Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

24
()
posted 3 years ago by ghost_of_aswartz 3 years ago by ghost_of_aswartz +25 / -1
26 comments share
26 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– ApexVeritas 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I've heard this before but not researched it thoroughly. It's been regularly stated in conspiracy forums that the sugar industry has heavily lobbied the FDA and other "health" organizations, to support the narrative that things like heart disease and obesity are due to fat and salt consumption, rather than excess sugar consumption, which is what's actually causing it. If this is true, then in reality this study might be one of those rare cases where "science" accidentally reports the truth.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Mad_King_Kalak 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

The sugar industry did a lot of research to try to get people to think "all calories are the same" when they are, in fact, not the same. Sugar calories on an "energy in/energy out" diet are the same, but sugar is NOT the same as other calories in how they affect your hormones.

In short, a bunch of pixie sticks and candy is not the same as a steak, even if they are the same calories, when it comes to how full you feel and how hungry you get later.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– the-new-style 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

the paper does not present the conclusion inferred by the headline

the subjects in the study were those already hospitalised by heart disease

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– loonygecko 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The lancet seems to suck less than some of the other science sources. They were also among the first to dare to publish a few things that called into question some of the covid sacred cows.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy