It's not that they can "stop" (i.e., filter) an oxygen molecule; it's that they cause you to re-breathe some of the same air over and over again by trapping a pocket of air against your face (especially the huge N-95 cones). Your body bonds O2 to carbon (that's how the energy stored in glycogen is released). The resulting CO2 is poisonous. If you rebreathe, e.g., 10% more of it than normal, it will poison you just a little bit with each breath and starve your brain if some of the oxygen. Think Fluoride (doesn't make you retarded, but reduces your IQ maybe 1-2 points during your brains childhood development).
If there is enough of a gap for viruses to pass through the mask, air is passing through freely. This is well poisoning. Surgeons wear the same masks for 12+ hours at a time routinely. If you think that they wouldn't have figured out by now that masks cause brain damage, it's because you have it.
What I'm describing isn't air being truly trapped, as if it can't get through the mask / filter. I'm describing a phenomenon whereby most air will naturally remain within a loosely defined cavity, because the boundary (mask) prevents the local air current (e.g., caused by A/C, fan, people walking by, wind, etc.) from pushing the air immediately out from in front of your face.
You can imagine breathing in and out of a paper bag, and how that might turn out. This effect, put on a continuum with the effect produced by an N-95 mask, would be worse than the N-95 mask; however, the mechanism would remain roughly the same and both would be somewhere between "no oxygen at all" and "atmosphere level oxygen" on that continuum.
To experience what I'm describing, just put on a pulse oximeter and take a reading every 15 seconds for 5 minutes. Then, without getting up or changing your position, put on an N-95 mask tightly, wait 1 minute, then take a reading from the oximeter every 15 seconds for 5 more minutes. Add up the readings from each group and divide by the total counts in each group to get the average.
Once you've experienced this, we can then use the transitive / syllogistic logic of: if lower oxygen leads to brain damage (or lesser development) during childhood AND masks lower oxygen levels, THEN we come to the a priori conclusion that masks lead to brain damage.
Of course they wear masks when they're doing surgery but they don't wear the same mask for 12 hours straight or 24 hours straight like some of the idiots in the comments are implying these are trained professional you can't compare sturgeons to your average retarded American
It's not that they can "stop" (i.e., filter) an oxygen molecule; it's that they cause you to re-breathe some of the same air over and over again by trapping a pocket of air against your face (especially the huge N-95 cones). Your body bonds O2 to carbon (that's how the energy stored in glycogen is released). The resulting CO2 is poisonous. If you rebreathe, e.g., 10% more of it than normal, it will poison you just a little bit with each breath and starve your brain if some of the oxygen. Think Fluoride (doesn't make you retarded, but reduces your IQ maybe 1-2 points during your brains childhood development).
If there is enough of a gap for viruses to pass through the mask, air is passing through freely. This is well poisoning. Surgeons wear the same masks for 12+ hours at a time routinely. If you think that they wouldn't have figured out by now that masks cause brain damage, it's because you have it.
Read the damm literature and take off the mask.
What I'm describing isn't air being truly trapped, as if it can't get through the mask / filter. I'm describing a phenomenon whereby most air will naturally remain within a loosely defined cavity, because the boundary (mask) prevents the local air current (e.g., caused by A/C, fan, people walking by, wind, etc.) from pushing the air immediately out from in front of your face.
You can imagine breathing in and out of a paper bag, and how that might turn out. This effect, put on a continuum with the effect produced by an N-95 mask, would be worse than the N-95 mask; however, the mechanism would remain roughly the same and both would be somewhere between "no oxygen at all" and "atmosphere level oxygen" on that continuum.
To experience what I'm describing, just put on a pulse oximeter and take a reading every 15 seconds for 5 minutes. Then, without getting up or changing your position, put on an N-95 mask tightly, wait 1 minute, then take a reading from the oximeter every 15 seconds for 5 more minutes. Add up the readings from each group and divide by the total counts in each group to get the average.
Once you've experienced this, we can then use the transitive / syllogistic logic of: if lower oxygen leads to brain damage (or lesser development) during childhood AND masks lower oxygen levels, THEN we come to the a priori conclusion that masks lead to brain damage.
You're retarded.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18500410/
They specifically minimize mask wearing because they know of the effects.
Surgeons are in a controlled closed off environment you dumb fuck
So you're saying surgeons don't wear surgical masks orrrrrrrrrrrrrr..............?
Wat?
Of course they wear masks when they're doing surgery but they don't wear the same mask for 12 hours straight or 24 hours straight like some of the idiots in the comments are implying these are trained professional you can't compare sturgeons to your average retarded American