If it’s just about the graphene though why go through the trouble of a vaccine vs aerosol or food borne? I still think the inflammatory response and immune dysfunction is more explanatory. 🤷♂️ maybe it’s both.
There is the whole angle of consent also. It can be argued that for their schemes to work consent is an issue. Its also true to question how consent can be given without full disclosure.
Vaccines are more targeted, you can target ethnicity, income brackets, age, etc.. AND it's far more reliable.
How much should you spray? How much should you put on food? What type of food? Maybe some people eat more bread than others? A Vaccine with delayed effects is the best and most practical large scale murder method.
And....The masses have given their consent!! If the ones who pushed this believe in some sort of Karma, they can absolve themselves of any guilt, after all, the masses were gullible to take it voluntarily.
All that said, we cannot take it for granted, what percentage is a kill shot or if it will kill large swathes of the population or not.
I suspect, that it is possible that some who got it could survive without any severe measures. (even if they got a full dose)
It's not an easy thing to poison someone to die after a specific time, if you give a big enough dose it will kill people instantly, a small one could have no effect, people have different body volumes and different blood circulations, someone who is obese and sedentary might require a bigger dose, a small sized person will need a smaller one. Hence all the "boosters".
Additionally, we might take into consideration, that some of these "blades" could stay in some fat tissue or not move as much as in some other person, or it might be discharged, ruining a part of the kidneys as well, but it might go out eventually.
The body can remove graphene through agglomeration of glutathione. Same is true for spikes. Hence the whole war on antioxidants. Hence also the push for boosters.
Okay but even so this implies direct involvement is dose selection by healthcare. This opens them up to liability and increases the surface of secrecy. We would have had leaks by now. I should have also mentioned water source since this is a well known technique of affecting a population - dating back to the Middle Ages
Some people have water filters, others drink bottled, some drink more than others, additionally you would have to do all regions of the world simultaneously, also it's not easy to determine when to keep adding poisons and when to stop, etc.. If you really think about all other methods, I mean really really take the time to think of how to do it on a mass scale, then a vaccine with delayed effect is the most practical. (Also starvation and chaos is a pretty good option as well)
even so this implies direct involvement is dose selection by healthcare. This opens them up to liability and increases the surface of secrecy. We would have had leaks by now
Different batches of "vaccines" do not need any involvement of medical care personnel, they just receive the batch and inject it, they do not know what they got. In many places of the world you take an appointment and they tell you where to take your poison (different centers can have different batches), it also depends on the location of the distribution. Of course when they wanted to get more numbers they discarded the appointment system, and could only control by location. It's not perfect but better than nothing.
People are highly specialized in their work, they do not really need to know much, and they are easily suspect to bribe and to obeying orders, never count on any "leaks".
I suppose the food would have to be distribution constrained which isn’t possible for most. Aerosol would be more targeted than vaccine lots. There’s some evidence to support the idea is aerosols….
There probably was, but sifting through the data, and being 100% certain of our conclusions is really difficult with all the manipulation and fakery going on.
This poison seems to be a different form of anticoagulants rodents poison, Anticoagulants ends up damaging tiny vessels (internal bleeding), graphene hydroxide seems to take it into the next level by damaging the actual blood cells.
To me this is far more plausible than any 5G theory proposed by Icke, or even mRNA which seem to be far more complicated. Rodenticide is simple and effective!
Please do read the link of the rodents poisons, this is different from your doctor's prescribed medicine. (it takes 2 weeks for rodents to kill them), and they didn't use anticoagulants, they used something different but I was just hinting it's the same principle.
I’ll take a look. I’m working on a hypothesis that goes something like: mRNA+hydrogel. Trying to come up with a simple an explanation for all the observed side effects as possible.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355979001_DETECTION_OF_GRAPHENE_IN_COVID19_VACCINES
Sadly, this is always how the Regime ends up validating the claims of a dissident.
By murdering them.
May his sacrifice not have been in vain.
Dr. Andreas Noack is tot
posted today.
any other sources on the death?
this is beyond wild, this is nuts.
If it’s just about the graphene though why go through the trouble of a vaccine vs aerosol or food borne? I still think the inflammatory response and immune dysfunction is more explanatory. 🤷♂️ maybe it’s both.
There is the whole angle of consent also. It can be argued that for their schemes to work consent is an issue. Its also true to question how consent can be given without full disclosure.
The satanic pedophiles don't want to risk inhaling their own poison.
Injection is much more precise.
Vaccines are more targeted, you can target ethnicity, income brackets, age, etc.. AND it's far more reliable.
How much should you spray? How much should you put on food? What type of food? Maybe some people eat more bread than others? A Vaccine with delayed effects is the best and most practical large scale murder method.
And....The masses have given their consent!! If the ones who pushed this believe in some sort of Karma, they can absolve themselves of any guilt, after all, the masses were gullible to take it voluntarily.
All that said, we cannot take it for granted, what percentage is a kill shot or if it will kill large swathes of the population or not.
I suspect, that it is possible that some who got it could survive without any severe measures. (even if they got a full dose)
It's not an easy thing to poison someone to die after a specific time, if you give a big enough dose it will kill people instantly, a small one could have no effect, people have different body volumes and different blood circulations, someone who is obese and sedentary might require a bigger dose, a small sized person will need a smaller one. Hence all the "boosters".
Additionally, we might take into consideration, that some of these "blades" could stay in some fat tissue or not move as much as in some other person, or it might be discharged, ruining a part of the kidneys as well, but it might go out eventually.
The body can remove graphene through agglomeration of glutathione. Same is true for spikes. Hence the whole war on antioxidants. Hence also the push for boosters.
Okay but even so this implies direct involvement is dose selection by healthcare. This opens them up to liability and increases the surface of secrecy. We would have had leaks by now. I should have also mentioned water source since this is a well known technique of affecting a population - dating back to the Middle Ages
Some people have water filters, others drink bottled, some drink more than others, additionally you would have to do all regions of the world simultaneously, also it's not easy to determine when to keep adding poisons and when to stop, etc.. If you really think about all other methods, I mean really really take the time to think of how to do it on a mass scale, then a vaccine with delayed effect is the most practical. (Also starvation and chaos is a pretty good option as well)
Different batches of "vaccines" do not need any involvement of medical care personnel, they just receive the batch and inject it, they do not know what they got. In many places of the world you take an appointment and they tell you where to take your poison (different centers can have different batches), it also depends on the location of the distribution. Of course when they wanted to get more numbers they discarded the appointment system, and could only control by location. It's not perfect but better than nothing.
People are highly specialized in their work, they do not really need to know much, and they are easily suspect to bribe and to obeying orders, never count on any "leaks".
I suppose the food would have to be distribution constrained which isn’t possible for most. Aerosol would be more targeted than vaccine lots. There’s some evidence to support the idea is aerosols….
Hasn’t there been higher side effects related to specific batches? Seems like I’ve seen those graphs.
There probably was, but sifting through the data, and being 100% certain of our conclusions is really difficult with all the manipulation and fakery going on.
https://twitter.com/DennisKBerlin/status/1329399530421424128
Während Livestream: Polizei stürmt Wohnung von YouTuber Andreas Noack https://www.rtl.de/cms/waehrend-livestream-polizei-stuermt-wohnung-von-youtuber-andreas-noack-4654218.html
Die deutsche Polizei verhaftet den Gefängniskritiker Dr. Andreas Noack in einem schockierenden Video https://wikitechnews.net/ge/die-deutsche-polizei-verhaftet-den-gefangniskritiker-dr-andreas-noack-in-einem-schockierenden-video/
Makes you wonder about all those dead microbiologists in the early 2000's. Crazy shit. We are at war.
This poison seems to be a different form of anticoagulants rodents poison, Anticoagulants ends up damaging tiny vessels (internal bleeding), graphene hydroxide seems to take it into the next level by damaging the actual blood cells.
To me this is far more plausible than any 5G theory proposed by Icke, or even mRNA which seem to be far more complicated. Rodenticide is simple and effective!
You won't catch Covid¹ but now you're anemic.
¹you'll still get Covid
Anticoagulants have a short half life - hours if that.
Please do read the link of the rodents poisons, this is different from your doctor's prescribed medicine. (it takes 2 weeks for rodents to kill them), and they didn't use anticoagulants, they used something different but I was just hinting it's the same principle.
I’ll take a look. I’m working on a hypothesis that goes something like: mRNA+hydrogel. Trying to come up with a simple an explanation for all the observed side effects as possible.