a) I adapt to whatever inspires; hence having no issues (other than laziness) with putting effort into responses. What you do with it represents your free will of choice.
b) if one would ask me about anything I don't like about my children; then I would point out the moments I have to share the homemade waffles by my wife with them. I could consider greed and envy playing a role here; but then again...waffles.
a) I utilized the former as an expression of perceivable inspiration (choice of need); you used the latter as a judgment upon suggested information (choice of want).
b) equal (=) vs non equal (≠) represents a rebranding of want vs not want reasoning caused by your consent to suggested information.
c) both equal (want) and non equal (not want) ignore diverse (need). The ones perceiving within all perceivable cannot perceive sameness; only moving differences; hence representing differentiated "ones".
d) the entirety of math is based on the suggestion of 0 (not 1; nothingness) and your consent to it is what tempts you to view other ones as equal (=) or non equal (≠). There's no such thing as a 0 state within a constantly moving system. Question if energy represents 1; then what represents 0? No energy? Where would energy deplete to...nothingness?
a) I adapt to whatever inspires; hence having no issues (other than laziness) with putting effort into responses. What you do with it represents your free will of choice.
b) if one would ask me about anything I don't like about my children; then I would point out the moments I have to share the homemade waffles by my wife with them. I could consider greed and envy playing a role here; but then again...waffles.
Writing more ≠ better writing
a) I utilized the former as an expression of perceivable inspiration (choice of need); you used the latter as a judgment upon suggested information (choice of want).
b) equal (=) vs non equal (≠) represents a rebranding of want vs not want reasoning caused by your consent to suggested information.
c) both equal (want) and non equal (not want) ignore diverse (need). The ones perceiving within all perceivable cannot perceive sameness; only moving differences; hence representing differentiated "ones".
d) the entirety of math is based on the suggestion of 0 (not 1; nothingness) and your consent to it is what tempts you to view other ones as equal (=) or non equal (≠). There's no such thing as a 0 state within a constantly moving system. Question if energy represents 1; then what represents 0? No energy? Where would energy deplete to...nothingness?