a) I utilized the former as an expression of perceivable inspiration (choice of need); you used the latter as a judgment upon suggested information (choice of want).
b) equal (=) vs non equal (≠) represents a rebranding of want vs not want reasoning caused by your consent to suggested information.
c) both equal (want) and non equal (not want) ignore diverse (need). The ones perceiving within all perceivable cannot perceive sameness; only moving differences; hence representing differentiated "ones".
d) the entirety of math is based on the suggestion of 0 (not 1; nothingness) and your consent to it is what tempts you to view other ones as equal (=) or non equal (≠). There's no such thing as a 0 state within a constantly moving system. Question if energy represents 1; then what represents 0? No energy? Where would energy deplete to...nothingness?
a) I utilized the former as an expression of perceivable inspiration (choice of need); you used the latter as a judgment upon suggested information (choice of want).
b) equal (=) vs non equal (≠) represents a rebranding of want vs not want reasoning caused by your consent to suggested information.
c) both equal (want) and non equal (not want) ignore diverse (need). The ones perceiving within all perceivable cannot perceive sameness; only moving differences; hence representing differentiated "ones".
d) the entirety of math is based on the suggestion of 0 (not 1; nothingness) and your consent to it is what tempts you to view other ones as equal (=) or non equal (≠). There's no such thing as a 0 state within a constantly moving system. Question if energy represents 1; then what represents 0? No energy? Where would energy deplete to...nothingness?