Just a random thought I had, and I re-stumbled upon this post and it's a good place for it.
"Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's.."
Does Caesar, Kaiser, and Khazar mean essentially the same thing? So I've seen conflicting reports on Khazaria's origin time-wise, but is there any relation between the two? Some of the Roman emperors were pretty fucked up and worshiped weird idols...
Unwittingly, yesterday I listened to a song by the Kaiser Chiefs.
Their song "I Predict a Riot" was recently covered by Robert Fripp and his wife. Fripp was the head of King Crimson, and man, he wears black eye makeup now and has a mohawk. Bizarre.
Ever read about the Emperor that worshiped a stone and named himself after it?
So, yeah, re-looked it up and it was Elagabalus. Who was Syrian...hmmm....
The "god" was Elagabalus as well, but Elagabal for short, and this line is interesting, "Elagabalus was the religious "lord", or Ba'al, of Emesa.[4] The deity successfully preserved Arab characteristics, both in his names and in his representations."
The god was represented by a cult stone that the Emperor paraded into and around the city.
This is a pretty interesting angle, ngl.
How many people would think, the way history is taught, that a Roman emperor would be an "Arab" Syrian?
You are right Xavier! Though etymology is often sketchy and should always be tested, it is known that both Kaiser and Czar come from Caesar. I find that Khazar is uncertain but Andras Rona-Tas does connect it through qasar and Kesar to Caesar. Add: This etymology for Khazar also agrees with my study of how the Czars accepted that title as granted to externals by the waning emperors.
I've studied Arnold Fruchtenbaum, who argues that the Kaisers (succeeded by the conquering US) and the Czars (now Russia) perpetuate the East-West schism and are the two legs or feet of Nebuchadnezzar's statue. This bilateralism is implicit in OP's tree, which has always been known to depend on two columns plus a central trunk, although the East-West nature is not as clear in this depiction. The HRE seems to be the missing link I sought between Vatican and Illuminati, but in this diagram the central trunk still seems more to favor the visual left than to be truly neutral. Since the Khazars were defeated by Prince Vladimir in the 10th century, who became Orthodox, we must judge their successors as being absorbed by the Czars rather than by a hypothetical connection to the Ashkenazim. Judea still exists today under the names Medinat Israel and Sanhedrin and Rabbinical Judaism and others, but it's just one of the competing power centers.
And yet the US calls its princes Czars rather than Kaisers, so perhaps it has indeed taken the mantle of both sides. Division into a contemporaneous ten toes or ten horns is indicated; the Club of Rome "Turning Point" document indicates that today we would call these the three traditional markets (US, UK, Japan), the five BRICS, and the pan-African and pan-Arab blocs.
For simplicity's sake the diagram above is excellent, but remember the devil is always rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic (Titan = Satan).
Add: forgot to ping u/Zap_Powerz, hope this goes through.
This is an excellent production as far as it goes.
Note well that neither Judea nor Khazars count as the whole thing! These are one branch of the tree. If this graphic were propagated people might stop focusing on one group when there are eleven power centers to be concerned about. ("Focus on these.") And keep in mind that there are righteous ones working behind the scenes in every power center, like Joseph of Arimathaea.
The connections are relatively valid. There ought to be a vertical line from Vatican to Illuminati because the sephirot always have a main trunk all the way through the diagram. I can give "Atonism" a pass although "Atenism" is more used, and "Gods Assassins" without an apostrophe as a subtle dig. But nothing is misspelled! Excellent find! It appears better poised than almost any other connections map that has been posted here and is worth reposting in other forums.
I was listening to an audiobook on YouTube when I was hiking that explained that what we call the Cananites today is actually their enemies. It's inverted.
I can't remember the name of the book, but hopefully my comment will jog someone else's memory.
The source was posted. I read the link, and it started out great and perfectly agreeable, but then it suddenly drew the conclusion that the Abrahamic religions themselves were pagan at the core, which is a gnostic rejection of the revelation of Yahweh in Christianity in favor of some secretly-knowable god who has not revealed himself through the Bible. Disappointing, but the author seems to be onto enough truth that he might work his god around to be the real one in time.
Just a random thought I had, and I re-stumbled upon this post and it's a good place for it.
"Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's.."
Does Caesar, Kaiser, and Khazar mean essentially the same thing? So I've seen conflicting reports on Khazaria's origin time-wise, but is there any relation between the two? Some of the Roman emperors were pretty fucked up and worshiped weird idols...
Short aside...
Unwittingly, yesterday I listened to a song by the Kaiser Chiefs.
Their song "I Predict a Riot" was recently covered by Robert Fripp and his wife. Fripp was the head of King Crimson, and man, he wears black eye makeup now and has a mohawk. Bizarre.
Ever read about the Emperor that worshiped a stone and named himself after it?
So, yeah, re-looked it up and it was Elagabalus. Who was Syrian...hmmm....
The "god" was Elagabalus as well, but Elagabal for short, and this line is interesting, "Elagabalus was the religious "lord", or Ba'al, of Emesa.[4] The deity successfully preserved Arab characteristics, both in his names and in his representations."
The god was represented by a cult stone that the Emperor paraded into and around the city.
This is a pretty interesting angle, ngl.
How many people would think, the way history is taught, that a Roman emperor would be an "Arab" Syrian?
But the theme's the same...Occultists that do bad shit in secrecy, then present fake bad shit to the public.
Yeah, I think people are pretty fed up with lies at this point.
You are right Xavier! Though etymology is often sketchy and should always be tested, it is known that both Kaiser and Czar come from Caesar. I find that Khazar is uncertain but Andras Rona-Tas does connect it through qasar and Kesar to Caesar. Add: This etymology for Khazar also agrees with my study of how the Czars accepted that title as granted to externals by the waning emperors.
I've studied Arnold Fruchtenbaum, who argues that the Kaisers (succeeded by the conquering US) and the Czars (now Russia) perpetuate the East-West schism and are the two legs or feet of Nebuchadnezzar's statue. This bilateralism is implicit in OP's tree, which has always been known to depend on two columns plus a central trunk, although the East-West nature is not as clear in this depiction. The HRE seems to be the missing link I sought between Vatican and Illuminati, but in this diagram the central trunk still seems more to favor the visual left than to be truly neutral. Since the Khazars were defeated by Prince Vladimir in the 10th century, who became Orthodox, we must judge their successors as being absorbed by the Czars rather than by a hypothetical connection to the Ashkenazim. Judea still exists today under the names Medinat Israel and Sanhedrin and Rabbinical Judaism and others, but it's just one of the competing power centers.
And yet the US calls its princes Czars rather than Kaisers, so perhaps it has indeed taken the mantle of both sides. Division into a contemporaneous ten toes or ten horns is indicated; the Club of Rome "Turning Point" document indicates that today we would call these the three traditional markets (US, UK, Japan), the five BRICS, and the pan-African and pan-Arab blocs.
For simplicity's sake the diagram above is excellent, but remember the devil is always rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic (Titan = Satan).
Add: forgot to ping u/Zap_Powerz, hope this goes through.
Thanks for the info. Still haven't read about the Club of Rome enough, but I tend to glaze over the more hierarchical stuff.
I still get a chuckle when I see the name Kaiser Permanente. I thought the Caesar quote was about taxes, not about your life. ;)
Tree of Death
That's why it's the Sefirot and not the Qlipthoth.
So the evil is very long-term and has always sought ruling power through covert dominance.
This is an excellent production as far as it goes.
Note well that neither Judea nor Khazars count as the whole thing! These are one branch of the tree. If this graphic were propagated people might stop focusing on one group when there are eleven power centers to be concerned about. ("Focus on these.") And keep in mind that there are righteous ones working behind the scenes in every power center, like Joseph of Arimathaea.
The connections are relatively valid. There ought to be a vertical line from Vatican to Illuminati because the sephirot always have a main trunk all the way through the diagram. I can give "Atonism" a pass although "Atenism" is more used, and "Gods Assassins" without an apostrophe as a subtle dig. But nothing is misspelled! Excellent find! It appears better poised than almost any other connections map that has been posted here and is worth reposting in other forums.
I was listening to an audiobook on YouTube when I was hiking that explained that what we call the Cananites today is actually their enemies. It's inverted.
I can't remember the name of the book, but hopefully my comment will jog someone else's memory.
It's possible that it could be like Rome and the "barbarians" who were less barbarous than the Romans.
I didn't know that Phoenicians were just the Greek name for the Canaanites, and the Phoenicians have a pretty sordid history.
The source was posted. I read the link, and it started out great and perfectly agreeable, but then it suddenly drew the conclusion that the Abrahamic religions themselves were pagan at the core, which is a gnostic rejection of the revelation of Yahweh in Christianity in favor of some secretly-knowable god who has not revealed himself through the Bible. Disappointing, but the author seems to be onto enough truth that he might work his god around to be the real one in time.
This is words with circles and lines arranged meaninglessly.