I have had 2 seizures and a nosebleed trying to read his comments. This madness must end.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
What if a person represents per sonos (by sound); which implies being insane aka in sanus (within sound)? If we represent the response to perceived sound; then what does silence represent for those within sound?
To make this line of thinking a little tougher...SI'LENT, adjective - "not speaking; mute". Now reconsider the sound of silence..."Hello, darkness, my old friend I've come to talk with you again"
Silence can indeed be uncomfortable and yet still necessary. I usually enjoy a cacophony of sound but much can be said about trying to find peace in the quiet. Bottom line, gotta deal with the voices sometime.
What if perceived sound already implies being driven out aka moved towards ones perceiving senses; which makes voice a resound (resonance) to perceived sound? Now ask yourself...what does choice responding to perceived sound; then shaping it into words; then suggesting those words as idolized meaning to the choice of others...imply for ones resonance with the origin of sound?
What if the balance (momentum caused by motion) that defines one having a choice based response; requires resonance (choice of need) yet tempts dissonance (choice of want)? What if one needs to adapt to perceived sound; while resisting the temptation to consent to suggested sound; shaped into words?
The song remains the same, acknowledging the perceived sound promotes choices to battle or be beaten and you have the free will to decide what you will. The winner then has opportunity to conduct suggested sound. I'll always be cheering for your victory!
What if for choice it's about balancing until outcome; instead of conflict for outcome (winning; victory). What is the price for those within; when all that is offered is sound? Could it be ONEs participation within ALL aka conscious existence as the temporary within the ongoing?
What if choosing that which might be (battle; beaten; winning; victory) ignores that which is (balance)? What if to choose any wanted intention; ignores the needed foundation for having a choice...balance (momentum)?
What if the perceive battle isn't against something in the way of wanted victory; but the response-ibilty of choice to struggle to resist the temptation of want over need?
If energy processes loss (flow) and growth (form) internally as a balance (momentum); then the ongoing velocity of flow dominates the temporary resistance of form; hence the need for responsibility (struggle) and the want for temptation. In other words...the struggle for growth needs to be inspired to allow self sustenance within the dominating temptation of loss. What is more inspiring for growth; then the consequences of loss? Hold your breath (spirit) for a moment (um) and the inspiration for struggle is right there overruling want by need; while reminding will of its responsibility as choice in response to balance.
The decision to sustain self or ignoring it...yet the many are fooled by the suggestions of the few to ignore this fundamental use of choice for the temptation of endless suggested choices.