The other reason, besides the above, is that attention spans for the post MTV generation are shit. Thus their test taking sucks. Plus schooling is shittier. We know this because the Flynn Effect has stopped, or reversed, in homogeneous white populations too.
The Flynn effect is constantly mischaracterized. It did not document some gradual increase in general intelligence in Western countries. The increase was all found in one very specific subtest, visual-spatial reasoning (your ability to have a mental map of the world around you, what it contains, where everything is relative to everything else). Since the increase was only in one very specific subset of intelligence (everything else stayed the same), the cause is some kind of shared environmental factor.
My personal guess is the impact of automobiles, both car accidents killing off people with low ability, sometimes entire crappy gene pools at a time and also the rigors of driving training everyone to be better at visual-spatial reasoning. I like my theory because the Flynn effect shows up in countries about when automobiles become widespread, and its end roughly coincides with the widespread adoption of airbags, crumple zones, other stupidproofing.
Elsewhere I have read that the Flynn Effect was, generally speaking, a product of getting enough calories, which also allows you to pay more attention in school and allowed for full biological development, and removal of parasites like stomach worms, from children.
That would make sense, in that the introduction of automobiles coincides with the increase in standards of living as mass industrialization lead to food and clothing, etc. being far cheaper.
Another argument is that current generations are learning and thinking more about abstract concepts while forgoing more practical knowledge used to survive in a non digital world.
The things you mentioned have basically zero effect on IQ scores. The Flynn effect doesn't have a known cause, but was definitely a form of natural selection.
Ok, riddle me this... Why haven't those societies developed agriculture, plumbing, modern medicine, or waste management? Why is it that when Western countries literally intervene and build it for them, it simply decays into ruins within a generation?
Do you know how many times the French and US have built a full infrastructure for Haiti, only to see it crumble into dust?
Spare me your liberal PC brainwashing and face the reality of the situation. Different groups of people have different levels of IQ and that IQ level is directly correlated to their ability to build, maintain, and exist productively in an advanced civilization. Individuals can be anywhere on the bell curve, but the overall average makes a huge difference, and if you understand outliers, you know that even a slight increase in the average IQ will create exponentially more geniuses in a population.
"Diversity" is not strength. It's a ploy to destabilize nations so globalists can more easily take control. They want a caste system of low IQ serfs, a middle management level just smart enough to run the machines and maintain order, the intelligencia class spouting ideologies firmly under their control, and them on top.
Because you need a national average IQ of about 95 to have a functional country.
Flynn Effect happening to shithole countries still didn't bring them up to 95.
And douche for brains, you know nothing of my opinions on a damn thing. I'm a race realist, if not an out and out racist because like anyone with a pair of eyes I can see that black people ruin anywhere they get control, and one can be both those things but still acknowledge the Flynn Effect is real and does exist.
The other reason, besides the above, is that attention spans for the post MTV generation are shit. Thus their test taking sucks. Plus schooling is shittier. We know this because the Flynn Effect has stopped, or reversed, in homogeneous white populations too.
Thanks!
edit: Look up "r" verses "k" breeding strategies too, for a blackpill.
The Flynn effect is constantly mischaracterized. It did not document some gradual increase in general intelligence in Western countries. The increase was all found in one very specific subtest, visual-spatial reasoning (your ability to have a mental map of the world around you, what it contains, where everything is relative to everything else). Since the increase was only in one very specific subset of intelligence (everything else stayed the same), the cause is some kind of shared environmental factor.
My personal guess is the impact of automobiles, both car accidents killing off people with low ability, sometimes entire crappy gene pools at a time and also the rigors of driving training everyone to be better at visual-spatial reasoning. I like my theory because the Flynn effect shows up in countries about when automobiles become widespread, and its end roughly coincides with the widespread adoption of airbags, crumple zones, other stupidproofing.
Elsewhere I have read that the Flynn Effect was, generally speaking, a product of getting enough calories, which also allows you to pay more attention in school and allowed for full biological development, and removal of parasites like stomach worms, from children.
That would make sense, in that the introduction of automobiles coincides with the increase in standards of living as mass industrialization lead to food and clothing, etc. being far cheaper.
Another argument is that current generations are learning and thinking more about abstract concepts while forgoing more practical knowledge used to survive in a non digital world.
The things you mentioned have basically zero effect on IQ scores. The Flynn effect doesn't have a known cause, but was definitely a form of natural selection.
Not having enough to eat while growing up and having parasitic worms doesn't effect IQ? Not quite.
Ok, riddle me this... Why haven't those societies developed agriculture, plumbing, modern medicine, or waste management? Why is it that when Western countries literally intervene and build it for them, it simply decays into ruins within a generation?
Do you know how many times the French and US have built a full infrastructure for Haiti, only to see it crumble into dust?
Spare me your liberal PC brainwashing and face the reality of the situation. Different groups of people have different levels of IQ and that IQ level is directly correlated to their ability to build, maintain, and exist productively in an advanced civilization. Individuals can be anywhere on the bell curve, but the overall average makes a huge difference, and if you understand outliers, you know that even a slight increase in the average IQ will create exponentially more geniuses in a population.
"Diversity" is not strength. It's a ploy to destabilize nations so globalists can more easily take control. They want a caste system of low IQ serfs, a middle management level just smart enough to run the machines and maintain order, the intelligencia class spouting ideologies firmly under their control, and them on top.
Because you need a national average IQ of about 95 to have a functional country.
Flynn Effect happening to shithole countries still didn't bring them up to 95.
And douche for brains, you know nothing of my opinions on a damn thing. I'm a race realist, if not an out and out racist because like anyone with a pair of eyes I can see that black people ruin anywhere they get control, and one can be both those things but still acknowledge the Flynn Effect is real and does exist.
You THINK you are debating someone you're not.