Control Factors
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Just wait until it becomes a state right issue and then a federal case is forced to decide whether the difference between definition of life by state grants fathers the right to prevent abortion across state lines. It will cause a forest fire.
The term the MRA guys were calling how to deal with this was a "financial abortion."
Imagine you knock some woman up. She wants to keep the kid, you want to kill it. If a woman can kill your kid or keep it, as she wishes, the moral equivalent to give men power in this situation is the father saying "okay, you can keep it, but I am getting a 'financial abortion' so I don't have to pay child support, because I don't want the kid."
There were TWO r/legaladvice threads where the woman didn't want the baby, and the father did. The women delivered the baby, gave the father the baby, and walked away.
BOTH women were hot up for child support. One woman had to deal with the baby daddy expecting the mother to help raise the baby they walked away from. They paid child support, and walked away just like men.
I'm sure you can find those threads.
I've not been on Reddit since 2017, and even then I was only on The_Donald. I won't give them the clicks.
Just from what you tell me, the guys in these cases were legally in the right, unless the women waived the payments that is. I don't support the "financial abortion" thing, just mentioning it as a comparison. Nature, experience, and reason, tell us that children are best raised by a mother and father, in a marriage.
The men both tricked the women into keeping the babies, and one thought they would be able to manipulate a relationship out of it.
I would like to think I would find the situation wrong if the genders were reversed, but it was absolutely memorable because it happened in the nontradtion manner it did.
Equal rights, equal (legal) fights.
Oh, and two less murdered babies at least.
Equal walking away.
This post is spot on, except that it seems to suppose that women, themselves, are the source of motivation behind this movement.
I think the theory is sound, but I think it is the men behind the curtain that want to delegate these "rights" to women, in order to empower them, in order to further disassemble the natural relationship between men and women in our society, as, yet, part of the greater societal disassembly that we've been witnessing.
Abstraction layers and manufactured consent. It's similar to 'black culture'.
finna, itz dey culcha dough
FYI, don't know what finna means.
fake power as the brainwashing mechanism behind the jewish rite of child sacrifice
Let me add this to my "Duh" files
I believe you've got that backwards. As one human life is worth more than infinite pleasure. You cuckold.
Yes, I do believe you are pedaling evil.
Sad.
Am I the only one that things of statistical OLS regression when I see the term "control factors"?
Yes. And it should be so self apparent to you, that it should have gone without mention.
CONTROL TRACTORS
Virgin fingers typed that post
Hmmm....more likely some guy raped in divorce court.
Honestly it's either one or the other.
Those are the two archetypes that write things like this. Incels and divorce court dads.
"Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" is a famous quote from long before modern divorce courts.
Look at the threads this (((faggot))) posts.
"Christians are leading the anti-education charge in America as the only way to keep cult membership on the rise is to keep the population stupid" https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/15Hv2Ms5Wn/christians-are-leading-the-antie/c
Triggered christcuck incel is triggered
What ever you say Simple_Brandon.
K?