If we are taking votes to kick people off the boat, I suggest you leave. And I dont even read most of free will's stuff but I will fight for their right to keep saying stuff. You however are mostly a troublemaker and I don't take too kindly to you not taking too kindly to other people's freedom. You are not helpful in the least, this post proves you are a miserable busy body and God knows we don't need anymore of those around town. It's ok to be silent.
What if a person represents per sonos (by sound); which implies being insane aka in sanus (within sound)? If we represent the response to perceived sound; then what does silence represent for those within sound?
To make this line of thinking a little tougher...SI'LENT, adjective - "not speaking; mute". Now reconsider the sound of silence..."Hello, darkness, my old friend
I've come to talk with you again"
Silence can indeed be uncomfortable and yet still necessary. I usually enjoy a cacophony of sound but much can be said about trying to find peace in the quiet. Bottom line, gotta deal with the voices sometime.
VOICE, noun [Latin vox; voco. The sense of the verb is to throw, to drive out sound; and voice is that which is driven out.]
What if perceived sound already implies being driven out aka moved towards ones perceiving senses; which makes voice a resound (resonance) to perceived sound? Now ask yourself...what does choice responding to perceived sound; then shaping it into words; then suggesting those words as idolized meaning to the choice of others...imply for ones resonance with the origin of sound?
What if the balance (momentum caused by motion) that defines one having a choice based response; requires resonance (choice of need) yet tempts dissonance (choice of want)? What if one needs to adapt to perceived sound; while resisting the temptation to consent to suggested sound; shaped into words?
The song remains the same, acknowledging the perceived sound promotes choices to battle or be beaten and you have the free will to decide what you will. The winner then has opportunity to conduct suggested sound. I'll always be cheering for your victory!
acknowledging the perceived sound promotes choices to battle or be beaten...The winner...victory.
What if for choice it's about balancing until outcome; instead of conflict for outcome (winning; victory). What is the price for those within; when all that is offered is sound? Could it be ONEs participation within ALL aka conscious existence as the temporary within the ongoing?
What if choosing that which might be (battle; beaten; winning; victory) ignores that which is (balance)? What if to choose any wanted intention; ignores the needed foundation for having a choice...balance (momentum)?
What if the perceive battle isn't against something in the way of wanted victory; but the response-ibilty of choice to struggle to resist the temptation of want over need?
If energy processes loss (flow) and growth (form) internally as a balance (momentum); then the ongoing velocity of flow dominates the temporary resistance of form; hence the need for responsibility (struggle) and the want for temptation. In other words...the struggle for growth needs to be inspired to allow self sustenance within the dominating temptation of loss. What is more inspiring for growth; then the consequences of loss? Hold your breath (spirit) for a moment (um) and the inspiration for struggle is right there overruling want by need; while reminding will of its responsibility as choice in response to balance.
The song remains the same...you have the free will to decide what you will.
The decision to sustain self or ignoring it...yet the many are fooled by the suggestions of the few to ignore this fundamental use of choice for the temptation of endless suggested choices.
I enjoy the perspective, truly. What can be gained in a temporal state but to win the present battles? Perhaps the context is greater than the subject. If energy continues to exist do we proceed forward with our own power( is there any?) Or is there a greater force that intercedes to enable progress? If there is something out there helping, would it then be a stretch to imagine that force enabling your progress in every aspect and constantly interceding for your benefit? The world then becomes very different and balance cannot be calculated from our experience as we are moved along by something bigger than ourselves.
a) perspective implies per-spective aka person-optics. What we are being deceived to ignore is that person represents (per sonos aka by sound), hence a response... resonance (choice of need) or dissonance (choice of want) to origin of perceived sound.
Furthermore; to perceive everything from the source of sound; doesn't represents comprehending everything perceived. The growth of ONEs comprehend out of ALL perceived is based on choice of response; hence need (growth) or want (loss).
When we enjoy different (every one has a different comprehension of all perceived) perspectives we need to be aware another person can neither be the origin of sound; nor offering comprehension. For ONE within ALL, every other represents the choice of inspiration (need) or temptation (want). So try to resist the suggested information (within form) and try to adapt to perceived inspiration (within spirit) by "simply" (just kidding; it's a struggle) choosing need over want instead of want over need.
b) true implies versus false aka the conflict of reason (want vs not want) caused by consenting to suggested information. This is where your choice of writing "perspective" telegraphs to others that you consented to suggested information by another person; while ignoring perceived inspiration by the source of sound.
What can be gained in a temporal state but to win the present battles?
a) your choice of want over need represents the ignorance of perceived need for suggested want; which puts you into the want vs not want conflict (reason) with others. This is why you perceive battles; instead of the internal struggle to resist temptation; while balancing within momentum by choice based response.
b) ignorance causes the lack of self discernment as being ONE within ALL; form within flow; potential within potentiality; temporary within ongoing; magnetic resistance within electric velocity; choice within balance etc.
What you lack to understand is that as ONE you have temporary access to ALL existence has to offer and the choice to shape ONEself out of ALL offered. When you ignore perceived need for suggested want; then you ignore balance for outcomes. As free will of choice you're positioned as the response to balance (momentum); hence you needing to adapt to ever changing circumstances to resonate with balance for self sustenance and growth potential.
You represent the limited access to the unlimited system; yet the many choose to ignore this for what the few are suggesting them instead (self destruction; self restriction; self corruption...all those tempting wants and not wants).
As for gain...growth of form comes out of flow; not through other form. The consciousness transmutes perceived inspiration (electric velocity) into comprehended information (magnetic resistance)...unless ignored for suggested information by other form; which just drains us (form) right back into base electric velocity (flow). This is what the few call energy harvesting and it's as simple as using suggestion to gain consent to it; thereby deceiving other form to ignore growing out of flow.
Perhaps the context is greater than the subject.
ONE represents the smallest part within ALL; hence the opportunity for growth. It's not that we are subjected underneath; but that each ONE represents a seed within the soil of ALL containing everything; yet lacking understanding and effort to grow; which is where free will of choice is used to express ALL through ONEself.
CONTEXT, noun [Latin Con and texo, to weave.]...that represents the growth of understanding out of everything perceived; the more ONE comprehend; the more of ALL perceived becomes interwoven for the consciousness to roam within and plug inspiration out of; which requires a less restricted consciousness by self imposed restrictions of consented to information (beliefs; -isms).
I can only write so much and on such a scope; because I adapt to what inspires me on the fly and ever since I started doing this; I get more and more efficient at it. We don't need to accumulate information within our conscious memories like a hard drive we try to fill to capacity. We need to use memory like a ram aka short term information storage for ongoing adaptation to perceived inspiration. Clearing the cache (-isms) lets the consciousness of the leash and then the inspiration just becomes available at any moment (until body/mind exhaustion that is...).
If energy continues to exist do we proceed forward with our own power( is there any?)
a) suggested creationism deceives us to believe in creation out of nothing; while energy implies transmutation out of base everything. Therefore non-existence cannot exist within energy. Our lifespan represents temporary form within ongoing flow; which within energy represents the internal balance of loss (flow) growth (form). We represent temporary chaos out of ongoing order; while the parasites suggest us to seek the inversion thereof...order out of chaos.
b) energy implies inherent power, and the balance (loss/growth) within energy represents power of velocity (flow) causing power of resistance (form). The balance that self segregates ALL collective flow into individual ONEs form represents the momentum within which form can temporary growth within the loss of ongoing flow.
Velocity meeting resistance causes friction; vibration, resonance and everything we perceive as form within momentum.
c) resistance ceases within ongoing velocity; which we can mimic by either throwing a ball to perceive the temporary resistance of its momentum; before the ball falls or by attempting to build a perpetual motion machine that will show us that the ongoing motion is going to corrupt whatever material we use as formed resistance.
What's important is that perception (consequences of form within the momentum of flow) requires balance with comprehension (understanding flow by perceiving the consequences thereof upon form). As life you cannot perceive your own inception and death; yet perceiving those among everyone else allows you to grow you understanding of that which you cannot perceive. That balance between perception and comprehension represents self discernment (being ONE within ALL); which then allows you to question the ONEness of ALL; because you then have a foundation to build your assumptions upon.
d) that which remains of form within flow represents the self we can sustain aka our identity carrier (blood)...our shared identity carrier (bloodline). You represent the accumulation of all that was; the choice within all that is, and the gatekeeper for all that will be. ALL represents the story of ONE; hence others suggesting his-story; while leaving out the only one that matters within ALL...ONEself.
e) another suggested inversion represents togetherness aka choice in agreement with choice; which is suggested as unity. Yet a) choice represents response to balance (resonance); while choice to choice represents dissonance and b) U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness" or as the parasite sleight of hand goes "there can be only ONE".
Or is there a greater force that intercedes to enable progress?
The force that enables progress represents velocity (flow); which in return causes the interceding force of resistance within its momentum. The corruption here is suggested progress (going with the flow) while ignoring being the resistance to flow; hence the struggle to survive as form within flow.
We (form) represent resistance to the natural order (flow); while the parasitic few suggest us to instead follow their orders towards progress; achievements; victory; growth; success; outcomes; hopes and so on. We don't need to follow flow; we are moved by it; which is why we need to resist by staying within momentum aka responding as choice to balance (need/want); while struggling to resist the temptation to ignore this for suggestions by others (want vs not want).
If there is something out there helping, would it then be a stretch to imagine that force enabling your progress in every aspect and constantly interceding for your benefit?
Existing within balance requires the sole authority over self aka the "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom. Balance therefore represents the only dominance for the free will of choice within.
The "out there" represents lack of understanding of the ONEness of ALL (energy). What's out there for the responding perspective of those within? From the psychological perspective...ONEs ignorance of need for want; tempts the shirking of responsibility onto another ONE; which the parasites are exploiting by the suggestion of unquestionable ones above all (deities). They simply exploit ignorance and the want to shirk responsibility by suggesting both authority above self and a boogeyman to blame. Both sides are required to deceive one to ignore being choice within balance.
As for benefits...the internal balance of energy (loss/growth) represents the self sustenance of energy; hence every response within being defined by self sustenance...a pretty beneficial set-up one could say; yet choice within balance requires a want (temptation) to the need (self sustenance) and we really seem to like temptations so far.
The world then becomes very different and balance cannot be calculated from our experience as we are moved along by something bigger than ourselves.
a) flow differentiates ALL into formed ONEs; because perceived differences are needed to communicate inspiration to choice for the struggle of self sustenance. If everything is the same; why would one within struggle for anything? Miscegenation is utilized by the few to corrupt the understanding of the many towards perceived inspiration. "if everything's brown; why not flush it all down?" This corrupts our will to choose self sustenance over temptation. Then again...can't fuck with balance; only cause imbalance within for ourselves until balance re-enforces the natural order.
This is where our growing understanding; being inspired by the consequences of mass ignorance shines through; which the parasites try to buffer through disclosing as much of their deceptive behavior as possible. Why? To corrupt our growth of understanding by perceived inspiration through their suggested information dump. That's where "truth seekers" are suggested to consent to "red-pills" while chasing down the "rabbit-holes".
"bigger than ourselves" implies lack of understanding that each ONE contains ALL offered; yet has to grow it. Everything suggested to you as historical achievements can be done by you; yet the few suggest it to you so that you choose to "want" to achieve it; which represents your ignorance of need; which in return corrupts your growth.
Example...if you want to grow a garden for the profits you get monsanto aka the industrialization of poison; while corrupting everything around it just so that you can get what you want; which can never be enough anyway; since you plant the seeds of temptation into velocity; hence the exponential increase of wants (greed).
Meanwhile; if you grow a garden; because you need water; food; shelter and a breathable environment; then that will require you to stay within momentum aka adapting by choice to balance among constantly changing circumstances. This way the fruits of your labors will exponentially grow into more needs; thereby expanding the ecosystem of ONE within ALL which will unite (oneness) you with all the life that gets attracted by your growth. Every one of ONEs choices represents a seed planted into the soil of ALL.
Life is about nurturing growth within the moment(um); not about shortcuts towards wanted outcomes. Now look around you and ask yourself...how few will be that responsible instead of falling for the temptations suggested to them by the parasitic farmers of ignorance?
What are the implications of using free will of choice for reading the comments of free-will-of-choice; to then again use free will of choice to complain about free-will-of-choice commenting by free will of choice?
trying to read his comments
What if instead of trying to understand the suggested information; you just adapt to whatever inspires you?
madness
MAD'NESS, noun [from mad.] - "distraction; a state of disordered reason or intellect". What if consenting to reason (conflict between wanting vs not wanting suggested information) causes a disordered INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand.] ?
Made an account just so I can block him, and not have to see that word salad garbage anymore. He/it/whatever is a pigeon with diarrhea crapping all over this place.
If we are taking votes to kick people off the boat, I suggest you leave. And I dont even read most of free will's stuff but I will fight for their right to keep saying stuff. You however are mostly a troublemaker and I don't take too kindly to you not taking too kindly to other people's freedom. You are not helpful in the least, this post proves you are a miserable busy body and God knows we don't need anymore of those around town. It's ok to be silent.
What if a person represents per sonos (by sound); which implies being insane aka in sanus (within sound)? If we represent the response to perceived sound; then what does silence represent for those within sound?
To make this line of thinking a little tougher...SI'LENT, adjective - "not speaking; mute". Now reconsider the sound of silence..."Hello, darkness, my old friend I've come to talk with you again"
Silence can indeed be uncomfortable and yet still necessary. I usually enjoy a cacophony of sound but much can be said about trying to find peace in the quiet. Bottom line, gotta deal with the voices sometime.
What if perceived sound already implies being driven out aka moved towards ones perceiving senses; which makes voice a resound (resonance) to perceived sound? Now ask yourself...what does choice responding to perceived sound; then shaping it into words; then suggesting those words as idolized meaning to the choice of others...imply for ones resonance with the origin of sound?
What if the balance (momentum caused by motion) that defines one having a choice based response; requires resonance (choice of need) yet tempts dissonance (choice of want)? What if one needs to adapt to perceived sound; while resisting the temptation to consent to suggested sound; shaped into words?
The song remains the same, acknowledging the perceived sound promotes choices to battle or be beaten and you have the free will to decide what you will. The winner then has opportunity to conduct suggested sound. I'll always be cheering for your victory!
What if for choice it's about balancing until outcome; instead of conflict for outcome (winning; victory). What is the price for those within; when all that is offered is sound? Could it be ONEs participation within ALL aka conscious existence as the temporary within the ongoing?
What if choosing that which might be (battle; beaten; winning; victory) ignores that which is (balance)? What if to choose any wanted intention; ignores the needed foundation for having a choice...balance (momentum)?
What if the perceive battle isn't against something in the way of wanted victory; but the response-ibilty of choice to struggle to resist the temptation of want over need?
If energy processes loss (flow) and growth (form) internally as a balance (momentum); then the ongoing velocity of flow dominates the temporary resistance of form; hence the need for responsibility (struggle) and the want for temptation. In other words...the struggle for growth needs to be inspired to allow self sustenance within the dominating temptation of loss. What is more inspiring for growth; then the consequences of loss? Hold your breath (spirit) for a moment (um) and the inspiration for struggle is right there overruling want by need; while reminding will of its responsibility as choice in response to balance.
The decision to sustain self or ignoring it...yet the many are fooled by the suggestions of the few to ignore this fundamental use of choice for the temptation of endless suggested choices.
I enjoy the perspective, truly. What can be gained in a temporal state but to win the present battles? Perhaps the context is greater than the subject. If energy continues to exist do we proceed forward with our own power( is there any?) Or is there a greater force that intercedes to enable progress? If there is something out there helping, would it then be a stretch to imagine that force enabling your progress in every aspect and constantly interceding for your benefit? The world then becomes very different and balance cannot be calculated from our experience as we are moved along by something bigger than ourselves.
a) perspective implies per-spective aka person-optics. What we are being deceived to ignore is that person represents (per sonos aka by sound), hence a response... resonance (choice of need) or dissonance (choice of want) to origin of perceived sound.
Furthermore; to perceive everything from the source of sound; doesn't represents comprehending everything perceived. The growth of ONEs comprehend out of ALL perceived is based on choice of response; hence need (growth) or want (loss).
When we enjoy different (every one has a different comprehension of all perceived) perspectives we need to be aware another person can neither be the origin of sound; nor offering comprehension. For ONE within ALL, every other represents the choice of inspiration (need) or temptation (want). So try to resist the suggested information (within form) and try to adapt to perceived inspiration (within spirit) by "simply" (just kidding; it's a struggle) choosing need over want instead of want over need.
b) true implies versus false aka the conflict of reason (want vs not want) caused by consenting to suggested information. This is where your choice of writing "perspective" telegraphs to others that you consented to suggested information by another person; while ignoring perceived inspiration by the source of sound.
a) your choice of want over need represents the ignorance of perceived need for suggested want; which puts you into the want vs not want conflict (reason) with others. This is why you perceive battles; instead of the internal struggle to resist temptation; while balancing within momentum by choice based response.
b) ignorance causes the lack of self discernment as being ONE within ALL; form within flow; potential within potentiality; temporary within ongoing; magnetic resistance within electric velocity; choice within balance etc.
What you lack to understand is that as ONE you have temporary access to ALL existence has to offer and the choice to shape ONEself out of ALL offered. When you ignore perceived need for suggested want; then you ignore balance for outcomes. As free will of choice you're positioned as the response to balance (momentum); hence you needing to adapt to ever changing circumstances to resonate with balance for self sustenance and growth potential.
You represent the limited access to the unlimited system; yet the many choose to ignore this for what the few are suggesting them instead (self destruction; self restriction; self corruption...all those tempting wants and not wants).
As for gain...growth of form comes out of flow; not through other form. The consciousness transmutes perceived inspiration (electric velocity) into comprehended information (magnetic resistance)...unless ignored for suggested information by other form; which just drains us (form) right back into base electric velocity (flow). This is what the few call energy harvesting and it's as simple as using suggestion to gain consent to it; thereby deceiving other form to ignore growing out of flow.
ONE represents the smallest part within ALL; hence the opportunity for growth. It's not that we are subjected underneath; but that each ONE represents a seed within the soil of ALL containing everything; yet lacking understanding and effort to grow; which is where free will of choice is used to express ALL through ONEself.
CONTEXT, noun [Latin Con and texo, to weave.]...that represents the growth of understanding out of everything perceived; the more ONE comprehend; the more of ALL perceived becomes interwoven for the consciousness to roam within and plug inspiration out of; which requires a less restricted consciousness by self imposed restrictions of consented to information (beliefs; -isms).
I can only write so much and on such a scope; because I adapt to what inspires me on the fly and ever since I started doing this; I get more and more efficient at it. We don't need to accumulate information within our conscious memories like a hard drive we try to fill to capacity. We need to use memory like a ram aka short term information storage for ongoing adaptation to perceived inspiration. Clearing the cache (-isms) lets the consciousness of the leash and then the inspiration just becomes available at any moment (until body/mind exhaustion that is...).
a) suggested creationism deceives us to believe in creation out of nothing; while energy implies transmutation out of base everything. Therefore non-existence cannot exist within energy. Our lifespan represents temporary form within ongoing flow; which within energy represents the internal balance of loss (flow) growth (form). We represent temporary chaos out of ongoing order; while the parasites suggest us to seek the inversion thereof...order out of chaos.
b) energy implies inherent power, and the balance (loss/growth) within energy represents power of velocity (flow) causing power of resistance (form). The balance that self segregates ALL collective flow into individual ONEs form represents the momentum within which form can temporary growth within the loss of ongoing flow.
Velocity meeting resistance causes friction; vibration, resonance and everything we perceive as form within momentum.
c) resistance ceases within ongoing velocity; which we can mimic by either throwing a ball to perceive the temporary resistance of its momentum; before the ball falls or by attempting to build a perpetual motion machine that will show us that the ongoing motion is going to corrupt whatever material we use as formed resistance.
What's important is that perception (consequences of form within the momentum of flow) requires balance with comprehension (understanding flow by perceiving the consequences thereof upon form). As life you cannot perceive your own inception and death; yet perceiving those among everyone else allows you to grow you understanding of that which you cannot perceive. That balance between perception and comprehension represents self discernment (being ONE within ALL); which then allows you to question the ONEness of ALL; because you then have a foundation to build your assumptions upon.
d) that which remains of form within flow represents the self we can sustain aka our identity carrier (blood)...our shared identity carrier (bloodline). You represent the accumulation of all that was; the choice within all that is, and the gatekeeper for all that will be. ALL represents the story of ONE; hence others suggesting his-story; while leaving out the only one that matters within ALL...ONEself.
e) another suggested inversion represents togetherness aka choice in agreement with choice; which is suggested as unity. Yet a) choice represents response to balance (resonance); while choice to choice represents dissonance and b) U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness" or as the parasite sleight of hand goes "there can be only ONE".
The force that enables progress represents velocity (flow); which in return causes the interceding force of resistance within its momentum. The corruption here is suggested progress (going with the flow) while ignoring being the resistance to flow; hence the struggle to survive as form within flow.
We (form) represent resistance to the natural order (flow); while the parasitic few suggest us to instead follow their orders towards progress; achievements; victory; growth; success; outcomes; hopes and so on. We don't need to follow flow; we are moved by it; which is why we need to resist by staying within momentum aka responding as choice to balance (need/want); while struggling to resist the temptation to ignore this for suggestions by others (want vs not want).
Existing within balance requires the sole authority over self aka the "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom. Balance therefore represents the only dominance for the free will of choice within.
The "out there" represents lack of understanding of the ONEness of ALL (energy). What's out there for the responding perspective of those within? From the psychological perspective...ONEs ignorance of need for want; tempts the shirking of responsibility onto another ONE; which the parasites are exploiting by the suggestion of unquestionable ones above all (deities). They simply exploit ignorance and the want to shirk responsibility by suggesting both authority above self and a boogeyman to blame. Both sides are required to deceive one to ignore being choice within balance.
As for benefits...the internal balance of energy (loss/growth) represents the self sustenance of energy; hence every response within being defined by self sustenance...a pretty beneficial set-up one could say; yet choice within balance requires a want (temptation) to the need (self sustenance) and we really seem to like temptations so far.
a) flow differentiates ALL into formed ONEs; because perceived differences are needed to communicate inspiration to choice for the struggle of self sustenance. If everything is the same; why would one within struggle for anything? Miscegenation is utilized by the few to corrupt the understanding of the many towards perceived inspiration. "if everything's brown; why not flush it all down?" This corrupts our will to choose self sustenance over temptation. Then again...can't fuck with balance; only cause imbalance within for ourselves until balance re-enforces the natural order.
This is where our growing understanding; being inspired by the consequences of mass ignorance shines through; which the parasites try to buffer through disclosing as much of their deceptive behavior as possible. Why? To corrupt our growth of understanding by perceived inspiration through their suggested information dump. That's where "truth seekers" are suggested to consent to "red-pills" while chasing down the "rabbit-holes".
"bigger than ourselves" implies lack of understanding that each ONE contains ALL offered; yet has to grow it. Everything suggested to you as historical achievements can be done by you; yet the few suggest it to you so that you choose to "want" to achieve it; which represents your ignorance of need; which in return corrupts your growth.
Example...if you want to grow a garden for the profits you get monsanto aka the industrialization of poison; while corrupting everything around it just so that you can get what you want; which can never be enough anyway; since you plant the seeds of temptation into velocity; hence the exponential increase of wants (greed).
Meanwhile; if you grow a garden; because you need water; food; shelter and a breathable environment; then that will require you to stay within momentum aka adapting by choice to balance among constantly changing circumstances. This way the fruits of your labors will exponentially grow into more needs; thereby expanding the ecosystem of ONE within ALL which will unite (oneness) you with all the life that gets attracted by your growth. Every one of ONEs choices represents a seed planted into the soil of ALL.
Life is about nurturing growth within the moment(um); not about shortcuts towards wanted outcomes. Now look around you and ask yourself...how few will be that responsible instead of falling for the temptations suggested to them by the parasitic farmers of ignorance?
Y u so mad bro
Most everyone's mad here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTLOlf5My6w
What are the implications of using free will of choice for reading the comments of free-will-of-choice; to then again use free will of choice to complain about free-will-of-choice commenting by free will of choice?
What if instead of trying to understand the suggested information; you just adapt to whatever inspires you?
MAD'NESS, noun [from mad.] - "distraction; a state of disordered reason or intellect". What if consenting to reason (conflict between wanting vs not wanting suggested information) causes a disordered INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand.] ?
Can energy end? Where would it go then?
~sincerely the few who want to control the many
So, don't read his comments, what's the problem? Or you are a masochist? In that case, enjoy.
Everybody does. Pseudointellectual mumbo jumbo.
Reading posts and comments that you don't like, like it's your job or something?
You and lightwarrior there seem to lament having to shill here.
a) female; magnetic resistance (form) within male; electric velocity (flow)
b) rule 37
you think mildly annoying ppl present public health issues?
……ok. whatever.
Made an account just so I can block him, and not have to see that word salad garbage anymore. He/it/whatever is a pigeon with diarrhea crapping all over this place.
Salad bot. Hes a weird one. He belongs here with the rest of the weird ones.
WEIRD, adjective - "skilled in witchcraft"; also "having power to control fate and controlling human destiny"
In other words....free will of choice to shape form within the balance of flow. Weird indeed.