Just wondering when the last real election actually was.
ELECT', verb transitive [Latin electus, from eligo; e or ex and lego; Gr. to choose.]. That's allegory for you...free will of choice aka the response-ability at the center of a balance (need/want) based system. You represent the expressed choice at every moment of existence; while others use suggestion to deceive you to ignore perceived balance (need/want) to adapt to for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) to submit to.
Rephrase your question into "when was the last time choice mattered"; then ask yourself who has free will of choice, and why am I waiting for the suggested choices of others to cause consequences in my favor?
a) both leading and following for life represent towards death; while ignoring to be the temporary resisting life within the ongoing motion from inception towards death. Life isn't outcome oriented; it's a reaction to an enacting origin. The parasitic few exploit the ignorance thereof by suggesting "progressivism" to the many, hence tricking them to go with the flow towards death; instead of resisting for the sustenance of life.
b) being a "jew controlled pawn" (allegory of the golem) represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while ignoring perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law. In other words...instead of being the resistance to the natural order; the many are tricked to follow the suggested orders of the parasitic few.
c) PRES'IDENT, noun [Latin proesidens.] - "an officer elected or appointed to preside over a corporation". The election represents the aforementioned contract law; established through suggested "voting"; and the resulting corporation (corpus oration aka the whisper of the dead) represents the ignorance of perceived sound (reality) for suggested word (fiction). Those who ignore their free will of choice for the suggested choices by others; become incorporated; hence being tricked into corpus oration aka temporary existence in ignorance of self discernment (who; where; what and why) and response-ability (choice in response to balance).
d) the entire US his-story represents a suggested narrative for slaves; including the entire slavery sub-narrative. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_East_India_Company#/media/File:Flag_of_the_British_East_India_Company_(1801).svg Underneath that operates the civilization racket...a domestication of free will deception that tricks consenting slaves to build the beast system called society (allegory for ouroboros aka eating itself); which is caused by mass ignorance towards the natural order aka being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka being temporary resistance within ongoing velocity.
e) UNITED STATES aka UNITAS (the state of being one; oneness) STATE (circumstantial condition aka to be (form) out of (flow)) has suggested meaning (mainstream narrative); alternative meaning (contradiction of the mainstream narrative) and perceived meaning (behavior of form within flow; perceived as inspiration).
f) the so called jew vs gentile narrative (conflict of reason) is used as a battery to exploit form vs form aka resistance vs resistance within ignored velocity. The parasitic few use suggestion to cause these conflicts; as to trick the consenting many to spend their ignored potential; which can be harvested by misdirection.
g) the 14 words "we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children" mislead towards seeking security; when resisting origin represents growth; propagation and self sustenance. Future represents a suggested fiction that tempts those consenting to it to ignore the perceived reality...being within the ever changing moment(um) aka the balance of motion for the responding choice at its center.
Both showcasing the revisionism applied to the words suggested, and growing my own comprehension of the perceived method used. The world we exist in doesn't communicate itself through words; those within shape words out of perceived sound to deceive each other with suggested meaning (fiction) over perceived meaning (reality).
are you just a bot
You are being tricked to want confirmation from this world; which ignores that this world demands adaptation from you. As choice you represent the subject to balance; as form (life) you represent the subject to flow (inception towards death); as the one perceiving you represent the subject to all perceivable.
SEN'TIMENT, noun [from Latin sentio, to feel, perceive or think.]...voting doesnt represent the mind adapting to perceived inspiration; it represents submission to suggested information.
All voters ignore their free will of choice as the response to the perceivable reality; for the suggested fiction by the few who suggest voting representative GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind) to them.
Macron won with 58.5% of the vote to Le Pen's 41.5%.
This side vs that side represents want versus not want reasoning...a) caused by consent to suggested "voting"; b) implying ignorance of need (perceived inspiration) for want (suggested information) and c) the mass population control mechanism of division (reason) by suggestion (voting).
As long as you reason about suggested numbers; you ignore being the ONE (perceiving) within ALL (perceivable), and as long as you reason about suggested authority; you ignore being the sole authority over self aka choice (response) within perceivable balance (offer).
Rigged rigged rigged.
RIG, noun - "to dress; to put on". That refers to dress perceived inspiration by putting on suggested information aka cloaking balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law; underneath choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which then allows the supply & demand economy based on temptation (want over need).
Does anyone want to defend Le Pen as NOT being controlled opposition? She didn't even hint at suggesting there might exist the possibility that some shenanigans took place with the commanding reelection of a deeply despised person. She just instantly conceded.
I think she is complict in the game played. She became erratic in the later strategy offered, purposefully throwing it, by becoming absurd. Instead of trying to appeal too anybody stuck in the middle.
Of course, she had too. It's also part of the game. They have to be opposite. If one says this, the other must do the opposite.
But if they have a bar, and a hammer over her head. Court, jail, or worse. Was she anything more than a dog whistle.
It was rigged. He didn't gain popularity. But she lost it. Not that she ever had the status quo. But he never had the majority. All of a sudden in an election year. He gained those numbers. They could only hate the opposition more, according to an easier narrative. Because that game rigs it, look at the choice, it's not accidental. What happened to anybody else? She is therefore complict.
It seems like They are really desperate. They won't even take a chance throwing a bone to the French populace and give them a compromised Le Pen. That could have bought them a couple of years.
It's like They don't remember the Yellow Vests, who seemed like they'd had it up their globes oculaires before all the COVID lockdowns. I hate when They just push more chips into the center of the table. Gives me the feeling They don't plan on folding, tipping their hat, and walking away gracefully.
It's not supposed today. Part of the agenda. Depopulation. It is dividing us completely, or importantly subduing compliance by any means. Those gloves are off. Cut cut and slice slice. 1000 more cuts. Because the technology has outpaced the supply. But in order to implement it, it forces opposition and debt. Until any numbers tip, causing it. The people behind it, an unseen hand pulling the strings, don't care about anything else other than their later version of profit. They've rigged the game.
She might have been the best thing for France, decisive change. By slicing immediately away at that knot. Empowering god knows what that policy is, it became a leap of faith. Until it also lied, except in its obvious intent. But from immediately upseting it. She didn't play her hand, couldn't to be precise. She blew it. Had too in fact. Her timing and policy was off, and irrelevant. She served the game. Provoking it. But they would've just as easily assassinated her. Instead of turning her into a much simpler loser, according to a much easier narrative. A dog whistle, leading that herd into capitulation, into the last round up, git along little dogie, and it's off to the abattoir. Not that they will yield, but it forces policy, causing any agenda. Because there are still a 1000 more knots to tie, or 1000 cuts to be made. Until they continue to implode. But by his way, being a liar, where he promises stability and delivers nothing but protest. At least he bluffs any agenda through, instead of taking a guillotine to it.
Back to the topic. There's no way he gained all that popularity in an election year. Unless she lost it. Think about what that means.
I take it that when you say They, you're referring to (((they))). If that is the case, (((they))) would never fold and walk away. (((They))) are responsible for nearly every tragic event throughout the course of history, except natural disasters and maybe a few others. (((They))) prey on human kindness and compassion and take for granted that because of those things, (((they))) still remain on this Earth in some number. (((They))) have shown countless times that (((they))) will never change.
Sometimes the controlled opposition is being the only allowed candidate to run with the idea being, "This person is so awful, no one would actually VOTE for them." That's how Trump won 2016. He was supposed to be the bad guy setting Hillary up for an easy win. They just had no idea how much people hated Hillary.
ya know what? im seriously to that point now....if this shit is what people want? let it keep going, and let it fucking all burn so we can finally get to the point so we can rebuild.
the sooner this shit falls, the sooner we can all rebuild
its pretty obvious we cant vote our way out of this shit hole we are in now ok? enough with thinking we can. we need to stop thinking that way and start thinking beyond voting. time to be cogs in the wheel.
I love your fact-free diversionary argument. It's on a par with "Hitler drank milk; you drink milk; therefore the only possible conclusion is that you're a Nazi".
Voting only has ceremonial significance like the guards at the Tower of London: a charade used to control historic narrative
yes, and has nothing to do with 'democracy', which is also a fairy tale.
Macron won with 58.5% of the vote to Le Pen's 41.5%. That doesn't match the known sentiment of a majority of voters. Rigged rigged rigged.
Not surprised anymore. Just wondering when the last real election actually was.
supposing there has ever been a real election.
ELECT', verb transitive [Latin electus, from eligo; e or ex and lego; Gr. to choose.]. That's allegory for you...free will of choice aka the response-ability at the center of a balance (need/want) based system. You represent the expressed choice at every moment of existence; while others use suggestion to deceive you to ignore perceived balance (need/want) to adapt to for suggested imbalance (want vs not want) to submit to.
Rephrase your question into "when was the last time choice mattered"; then ask yourself who has free will of choice, and why am I waiting for the suggested choices of others to cause consequences in my favor?
a) both leading and following for life represent towards death; while ignoring to be the temporary resisting life within the ongoing motion from inception towards death. Life isn't outcome oriented; it's a reaction to an enacting origin. The parasitic few exploit the ignorance thereof by suggesting "progressivism" to the many, hence tricking them to go with the flow towards death; instead of resisting for the sustenance of life.
b) being a "jew controlled pawn" (allegory of the golem) represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while ignoring perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law. In other words...instead of being the resistance to the natural order; the many are tricked to follow the suggested orders of the parasitic few.
c) PRES'IDENT, noun [Latin proesidens.] - "an officer elected or appointed to preside over a corporation". The election represents the aforementioned contract law; established through suggested "voting"; and the resulting corporation (corpus oration aka the whisper of the dead) represents the ignorance of perceived sound (reality) for suggested word (fiction). Those who ignore their free will of choice for the suggested choices by others; become incorporated; hence being tricked into corpus oration aka temporary existence in ignorance of self discernment (who; where; what and why) and response-ability (choice in response to balance).
d) the entire US his-story represents a suggested narrative for slaves; including the entire slavery sub-narrative. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_East_India_Company#/media/File:Flag_of_the_British_East_India_Company_(1801).svg Underneath that operates the civilization racket...a domestication of free will deception that tricks consenting slaves to build the beast system called society (allegory for ouroboros aka eating itself); which is caused by mass ignorance towards the natural order aka being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka being temporary resistance within ongoing velocity.
e) UNITED STATES aka UNITAS (the state of being one; oneness) STATE (circumstantial condition aka to be (form) out of (flow)) has suggested meaning (mainstream narrative); alternative meaning (contradiction of the mainstream narrative) and perceived meaning (behavior of form within flow; perceived as inspiration).
f) the so called jew vs gentile narrative (conflict of reason) is used as a battery to exploit form vs form aka resistance vs resistance within ignored velocity. The parasitic few use suggestion to cause these conflicts; as to trick the consenting many to spend their ignored potential; which can be harvested by misdirection.
g) the 14 words "we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children" mislead towards seeking security; when resisting origin represents growth; propagation and self sustenance. Future represents a suggested fiction that tempts those consenting to it to ignore the perceived reality...being within the ever changing moment(um) aka the balance of motion for the responding choice at its center.
are you just a bot that goes around and quotes people using dictionary technical sentences? o.O
Adaption to inspiration.
Both showcasing the revisionism applied to the words suggested, and growing my own comprehension of the perceived method used. The world we exist in doesn't communicate itself through words; those within shape words out of perceived sound to deceive each other with suggested meaning (fiction) over perceived meaning (reality).
You are being tricked to want confirmation from this world; which ignores that this world demands adaptation from you. As choice you represent the subject to balance; as form (life) you represent the subject to flow (inception towards death); as the one perceiving you represent the subject to all perceivable.
SEN'TIMENT, noun [from Latin sentio, to feel, perceive or think.]...voting doesnt represent the mind adapting to perceived inspiration; it represents submission to suggested information.
All voters ignore their free will of choice as the response to the perceivable reality; for the suggested fiction by the few who suggest voting representative GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind) to them.
This side vs that side represents want versus not want reasoning...a) caused by consent to suggested "voting"; b) implying ignorance of need (perceived inspiration) for want (suggested information) and c) the mass population control mechanism of division (reason) by suggestion (voting).
As long as you reason about suggested numbers; you ignore being the ONE (perceiving) within ALL (perceivable), and as long as you reason about suggested authority; you ignore being the sole authority over self aka choice (response) within perceivable balance (offer).
RIG, noun - "to dress; to put on". That refers to dress perceived inspiration by putting on suggested information aka cloaking balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law; underneath choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; which then allows the supply & demand economy based on temptation (want over need).
Does anyone want to defend Le Pen as NOT being controlled opposition? She didn't even hint at suggesting there might exist the possibility that some shenanigans took place with the commanding reelection of a deeply despised person. She just instantly conceded.
"We'll get 'em prochaine fois, mes amis!"
I think she is complict in the game played. She became erratic in the later strategy offered, purposefully throwing it, by becoming absurd. Instead of trying to appeal too anybody stuck in the middle.
Of course, she had too. It's also part of the game. They have to be opposite. If one says this, the other must do the opposite.
But if they have a bar, and a hammer over her head. Court, jail, or worse. Was she anything more than a dog whistle.
It was rigged. He didn't gain popularity. But she lost it. Not that she ever had the status quo. But he never had the majority. All of a sudden in an election year. He gained those numbers. They could only hate the opposition more, according to an easier narrative. Because that game rigs it, look at the choice, it's not accidental. What happened to anybody else? She is therefore complict.
It seems like They are really desperate. They won't even take a chance throwing a bone to the French populace and give them a compromised Le Pen. That could have bought them a couple of years.
It's like They don't remember the Yellow Vests, who seemed like they'd had it up their globes oculaires before all the COVID lockdowns. I hate when They just push more chips into the center of the table. Gives me the feeling They don't plan on folding, tipping their hat, and walking away gracefully.
It's not supposed today. Part of the agenda. Depopulation. It is dividing us completely, or importantly subduing compliance by any means. Those gloves are off. Cut cut and slice slice. 1000 more cuts. Because the technology has outpaced the supply. But in order to implement it, it forces opposition and debt. Until any numbers tip, causing it. The people behind it, an unseen hand pulling the strings, don't care about anything else other than their later version of profit. They've rigged the game.
She might have been the best thing for France, decisive change. By slicing immediately away at that knot. Empowering god knows what that policy is, it became a leap of faith. Until it also lied, except in its obvious intent. But from immediately upseting it. She didn't play her hand, couldn't to be precise. She blew it. Had too in fact. Her timing and policy was off, and irrelevant. She served the game. Provoking it. But they would've just as easily assassinated her. Instead of turning her into a much simpler loser, according to a much easier narrative. A dog whistle, leading that herd into capitulation, into the last round up, git along little dogie, and it's off to the abattoir. Not that they will yield, but it forces policy, causing any agenda. Because there are still a 1000 more knots to tie, or 1000 cuts to be made. Until they continue to implode. But by his way, being a liar, where he promises stability and delivers nothing but protest. At least he bluffs any agenda through, instead of taking a guillotine to it.
Back to the topic. There's no way he gained all that popularity in an election year. Unless she lost it. Think about what that means.
I take it that when you say They, you're referring to (((they))). If that is the case, (((they))) would never fold and walk away. (((They))) are responsible for nearly every tragic event throughout the course of history, except natural disasters and maybe a few others. (((They))) prey on human kindness and compassion and take for granted that because of those things, (((they))) still remain on this Earth in some number. (((They))) have shown countless times that (((they))) will never change.
Or, she recognized that the voting system is massively rigged and there was little she could do about it.
Well, she didn't do little, she did nothing. You quite literally did more by posting about it on conspiracies.win.
Sometimes the controlled opposition is being the only allowed candidate to run with the idea being, "This person is so awful, no one would actually VOTE for them." That's how Trump won 2016. He was supposed to be the bad guy setting Hillary up for an easy win. They just had no idea how much people hated Hillary.
im over her....she doesnt seem like the fighting type tbh :/
ya know what? im seriously to that point now....if this shit is what people want? let it keep going, and let it fucking all burn so we can finally get to the point so we can rebuild.
the sooner this shit falls, the sooner we can all rebuild
But .. but .. who will supply the French toast then?
Looks like the WEF is a true terrorist organization.
pikachu
its pretty obvious we cant vote our way out of this shit hole we are in now ok? enough with thinking we can. we need to stop thinking that way and start thinking beyond voting. time to be cogs in the wheel.
They also have Dominion voting machines?
An election isn’t rigged just because you lose.
You probably also believe biden got the most votes of all time on his 3rd attempt for the presidency.
Still waiting for that mountain of evidence and the Kraken to come along and reinstate Trump into office.
still waiting on that mountain of evidence of 81 million people voting for biden, which is fucking hilariously laughable.
I'll wait ;)
Here ya go.
I love your fact-free diversionary argument. It's on a par with "Hitler drank milk; you drink milk; therefore the only possible conclusion is that you're a Nazi".
A successful place of global trade and diplomatic resolution?
Yeah, I agree.
you certainly are from reddit! with your delusions and all. you probably think obama was the best president this nation ever had
I'm willing to bet this is the comment that got you banned for a week
Have you tried throwing a temper tantrum on Facebook?
i dont go on facefuck or any place boomers are. they already ruined enough. i prefer to not go anywhere near em