I submitted something. I understand it.

Submission to information suggested to you; standing under (understanding) those suggesting it to you. Why use your choice to submit and stand under the suggesting choices of another's choice?

I don't need definitions here.

A suggested word cannot define anything; it can only tempt to ignore perceivable sound aka predefined input (perceivable) for redefining output (perceiving).

I am not sure you do when expressing all of that.

What I try to express is perceivable inspiration...not suggested information. I grow comprehension within perceivable; while resisting the temptation to understand (stand under) suggested.

The people around you cannot define reality for you; reality exists as perceivable before anyone within can make suggestions about it. The many ignore this; which allows the few to exploit ignorance.

This system moves and motion communicates inspiration to those within. Others suggest brands upon moving things to tempt them to ignore the motion. All suggested words represent brands upon perceivable sound. The few utilize suggested words (all languages) to invert the behavior of all those who ignore sound.

When we use words; we are tempted to view communication as agreement vs disagreement aka a conflict (reasoning). The moving system moves on, no matter if those within agree or disagree with it. Real communication represents adaptation to input aka resisting (living) temptation (dying); which isn't a conflict (want vs not want) but a response-ability (choice) within balance (need/want).

But thanks for your efforts. They aren't wasted.

Resistance (living) is fertile (growth); Ignorance (dying) is futile (loss). Both (growth/loss) represent the internal power of energy. All effort; no waste.

Although how they affect the country is quite hidden from it.

What if it's the many who ignore that everything is open (perceivable inspiration); which allows the few to suggest information and then withhold it from the many who want it?

Suggestion represents the hidden hand for all those who ignore being the all (perceivable) seeing I (perceiving).

Furthermore; it's the few who constantly use sleight of hands; reveal of methods and notices of liability to the many; while simultaneously tempting them to consent to nondisclosure agreements. Why does that work? Because the many ignore perceivable for suggested. The perceivable inspiration doesn't require agreement to be perceivable; it requires response-ability (choice) for adaptation to it.

a larger role in it

ONE represents the only part (role) within the whole ALL, and only within the whole (dying) can the partial (living) grow.

On the outside they're another corporation, or HQ of corporations

Corpus oration (whisper of the dead) represents of the outside (motion) communicating sound towards perception; which is being ignored for suggested words; which when consented to tempts one to ignore sustaining life by adaptation to perceivable sound, for babbling (utter words incoherently) while dying; hence uttering the whisper of the dead.

headquarter

HEAD (perceiving input aka sensation) for responding choice within balance (need/want). That implies center within half/half. If one ignores this for wanting or not wanting the suggestions by others; then one puts oneself into a want vs not want conflict; while ignoring need. That represents quartering (imbalance) the half (balance).

Sleight of hand: GORDON (guardian aka resistance) FREEMAN (men with free will of choice) within HALFLIFE (balanced living).

You're breaking down what I have causally implied

Each of us represents the effect (perceiving) expressing the cause (perceivable). Implication (if/then) represents the tool of choice within a moving system to discern self; while growing comprehension, and through moving, the whole enacting system already broke itself down into each partial response (choice) within its momentum (balance).

but I am laymen

It's suggested information that tempts one to stand under (understanding) others; hence feeling like not being an expert (layman). Meanwhile within ALL perceivable; each ONE represents the perceiving center (choice) for expression (need) or repression (want).

There's no but (exception) for perceiving within perceivable; only ignorance thereof for suggestions by others.

The way I write and the amount thereof represents expressing growth of comprehension by repeated adaptation (frequency of resistance) to perceivable inspiration. Everyone can choose to do that; but reading any of it as suggested information only tempts them to ignore perceivable inspiration; while watching ever increasing walls of text.

Look at squirrels living in a tree. They live in accordance with the momentum of the growing tree. They adapt to any circumstances perceived while life moves on. The more they do; the more they comprehend about the tree; which then allows them to run up and down; while chasing each other around the tree at high speed; while jumping gaps at ease.

I know of them watched some opinions controversial and pro.

Knowledge (perceivable inspiration); pro vs contra (reasoning about suggested information). Suggestion tempts to ignore perception.

To WATCH (forbearance of sleep aka restraint of passions) is being ignored when consenting to watch suggested information; because choosing want (information suggested) over need (inspiration perceived) represents falling for temptation (passion); hence lacking resistance (restraint).

It means nothing more or less.

Meaning is predefined within perceivable everything; which allows each perceiving one-thing to grow (more) within loss (less). Nothing represents the suggested inversion thereof.

Whenever the many suggest no; not; none; nothing; nothingness, they telegraph their ignorance of perceivable everything to the few. It's like a daily litmus test for ignorance. Notice also that almost every conflict of reason one engages in; tempts on to defend oneself against suggestion by saying "no; because....". That represents building ones defense upon the foundation of "nothing". Hilarious; yet ineffective.

Could the FED be held treasonous

FEDERAL (pledged; contracted) RESERVE (response to serve; slave) SYSTEM (assemblage of things adjusted into a regular whole).

a) a suggested system tempts one to ignore being the dissembled partial (living) within the whole (dying) perceivable system.

b) the contract represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka ones submission to the choice of others.

c) those who consent to suggested are already guilty of ignoring natural law (balance to choice) for contract law (choice to choice). That's treason aka the overthrow of controlling (govern) ones own mind (ment) by standing under the suggestions of others; who can then define; redefine and contradict any suggested information at will.

in response to another claim

The temporary living within the ongoing process of dying represent the response to a moving system; which cannot be claimed (obtained; held onto) by those within being moved by it.

You view all of this through the lens of the suggested laws of men aka a controlled environment that restricts your behavior; your free will of choice and thereby your means to grow comprehension of the perceivable (natural law) system. There's no way to overcome a controlled environment; when going into represents the ignorance of having free will of choice by consenting to the suggested environment that restricts choice.

The many are tempted to choose among the suggested choices of the few; while ignoring to represent free will of choice at the center of a balance based system. They are blindly trying to make choices within imbalance; while wondering why everything is fucked up. Others can make efforts to write all of this down for them; but others cannot make the choices for them.

a lynch mob

Using the many to lynch the few doesn't heal the weakness within the many (ignorance) and there will be yet another few ready to exploit ignorance of perceivable with suggestions. On the other hand...resisting ignorance; while growing resistance to temptation; shrinks the potential of suggestion and without suggestion; the parasitic few loose the vector to tap the ignorance of the host many.

If the many would comprehend that being perceiving within perceivable represents evaluation within value; then the few couldn't suggest any substitute values anymore, and without consent to suggested values; the few couldn't define; redefine and contradict prices upon freely perceivable value.