The Fabian Society
(www.omegatimes.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
When you say it like that you imply your belief in "the law" above us and them. That law was suggested by the few and consented to by the belief of the many.
Ask yourself why "they" can use their free will of choice to stand above "the law" if the law governs us and them? What if choice is bound to a different law...to natural law?
Ask yourself why you want to PROS'ECUTE, verb - "to follow or pursue with a view to reach" when living implies resisting outcome (dying)?
KING (sovereign) + QUEEN (consort of sovereign)...what if those represent enacting balance and reacting choice?
And yet the lives of us and them are being moved from inception towards death, no matter how many stone walls the masons of free will are putting up within the minds of the many.
Try to resist the temptation of suggested restrictions and question the ongoing, perceivable system underneath. The use suggestion to tempt the many to ignore the perceivable system and the more the perceivable is ignored; the less power (resistance) the perceiving have within.
Your consent to suggested moralism is what allows the few to shape "sin" within your head, which only then allows further suggestion of a scapegoat to shirk response-ability (choice) onto.
There's no such thing as forgiveness within a moving system...those within shape as responding choice, on the fly, the consequences of their choices.
The anticipation of outcomes is based on the many consenting to the suggested "progressivism" by the few. Life isn't outcome oriented (dying); but resistance to origin for sustenance of self (living).
Have you ever committed cold blooded murder? Turns out very few have; yet so many blame others for doing it. What about self destruction? Turns out many do; yet so few reflect upon self for doing it.
NATION; noun - "a people". Is there any nation that is controlled by its people instead of so called representatives? Isn't the biggest national violation the ignorance of being one of "a people"; hence already partially representing the whole nation?
CHANCE; noun - "the effect of an unknown cause"...how then could the perceiving ones exist within all perceivable as the effect of the cause?
Also; if the perceiving ones exist within everything perceivable...where does "nothing" comes from? Could it be a suggestion by others.
The so called "Crown Corporation" represents the corpus oration (whisper of the death) of the ornament (crown) aka the ORNA (from adorn - "to set off to advantage") MENT (from mens; mind; memory).
The state of nations within nations represent the suggestion of others within your consenting mind.
LONDON aka LONE (alone; solitary one) DONE (performed; expressed) represents "alone" ALL (perceiving) within ONE (perceivable) as form (life) expressed within flow (inception towards death).
Been there; done that. Digging into suggested information doesn't grow ones comprehension within perceivable inspiration; it buries it down the "rabbit-hole"; while spending resistance seeking information from others.
As for providing definitions...I try to take the provided (suggested) definitions apart; while try to express the predefined; perceivable inspiration this system communicates itself with. Nature doesn't provide one defined word; it offers predefined sound towards responding choice to resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
VATICAN; noun (Latin vates; seer) - "fore-teller" aka one who suggest that which isn't to tempt others to ignore resisting that which is. The temporary living within the ongoing process of dying can only foretell death.
Yawn yawn yawn. I don't need definitions here. I submitted something. I understand it. I am not sure you do when expressing all of that. But thanks for your efforts. They aren't wasted.
Although how they affect the country is quite hidden from it. But obviously has a larger role in it. On the outside they're another corporation, or HQ of corporations. But that is veiled in quite a secretive state. Laws, Mayor, Police Force, Security arrangements. What it means is quite the guess you're providing. I suggest watching some documentaries about it.
You're breaking down what I have causally implied, but I am laymen. I know of them watched some opinions controversial and pro. It means nothing more or less.
But I forwarded a comparative argument. Could the FED be held treasonous, in response to another claim. Hahaha. Only a lynch mob would disagree, and at that point what has happened?
Submission to information suggested to you; standing under (understanding) those suggesting it to you. Why use your choice to submit and stand under the suggesting choices of another's choice?
A suggested word cannot define anything; it can only tempt to ignore perceivable sound aka predefined input (perceivable) for redefining output (perceiving).
What I try to express is perceivable inspiration...not suggested information. I grow comprehension within perceivable; while resisting the temptation to understand (stand under) suggested.
The people around you cannot define reality for you; reality exists as perceivable before anyone within can make suggestions about it. The many ignore this; which allows the few to exploit ignorance.
This system moves and motion communicates inspiration to those within. Others suggest brands upon moving things to tempt them to ignore the motion. All suggested words represent brands upon perceivable sound. The few utilize suggested words (all languages) to invert the behavior of all those who ignore sound.
When we use words; we are tempted to view communication as agreement vs disagreement aka a conflict (reasoning). The moving system moves on, no matter if those within agree or disagree with it. Real communication represents adaptation to input aka resisting (living) temptation (dying); which isn't a conflict (want vs not want) but a response-ability (choice) within balance (need/want).
Resistance (living) is fertile (growth); Ignorance (dying) is futile (loss). Both (growth/loss) represent the internal power of energy. All effort; no waste.
What if it's the many who ignore that everything is open (perceivable inspiration); which allows the few to suggest information and then withhold it from the many who want it?
Suggestion represents the hidden hand for all those who ignore being the all (perceivable) seeing I (perceiving).
Furthermore; it's the few who constantly use sleight of hands; reveal of methods and notices of liability to the many; while simultaneously tempting them to consent to nondisclosure agreements. Why does that work? Because the many ignore perceivable for suggested. The perceivable inspiration doesn't require agreement to be perceivable; it requires response-ability (choice) for adaptation to it.
ONE represents the only part (role) within the whole ALL, and only within the whole (dying) can the partial (living) grow.
Corpus oration (whisper of the dead) represents of the outside (motion) communicating sound towards perception; which is being ignored for suggested words; which when consented to tempts one to ignore sustaining life by adaptation to perceivable sound, for babbling (utter words incoherently) while dying; hence uttering the whisper of the dead.
HEAD (perceiving input aka sensation) for responding choice within balance (need/want). That implies center within half/half. If one ignores this for wanting or not wanting the suggestions by others; then one puts oneself into a want vs not want conflict; while ignoring need. That represents quartering (imbalance) the half (balance).
Sleight of hand: GORDON (guardian aka resistance) FREEMAN (men with free will of choice) within HALFLIFE (balanced living).
Each of us represents the effect (perceiving) expressing the cause (perceivable). Implication (if/then) represents the tool of choice within a moving system to discern self; while growing comprehension, and through moving, the whole enacting system already broke itself down into each partial response (choice) within its momentum (balance).
It's suggested information that tempts one to stand under (understanding) others; hence feeling like not being an expert (layman). Meanwhile within ALL perceivable; each ONE represents the perceiving center (choice) for expression (need) or repression (want).
There's no but (exception) for perceiving within perceivable; only ignorance thereof for suggestions by others.
The way I write and the amount thereof represents expressing growth of comprehension by repeated adaptation (frequency of resistance) to perceivable inspiration. Everyone can choose to do that; but reading any of it as suggested information only tempts them to ignore perceivable inspiration; while watching ever increasing walls of text.
Look at squirrels living in a tree. They live in accordance with the momentum of the growing tree. They adapt to any circumstances perceived while life moves on. The more they do; the more they comprehend about the tree; which then allows them to run up and down; while chasing each other around the tree at high speed; while jumping gaps at ease.
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration); pro vs contra (reasoning about suggested information). Suggestion tempts to ignore perception.
To WATCH (forbearance of sleep aka restraint of passions) is being ignored when consenting to watch suggested information; because choosing want (information suggested) over need (inspiration perceived) represents falling for temptation (passion); hence lacking resistance (restraint).
Meaning is predefined within perceivable everything; which allows each perceiving one-thing to grow (more) within loss (less). Nothing represents the suggested inversion thereof.
Whenever the many suggest no; not; none; nothing; nothingness, they telegraph their ignorance of perceivable everything to the few. It's like a daily litmus test for ignorance. Notice also that almost every conflict of reason one engages in; tempts on to defend oneself against suggestion by saying "no; because....". That represents building ones defense upon the foundation of "nothing". Hilarious; yet ineffective.
FEDERAL (pledged; contracted) RESERVE (response to serve; slave) SYSTEM (assemblage of things adjusted into a regular whole).
a) a suggested system tempts one to ignore being the dissembled partial (living) within the whole (dying) perceivable system.
b) the contract represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka ones submission to the choice of others.
c) those who consent to suggested are already guilty of ignoring natural law (balance to choice) for contract law (choice to choice). That's treason aka the overthrow of controlling (govern) ones own mind (ment) by standing under the suggestions of others; who can then define; redefine and contradict any suggested information at will.
The temporary living within the ongoing process of dying represent the response to a moving system; which cannot be claimed (obtained; held onto) by those within being moved by it.
You view all of this through the lens of the suggested laws of men aka a controlled environment that restricts your behavior; your free will of choice and thereby your means to grow comprehension of the perceivable (natural law) system. There's no way to overcome a controlled environment; when going into represents the ignorance of having free will of choice by consenting to the suggested environment that restricts choice.
The many are tempted to choose among the suggested choices of the few; while ignoring to represent free will of choice at the center of a balance based system. They are blindly trying to make choices within imbalance; while wondering why everything is fucked up. Others can make efforts to write all of this down for them; but others cannot make the choices for them.
Using the many to lynch the few doesn't heal the weakness within the many (ignorance) and there will be yet another few ready to exploit ignorance of perceivable with suggestions. On the other hand...resisting ignorance; while growing resistance to temptation; shrinks the potential of suggestion and without suggestion; the parasitic few loose the vector to tap the ignorance of the host many.
If the many would comprehend that being perceiving within perceivable represents evaluation within value; then the few couldn't suggest any substitute values anymore, and without consent to suggested values; the few couldn't define; redefine and contradict prices upon freely perceivable value.