I definitely think she is being groomed as a poster "girl" for trannying. They need a prominent (and youngish) tranny "success" story (that is openly acknowledged, unlike Mike Obama or "Brigitte" Macron) to influence younger people who might be encountering too much tranny-realism online. She's probably carefully cultivated by handlers to always appear enthusiastic and never betray any doubt about what she's done, and probably had the very best surgeon money could buy, sponsored of course. Having said that, in some photos she looks absolutely wretched and you can see the suffering in her eyes, which shows trannying has done zero to help her psychologically, despite what she says. If it is all as I believe, trannies are being cultivated as a type of "priest" class, as they were in the ancient pre-roman Mithras religion (male priests dressed and behaved like females), an evolution of which appears to be under revival among the uber wealthy
The simpler explanation is that as a girl growing up famous and wealthy as an actress, she’s always been an emotionally unhinged attention whore. This is just her achieving her final form. It’ll make it easier to get future roles and higher pay as well because she’s playing the trans card now. There was that Orange is the New Black’s black guy that was trans but he isn’t very likable. Page has broader appeal I’m assuming based on the movies she’s been in.
Personally I was never a fan of Page because she’s not a very good actress and I hate emo people. She plays herself and that self isn’t something I enjoy, whereas at least with someone like Dwayne Johnson, you have him telling people to workout and try hard and succeed and shit. I don’t find Page likable and I’d have liked the series better if they killed her off. It’s also profoundly selfish of her to make the character she plays, who is not her anyway, also ‘transition’ as a public political statement. The funniest part of how the series handled it was that all she did to transition in the series was get a haircut. It’s insulting to men to suggest that all you had to do to become one was get a haircut.
There’s a character from an earlier time period in the series that meets her and acts like it’s all fine and that’s also implausible because he’s a character that’s highly conflicted over her and was from a time when people were more openly prejudiced. They’ve made Captain America parodies where he wakes up and is super racist and sexist. This would have been similar, with the character just laughing at her and asking for an explanation.
“You’re…a man? And you always have been? Like with a penis?”
“No, not with a penis. I got a haircut. It’s short now. Not manly short, but shorter.”
“How does that make you a man? Can you impregnate someone?”
“No, but you can call me Victor. I got a haircut. I’m like you now!”
I think you are totally right about the Mithras priest class, but I don’t think they are being newly cultivated. I think they have been continuously active since that time, and are now revealing themselves.
Maybe there are more of them than we know, and they are trying to use their power to become mainstream so they can be what they are openly.
I think they overestimate people’s willingness to go along, and I think whatever occult power they have depends on them being marginal, rather than mainstream.
You can't trust anyone who lends any sort of legitimacy to Jung, Freud, and the rest of the Psychoanalysts.
JP stands out because he's a dyed-in-the-wool academic who says obvious things. He's useful as a gateway for people questioning the orthodoxy and as a primer for bigger and harsher truths... but that's about it.
The whole thing is so gross, twitter is no longer relevant at all. Not sure why people are still using it.
Personally I see all this brainwash as one big sad story for humanity, this will be documented for decades while we try to understand what actually happened.
When many people have a pretty good idea of what is happening.
Here's a twist it seems no one has brought up: Page always been a dude.
Did you see "his" shirtless photo after "transitioning"? That's a guy's chest. Most soi bois of her age have bigger boobs because of all the estrogen they get from gestation to present. No surgical scars like anything was removed.
And an 8-pack? Yeah, most dudes would kill for that and would have to work incredibly hard. Because women have so much more subcutaneous fat it's almost impossible unless they're extremely disciplined amateur or professional bodybuilders. Closest I've seen on another celebrity is Pink, and it's really not even close.
So yet another double-reverse mind-F courtesy of the culture creators.
SEX, noun [Latin sexus; seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female". Nature self differentiates into male (velocity) and female (resistance) through "trans"mutation. This also represents the "gen"eration (dying) of reactors (living).
actor / actress
Suggested actors consenting to suggesting directors aren't acting; they're reacting (living) to direction (dying).
These are all suggested rhetorical allegories to distract the many from comprehending their perceivable source (energy).
male and female, in union. Nothing "TRANS" about it
UNITY; noun (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness" aka being ONE (perceiving) transmuted out of ONEness (perceivable). Hence male and fe (minine)-male; man and wo (mb)-man.
The suggestion of "nothing" under the umbrella of creationism is what tempts one to ignore transmutation out of "everything" perceivable.
They are halfway between both.
a) flowing way (inception towards death) causes momentum (balance) for form (life with choice) in-between. Does being the center of balance represents "halfway" towards a goal or the opportunity for the temporary (living) to grow within the ongoing (dying) loss?
b) BOTH, adjective - "two"...are you and me "two" or are we still each "one"? Two represents a suggested state; which tempts the "one" consenting to it to ignore that perception implies perceiving different ones.
From another angle...what represents "two" inside energy?
shemale
A more on the nose suggestion for the ignored fe (minine) male. One cannot sustain self without intercourse; hence bringing the coexisting differences in balance (male/female) with each others; which only then allows the perpetuating of self from blood (singular) to bloodline (plural). Yet another transmutation.
BI-Gendered (two gendered)
Generation differentiates ALL (perceivable) into each ONE (perceiving). ONE cannot generate "two"; only transmute more ONEs.
Show me two things and for me to be able to perceive them implies each one to exist within a different position. You cannot perceive sameness; yet others can deceive you with suggested likeness to ignore perceivable differentiation.
I like...they hate
Aka want (like) vs not want (hate) reasoning; caused by consent to a suggestion (shemale). This represents division by suggestion, and neither side can win reasoning, because the ones making the suggestion are outside the conflict; while operating with the consent of both conflicting sides; which allows them the sole power to define; redefine and contradict the meaning of whatever suggested.
they...call it
Perceivable nature doesn't need to be called anything; it's moving; which represents perceivable inspiration communicated towards your senses for adaptation. To call implies to brand by suggestion; hence to tempt others into idolizing perceivable. Why slap an affixed brand on a moving system? Do you need the brand "life" to be alive?
I want to remind you that Baphomet is bi-gendered--statue / symbol
a) when one ignores need (perception); then others will exploit it with want (suggestion).
b) instead of consenting to allow others to define what "is" by suggesting idols; question out of what perceivable inspiration others chose to shape the idol suggested to you? If one comprehends the base (perception); one can reverse engineer (transmute) the ingredient (suggestion).
c) STATUE, noun - "that which is set or fixed". How many suggested statues do the few have to topple before the many would question that there can't be anything affixed within a moving system?
d) What comes first...suggested symbolism or perceivable symmetry? Can your consent to suggested symbolism give others the power to prevent you access to perceivable symmetry?
cadeuceus
Staff with wings (ongoing flow); coexisting opposites (temporary form). Notice how they each start small from the same source; then grow until they meet again; all confined within the length of the staff?
the arms are up and down
Above/below; flow/form; loss/growth; ongoing/temporary; dying/living...both together representing the balance for the choice at the center.
a work of magick
EN'ERGY, noun [Greek. work.] - "internal or inherent power" + MAGIC; noun (from PIE root *magh-) - "to be able, have power." That represents being living within the process of dying aka power of resistance within power of velocity aka temporary growth within ongoing loss...the internal power of energy aka its self sustaining core.
opposites
Suggested dualism tempts one to put opposites against each other (versus); while ignoring that nature self differentiates into perceivable; coexisting opposites (balance) for ones responding choice at the center. Inception and death represents natural opposites for the life in-between. They aren't in conflict with each other; they represent the ongoing base for the transmutation of the temporary ingredient...life.
The perceivable balance from the perspective of perceiving choice represents need/want; ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested) causes the want vs not want conflict; which others suggest as dualism, and then rebrand and perpetuate as a tool of division.
A simpler example...whenever you choose to go left; it implies you came from right and vice verse. Perceivable left/right are in coexistence with each other; yet suggested left (democrats) vs right (republican) represent a conflict. Your consenting choice to the suggested conflict causes it.
dissolve and reform
Inception towards death aka the process of dying aka the velocity of motion represents the solvent, and the momentum thereof causes life aka the processed living aka the resistance within the velocity of motion aka the responding form to the solving flow.
In terms of transmutation...flow to from (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka ingredient out of base alchemy. The parasitic few use suggestion to mix the inversion aka ingredient back to base. How? By suggestion form to ignore resisting flow, hence being dissolved more quickly, while lack of resistance allows easy peasy parasitic squeezy.
the completion of the great work of alchemy
That represents the inverted suggestion. Nature self segregates aka from base (complete) into ingredient (incomplete aka within complete). Work (energy) represents the whole; alchemy happens among the partial at the center of the whole aka the form (ingredient) within the momentum (cauldron) of flow (base).
the hidden
Perceivable inspiration represents the ALL open to each ONE; hence making each within the "ALL seeing I". Consent to suggested information allows those suggesting it to withhold it from those who want it; hence keeping it hidden and those wanting in darkness (lack of comprehension based on ignorance towards perceivable).
breaking down society to reform it... into something different
Everything perceivable represents moving differences. The few suggest likeness to the many in form of SOCIETY; noun (togetherness; companionship); which tempts them to ignore being different and being in need to resist being dissolve back into the same base.
The few aren't breaking down society; the suggest the many endless narratives to distract them from being dissolved by the natural order they ignore to resist. The few parasitically exploit the self destructive ignorance of the many with ignorance representing the host weakness tempting parasitic responses.
In other words...the perceivable moving system is constantly changing; yet the suggested brands tempt those consenting to them to ignore constant change. The many are desperately holding onto the suggested brands; while the perceivable change is transmuting them back to base. They are tricked to hold onto sandcastles at the beach; while ignoring the water.
Everything perceivable represents a temporary state...affixed labels; brands; idols; names; words etc. tempt one to ignore the ongoing foundation (dying) for the temporary (living) within.
TRANSFORMERS
ROBOTS (Latin robur; strength) IN (within) DISGUISE (concealment) thanks to DECEPTICONS (others making suggestions); which tempts one to ignore being TRANS (mutated) FORM.
what is coming...
...is being suggested so that you ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcome.
I definitely think she is being groomed as a poster "girl" for trannying. They need a prominent (and youngish) tranny "success" story (that is openly acknowledged, unlike Mike Obama or "Brigitte" Macron) to influence younger people who might be encountering too much tranny-realism online. She's probably carefully cultivated by handlers to always appear enthusiastic and never betray any doubt about what she's done, and probably had the very best surgeon money could buy, sponsored of course. Having said that, in some photos she looks absolutely wretched and you can see the suffering in her eyes, which shows trannying has done zero to help her psychologically, despite what she says. If it is all as I believe, trannies are being cultivated as a type of "priest" class, as they were in the ancient pre-roman Mithras religion (male priests dressed and behaved like females), an evolution of which appears to be under revival among the uber wealthy
The simpler explanation is that as a girl growing up famous and wealthy as an actress, she’s always been an emotionally unhinged attention whore. This is just her achieving her final form. It’ll make it easier to get future roles and higher pay as well because she’s playing the trans card now. There was that Orange is the New Black’s black guy that was trans but he isn’t very likable. Page has broader appeal I’m assuming based on the movies she’s been in.
Personally I was never a fan of Page because she’s not a very good actress and I hate emo people. She plays herself and that self isn’t something I enjoy, whereas at least with someone like Dwayne Johnson, you have him telling people to workout and try hard and succeed and shit. I don’t find Page likable and I’d have liked the series better if they killed her off. It’s also profoundly selfish of her to make the character she plays, who is not her anyway, also ‘transition’ as a public political statement. The funniest part of how the series handled it was that all she did to transition in the series was get a haircut. It’s insulting to men to suggest that all you had to do to become one was get a haircut.
There’s a character from an earlier time period in the series that meets her and acts like it’s all fine and that’s also implausible because he’s a character that’s highly conflicted over her and was from a time when people were more openly prejudiced. They’ve made Captain America parodies where he wakes up and is super racist and sexist. This would have been similar, with the character just laughing at her and asking for an explanation.
“You’re…a man? And you always have been? Like with a penis?”
“No, not with a penis. I got a haircut. It’s short now. Not manly short, but shorter.”
“How does that make you a man? Can you impregnate someone?”
“No, but you can call me Victor. I got a haircut. I’m like you now!”
I think you are totally right about the Mithras priest class, but I don’t think they are being newly cultivated. I think they have been continuously active since that time, and are now revealing themselves.
Maybe there are more of them than we know, and they are trying to use their power to become mainstream so they can be what they are openly.
I think they overestimate people’s willingness to go along, and I think whatever occult power they have depends on them being marginal, rather than mainstream.
You can't trust anyone who lends any sort of legitimacy to Jung, Freud, and the rest of the Psychoanalysts.
JP stands out because he's a dyed-in-the-wool academic who says obvious things. He's useful as a gateway for people questioning the orthodoxy and as a primer for bigger and harsher truths... but that's about it.
Anyone given a platform is suspect, positive or negative.
The whole thing is so gross, twitter is no longer relevant at all. Not sure why people are still using it.
Personally I see all this brainwash as one big sad story for humanity, this will be documented for decades while we try to understand what actually happened.
When many people have a pretty good idea of what is happening.
What is, the day that never comes? Metallica is that you?
sad. she was a pretty girl. fucking disgusting
It was stupid but I'm glad they didn't linger on it for very long. Pretty cool show nonetheless
Here's a twist it seems no one has brought up: Page always been a dude.
Did you see "his" shirtless photo after "transitioning"? That's a guy's chest. Most soi bois of her age have bigger boobs because of all the estrogen they get from gestation to present. No surgical scars like anything was removed.
And an 8-pack? Yeah, most dudes would kill for that and would have to work incredibly hard. Because women have so much more subcutaneous fat it's almost impossible unless they're extremely disciplined amateur or professional bodybuilders. Closest I've seen on another celebrity is Pink, and it's really not even close.
So yet another double-reverse mind-F courtesy of the culture creators.
SEX, noun [Latin sexus; seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female". Nature self differentiates into male (velocity) and female (resistance) through "trans"mutation. This also represents the "gen"eration (dying) of reactors (living).
Suggested actors consenting to suggesting directors aren't acting; they're reacting (living) to direction (dying).
These are all suggested rhetorical allegories to distract the many from comprehending their perceivable source (energy).
UNITY; noun (Latin unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness" aka being ONE (perceiving) transmuted out of ONEness (perceivable). Hence male and fe (minine)-male; man and wo (mb)-man.
The suggestion of "nothing" under the umbrella of creationism is what tempts one to ignore transmutation out of "everything" perceivable.
a) flowing way (inception towards death) causes momentum (balance) for form (life with choice) in-between. Does being the center of balance represents "halfway" towards a goal or the opportunity for the temporary (living) to grow within the ongoing (dying) loss?
b) BOTH, adjective - "two"...are you and me "two" or are we still each "one"? Two represents a suggested state; which tempts the "one" consenting to it to ignore that perception implies perceiving different ones.
From another angle...what represents "two" inside energy?
A more on the nose suggestion for the ignored fe (minine) male. One cannot sustain self without intercourse; hence bringing the coexisting differences in balance (male/female) with each others; which only then allows the perpetuating of self from blood (singular) to bloodline (plural). Yet another transmutation.
Generation differentiates ALL (perceivable) into each ONE (perceiving). ONE cannot generate "two"; only transmute more ONEs.
Show me two things and for me to be able to perceive them implies each one to exist within a different position. You cannot perceive sameness; yet others can deceive you with suggested likeness to ignore perceivable differentiation.
Aka want (like) vs not want (hate) reasoning; caused by consent to a suggestion (shemale). This represents division by suggestion, and neither side can win reasoning, because the ones making the suggestion are outside the conflict; while operating with the consent of both conflicting sides; which allows them the sole power to define; redefine and contradict the meaning of whatever suggested.
Perceivable nature doesn't need to be called anything; it's moving; which represents perceivable inspiration communicated towards your senses for adaptation. To call implies to brand by suggestion; hence to tempt others into idolizing perceivable. Why slap an affixed brand on a moving system? Do you need the brand "life" to be alive?
a) when one ignores need (perception); then others will exploit it with want (suggestion).
b) instead of consenting to allow others to define what "is" by suggesting idols; question out of what perceivable inspiration others chose to shape the idol suggested to you? If one comprehends the base (perception); one can reverse engineer (transmute) the ingredient (suggestion).
c) STATUE, noun - "that which is set or fixed". How many suggested statues do the few have to topple before the many would question that there can't be anything affixed within a moving system?
d) What comes first...suggested symbolism or perceivable symmetry? Can your consent to suggested symbolism give others the power to prevent you access to perceivable symmetry?
Staff with wings (ongoing flow); coexisting opposites (temporary form). Notice how they each start small from the same source; then grow until they meet again; all confined within the length of the staff?
Above/below; flow/form; loss/growth; ongoing/temporary; dying/living...both together representing the balance for the choice at the center.
EN'ERGY, noun [Greek. work.] - "internal or inherent power" + MAGIC; noun (from PIE root *magh-) - "to be able, have power." That represents being living within the process of dying aka power of resistance within power of velocity aka temporary growth within ongoing loss...the internal power of energy aka its self sustaining core.
Suggested dualism tempts one to put opposites against each other (versus); while ignoring that nature self differentiates into perceivable; coexisting opposites (balance) for ones responding choice at the center. Inception and death represents natural opposites for the life in-between. They aren't in conflict with each other; they represent the ongoing base for the transmutation of the temporary ingredient...life.
The perceivable balance from the perspective of perceiving choice represents need/want; ignoring need (perceivable) for want (suggested) causes the want vs not want conflict; which others suggest as dualism, and then rebrand and perpetuate as a tool of division.
A simpler example...whenever you choose to go left; it implies you came from right and vice verse. Perceivable left/right are in coexistence with each other; yet suggested left (democrats) vs right (republican) represent a conflict. Your consenting choice to the suggested conflict causes it.
Inception towards death aka the process of dying aka the velocity of motion represents the solvent, and the momentum thereof causes life aka the processed living aka the resistance within the velocity of motion aka the responding form to the solving flow.
In terms of transmutation...flow to from (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) aka ingredient out of base alchemy. The parasitic few use suggestion to mix the inversion aka ingredient back to base. How? By suggestion form to ignore resisting flow, hence being dissolved more quickly, while lack of resistance allows easy peasy parasitic squeezy.
That represents the inverted suggestion. Nature self segregates aka from base (complete) into ingredient (incomplete aka within complete). Work (energy) represents the whole; alchemy happens among the partial at the center of the whole aka the form (ingredient) within the momentum (cauldron) of flow (base).
Perceivable inspiration represents the ALL open to each ONE; hence making each within the "ALL seeing I". Consent to suggested information allows those suggesting it to withhold it from those who want it; hence keeping it hidden and those wanting in darkness (lack of comprehension based on ignorance towards perceivable).
Everything perceivable represents moving differences. The few suggest likeness to the many in form of SOCIETY; noun (togetherness; companionship); which tempts them to ignore being different and being in need to resist being dissolve back into the same base.
The few aren't breaking down society; the suggest the many endless narratives to distract them from being dissolved by the natural order they ignore to resist. The few parasitically exploit the self destructive ignorance of the many with ignorance representing the host weakness tempting parasitic responses.
In other words...the perceivable moving system is constantly changing; yet the suggested brands tempt those consenting to them to ignore constant change. The many are desperately holding onto the suggested brands; while the perceivable change is transmuting them back to base. They are tricked to hold onto sandcastles at the beach; while ignoring the water.
Everything perceivable represents a temporary state...affixed labels; brands; idols; names; words etc. tempt one to ignore the ongoing foundation (dying) for the temporary (living) within.
ROBOTS (Latin robur; strength) IN (within) DISGUISE (concealment) thanks to DECEPTICONS (others making suggestions); which tempts one to ignore being TRANS (mutated) FORM.
...is being suggested so that you ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcome.