehumanization didn't stick so now it's on to plural...
01000010 01101111 01110100 00100000 01100101 01110001 01110101 01100001 01101100 01110011 00100000 01010010 01101111 01100010 01101111 01110100 00100000 01100101 01110001 01110101 01100001 01101100 01110011 00100000 01010010 01101111 01100010 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100101 01110001 01110101 01100001 01101100 01110011 00100000 01010011 01110100 01110010 01100101 01101110 01100111 01110100 01101000