The other reason, besides the above, is that attention spans for the post MTV generation are shit. Thus their test taking sucks. Plus schooling is shittier. We know this because the Flynn Effect has stopped, or reversed, in homogeneous white populations too.
The Flynn effect is constantly mischaracterized. It did not document some gradual increase in general intelligence in Western countries. The increase was all found in one very specific subtest, visual-spatial reasoning (your ability to have a mental map of the world around you, what it contains, where everything is relative to everything else). Since the increase was only in one very specific subset of intelligence (everything else stayed the same), the cause is some kind of shared environmental factor.
My personal guess is the impact of automobiles, both car accidents killing off people with low ability, sometimes entire crappy gene pools at a time and also the rigors of driving training everyone to be better at visual-spatial reasoning. I like my theory because the Flynn effect shows up in countries about when automobiles become widespread, and its end roughly coincides with the widespread adoption of airbags, crumple zones, other stupidproofing.
Elsewhere I have read that the Flynn Effect was, generally speaking, a product of getting enough calories, which also allows you to pay more attention in school and allowed for full biological development, and removal of parasites like stomach worms, from children.
That would make sense, in that the introduction of automobiles coincides with the increase in standards of living as mass industrialization lead to food and clothing, etc. being far cheaper.
Another argument is that current generations are learning and thinking more about abstract concepts while forgoing more practical knowledge used to survive in a non digital world.
The things you mentioned have basically zero effect on IQ scores. The Flynn effect doesn't have a known cause, but was definitely a form of natural selection.
Ok, riddle me this... Why haven't those societies developed agriculture, plumbing, modern medicine, or waste management? Why is it that when Western countries literally intervene and build it for them, it simply decays into ruins within a generation?
Do you know how many times the French and US have built a full infrastructure for Haiti, only to see it crumble into dust?
Spare me your liberal PC brainwashing and face the reality of the situation. Different groups of people have different levels of IQ and that IQ level is directly correlated to their ability to build, maintain, and exist productively in an advanced civilization. Individuals can be anywhere on the bell curve, but the overall average makes a huge difference, and if you understand outliers, you know that even a slight increase in the average IQ will create exponentially more geniuses in a population.
"Diversity" is not strength. It's a ploy to destabilize nations so globalists can more easily take control. They want a caste system of low IQ serfs, a middle management level just smart enough to run the machines and maintain order, the intelligencia class spouting ideologies firmly under their control, and them on top.
Because you need a national average IQ of about 95 to have a functional country.
Flynn Effect happening to shithole countries still didn't bring them up to 95.
And douche for brains, you know nothing of my opinions on a damn thing. I'm a race realist, if not an out and out racist because like anyone with a pair of eyes I can see that black people ruin anywhere they get control, and one can be both those things but still acknowledge the Flynn Effect is real and does exist.
Funny you should say that, because in the last 20 yrs, I've watched the Rise and multiplication of the SJW along with, the OBAMA EFFECT, aka Rise in Racism, both of which we had almost destroyed.....
I hate to break it to you, but your "enemies" aren't mixing with low IQ partners, dumbing themselves down. They intermarry with their own. You don't even know who the enemy is.
When schools stopped disciplining and started babysitting, when kids rarely have parents still married by the time they enter school (so a lot of single parents or blended families), when schools began to track kids by race and gender and decided that Asian and white boys were too good in math and science so it must be racist (enter fuzzy math 2.0 which dumbs down everyone equally), when our kids have so many electronic gadgets and communicate via game devices instead of having interpersonal relationships, when our cities and culture became too dangerous for kids to roam and explore freely,—-is when we lost our culture and our minds. I think the loss of a nuclear family is the worst.
Jeeze. You push smartphones and gaming machines onto people so they are tied to a centralized network and playing brain numbing games. You killed off the edutainment industry for PC's so now there is no way for a child to have their minds get sharpened and schools are dumbed down too only covering basic history at best and slanted at that.
Geez I wonder why their IQ's are dropping in developed nations? (Pretends to ponder)
i have a feeling there are a lot of people that are out there now that would actually be considered "retarded" on paper, holding very important jobs
Come on man, that's...you know, the thing!
Sheeeeit!
Jay Inslee.
The other reason, besides the above, is that attention spans for the post MTV generation are shit. Thus their test taking sucks. Plus schooling is shittier. We know this because the Flynn Effect has stopped, or reversed, in homogeneous white populations too.
Thanks!
edit: Look up "r" verses "k" breeding strategies too, for a blackpill.
The Flynn effect is constantly mischaracterized. It did not document some gradual increase in general intelligence in Western countries. The increase was all found in one very specific subtest, visual-spatial reasoning (your ability to have a mental map of the world around you, what it contains, where everything is relative to everything else). Since the increase was only in one very specific subset of intelligence (everything else stayed the same), the cause is some kind of shared environmental factor.
My personal guess is the impact of automobiles, both car accidents killing off people with low ability, sometimes entire crappy gene pools at a time and also the rigors of driving training everyone to be better at visual-spatial reasoning. I like my theory because the Flynn effect shows up in countries about when automobiles become widespread, and its end roughly coincides with the widespread adoption of airbags, crumple zones, other stupidproofing.
Elsewhere I have read that the Flynn Effect was, generally speaking, a product of getting enough calories, which also allows you to pay more attention in school and allowed for full biological development, and removal of parasites like stomach worms, from children.
That would make sense, in that the introduction of automobiles coincides with the increase in standards of living as mass industrialization lead to food and clothing, etc. being far cheaper.
Another argument is that current generations are learning and thinking more about abstract concepts while forgoing more practical knowledge used to survive in a non digital world.
The things you mentioned have basically zero effect on IQ scores. The Flynn effect doesn't have a known cause, but was definitely a form of natural selection.
Not having enough to eat while growing up and having parasitic worms doesn't effect IQ? Not quite.
Ok, riddle me this... Why haven't those societies developed agriculture, plumbing, modern medicine, or waste management? Why is it that when Western countries literally intervene and build it for them, it simply decays into ruins within a generation?
Do you know how many times the French and US have built a full infrastructure for Haiti, only to see it crumble into dust?
Spare me your liberal PC brainwashing and face the reality of the situation. Different groups of people have different levels of IQ and that IQ level is directly correlated to their ability to build, maintain, and exist productively in an advanced civilization. Individuals can be anywhere on the bell curve, but the overall average makes a huge difference, and if you understand outliers, you know that even a slight increase in the average IQ will create exponentially more geniuses in a population.
"Diversity" is not strength. It's a ploy to destabilize nations so globalists can more easily take control. They want a caste system of low IQ serfs, a middle management level just smart enough to run the machines and maintain order, the intelligencia class spouting ideologies firmly under their control, and them on top.
Because you need a national average IQ of about 95 to have a functional country.
Flynn Effect happening to shithole countries still didn't bring them up to 95.
And douche for brains, you know nothing of my opinions on a damn thing. I'm a race realist, if not an out and out racist because like anyone with a pair of eyes I can see that black people ruin anywhere they get control, and one can be both those things but still acknowledge the Flynn Effect is real and does exist.
You THINK you are debating someone you're not.
ZP is right, you need an average IQ of about 95 for a functioning society.
Idiocracy comes to mind...
Funny you should say that, because in the last 20 yrs, I've watched the Rise and multiplication of the SJW along with, the OBAMA EFFECT, aka Rise in Racism, both of which we had almost destroyed.....
I hate to break it to you, but your "enemies" aren't mixing with low IQ partners, dumbing themselves down. They intermarry with their own. You don't even know who the enemy is.
IQ testing infants now, are they
Where do you see this conclusion relying upon that?
Chocolate is racist.
When schools stopped disciplining and started babysitting, when kids rarely have parents still married by the time they enter school (so a lot of single parents or blended families), when schools began to track kids by race and gender and decided that Asian and white boys were too good in math and science so it must be racist (enter fuzzy math 2.0 which dumbs down everyone equally), when our kids have so many electronic gadgets and communicate via game devices instead of having interpersonal relationships, when our cities and culture became too dangerous for kids to roam and explore freely,—-is when we lost our culture and our minds. I think the loss of a nuclear family is the worst.
Education has basically ZERO impact on IQ. Read the bell curve.
No child left behind started in the late 80s, that was the beginning of the Educational Downward spiral....
Then they slowly stopped the use of Dictionaries..... like 90s to early 2k..
Then the beginning push post 9/11 of Justice, which Obama turned into SOCIAL JUSTICE and the massive return of the Racism mixed with it....
Obama also reintroduced the Flat Earthers to Society....
It has been a very long slow decline, but it became much faster these last 12 yrs....
Frankly, it almost surprises me when an 18 yr old can actually read....
Literally people cannot work a basic fast food job.
Jeeze. You push smartphones and gaming machines onto people so they are tied to a centralized network and playing brain numbing games. You killed off the edutainment industry for PC's so now there is no way for a child to have their minds get sharpened and schools are dumbed down too only covering basic history at best and slanted at that.
Geez I wonder why their IQ's are dropping in developed nations? (Pretends to ponder)