The Mars rover is actually on Devon Island, Canada
(media.communities.win)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
If you like those pictures you will love this. Long read but essentially proof of what you are saying https://www.google.com/amp/s/astroengineer.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/a-curiosity-of-spirit-full-document/amp/
To me the idea that the author of this story (astroengineer) assumed quantum FTL communication without ruling out hoaxed mars pictures (from Devon Island, Canada according to the OP), makes this just an interesting work of fiction.
A Goolag/AMP link on here, seriously?
Actual url: https://astroengineer.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/a-curiosity-of-spirit-full-document/amp/
Isn't the phrase "NASA lies" redundant?
Like literally?
Fun fact: I made that infographic back in 2017 and posted it to the flatearth and conspiracy subs. Notice the watermark at the bottom.
I'm so glad to see it still circulating around. 😎
Another fun fact: That same infographic was featured in a buzzfeed article attempting to deboonk nasa skeptics.
Edit: Posted it here 7 months ago.
https://conspiracies.win/p/12iNLSQU2r/mars-rover-is-on-devon-island-ca/c/
OK, NASA lies, is that something new that government agency lie? There are no any government agency that does not lie.
What's the point?
More interesting is why the "critical thinkers" "research" is much worse than lie itself. Some photoshop to create a collage from low-resolution NASA pictures and images from internet that really prove nothing?
Well, let me think, that I as critical thinker would do to prove Mars rover is on Devon Island.
That will be undeniable and verifiable proof that NASA fake Mars photos.
However, it is still unclear, what is the point of such research. It will only prove that NASA lies about their Mars exploration program, nothing more. But that is a well-known fact, since the time they show their first wrong-colored images picturing Mars as a red planet with clear red sky for unknown reason. That is obvious, that on any planet with any composition of atmosphere, clear sky should be blue, due to Rayleigh scattering of sunlight on atmosphere atoms, that is independent from atmosphere composition.
Does that prove that humans can't send a drone to Mars? Absolutely not. We have all necessary tech to do it. The correct question should be "Why we still have no any habitable Mars bases and regular Earth-Mars flights in 21 century?", not "Did NASA land a drone on Mars?".
"Why we still have no any habitable Mars bases and regular Earth-Mars flights in 21 century"
You answered the question... because they lie.
NASA is not the only space agency on the Earth.
I think it is all about artificial inhibition of progress in all areas except digital electronics.
Why do you need to ask them?
How people visit different hard to reach places? Plane to the closest airport, then bus/train/car to closest town/village, then local helicopter/boat/landrover, finally your foots.
Or, if you are limited in resources, you could just look for a vacancy in that place and get a job. May be even in NASA division or its contractor running that Devon testing site.
Heavy unpenetrateable guard on unhabitable island is a good sign that you are got to something. Only that fact will be a good reason to do more research. But I didn't find any info about strange appearance of numerous guards on Devon.
Did Taimyr, without problems. Why Devon will be different?
Antarctica is not a big problem too. At least from Russian point of view. Periodically they look for, f.e. IT specialists for work at Antarctic stations. Not a best salary, but it is not about salary, isn't it? There are no any special skills needed, only to be healthy, have minimum knowledge to support stations computers and network and consent to spend a half a year in a distant and cold station.
Current vacancies for next year: http://www.aari.ru/dept/kadry/rae.html (use online translator, it is in Russian, obviously) This time IT specialist not needed, but there are a lot of other vacancies to choose from. Not very popular job, really, some time ago they look for IT specialist urgently, even on IT forums and social networks, looking for somebody who will agree for their not very decent salary.
I don't really check nowdays that old photos, but NASA have raw images archive, may be they are still there.
Try Viking lander images. Or Opportunity rover images. Both had color calibration tiles on board of known colors, so it is easy to see the NASA fucking with mars colors.
PS: Quick find: Viking lander 1 images
Viking lander 2 image with color calibration tile Bottom right square should be blue, not violet.
You are welcome.
Of course. But it does mean that NASA lies.
It is possible. But it is still a lie.
It could be political thing to cut any dreams of abandoning Earth authorities. What will you think when you saw blue sky and usual landscape on another planet? "Wow, it looks fine, it is not scare, may be I even could live there, or at least it will be interesting to see it by my own eyes". But if you see something alien and deep red, it cut the desire to reach that place.
For many years they thorougly make space look scare with all that vacuum, radiation, difficulty, etc, but really it is not.
The pressure difference is only 1 atmosphere, even usual commercial plane body could withstand it without any problems for passengers, it is only 0.25 atmosphere on the 30000 feet altitude where passenger planes fly.
Radiation is not a big problem too - Curiosity had a sensor on board and recorded radiation levels on its way to Mars being in its capsule. So it is recorded what will human experience in a regular nowdays spaceship on the way to another planet. It is interesting, that equivalent of radiation dose in the 6 month flight to Mars, is the same as 1 year on ISS (world record of LEO habitancy is 878 days by Gennady Padalka, and guy is absolutely healthy, still ready to fly and interesting person, who once told in interview for MSM that there exist a secret precept of behaviour in case of meeting with aliens, later he told that it was a joke, but who knows...) or 2 years of work on nuclear station and definitely far below really dangerous for humans level. And if you take a minimum measures for shielding a spaceship, slightly more than thin aluminium sheet, radiation in interplanetary flight will be on the level of ordinary plane flight.
I think there is some special, not very noticeable, but constant fearmongering propaganda about the space travels.
Returning to NASA, when they was caught with colors, they began to think out some senseless bullshit, like "it was done for geologists to allow them better determine geological things". Really, true color of rock is very important property of rock for any geologist.
I’ve got to admit there is something super weird about the rovers. Wasn’t there an insurance when they screwed up the timing? Like picture delete didn’t match speed of light for distance mars at that time. Seem to recall
Why would they benefit from lying about this?
No, I genuinely want to know. Im out of the loop. How do they benefit from lying? They get more money? So they're lying to the feds and to us?
I’ve seen a lot of “Mars” photos and none really looked like the ones that are alleged to be photos of Mars in this post. Do you have some links to said photos just to corroborate?
Go back to reddit, faggot
I’m gonna take that as a no, lol. To each their own, you keep believing random memes. I mean the meme even says “official Mars photo” it must be true!
You're too obvious glow nigger.
I’m sorry for your mental illness, I hope you’re able to get the help you need
Wonder how much these live videos are staged. How does it stay a secret.
I'm going to crop out the flat Earth tag at the bottom and repost elsewhere.
-_- here we go with another "space isnt real" post lol. what's next, is everything CGI? lol
https://www.google.com/amp/s/astroengineer.wordpress.com/2010/04/07/a-curiosity-of-spirit-full-document/amp/
Bad Bot.
how many sheckles per hour do you get kike?