NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" + UNIT; noun (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness.
If ONE (self) consents to suggested numbers by other ONEs; then one is being tempted to ignore the only perceivable number...ONE. Being able to perceive within perceivable implies being a different ONE out of the same ONEness (energy self differentiates internally); hence EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Also; "latest" (coming after) tempts one to ignore the origin (perceivable) for what comes after (suggested)...
The other numbers...
Show me a "two" and I will ask you how you could perceive them if they aren't existing each "one" in a different place? Perception implies perceiving moving differences; hence each different one of them. Others suggest a) you to count them and b) the mimicry of likeness to tempt you to consent to sameness; the inversion of differentiation.
The few suggest math to tempt the many to seek solutions; while ignoring being form (life) within flow (inception towards death); hence a temporary problem within the ongoing solution. By choosing to seek suggested solutions; the problems (living) are tempted to dissolve (dying) themselves. Once again the suggested inversion of the perceivable reality.
I hope all of those parents and legal guardians hang.
publicly
you should be ashamed of yourself and seriously put this experimental poison trash into your child's body. disgusting
Here's the source for that screenshot.
How many children under 5 died of COVID-19? Like 10?
If ONE (self) consents to suggested numbers by other ONEs; then one is being tempted to ignore the only perceivable number...ONE. Being able to perceive within perceivable implies being a different ONE out of the same ONEness (energy self differentiates internally); hence EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
Also; "latest" (coming after) tempts one to ignore the origin (perceivable) for what comes after (suggested)...
Show me a "two" and I will ask you how you could perceive them if they aren't existing each "one" in a different place? Perception implies perceiving moving differences; hence each different one of them. Others suggest a) you to count them and b) the mimicry of likeness to tempt you to consent to sameness; the inversion of differentiation.
The few suggest math to tempt the many to seek solutions; while ignoring being form (life) within flow (inception towards death); hence a temporary problem within the ongoing solution. By choosing to seek suggested solutions; the problems (living) are tempted to dissolve (dying) themselves. Once again the suggested inversion of the perceivable reality.