Seems legit when he's interviewed on Church Militant.. Silicon Valley tried to cancel him several times...he had to build his infrastructure from the ground up. Additionally, the press keep coming after him, which they wouldn't do if he wasn't legit. Trust nobody though.
Supposedly he had some early writings that were sort of pro feminism, but I've not gone digging.
He's just really Christian. He has been cancelled by literally everyone, so what are they gonna do if he says something they don't like? What is left to cancel? Banks keep cancelling him, so he's making his own bank. They're just forcing him to turn Gab into an end to end supply chain for everything.
Have a ton of respect for anybody who has accomplished what he has. Instead of just whining on the internet the dude is actually fighting the good fight.
I see nothing bad in calling kikes, bug tech, pedos, fags, whatever. That does not mean anything. The only thing that matter is that Gab is centralised. That is an absolute no-go for such platform.
There is no way around some centralization for a platform such as gab, which had to be built from the ground up as Silicon Valley tried to cancel him a couple times. Supposedly he lives out in the middle of nowhere as well, but can't confirm.
There is no way around some centralization for a platform such as gab
Seriously?
So, perhaps we obviously should forget about existense of different Mastodon, PeerTube, Diaspora, Zeronet, Tox and other decentralized and absolutely uncontrolled things.
I began to think that all that crap with centralized and closedsourced "new freespeech platforms" is continously happens only to distract people from really working distributed solutions by any means.
Every time, sheeple who was banned from one centralised platform just go and register on another one, again and again. Mice cried, pricked, but continue to chew the cactus.
It's insane. Absolutely insane. It gives even worse loss of belief in humans than coronahoax.
He's trying to build a parallel economy. That doesn't happen around decentralized platforms. And I said "some" centralization, did your eyes gloss over that word? Even alt tech has to be planned to some extent.
Now, to the extent I sorta agree with you, is that Parlor was a Jew funded honeypot.
Still, you gotta realize...this is often why leftists win. They aren't afraid to centralize and plan, while individualists, well, they're atomized individualists (but I repeat myself). While I'm not adverse to the libertarian mindset, the right will only start to win when it embraces some form of conservative fascism.
He's trying to build a parallel economy. That doesn't happen around decentralized platforms.
It is orthogonal things. You could build parallel economy on any platform. Crypto+illegal things economy build completely on decentralised platform and works perfectly.
this is often why leftists win. They aren't afraid to centralize and plan
Don't even know where to start....
Current leftists (or better say "leftists") win only because TPTB want that. Without TPTB support we wouldn't even hear something about all that SJWs, marxists, fags and other crap.
Independent leftists win or stand only when used decentralized resistance tactics. (f.e. Zapatista)
Planning have nothing to do with centralization at all. In case of modern TPTB leftists planning is done for them by TPTB.
Torba could be a nice guy, trying to do something good and make some money. There is nothing bad in that, but unfortunately his platform have a giant inevitable vulnerability right in its core. If somehow he change his mind or would be destroyed by TPTB or appear to be not who he is, all his platform will be immidiately taken over with all its participants.
That is why distributed things are much preferrable now. Corporations try to destroy torrents over 20 years without any success. It is a very good result for a technology.
An organized minority will always win against an unorganized majority. And torrenting is a niche thing where most people end up with a virus on their computer.
You are basically saying the way to fight back is to create a black market. That doesn't get you political power. It get's you left alone, which is enough for most people I suppose.
An organized minority will always win against an unorganized majority.
Organization have nothing to do with centralization. You could easily have a perfectly organized and fully decentralized community.
And torrenting is a niche thing where most people end up with a virus on their computer.
I'm waiting for more than 20 years to see any working virus for Linux. Still waiting without any result. May be a problem is not in torrents? May be you just should not use proprietary OS where you have a need to download proprietary software in binary form from murky sources, and everything will be OK?
How torrents could be connected with your wrong choice of OS?
Most people use torrents to share music, movies and books and not software.
You are basically saying the way to fight back is to create a black market.
Exactly. It is just a necessary part on the way to win. In any case you will need some kind of goods exchange in your community. If trade for f.e. unvaxxed or conservatives become outlawed, there will be no any other way except creating black market. So why don't you want to create working solition without a hurry and thoroughly tune it to the needs of community before it become an urgent necessity?
That doesn't get you political power.
All and every political power was literally bought on black market. Obviously you can't go to some legal shop and officially buy some political power.
I don't think you understand what the word centralization means. While not a synonym for organization, there is quite the overlap. Being organized is being centralized, to a large extent. It was George Washington's army, not individual militia patriots, that won the Revolutionary War. Likewise, although the IRA was both centralized and decentralized, it was their decentralization that led to them losing. Same goes for about every successful vs failed revolution.
Linux? That's even more niche. The only reason there is no viruses for Linux is because not enough people use it to make it worth the time to create them.
Peer-to-peer needs to be in person, to build connections. To build communities of like minded people who can organize for collective aims. This gets around the free-rider effect.
I heard hes a hard core Christian, hates both porn and jews.
Seems legit when he's interviewed on Church Militant.. Silicon Valley tried to cancel him several times...he had to build his infrastructure from the ground up. Additionally, the press keep coming after him, which they wouldn't do if he wasn't legit. Trust nobody though.
Supposedly he had some early writings that were sort of pro feminism, but I've not gone digging.
Who cares about a "honeypot" right now. We are all being marked as dissidents, accept that and move on.
He's just really Christian. He has been cancelled by literally everyone, so what are they gonna do if he says something they don't like? What is left to cancel? Banks keep cancelling him, so he's making his own bank. They're just forcing him to turn Gab into an end to end supply chain for everything.
Have a ton of respect for anybody who has accomplished what he has. Instead of just whining on the internet the dude is actually fighting the good fight.
I see nothing bad in calling kikes, bug tech, pedos, fags, whatever. That does not mean anything. The only thing that matter is that Gab is centralised. That is an absolute no-go for such platform.
There is no way around some centralization for a platform such as gab, which had to be built from the ground up as Silicon Valley tried to cancel him a couple times. Supposedly he lives out in the middle of nowhere as well, but can't confirm.
Seriously?
So, perhaps we obviously should forget about existense of different Mastodon, PeerTube, Diaspora, Zeronet, Tox and other decentralized and absolutely uncontrolled things.
I began to think that all that crap with centralized and closedsourced "new freespeech platforms" is continously happens only to distract people from really working distributed solutions by any means.
Every time, sheeple who was banned from one centralised platform just go and register on another one, again and again. Mice cried, pricked, but continue to chew the cactus.
It's insane. Absolutely insane. It gives even worse loss of belief in humans than coronahoax.
He's trying to build a parallel economy. That doesn't happen around decentralized platforms. And I said "some" centralization, did your eyes gloss over that word? Even alt tech has to be planned to some extent.
Now, to the extent I sorta agree with you, is that Parlor was a Jew funded honeypot.
Still, you gotta realize...this is often why leftists win. They aren't afraid to centralize and plan, while individualists, well, they're atomized individualists (but I repeat myself). While I'm not adverse to the libertarian mindset, the right will only start to win when it embraces some form of conservative fascism.
It is orthogonal things. You could build parallel economy on any platform. Crypto+illegal things economy build completely on decentralised platform and works perfectly.
Don't even know where to start....
Torba could be a nice guy, trying to do something good and make some money. There is nothing bad in that, but unfortunately his platform have a giant inevitable vulnerability right in its core. If somehow he change his mind or would be destroyed by TPTB or appear to be not who he is, all his platform will be immidiately taken over with all its participants.
That is why distributed things are much preferrable now. Corporations try to destroy torrents over 20 years without any success. It is a very good result for a technology.
An organized minority will always win against an unorganized majority. And torrenting is a niche thing where most people end up with a virus on their computer.
You are basically saying the way to fight back is to create a black market. That doesn't get you political power. It get's you left alone, which is enough for most people I suppose.
Organization have nothing to do with centralization. You could easily have a perfectly organized and fully decentralized community.
I'm waiting for more than 20 years to see any working virus for Linux. Still waiting without any result. May be a problem is not in torrents? May be you just should not use proprietary OS where you have a need to download proprietary software in binary form from murky sources, and everything will be OK? How torrents could be connected with your wrong choice of OS?
Most people use torrents to share music, movies and books and not software.
Exactly. It is just a necessary part on the way to win. In any case you will need some kind of goods exchange in your community. If trade for f.e. unvaxxed or conservatives become outlawed, there will be no any other way except creating black market. So why don't you want to create working solition without a hurry and thoroughly tune it to the needs of community before it become an urgent necessity?
All and every political power was literally bought on black market. Obviously you can't go to some legal shop and officially buy some political power.
I don't think you understand what the word centralization means. While not a synonym for organization, there is quite the overlap. Being organized is being centralized, to a large extent. It was George Washington's army, not individual militia patriots, that won the Revolutionary War. Likewise, although the IRA was both centralized and decentralized, it was their decentralization that led to them losing. Same goes for about every successful vs failed revolution.
Linux? That's even more niche. The only reason there is no viruses for Linux is because not enough people use it to make it worth the time to create them.
Peer-to-peer needs to be in person, to build connections. To build communities of like minded people who can organize for collective aims. This gets around the free-rider effect.
Asking the right questions here.