Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

49
()
posted 3 years ago by Zap_Powerz 3 years ago by Zap_Powerz +51 / -2
37 comments share
37 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– brahbruh 3 points 3 years ago +4 / -1

What I'm describing isn't air being truly trapped, as if it can't get through the mask / filter. I'm describing a phenomenon whereby most air will naturally remain within a loosely defined cavity, because the boundary (mask) prevents the local air current (e.g., caused by A/C, fan, people walking by, wind, etc.) from pushing the air immediately out from in front of your face.

You can imagine breathing in and out of a paper bag, and how that might turn out. This effect, put on a continuum with the effect produced by an N-95 mask, would be worse than the N-95 mask; however, the mechanism would remain roughly the same and both would be somewhere between "no oxygen at all" and "atmosphere level oxygen" on that continuum.


To experience what I'm describing, just put on a pulse oximeter and take a reading every 15 seconds for 5 minutes. Then, without getting up or changing your position, put on an N-95 mask tightly, wait 1 minute, then take a reading from the oximeter every 15 seconds for 5 more minutes. Add up the readings from each group and divide by the total counts in each group to get the average.


Once you've experienced this, we can then use the transitive / syllogistic logic of: if lower oxygen leads to brain damage (or lesser development) during childhood AND masks lower oxygen levels, THEN we come to the a priori conclusion that masks lead to brain damage.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy