In lieu of an earlier post, I find most people really don't know anything at all about the giants of our past, and often assume it's all a big myth. Lincoln was so matter of fact about it, likely because it was a general known fact at that time. In 1881, Congress gave sole excavation rights of these mounds to the Smithsonian and gave them thousands of tax payer dollars to do so more than once. We all know what happens when they get involved in recovering history; anything consequential disappears. Some of their findings were made public in their Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution for years 1873, 1875, and 1877. I'll post a link below to 1873 and you can change the years to view the rest. They found skulls measuring 36" in circumference, skeletons belonging to "gigantic savages," and so on. Publicly, The Smithsonian seems to mostly or only talk about the EASTERN mounds, but look for the stories from the Anasazi and also San Canyon Pueblo where footprints of 6 toed giants were found.
Would love to see what anyone knows about all this or give more info for those that want to know more. Of course this is just a glimpse of the story, definitely enough here to get started. This rabbit hole goes on and on once you start, but you will not be disappointed. It's more like, whole rabbit.
For those that want to go down the Giants/Nephilim road, there's also a very convincing story about giant remains being found on Jekyll island, along with a sacrificial altar built the same way the Canaanites built theirs. If it's true, the building that the infamous banksters' meeting happened in was built right on top of that altar. Search for Tim Bence on that story.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/34977#page/426/mode/1up (Human skull found measured 36 inches in circumference) https://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/lincoln2/1:6?rgn=div1;view=fulltext https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1881-pt3-v11/pdf/GPO-CRECB-1881-pt3-v11-12.pdf
I think you're the one that doesn't know what simulation means lol.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/simulation
Definition of simulation 1: the act or process of simulating 2: a sham object : COUNTERFEIT 3a: the imitative representation of the functioning of one system or process by means of the functioning of another a computer simulation of an industrial process b: examination of a problem often not subject to direct experimentation by means of a simulating device
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/simulating
Definition of simulate transitive verb
1: to give or assume the appearance or effect of often with the intent to deceive : IMITATE 2: to make a simulation of (something, such as a physical system)
A simulation is a thing. A thing that exists. A "sham" object is still an object. A counterfeit object is still an object. An imitation or representation is still a real thing by itself. A simulation is an illusion, but an illusion is still a thing itself. The illusion exists, therefore illusions are real things. They are deceptions, but the deceptions are still "real" objects themselves.
Your position is unknowable, you’ve yet to address that.
As for the definition of simulation. Do the words sham, counterfeit, imitative mean anything?
That concept works for only a superficial level. I’m talking on a grand scheme. When I play a video game like Skyrim, the game is real, the keyboard is real, I’m really interacting with a programmed reality. But am I a wizard that can ride dragons? No.
Can I learn useful things yes, but one thing you can never learn in a simulation is that you are in a simulation.
What sort of thing would you take as proof of " I think we are living in a simulation, but one that we control." ?
Proof that reality needs a conscious observer in order to coalesce? Take the double slit experiment for example.
Heres a book you'd probably like on this subject as well.
https://files.catbox.moe/47j3l4.pdf
Why do you say that the illusion that we are currently in is superficial and not an important part of the grand scheme? God created this world as an illusion, do you think this was done without a specific purpose?
You are making a claim that lacks the possibility of being proven at all. It’s impossible to prove, which is my concern.
There is no way you can be in the matrix, and show proof of it, without access to outside the matrix. It’s impossible. All of your observations within the matrix are created by the matrix in your view. Your only reality is fabricated and you have no access beyond it. Any experiment from physics, astrophysics, quantum physics will all yield results that are matrix results. Any information you gather is corrupted by the fact that it’s gathered from the matrix.
It destoys the possibility for you to justify your claim at all levels, logical and physical.
Any double slit experiment will still be within the matrix and therefore it will only show you what the matrix indicates.
Do you think your consciousness is within the matrix?