Just a random thought I had, and I re-stumbled upon this post and it's a good place for it.
"Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's.."
Does Caesar, Kaiser, and Khazar mean essentially the same thing? So I've seen conflicting reports on Khazaria's origin time-wise, but is there any relation between the two? Some of the Roman emperors were pretty fucked up and worshiped weird idols...
Unwittingly, yesterday I listened to a song by the Kaiser Chiefs.
Their song "I Predict a Riot" was recently covered by Robert Fripp and his wife. Fripp was the head of King Crimson, and man, he wears black eye makeup now and has a mohawk. Bizarre.
Ever read about the Emperor that worshiped a stone and named himself after it?
So, yeah, re-looked it up and it was Elagabalus. Who was Syrian...hmmm....
The "god" was Elagabalus as well, but Elagabal for short, and this line is interesting, "Elagabalus was the religious "lord", or Ba'al, of Emesa.[4] The deity successfully preserved Arab characteristics, both in his names and in his representations."
The god was represented by a cult stone that the Emperor paraded into and around the city.
This is a pretty interesting angle, ngl.
How many people would think, the way history is taught, that a Roman emperor would be an "Arab" Syrian?
You are right Xavier! Though etymology is often sketchy and should always be tested, it is known that both Kaiser and Czar come from Caesar. I find that Khazar is uncertain but Andras Rona-Tas does connect it through qasar and Kesar to Caesar. Add: This etymology for Khazar also agrees with my study of how the Czars accepted that title as granted to externals by the waning emperors.
I've studied Arnold Fruchtenbaum, who argues that the Kaisers (succeeded by the conquering US) and the Czars (now Russia) perpetuate the East-West schism and are the two legs or feet of Nebuchadnezzar's statue. This bilateralism is implicit in OP's tree, which has always been known to depend on two columns plus a central trunk, although the East-West nature is not as clear in this depiction. The HRE seems to be the missing link I sought between Vatican and Illuminati, but in this diagram the central trunk still seems more to favor the visual left than to be truly neutral. Since the Khazars were defeated by Prince Vladimir in the 10th century, who became Orthodox, we must judge their successors as being absorbed by the Czars rather than by a hypothetical connection to the Ashkenazim. Judea still exists today under the names Medinat Israel and Sanhedrin and Rabbinical Judaism and others, but it's just one of the competing power centers.
And yet the US calls its princes Czars rather than Kaisers, so perhaps it has indeed taken the mantle of both sides. Division into a contemporaneous ten toes or ten horns is indicated; the Club of Rome "Turning Point" document indicates that today we would call these the three traditional markets (US, UK, Japan), the five BRICS, and the pan-African and pan-Arab blocs.
For simplicity's sake the diagram above is excellent, but remember the devil is always rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic (Titan = Satan).
Add: forgot to ping u/Zap_Powerz, hope this goes through.
Just a random thought I had, and I re-stumbled upon this post and it's a good place for it.
"Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's.."
Does Caesar, Kaiser, and Khazar mean essentially the same thing? So I've seen conflicting reports on Khazaria's origin time-wise, but is there any relation between the two? Some of the Roman emperors were pretty fucked up and worshiped weird idols...
Short aside...
Unwittingly, yesterday I listened to a song by the Kaiser Chiefs.
Their song "I Predict a Riot" was recently covered by Robert Fripp and his wife. Fripp was the head of King Crimson, and man, he wears black eye makeup now and has a mohawk. Bizarre.
Ever read about the Emperor that worshiped a stone and named himself after it?
So, yeah, re-looked it up and it was Elagabalus. Who was Syrian...hmmm....
The "god" was Elagabalus as well, but Elagabal for short, and this line is interesting, "Elagabalus was the religious "lord", or Ba'al, of Emesa.[4] The deity successfully preserved Arab characteristics, both in his names and in his representations."
The god was represented by a cult stone that the Emperor paraded into and around the city.
This is a pretty interesting angle, ngl.
How many people would think, the way history is taught, that a Roman emperor would be an "Arab" Syrian?
But the theme's the same...Occultists that do bad shit in secrecy, then present fake bad shit to the public.
You are right Xavier! Though etymology is often sketchy and should always be tested, it is known that both Kaiser and Czar come from Caesar. I find that Khazar is uncertain but Andras Rona-Tas does connect it through qasar and Kesar to Caesar. Add: This etymology for Khazar also agrees with my study of how the Czars accepted that title as granted to externals by the waning emperors.
I've studied Arnold Fruchtenbaum, who argues that the Kaisers (succeeded by the conquering US) and the Czars (now Russia) perpetuate the East-West schism and are the two legs or feet of Nebuchadnezzar's statue. This bilateralism is implicit in OP's tree, which has always been known to depend on two columns plus a central trunk, although the East-West nature is not as clear in this depiction. The HRE seems to be the missing link I sought between Vatican and Illuminati, but in this diagram the central trunk still seems more to favor the visual left than to be truly neutral. Since the Khazars were defeated by Prince Vladimir in the 10th century, who became Orthodox, we must judge their successors as being absorbed by the Czars rather than by a hypothetical connection to the Ashkenazim. Judea still exists today under the names Medinat Israel and Sanhedrin and Rabbinical Judaism and others, but it's just one of the competing power centers.
And yet the US calls its princes Czars rather than Kaisers, so perhaps it has indeed taken the mantle of both sides. Division into a contemporaneous ten toes or ten horns is indicated; the Club of Rome "Turning Point" document indicates that today we would call these the three traditional markets (US, UK, Japan), the five BRICS, and the pan-African and pan-Arab blocs.
For simplicity's sake the diagram above is excellent, but remember the devil is always rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic (Titan = Satan).
Add: forgot to ping u/Zap_Powerz, hope this goes through.
Thanks for the info. Still haven't read about the Club of Rome enough, but I tend to glaze over the more hierarchical stuff.
I still get a chuckle when I see the name Kaiser Permanente. I thought the Caesar quote was about taxes, not about your life. ;)