It's great that you link me a webpage but I can just go outside and look across the span of water in front of me
This isn't difficult
What you want to do is stand on the shoreline and pick out the most distant landmark/object you can view from where you're standing
Google Maps > right click your location > measure distance from here > right click your distant landmark > measure distance to here
Then enter that distance into any of the freely available earth curvature calculators available online, some will allow you to input your altitude which should be appx. the distance between your eyes and the ground below your feet
Bring binoculars if you have them to see even further and really hammer this home for yourself
Pay attention to what you are seeing
How much of the distant landmark are you observing? All or nearly all of it? Does that reconcile with the amount of curve there should be at that distance?
When I do it, I am still seeing 100% of the distant landmark appx 20kms away from my reference point
There should already be about 100ft of drop and so the bottom 100ft of my landmark should be obscured from view but not only am I seeing all of it, the landmark itself isn't even 100ft tall so the fact that I'm seeing ANY of it, doesn't reconcile
I can go on about eclipses, gravity, crepuscular sun rays, coriolis effect, or how no one has ever been to the moon, but the distant landmark observation is a good place to start for most as it can be performed with the naked eye and without any links to webpages with documents, testimony, or videos
Go see for yourself
I can link you plenty of videos with examples of much further distances than my 20kms I can quickly observe for myself, but just go see for yourself
What you want to do is stand on the shoreline and pick out the most distant landmark/object you can view from where you're standing
This is how I did it for myself. I can see the neighboring city along the coast thats 20-35 miles away, or supposed to be like 500-1000 ft under the horizon yet none of it is. Yes, 20-35 miles because the city goes along the coast. Starts 20-25 and ends 30-35 miles away. I can see the shore, the hill that goes up to the actual landmass, the city, buildings and factories on top of it. If the earth were curved I would supposed to be able to see the tops of the smoke stacks, maybe.
“But why don’t any physicists or astronomers or anyone at nasa, etc speak out about this”
“I’m a boat captain over 20 years on the water and here’s a link to a .gov site with a PDF saying we can only see a few nautical miles, so, you’re wrong”
Cool. I’m literally looking at it with my own eyes.
Not to mention all of the other evidence blowing apart the heliocentric spinning globe story, but the conversation can end right there with the distant landmark over water observation
Falsified the radius and that’s it guys, they’re lying
It all builds on the earth being a spheroid average radius 3959miles
No equipment, tricks or videos or secret leaked top secret anything just your own eyeballs and some simple math using THEIR NUMBERS
I fail to understand how credentials matter more than scientific method
Credential; Credit; Creed - "belief; faith" aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. As opposed to METH'OD, noun [Latin methodus; Gr. with, and way.] aka being form (life) with the way of flow (inception towards death).
why don’t any physicists or astronomers or anyone at nasa, etc speak out about this
a) suggested scientism represents RELIGION, noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" from RE (respond) and LIGO (to bind). Religions isn't about what one consents to believe or not believe; but about choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law (the new bound); which ignores perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law (the original bond).
b) speaking out implies suggesting words to define reality; which ignores that perceived reality doesn't use suggested words to communicate itself; but moving inspiration for adaptation such as perceivable sound.
Those who choose to consent to a suggestion by wanting or not wanting it; would choose the opposite side within the same conflict when speaking out against (not want) the suggested (want).
c) NASA; noun (hebrew; נָשָׁא nasha) - "to beguile; deceive". Also. DE (away from) CEPT (perception) -ION (action). As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); one represents the reaction (form) to action (flow).
A sleight of hand for this...Transformers (form transmuted out of base flow) and Decepticons (those who use suggestion to deceive others to ignore perception) and of course "Robots in disguise" aka ROBOT (from robur; strength) IN (within) DISGUISE (to alter form).
I’m literally looking at it with my own eyes
Sensing and adapting to perceived (inspiration) over consenting to suggested (information). Information (from within form) and Inspiration (from within spirit) aka spiro - "to breathe" aka form to flow adaptation.
they’re lying
They contradict suggested information which you consented to believe represented truth. Now you switched sides within the same conflict of reason (true vs false) by opposing the suggested truth by suggesting it to be a lie. What both sides are ignoring represents being within constant change; hence needing to adapt to it. Truth (want) vs Lie (not want) represents a conflict (imbalance) in ignorance of need/want aka perceived/suggested (balance) for ones responding choice at the center.
The few contradict the suggested fiction the many consented to; which allows them to control those who ignore perceived reality.
using THEIR NUMBERS
a) still responding to their suggestions over all perceivable.
b) NUM'BER, noun (nombre) - "the designation of a unit" + UNIT; noun (unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness". It's ALL flow that designates each ONE form within. The few suggest numbers to deceive the many to count suggested numbers; while ignoring to express being the perceiving ONE unit within the perceivable designating ALL.
c) from a different perspective...within energy one doesn't need to count; for anything countable is inherent within everything. There are no math problems; everything represents solution (flow). What's lacking is ONEs self discernment within the perceived ALL.
Have you ever been outside before?
It's great that you link me a webpage but I can just go outside and look across the span of water in front of me
This isn't difficult
What you want to do is stand on the shoreline and pick out the most distant landmark/object you can view from where you're standing
Google Maps > right click your location > measure distance from here > right click your distant landmark > measure distance to here
Then enter that distance into any of the freely available earth curvature calculators available online, some will allow you to input your altitude which should be appx. the distance between your eyes and the ground below your feet
Bring binoculars if you have them to see even further and really hammer this home for yourself
Pay attention to what you are seeing
How much of the distant landmark are you observing? All or nearly all of it? Does that reconcile with the amount of curve there should be at that distance?
When I do it, I am still seeing 100% of the distant landmark appx 20kms away from my reference point
There should already be about 100ft of drop and so the bottom 100ft of my landmark should be obscured from view but not only am I seeing all of it, the landmark itself isn't even 100ft tall so the fact that I'm seeing ANY of it, doesn't reconcile
I can go on about eclipses, gravity, crepuscular sun rays, coriolis effect, or how no one has ever been to the moon, but the distant landmark observation is a good place to start for most as it can be performed with the naked eye and without any links to webpages with documents, testimony, or videos
Go see for yourself
I can link you plenty of videos with examples of much further distances than my 20kms I can quickly observe for myself, but just go see for yourself
This is how I did it for myself. I can see the neighboring city along the coast thats 20-35 miles away, or supposed to be like 500-1000 ft under the horizon yet none of it is. Yes, 20-35 miles because the city goes along the coast. Starts 20-25 and ends 30-35 miles away. I can see the shore, the hill that goes up to the actual landmass, the city, buildings and factories on top of it. If the earth were curved I would supposed to be able to see the tops of the smoke stacks, maybe.
Yepppp
So easy, right?
“But why don’t any physicists or astronomers or anyone at nasa, etc speak out about this”
“I’m a boat captain over 20 years on the water and here’s a link to a .gov site with a PDF saying we can only see a few nautical miles, so, you’re wrong”
Cool. I’m literally looking at it with my own eyes.
Not to mention all of the other evidence blowing apart the heliocentric spinning globe story, but the conversation can end right there with the distant landmark over water observation
Falsified the radius and that’s it guys, they’re lying
It all builds on the earth being a spheroid average radius 3959miles
No equipment, tricks or videos or secret leaked top secret anything just your own eyeballs and some simple math using THEIR NUMBERS
Credential; Credit; Creed - "belief; faith" aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law. As opposed to METH'OD, noun [Latin methodus; Gr. with, and way.] aka being form (life) with the way of flow (inception towards death).
a) suggested scientism represents RELIGION, noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" from RE (respond) and LIGO (to bind). Religions isn't about what one consents to believe or not believe; but about choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law (the new bound); which ignores perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law (the original bond).
b) speaking out implies suggesting words to define reality; which ignores that perceived reality doesn't use suggested words to communicate itself; but moving inspiration for adaptation such as perceivable sound.
Those who choose to consent to a suggestion by wanting or not wanting it; would choose the opposite side within the same conflict when speaking out against (not want) the suggested (want).
c) NASA; noun (hebrew; נָשָׁא nasha) - "to beguile; deceive". Also. DE (away from) CEPT (perception) -ION (action). As form (life) within flow (inception towards death); one represents the reaction (form) to action (flow).
A sleight of hand for this...Transformers (form transmuted out of base flow) and Decepticons (those who use suggestion to deceive others to ignore perception) and of course "Robots in disguise" aka ROBOT (from robur; strength) IN (within) DISGUISE (to alter form).
Sensing and adapting to perceived (inspiration) over consenting to suggested (information). Information (from within form) and Inspiration (from within spirit) aka spiro - "to breathe" aka form to flow adaptation.
They contradict suggested information which you consented to believe represented truth. Now you switched sides within the same conflict of reason (true vs false) by opposing the suggested truth by suggesting it to be a lie. What both sides are ignoring represents being within constant change; hence needing to adapt to it. Truth (want) vs Lie (not want) represents a conflict (imbalance) in ignorance of need/want aka perceived/suggested (balance) for ones responding choice at the center.
The few contradict the suggested fiction the many consented to; which allows them to control those who ignore perceived reality.
a) still responding to their suggestions over all perceivable.
b) NUM'BER, noun (nombre) - "the designation of a unit" + UNIT; noun (unitas) - "the state of being one; oneness". It's ALL flow that designates each ONE form within. The few suggest numbers to deceive the many to count suggested numbers; while ignoring to express being the perceiving ONE unit within the perceivable designating ALL.
c) from a different perspective...within energy one doesn't need to count; for anything countable is inherent within everything. There are no math problems; everything represents solution (flow). What's lacking is ONEs self discernment within the perceived ALL.
No I usually don’t leave the wheelhouse. I have deckhands that do the outside work for me.
Regards, A Captain
Furthest distance you’ve observed a lighthouse, captain?
Plenty of examples of lighthouses around the world impossibly in view from great distances!
20 years on a boat and you’ve never noticed?
That, or you don’t boat at all, and are the paid shill you accuse me of
Replying to your edit: I have been navigating for 20+ Years I don’t need you to inform me how to do my job
Ahoy
Basically you are wasting your time because you will never convince me of your theory.