Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

6
()
posted 3 years ago by TerfidDillywop 3 years ago by TerfidDillywop +6 / -0
14 comments share
14 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (14)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– Ep0ch 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Yawn this topic, every time.

What is preventing all out war right now?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Allas8 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

The fact that if you arme people, they rather just turn on the people who armed them, instead of going to die in some pointless war.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

No. What is preventing all out war. Currently. Nukes are.

Not speculation.

Of course there is a mad little AI embedding itself for profit. Playing both sides off. While investors reap the rewards of the conflicts generated.

It would be much easier to destroy a military conventionally otherwise. Suggesting they don't exist, is ridiculous. Because war is easier. It was against Saddam, and many others. You don't even need to win the war by holding on to Iraq. You just need to wipe out its military industrial complex. Then the opponent destroys themself, or install a favorable government.

So tell me genius why they haven't gone to war against those sides today. Look at them. Why hasn't Nato rolled in. It would lead to a bigger war, yes. But with no nukes, an easier win. Well, because they're both profiting off it. Yes undoubtedly. But it's because nukes are preventing it.

Stop shit posting this crap. Every Zombie would be at. Everywhere overnight. They'd rush America, they are, but through bullshit immigration. Overnight how many would give them a gigantic finger if there was no nukes. Look at Israel. It would be World War Z. What prevents it. Not Israel. Nukes do.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

No, they aren't. However they're more interlinked than the press would have us believe. They profit off demand and agenda.

But. What happens when a rogue side gets them. Unaligned. Wants to use them for war or for demands contrary to the control of any power brokers and profiteers.

Your argument is they don't exist. Nonsense. War would be easier as stated. It would be so much easier, if they didn't exist. Roll in, knock out the military, watch a nation destroy itself, or install a favourable government.

Instead of where we are at right now. Look at it. At this rate the chance of seeing them used is at its highest in history.

Might as well be speaking to monkeys. You're as dumb as redditors. Group think, attacking anybody not echoing your monkeyism. Monkeys are led by an acute system of echoes. The only karma they've got is from King Kong. But they all want a banana for agreeing. In your assumption it's the way the rest of the World works. No monkey, it is not. Nobody else echoes in war. You simply aren't convincing. Easier shooting the monkeys, trying to beg for the secrets of fire.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Allas8 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Same reason as North Korea do not need nukes to wipe out Seoul. V2 missiles is still a thing. While nukes are a fantasy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ep0ch 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Stop it you're dumber than a sack of bricks.

North Korea acquiring nukes is big. They can wipe out Seoul with their artillery, and conventional missiles. Higher elevation. What prevented them was nukes. By getting nukes, war becomes probability. This is why the current Admin is threatening their current test. But they'll anyway. What more dumb sanctions on top of the dumber sanctions. Japan gets nukes. South Korea gets nukes. Ontop of the American nukes? No, what.

Meanwhile Iran is also weaponizing. Ignoring the inspectors, refusing the inspectors, lying to the inspectors. What happens today. Instead of posting bullshit videos. The odds are incredibly high that nukes could become engaged. That factor is at its highest in history. Including in the current conflict happening.

What happens when more nations get nukes supposedly preventing nukes from occurring. No. They haven't. Besides many nations have them already. More than any wiki and Google will ever say. Nothing has been prevented. Instead their risk is at its highest historically.

But you believe there's gonna be what here ahead? You believe they aren't real. No. Because war would be easier. There would be a winner. It would be easier eliminating some of these rogue nations military industrial complexes. Of course profit suffers. But that question sooner becomes what would you rather? The risk they go off, or war? There's no peace until they go off. Why not war to prevent them?

Or are the stupid sides gonna sit down making some dumb rules of you pay me more. They have, and it doesn't work. They just make more nukes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– IGOexiled 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

This is reassuring, because I was worried that when Biden says things like "truindanashnundadepressa" he's slurring our nuclear launch codes to RT.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– jack445566778899 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

It is all so obvious in retrospect.

Hindsight is 2020 :(

Relativity is for children.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– jack445566778899 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Or perhaps I should! Not to wind you up, but to understand your perspective and research journey better.

We may enjoy discussing the topic further, as well as many other related topics on the community I created for them. Would you be interested to discuss there? I think others there would also be interested in the conversation (ideally now, as well as in the future)!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– alltheleavesarebrown 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

https://nuke-lies.org

[ To big-lies main site ] Welcome to nuke-lies.org | Reference Resource for Nuclear Investigators [ Wider screen shows more! | FORUM was live March 2011-March 2012 Later additions in red ] NEWEST map advanced e.g. Roosevelt Pearl Harbor

TWELVE NUKE SKEPTIC FORUMS:– 1 Welcome to "Nuke Lies" Forum! Do Nuclear Bombs Exist? High quality forum - Link guides to videos & evidence - Website notes - Nuclear revisionists vs nuke liars 2 Current Events Mostly 2012 Newsworthy subjects post here 3 Nuke Scams Past: Nuclear Plans & Conspiracies & Jews; Funds, Wars, Hoax Maintenance Manhattan Project, 'atom bomb', Cold War, spies, 'H-bomb', missile projects, 'neutron bomb', Vanunu, WMD lies + Photo evidence of 'Little Boy' and 'Fat Man' as Film Props (15 Apr 2013) + Cold War Deep Revisionism (9 Mar 2013) 4 Nuke Scams Future: Exit Strategies, Secret Plans, Sneak Phaseouts of Nuclear & Other Frauds 'Rethinking nuclear weapons' - discreet lies - covert policy reversals - managed nuclear closedowns - payoffs 5 WW2 Japan - Proofs that Hiroshima & Nagasaki were not A-Bombed Pacific War: Tokyo & Japan fire-bombed - 6 & 9 Aug 1945 - Hiroshima & Nagasaki nuke & radiation myths + Split Hiroshima clouds (17 Jan 2013) 6 Bogus A-Bomb & H-Bomb Test Sites - Bikini & Marshall Is. - Fake Air, Sea, Land Tests 'Nuclear bomb test sites' USA, USSR/Russia, UK, France, China, India, Pakistan - blast & radiation lies, disproofs 7 Nuclear Power Doubts: Nuclear Disasters? Safe Power? Is 'Nuclear Power' a Hoax? Dumploads? Covert uses? Radiation? Submarines? Chernobyl, Fukushima &c. Coal, oil, wind, solar. Electric grids 8 Science, Nuclear Physics, Astronomy, Space Travel Jodrell Bank/ 1949 Dagwood comic Nuclear & atomic theoretical physics - air & space science - bomb, missile & rocket technology - NASA, radar etc 9 Nuclear Movies, Stills, Soundtracks: Check the Media Yourself, for Fakes & Lies! Nuclear, military & science films - newsreels, TV, DVDs, videos, Youtubes - photos & images & pictures; EG&G 10 Rogues & Dupes: People, Groups, Organizations with Some Nuclear Links Propagandists, nuke liars, frauds, publicists, dupes - but also some debunkers - of nuclear and other issues 11 Other Revisionisms, Hyper-Revisionisms & Off-Topic Debates Ramifications of nuclear issues are everywhere: subjects loosely or remotely linked to the nuclear bomb myth 12 Introduction in Many Languages Leuens oor kern wapens - قنبلة نووية أسطورة - 核武器的根本所在 - Lži o jaderných zbraních - Illusjoner om atomvåpen - Leugens over kernwapens - Le mensonge nucléaire - Nuke Lügen - πυρηνικής ψέματα - שקרים על פצצות גרעיניות - परमाणु झूठ - Hazugságok a nukleáris fegyverek - Kebohongan tentang senjata nuklir - Leggere del'arma nucleare - 原子爆弾の神話 - 핵 무기와 핵 발전에 대한 자리잡고 있습니다. - Atsigulkite ant branduolinių ginklų - دروغ در مورد سلاح های هسته ای - Kłamstwa o broni jądrowej - nuclear mentiras - ядерная бомба мифы - mentiras nucleares - kärnkraft och atombomb lögner - nukleáris megtévesztés - Брехня про ядерну зброю - جوہری ہتھیاروں کے بارے میں جھوٹ بولتا ہے - nằm về bom hạt nhân YOUTUBE PLAYLISTS:– FirstClassSkeptic Rerevisionist YOUTUBES + SOME AUDIOS:–

LORDS OF THE NUKES 200 min: SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO on NUCLEAR FRAUDS & WORLD POLITICS Rerevisionist & others (many books, films, videos, images) (Audio)

SALT IN FOOD is necessary With Frank McManus (96 min.) OK; not nuclear! HIROSHIMA? John Friend & Rerevisionist. 90 min. (Audio) NUCLEAR BOMBS? NUCLEAR POWER? 91 min: Deanna Spingola & Rerevisionist EG&G: Faking Nuke Films 12 min Rerevisionist Youtube JEWS, GENES, NUKES, WHITES 106 min Rerevisionist Youtube from web radio "HAVE YOU HEARD NUCLEAR BOMBS ARE FAKE?" Slow Meme Spread 7 min Vox Pop "HAVE YOU HEARD THE 'HOLOCAUST' WAS FAKED?" 8 min Vox Pop

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No subversion.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
  • Perun
  • Thisisnotanexit
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy