how is it possible to fool so many people that space is real?
Being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents being ONE choice at the center of ALL balance. To distract from that center requires as little as consent to the suggestion of something else; which can then be grown into everything else by those suggesting it.
A simple allegory for this: "would you like to know what's in this box?" If you say yes; then I hold the sole power to define whatever I want you to believe is inside the box, for as long as you ignore perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information). What's in that box represents your mind.
As for so many...consenting to suggestion causes a chain of command underneath those suggesting aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law over perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
"There must be plenty of others out there who also know this"
Billions of people with access to the internet and everyone can observe their surroundings, so, how does the spinning globe lie stay up?
Or even gravity. Can anyone picture a crumpled up napkin on the ground? How is the awesome force of gravity able to hold all of the peoples, places, things, and worlds oceans against a violently spinning sphere and yet is no match for this napkin, which should be pressed flat against the floor completely unable to withstand this force constantly pulling everything towards earths core
And yet, no one questions the crumpled up napkin
So much of it is so easily blown apart, and I don't work in physics or anything even science related, so where are our astronomers and physicists? Does the indoctrination work so well that they explain everything away with formulas and then new formulas to explain discrepancies in the current failed model?
Even if there are 150 formulas to get lost and confused in, what about the simple observations we can't ignore?
Distant landmark observable across a span of water that should be blocked from view due to Earth's curvature?
Eclipses with the shadow starting anywhere other than from the bottom up? What is casting that shadow if not the Earth?! How do we have dozens of examples of eclipses with both the Sun and moon both visible in the sky at the same time?
HOW DOES NO ONE IN PHYSICS OR ASTRONOMY ASK THESE QUESTIONS
Crepuscular sun rays?
Can we see Mercury and/or Venus in our nighttime sky from anywhere on Earth, ever? How is this possible if we are facing away from the Sun and so Mercury and Venus should both be obscured from view using their own model
Spin of the Earth?! How does the Earth supposedly spin at over 1,600 km/h near the equator and yet no airplane, helicopter, hot air balloon, birds, or insects ever have to account for this? Some force is pulling all of Earth's matter along in perfect harmony so that we don't feel it? How do clouds move in multiple directions over the same place on the ground?
I present these questions and more, on multiple occasions, and almost everyone will come out to viciously defend the accepted bullshit model
It's the suggested explanations that represent form (in-form-ation) within flow; which are only held together by consent of the many to the suggestions of the few. The wind allegory (blown away) represents the ongoing perceivable inspiration aka the foundation we shape all suggestible information out of; yet it's the exchange thereof among ourselves aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; that corrupts our comprehension of everything perceivable; because now we think in terms of the suggested explanations of others. Their words are upheld within our memory; while we ignore the perceived sound those suggested words where shaped out of.
I don't work in physics or anything even science related
Here's the foundation of "work"...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". You represent half of the internal power (the choice within balance; the resistance within velocity).
Next, PHYS'IC, noun [Gr. from nature; to produce.]...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) you represent the produced; hence to be (produced) out of (nature).
Lastly; SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka to adapt to perceived inspiration; as opposed to scientism aka to consent suggested information.
Does the indoctrination work so well that they explain everything away with formulas and then new formulas to explain discrepancies in the current failed model?
"in the current" represents the ongoing flow; you represent the temporary form within. The suggested models aim to keep the wool over your eyes; to keep you ignorant of the need of the temporary to resist the velocity of the ongoing for self sustenance.
The "discrepancies" aka discredit (want of credit; creed; faith aka suggested information over perceived inspiration) represents your growth of resistance to the suggested temptation by others. You were farmed up to the point where the suggested food doesn't distract you enough anymore; which tempts you to now want different food. Yet that's just you; while all the others around you have different stages of comprehension; corrupted by different layers of suggested information.
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents credit to creditor; while discredit represents the consequence of ignoring perceived value (liquidity).
Even if there are 150 formulas to get lost and confused in...
The suggested information we stack within out memory; when consenting to it, represents the allegory of the Tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder".
what about the simple observations we can't ignore?
a) perceived inspiration represent the simple observation of a moving system.
b) being the response to perceivable implies the choice of both need (adaptation) and want (ignorance of need). Each one represents the choice at the center of perceived balance (need/want); who needs to resist the temptation of suggested imbalance (want vs not want). All of this is derived from being form within flow; from being the resistance to velocity; from being the reaction to an enacting system etc.
In short...ONEs free will of choice allows the ignorance of ALL perceived (inspiration) for what other ONEs are suggesting (information). The struggle of self sustenance requires resisting want (suggested) for need (perceived).
HOW DOES NO ONE IN PHYSICS OR ASTRONOMY ASK THESE QUESTIONS
The status quo for those who choose want (suggested) over need (perceived) represents following orders (towards death); instead of being the resistance to the natural order (for the sustenance of life). The allegory for this represents the "path of least resistance".
I present these questions and more, on multiple occasions, and almost everyone will come out to viciously defend the accepted bullshit model
a) Present aka PRE (before) ESSE (to be) implies to be (form) out of (flow). You don't present; you express.
b) what others are defending represents the suggested information they chose to "want"; which you contradict as "not want" when suggesting them different information. Both of you are being tricked to reason (want vs not want) against each other about suggested information; while ignoring to adapt (need) to perceived inspiration.
c) as choice one exists at the center of perceived balance (need/want). Viewing the world as a conflict is caused by choosing want (suggested) over need (perceived); which causes want vs not want (conflict of reason). Both of you are fighting over the suggested meaning (information); while ignoring the perceived meaning (inspiration).
d) true vs false; right vs wrong; good vs evil etc. represents a rebranding of want vs not want. You are tricked to switch sides within the same conflict; whenever seeing through a deception on your side, and if you lose enough of your side; you're tempted to hold onto the remaining even harder; hence attacking anyone trying to contradict your worldview; your faith; your belief; your truth; your side against the world.
they consider us animals
We represent AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] + HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] aka form animated by flow. You are being deceived by suggested words (animal; human) to devalue one side (animal) underneath the other (human); while ignoring the perceived status quo of an animal (animated) human (form).
Freemasonry aka being a mason of free (will of choice) represents the use of suggestion to shape the memory of those consenting to it. Therefore the perpetuation of suggested information shapes the memories of all those consenting to want or not want it. This is how freemasonry can infiltrate govern (to control) ment (mind); science (from scio; to know aka to perceive); corporations (corpus oration aka the whisper of the dead); suggested his-story; religion (from religio; to bind anew) and economy (from oeconomia; house-rule aka suggested contract law over perceived natural law).
Those who fall for the temptation of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while ignoring perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law, are stuck within a chain of command (a world wide caste system of submission) under the will of others. Those who consent to suggested information (fiction) are ignoring perceived inspiration (reality); those who consent to the suggested word are ignoring the perceived sound; those who ignore to resist the perceived natural order are tempted to follow suggested orders and so on.
The foundation for all of this:...ALL represents ONE in energy; so each ONE within represents an expression of ALL of it. In short...to be implies out of; hence being form (life) out of flow (inception towards death). So it's not a question about "can all be"; but lack of comprehension towards "being within all".
Starting with suggestion (want) over perception (need) aka suggested word over perceived sound. Nowadays this is being supplemented with whatever was pumped into the ancestors leading up to the child; but the want over need foundation is where it's all build upon.
Wrote a big long response and sent it, but somehow it didn't post.
This was me every other day before I realized that if one adapts to perceived inspiration instead of suggested information; then it's not about responding to others; but about the expression of self while writing. This way one is way less tempted by loss. Copy+paste into a txt file before responding also works.
I still don't understand it all.
Understanding represents "standing under" the suggested information by others; which ignores to grow comprehension (compressed) out of perceived (impressed) inspiration. Resist the temptation to figure what I write out, and instead use it to grow whatever you comprehend. Share the process of growing and we can adapt to each other.
Everything perceivable already exists, so I'm not the source for anything; just an expression of the only source for everything; yet your choice decides between perceived (need) or suggested (want).
Sorry no time now to write it again. Just wanted to be sure u knew I read it.
All good. If others get inspired by whatever I write about; then their expressions will show it. We're are tempted and exploited with seeking confirmation; while ignoring the ongoing need for adaptation to origin.
Being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents being ONE choice at the center of ALL balance. To distract from that center requires as little as consent to the suggestion of something else; which can then be grown into everything else by those suggesting it.
A simple allegory for this: "would you like to know what's in this box?" If you say yes; then I hold the sole power to define whatever I want you to believe is inside the box, for as long as you ignore perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information). What's in that box represents your mind.
As for so many...consenting to suggestion causes a chain of command underneath those suggesting aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law over perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
It’s constant indoctrination beginning from birth
Not complicated
I think about this, too
"There must be plenty of others out there who also know this"
Billions of people with access to the internet and everyone can observe their surroundings, so, how does the spinning globe lie stay up?
Or even gravity. Can anyone picture a crumpled up napkin on the ground? How is the awesome force of gravity able to hold all of the peoples, places, things, and worlds oceans against a violently spinning sphere and yet is no match for this napkin, which should be pressed flat against the floor completely unable to withstand this force constantly pulling everything towards earths core
And yet, no one questions the crumpled up napkin
So much of it is so easily blown apart, and I don't work in physics or anything even science related, so where are our astronomers and physicists? Does the indoctrination work so well that they explain everything away with formulas and then new formulas to explain discrepancies in the current failed model?
Even if there are 150 formulas to get lost and confused in, what about the simple observations we can't ignore?
Distant landmark observable across a span of water that should be blocked from view due to Earth's curvature?
Eclipses with the shadow starting anywhere other than from the bottom up? What is casting that shadow if not the Earth?! How do we have dozens of examples of eclipses with both the Sun and moon both visible in the sky at the same time?
HOW DOES NO ONE IN PHYSICS OR ASTRONOMY ASK THESE QUESTIONS
Crepuscular sun rays?
Can we see Mercury and/or Venus in our nighttime sky from anywhere on Earth, ever? How is this possible if we are facing away from the Sun and so Mercury and Venus should both be obscured from view using their own model
Spin of the Earth?! How does the Earth supposedly spin at over 1,600 km/h near the equator and yet no airplane, helicopter, hot air balloon, birds, or insects ever have to account for this? Some force is pulling all of Earth's matter along in perfect harmony so that we don't feel it? How do clouds move in multiple directions over the same place on the ground?
I present these questions and more, on multiple occasions, and almost everyone will come out to viciously defend the accepted bullshit model
No wonder they consider us animals
It's the suggested explanations that represent form (in-form-ation) within flow; which are only held together by consent of the many to the suggestions of the few. The wind allegory (blown away) represents the ongoing perceivable inspiration aka the foundation we shape all suggestible information out of; yet it's the exchange thereof among ourselves aka choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; that corrupts our comprehension of everything perceivable; because now we think in terms of the suggested explanations of others. Their words are upheld within our memory; while we ignore the perceived sound those suggested words where shaped out of.
Here's the foundation of "work"...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". You represent half of the internal power (the choice within balance; the resistance within velocity).
Next, PHYS'IC, noun [Gr. from nature; to produce.]...as form (life) within flow (inception towards death) you represent the produced; hence to be (produced) out of (nature).
Lastly; SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka to adapt to perceived inspiration; as opposed to scientism aka to consent suggested information.
"in the current" represents the ongoing flow; you represent the temporary form within. The suggested models aim to keep the wool over your eyes; to keep you ignorant of the need of the temporary to resist the velocity of the ongoing for self sustenance.
The "discrepancies" aka discredit (want of credit; creed; faith aka suggested information over perceived inspiration) represents your growth of resistance to the suggested temptation by others. You were farmed up to the point where the suggested food doesn't distract you enough anymore; which tempts you to now want different food. Yet that's just you; while all the others around you have different stages of comprehension; corrupted by different layers of suggested information.
Choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law represents credit to creditor; while discredit represents the consequence of ignoring perceived value (liquidity).
The suggested information we stack within out memory; when consenting to it, represents the allegory of the Tower of BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder".
a) perceived inspiration represent the simple observation of a moving system.
b) being the response to perceivable implies the choice of both need (adaptation) and want (ignorance of need). Each one represents the choice at the center of perceived balance (need/want); who needs to resist the temptation of suggested imbalance (want vs not want). All of this is derived from being form within flow; from being the resistance to velocity; from being the reaction to an enacting system etc.
In short...ONEs free will of choice allows the ignorance of ALL perceived (inspiration) for what other ONEs are suggesting (information). The struggle of self sustenance requires resisting want (suggested) for need (perceived).
The status quo for those who choose want (suggested) over need (perceived) represents following orders (towards death); instead of being the resistance to the natural order (for the sustenance of life). The allegory for this represents the "path of least resistance".
a) Present aka PRE (before) ESSE (to be) implies to be (form) out of (flow). You don't present; you express.
b) what others are defending represents the suggested information they chose to "want"; which you contradict as "not want" when suggesting them different information. Both of you are being tricked to reason (want vs not want) against each other about suggested information; while ignoring to adapt (need) to perceived inspiration.
c) as choice one exists at the center of perceived balance (need/want). Viewing the world as a conflict is caused by choosing want (suggested) over need (perceived); which causes want vs not want (conflict of reason). Both of you are fighting over the suggested meaning (information); while ignoring the perceived meaning (inspiration).
d) true vs false; right vs wrong; good vs evil etc. represents a rebranding of want vs not want. You are tricked to switch sides within the same conflict; whenever seeing through a deception on your side, and if you lose enough of your side; you're tempted to hold onto the remaining even harder; hence attacking anyone trying to contradict your worldview; your faith; your belief; your truth; your side against the world.
We represent AN'IMAL, noun [Latin animal from anima, air, breath, soul.] + HU'MAN, adjective [Latin humanus; Heb. form, species.] aka form animated by flow. You are being deceived by suggested words (animal; human) to devalue one side (animal) underneath the other (human); while ignoring the perceived status quo of an animal (animated) human (form).
https://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pdf/lightlists/LightList_V4_2022.pdf
Scroll down until you see the luminous range and geographic range. How is the weather in Langley today?
Freemasonry aka being a mason of free (will of choice) represents the use of suggestion to shape the memory of those consenting to it. Therefore the perpetuation of suggested information shapes the memories of all those consenting to want or not want it. This is how freemasonry can infiltrate govern (to control) ment (mind); science (from scio; to know aka to perceive); corporations (corpus oration aka the whisper of the dead); suggested his-story; religion (from religio; to bind anew) and economy (from oeconomia; house-rule aka suggested contract law over perceived natural law).
Those who fall for the temptation of choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; while ignoring perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law, are stuck within a chain of command (a world wide caste system of submission) under the will of others. Those who consent to suggested information (fiction) are ignoring perceived inspiration (reality); those who consent to the suggested word are ignoring the perceived sound; those who ignore to resist the perceived natural order are tempted to follow suggested orders and so on.
The foundation for all of this:...ALL represents ONE in energy; so each ONE within represents an expression of ALL of it. In short...to be implies out of; hence being form (life) out of flow (inception towards death). So it's not a question about "can all be"; but lack of comprehension towards "being within all".
Starting with suggestion (want) over perception (need) aka suggested word over perceived sound. Nowadays this is being supplemented with whatever was pumped into the ancestors leading up to the child; but the want over need foundation is where it's all build upon.
This was me every other day before I realized that if one adapts to perceived inspiration instead of suggested information; then it's not about responding to others; but about the expression of self while writing. This way one is way less tempted by loss. Copy+paste into a txt file before responding also works.
Understanding represents "standing under" the suggested information by others; which ignores to grow comprehension (compressed) out of perceived (impressed) inspiration. Resist the temptation to figure what I write out, and instead use it to grow whatever you comprehend. Share the process of growing and we can adapt to each other.
Everything perceivable already exists, so I'm not the source for anything; just an expression of the only source for everything; yet your choice decides between perceived (need) or suggested (want).
All good. If others get inspired by whatever I write about; then their expressions will show it. We're are tempted and exploited with seeking confirmation; while ignoring the ongoing need for adaptation to origin.