No. What is preventing all out war. Currently. Nukes are.
Not speculation.
Of course there is a mad little AI embedding itself for profit. Playing both sides off. While investors reap the rewards of the conflicts generated.
It would be much easier to destroy a military conventionally otherwise. Suggesting they don't exist, is ridiculous. Because war is easier. It was against Saddam, and many others. You don't even need to win the war by holding on to Iraq. You just need to wipe out its military industrial complex. Then the opponent destroys themself, or install a favorable government.
So tell me genius why they haven't gone to war against those sides today. Look at them. Why hasn't Nato rolled in. It would lead to a bigger war, yes. But with no nukes, an easier win. Well, because they're both profiting off it. Yes undoubtedly. But it's because nukes are preventing it.
Stop shit posting this crap. Every Zombie would be at. Everywhere overnight. They'd rush America, they are, but through bullshit immigration. Overnight how many would give them a gigantic finger if there was no nukes. Look at Israel. It would be World War Z. What prevents it. Not Israel. Nukes do.
No, they aren't. However they're more interlinked than the press would have us believe. They profit off demand and agenda.
But. What happens when a rogue side gets them. Unaligned. Wants to use them for war or for demands contrary to the control of any power brokers and profiteers.
Your argument is they don't exist. Nonsense. War would be easier as stated. It would be so much easier, if they didn't exist. Roll in, knock out the military, watch a nation destroy itself, or install a favourable government.
Instead of where we are at right now. Look at it. At this rate the chance of seeing them used is at its highest in history.
Might as well be speaking to monkeys. You're as dumb as redditors. Group think, attacking anybody not echoing your monkeyism. Monkeys are led by an acute system of echoes. The only karma they've got is from King Kong. But they all want a banana for agreeing. In your assumption it's the way the rest of the World works. No monkey, it is not. Nobody else echoes in war. You simply aren't convincing. Easier shooting the monkeys, trying to beg for the secrets of fire.
North Korea acquiring nukes is big. They can wipe out Seoul with their artillery, and conventional missiles. Higher elevation. What prevented them was nukes. By getting nukes, war becomes probability. This is why the current Admin is threatening their current test. But they'll anyway. What more dumb sanctions on top of the dumber sanctions. Japan gets nukes. South Korea gets nukes. Ontop of the American nukes? No, what.
Meanwhile Iran is also weaponizing. Ignoring the inspectors, refusing the inspectors, lying to the inspectors. What happens today. Instead of posting bullshit videos. The odds are incredibly high that nukes could become engaged. That factor is at its highest in history. Including in the current conflict happening.
What happens when more nations get nukes supposedly preventing nukes from occurring. No. They haven't. Besides many nations have them already. More than any wiki and Google will ever say. Nothing has been prevented. Instead their risk is at its highest historically.
But you believe there's gonna be what here ahead? You believe they aren't real. No. Because war would be easier. There would be a winner. It would be easier eliminating some of these rogue nations military industrial complexes. Of course profit suffers. But that question sooner becomes what would you rather? The risk they go off, or war? There's no peace until they go off. Why not war to prevent them?
Or are the stupid sides gonna sit down making some dumb rules of you pay me more. They have, and it doesn't work. They just make more nukes.
No. What is preventing all out war. Currently. Nukes are.
Not speculation.
Of course there is a mad little AI embedding itself for profit. Playing both sides off. While investors reap the rewards of the conflicts generated.
It would be much easier to destroy a military conventionally otherwise. Suggesting they don't exist, is ridiculous. Because war is easier. It was against Saddam, and many others. You don't even need to win the war by holding on to Iraq. You just need to wipe out its military industrial complex. Then the opponent destroys themself, or install a favorable government.
So tell me genius why they haven't gone to war against those sides today. Look at them. Why hasn't Nato rolled in. It would lead to a bigger war, yes. But with no nukes, an easier win. Well, because they're both profiting off it. Yes undoubtedly. But it's because nukes are preventing it.
Stop shit posting this crap. Every Zombie would be at. Everywhere overnight. They'd rush America, they are, but through bullshit immigration. Overnight how many would give them a gigantic finger if there was no nukes. Look at Israel. It would be World War Z. What prevents it. Not Israel. Nukes do.
No, they aren't. However they're more interlinked than the press would have us believe. They profit off demand and agenda.
But. What happens when a rogue side gets them. Unaligned. Wants to use them for war or for demands contrary to the control of any power brokers and profiteers.
Your argument is they don't exist. Nonsense. War would be easier as stated. It would be so much easier, if they didn't exist. Roll in, knock out the military, watch a nation destroy itself, or install a favourable government.
Instead of where we are at right now. Look at it. At this rate the chance of seeing them used is at its highest in history.
Might as well be speaking to monkeys. You're as dumb as redditors. Group think, attacking anybody not echoing your monkeyism. Monkeys are led by an acute system of echoes. The only karma they've got is from King Kong. But they all want a banana for agreeing. In your assumption it's the way the rest of the World works. No monkey, it is not. Nobody else echoes in war. You simply aren't convincing. Easier shooting the monkeys, trying to beg for the secrets of fire.
Same reason as North Korea do not need nukes to wipe out Seoul. V2 missiles is still a thing. While nukes are a fantasy.
Stop it you're dumber than a sack of bricks.
North Korea acquiring nukes is big. They can wipe out Seoul with their artillery, and conventional missiles. Higher elevation. What prevented them was nukes. By getting nukes, war becomes probability. This is why the current Admin is threatening their current test. But they'll anyway. What more dumb sanctions on top of the dumber sanctions. Japan gets nukes. South Korea gets nukes. Ontop of the American nukes? No, what.
Meanwhile Iran is also weaponizing. Ignoring the inspectors, refusing the inspectors, lying to the inspectors. What happens today. Instead of posting bullshit videos. The odds are incredibly high that nukes could become engaged. That factor is at its highest in history. Including in the current conflict happening.
What happens when more nations get nukes supposedly preventing nukes from occurring. No. They haven't. Besides many nations have them already. More than any wiki and Google will ever say. Nothing has been prevented. Instead their risk is at its highest historically.
But you believe there's gonna be what here ahead? You believe they aren't real. No. Because war would be easier. There would be a winner. It would be easier eliminating some of these rogue nations military industrial complexes. Of course profit suffers. But that question sooner becomes what would you rather? The risk they go off, or war? There's no peace until they go off. Why not war to prevent them?
Or are the stupid sides gonna sit down making some dumb rules of you pay me more. They have, and it doesn't work. They just make more nukes.