Every Masonic temple I have been in has heeb symbolism all over the place. They are deeply intertwined. Read Under The Sign Of The Scorpion by Juri Lina. He documents this very well
a) he-brew...suggesting form to ignore resisting flow represents transmutation of ingredient back to base aka alchemy. He who does that..."he brews".
b) the -ism represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law; the inversion of perceivable balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
c) symmetric and asymmetric represent action and reaction; flow and form; balance and choice; dying and living; ongoing and temporary; loss and growth; ALL and ONE etc.
The few suggest symbolism; so that the many ignore to resonate with the perceivable origin of symmetry as to sustain their asymmetric existence within. In short...to grow within loss expresses symmetry; while ignoring this regresses one into asymmetry.
masonic temple
A mason represents a builder...one who shapes by suggestion the temporary temples (mind; memory; shaped by free will of choice); hence masons of free will aka freemasons.
They are deeply intertwined
Ones choice represents the center of all balance (need/want aka perceivable/suggested). To be (perceiving) implies within center (of perceivable) aka as form (choice) within the momentum (balance) of motion. One represents the deepest position within all; hence the opportunity to grow by expression within everything impressing.
Read Under The Sign Of The Scorpion by Juri Lina. He documents this very well.
I got three of his books in my collection: Right now I'm in-between Hofstadter's "I'm a Strange Loop" and James Herbert's "Sepulchre". Anyway; his-story and religion represent tools for industrialized mass population control through suggestion, as does the suggested states of "past; present and future" to tempt the many to ignore that time implies the ever changing moment (um) of motion; hence the tick; tick; tick...sleight of hand for those with eyes to see.
Choice can only exist temporarily within the ever changing momentum (balance within motion). It's the suggestions of the few that fill up the memories of the many with information only the few can define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning). His-story exludes the one (perceiving) within all (perceivable) by suggesting the narrated stories of other ones, and it's the consent of the many to the suggested his-story that fuels; perpetuates and replays it over and over again.
I like how the only Star of David there was drawn in with computer graphics.
You chose to ignore perceivable symmetry for suggested symbolism; hence putting yourself within the conflict of reason aka like (want) vs not like (not want) reasoning over the suggested meaning (star of david) by others.
Did I suggest "star of david" or did I adapt to inspiration by showing perceivable symmetry within suggested narratives?
a) All represents one in energy aka the foundation for each ONE (perceiving) within ALL (perceivable).
b) ...is a star of david represents your consent to what others suggested you "star of david" means. How could the ones perceiving define meaning for all perceivable when existing within; out of; by; in response to?
What if suggested symbolism can tempt you to ignore perceivable symmetry; while giving those making the suggestions the power of your consent to define; redefine and contradict the meaning of whatever they suggest to you?
c) Street lights without a street? How dense is the traffic around a fountain at a UN headquarter at night?
d) What about Vienna as the "cradle of zionism"? Wouldn't the "Gnomes of Basel" usury cartel also like to flash their gang-signs around?
e) Thinking implies responding to input and so the suggested symbolism aside...what does perceivable symmetry communicate to you? What do you think about the "energetic" origins of such a star and why the branding STAR; noun - "luminary"? Oh gosh...did I just stumble over a connection between lamps and a luminary symbol?
b) within the box (left/right; up/down; front/back perspective) one is tempted to focus on the suggested information (fiction) by others; while ignoring the perceivable inspiration (reality).
c) the box expresses darkness (ignorance); yet is surrounded by light (ignored comprehension of perceivable)
d) from within the box; one only views the artificially suggested, while shielding oneself to the naturally perceivable. This represents tunnel-vision and a sleight of hand for this represents the music video of "Bitter Sweet Symphony"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lyu1KKwC74 Yet the video suggests the inversion aka him resisting the tunnel vision of everyone else.
From my understanding: The cube represents the tesseract, the fifth-dimensional self-transforming cube, also represented in 2D via the form of the octagon. It is a symbol that represents different levels of order or control.
Is it your understanding when "standing under" the suggested information by others? Question the growth of ones comprehension by adaptation to all perceivable inspiration instead?
The cube represents the tesseract
TESSARA'IC, adjective [Latin tessera, a square thing.] - "diversified by squares"
a) what does difference represent? Everything perceivable for the ones perceiving it within. Why? Because for it to be perceivable; it has to be within a different position from anything else. Within sameness; neither could anything be perceivable; nor would there be "one" within "all" to perceive it.
b) diversification aka DIVERSE (different) -ATION (through action). That us...the living within the process of dying aka the temporary reaction (living) within the ongoing enacting (dying) aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
In short...it's ongoing motion that diversifies.
the fifth-dimensional self-transforming cube
a) fifth implies one counting others ones. Question if 1D represents a point or the focus-point of the perceiving one within all perceivable? Question if 2D represents a line or one within all choosing to connect perceivable points; hence zooming out? Next step; 3D...is that where one comes into existence or was one there beforehand for 1D and 2D to be perceivable?
b) "transform" represents transmutation of form (life) out of flow (inception towards death); while the "self" represents that which remains of form within flow.; hence the individual self (blood) shared through the collective self (bloodline).
It is a symbol that represents different levels of order or control.
The natural order represents dying aka being moved from inception towards death; which implies that living represents temporary chaos within the natural order; hence struggling to sustain itself.
In other words...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) aka forms transmutation out of base flow.
a) I adapt to whatever inspires; hence having no issues (other than laziness) with putting effort into responses. What you do with it represents your free will of choice.
b) if one would ask me about anything I don't like about my children; then I would point out the moments I have to share the homemade waffles by my wife with them. I could consider greed and envy playing a role here; but then again...waffles.
a) I utilized the former as an expression of perceivable inspiration (choice of need); you used the latter as a judgment upon suggested information (choice of want).
b) equal (=) vs non equal (≠) represents a rebranding of want vs not want reasoning caused by your consent to suggested information.
c) both equal (want) and non equal (not want) ignore diverse (need). The ones perceiving within all perceivable cannot perceive sameness; only moving differences; hence representing differentiated "ones".
d) the entirety of math is based on the suggestion of 0 (not 1; nothingness) and your consent to it is what tempts you to view other ones as equal (=) or non equal (≠). There's no such thing as a 0 state within a constantly moving system. Question if energy represents 1; then what represents 0? No energy? Where would energy deplete to...nothingness?
I am surprised they don’t have a big Star of David on the wall like they do in most Masonic temples.
"Hello, Vienna calling, hello?"... https://pic8.co/sh/I7mkUl.jpg
Every Masonic temple I have been in has heeb symbolism all over the place. They are deeply intertwined. Read Under The Sign Of The Scorpion by Juri Lina. He documents this very well
a) he-brew...suggesting form to ignore resisting flow represents transmutation of ingredient back to base aka alchemy. He who does that..."he brews".
b) the -ism represents choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law; the inversion of perceivable balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law.
c) symmetric and asymmetric represent action and reaction; flow and form; balance and choice; dying and living; ongoing and temporary; loss and growth; ALL and ONE etc.
The few suggest symbolism; so that the many ignore to resonate with the perceivable origin of symmetry as to sustain their asymmetric existence within. In short...to grow within loss expresses symmetry; while ignoring this regresses one into asymmetry.
A mason represents a builder...one who shapes by suggestion the temporary temples (mind; memory; shaped by free will of choice); hence masons of free will aka freemasons.
Ones choice represents the center of all balance (need/want aka perceivable/suggested). To be (perceiving) implies within center (of perceivable) aka as form (choice) within the momentum (balance) of motion. One represents the deepest position within all; hence the opportunity to grow by expression within everything impressing.
I got three of his books in my collection: Right now I'm in-between Hofstadter's "I'm a Strange Loop" and James Herbert's "Sepulchre". Anyway; his-story and religion represent tools for industrialized mass population control through suggestion, as does the suggested states of "past; present and future" to tempt the many to ignore that time implies the ever changing moment (um) of motion; hence the tick; tick; tick...sleight of hand for those with eyes to see.
Choice can only exist temporarily within the ever changing momentum (balance within motion). It's the suggestions of the few that fill up the memories of the many with information only the few can define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning). His-story exludes the one (perceiving) within all (perceivable) by suggesting the narrated stories of other ones, and it's the consent of the many to the suggested his-story that fuels; perpetuates and replays it over and over again.
I like how the only Star of David there was drawn in with computer graphics.
You chose to ignore perceivable symmetry for suggested symbolism; hence putting yourself within the conflict of reason aka like (want) vs not like (not want) reasoning over the suggested meaning (star of david) by others.
Did I suggest "star of david" or did I adapt to inspiration by showing perceivable symmetry within suggested narratives?
I don't think a circle of street lights is a Star of David.
a) All represents one in energy aka the foundation for each ONE (perceiving) within ALL (perceivable).
b) ...is a star of david represents your consent to what others suggested you "star of david" means. How could the ones perceiving define meaning for all perceivable when existing within; out of; by; in response to?
What if suggested symbolism can tempt you to ignore perceivable symmetry; while giving those making the suggestions the power of your consent to define; redefine and contradict the meaning of whatever they suggest to you?
c) Street lights without a street? How dense is the traffic around a fountain at a UN headquarter at night?
d) What about Vienna as the "cradle of zionism"? Wouldn't the "Gnomes of Basel" usury cartel also like to flash their gang-signs around?
e) Thinking implies responding to input and so the suggested symbolism aside...what does perceivable symmetry communicate to you? What do you think about the "energetic" origins of such a star and why the branding STAR; noun - "luminary"? Oh gosh...did I just stumble over a connection between lamps and a luminary symbol?
First thing I thought of when seeing this was the Kaaba.
https://www.ibtimes.com/what-kaaba-black-cube-marking-islams-most-sacred-site-sparks-curiosity-1699203
https://np.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/vga6qj/there_is_a_very_strange_meditation_room_in_the/
a) the cube represents ones ignorance.
b) within the box (left/right; up/down; front/back perspective) one is tempted to focus on the suggested information (fiction) by others; while ignoring the perceivable inspiration (reality).
c) the box expresses darkness (ignorance); yet is surrounded by light (ignored comprehension of perceivable)
d) from within the box; one only views the artificially suggested, while shielding oneself to the naturally perceivable. This represents tunnel-vision and a sleight of hand for this represents the music video of "Bitter Sweet Symphony"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lyu1KKwC74 Yet the video suggests the inversion aka him resisting the tunnel vision of everyone else.
From my understanding: The cube represents the tesseract, the fifth-dimensional self-transforming cube, also represented in 2D via the form of the octagon. It is a symbol that represents different levels of order or control.
Is it your understanding when "standing under" the suggested information by others? Question the growth of ones comprehension by adaptation to all perceivable inspiration instead?
a) what does difference represent? Everything perceivable for the ones perceiving it within. Why? Because for it to be perceivable; it has to be within a different position from anything else. Within sameness; neither could anything be perceivable; nor would there be "one" within "all" to perceive it.
b) diversification aka DIVERSE (different) -ATION (through action). That us...the living within the process of dying aka the temporary reaction (living) within the ongoing enacting (dying) aka form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
In short...it's ongoing motion that diversifies.
a) fifth implies one counting others ones. Question if 1D represents a point or the focus-point of the perceiving one within all perceivable? Question if 2D represents a line or one within all choosing to connect perceivable points; hence zooming out? Next step; 3D...is that where one comes into existence or was one there beforehand for 1D and 2D to be perceivable?
b) "transform" represents transmutation of form (life) out of flow (inception towards death); while the "self" represents that which remains of form within flow.; hence the individual self (blood) shared through the collective self (bloodline).
The natural order represents dying aka being moved from inception towards death; which implies that living represents temporary chaos within the natural order; hence struggling to sustain itself.
In other words...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life); form to flow (death) aka forms transmutation out of base flow.
How much time did you waste writing all that waffle?
a) I adapt to whatever inspires; hence having no issues (other than laziness) with putting effort into responses. What you do with it represents your free will of choice.
b) if one would ask me about anything I don't like about my children; then I would point out the moments I have to share the homemade waffles by my wife with them. I could consider greed and envy playing a role here; but then again...waffles.
Writing more ≠ better writing
a) I utilized the former as an expression of perceivable inspiration (choice of need); you used the latter as a judgment upon suggested information (choice of want).
b) equal (=) vs non equal (≠) represents a rebranding of want vs not want reasoning caused by your consent to suggested information.
c) both equal (want) and non equal (not want) ignore diverse (need). The ones perceiving within all perceivable cannot perceive sameness; only moving differences; hence representing differentiated "ones".
d) the entirety of math is based on the suggestion of 0 (not 1; nothingness) and your consent to it is what tempts you to view other ones as equal (=) or non equal (≠). There's no such thing as a 0 state within a constantly moving system. Question if energy represents 1; then what represents 0? No energy? Where would energy deplete to...nothingness?