That this earth does not revolve, and is not round, or roundish, at all, but is continuous with the rest of its system, so that, if one could break away from the traditions of the geographers, one might walk and walk, and come to Mars, and then find Mars continuous with Jupiter? I suppose some day such queries will sound absurd—the thing will be so obvious—
-Charles Fort, “The Book of the Damned” 1919
You're going to want to suspend your disbelief for this one. Think of it as a thought experiment.
Sometimes the conspiracy theorist must start at the conclusion and work backwards from there. The experienced conspiracy theorist knows to pay attention when there are only 2 possible explanations given, one "mainstream" and one "conspiratorial". The truth of the matter is almost universally a third option, hiding tangentially in another, often unfamiliar, realm.
Take Roswell...an experimental weather balloon? Or an alien craft? Try Nazi antigravity tech.
9/11...jet fuel? Or controlled demo/thermite? Try Directed Energy Weaponry
Globe Earth hurtling through space? Or flat Earth on a plane beneath a firmament?
Try Crater Earth on a larger planet.
NASA demonstrably has lied from the beginning. The Flat Earthers are universally mocked, but allowed to persist on just about every platform. Why?
Try to revert to a child-like state of wonder, back to square one. You don't know about galaxies and planets and moons and comets and pulsars.
Consider the notion that the "moon" is a reflection of a larger "earth".
It couldn't be a reflection of our known world, because we would recognize the patterns immediately. Some have claimed to have located the "continents" including mysterious areas yet unexplored.
Others claim our "biosphere" is even smaller in comparison, and that the true "earth" (which is indeed round!), could be at least 1,000 times larger than our known realm.
Are we on a "crater" on a larger earth? Let's start at that conclusion, regardless of how unreasonable it might seem. How much could that explain? Let's discuss.
According to speculation from the previously linked content creator, our "earth" could potentially be surrounded by a series of plasma "spheres" that act as reflecting agents.
The sun shines on our larger "earth" (let's call it Gaia) and we see a reflection of this larger sphere on a layer of "plasma" above us, aka the "moon".
Read Who Built the Moon?. The moon really shouldn't be there.
Whilst we casually take it for granted that the two main bodies seen in Earth's skies look the same size, it is actually something of a miracle. To be precise, the moon is 400 times smaller than the sun, yet it is also just 1/400th of the distance between the Earth and the sun.
Isaac Asimov described this perfect visual alignment as being 'the most unlikely coincidence imaginable'. By some absolutely incomprehensible quirk of nature, the Moon also manages to precisely imitate the perceived annual movements of the Sun each month.
When dealing with "Science", your eyebrows should be immediately raised when confronted with words like "miracle" and "incomprehensible". Jim Marrs notes:
The point – and it is one seldom noted in considering the origin of the moon – is that it is extremely unlikely that any object would just stumble into the right combination of factors required to stay in orbit. ‘Something’ had to put the moon at its altitude, on its course and at its speed.
So...how are these anomalies explained by "Science"? They're not. Even the Wikipedia page for the moon's origin hypothesis admits its profound shortcomings. They also can't explain Mars' "moons".
I'm noticing that same old false dichotomy here...Orthodoxy: The Moon was from a "giant impact"...or Conspiracy: The moon is a spaceship!
Try...is the moon even there?
Strange phenomenon occurring on the lunar surface
But wait!! Gravity! Einstein! Physics! Are we operating under a largely fallacious physics paradigm?
Read this: The Secrets of Anti-Gravity Propulsion by Paul A. LaViolette.
The same author also wrote a book called Decoding the Message of the Pulsars. LaViolette concludes that many so-called "pulsars" are a communication system...and that our planet seems to be a focal point of this network.
Are the stars...even stars at all?
If the moon is a reflection of the larger Gaia, then additional "plasma" rings would provide different perspectives, near and far, of our realm. IOW, "stars" and "galaxies" are different layers of Gaia, brilliantly displayed on the night sky.
There is no "infinite" universe, at least not as represented by the "stars". Many unexplained paradoxes may be explained by this theory. As would "aliens".
Aliens are no longer required to engage in interdimensional travel or traverse vast reaches of "space" to get here. They would simply be visiting from another biome on Gaia.
And what are these biomes? Craters! The similarities between "creator/crater" are notable.
So which is our crater? Content creator (heh) "godgevlamste" has suggested we live in the area referred to as the crater "Sulpicius Gallus M" on the moon.
Antarctica comprises the right side of the crater, and is much larger than is admitted, while the known "earth" makes up the left side.
The "moon landing" and subsequent missions were us leaving the crater and landing on the larger planet. The early Apollo missions are suspiciously centered around Sulpicius Gallus M. The world's space agencies, with NASA at the helm, are hiding the true nature of "space" and our place on a larger world. Flat Earth is a convenient scapegoat.
The other "planets" are nearby craters. Jupiter is the crater "Joy." The God Jupiter's other name is "Jove" from which we get the word "jovial" which means joyful. That's rather on the nose, isn't it?
The crater "Linne" is a candidate for Saturn, and it's possible that 3 concentric rings in the crater could produce a "ring around a planet" reflection on the plasma, explaining Saturn's "rings". This could also be the location of "Atlantis" and would explain the Saturnalian cult's origin.
The crater "Atlantis" got flooded (it's located in a "sea" on the moon aka Gaia on a lower elevation). They traveled on the larger ocean until they found a mountain range...at the top is our crater, which would have been above the "flood". This all checks out on the "lunar" map.
Occasionally, however, the oceans on Gaia do reach our crater, causing sporadic massive floods over the millennia as the larger oceans reaches our elevation. One of these events likely led to the flooding of Atlantis and the "move" to our crater to rebuild their civilization. It explains why there's no visible evidence of "Atlantis" on "Earth" and how these massive structures appeared out of no where.
Aliens from "outer space"? Or neighboring craters? Which sounds more believable?
When the "arc" landed near "Antarctica*, was it bringing varied species from other biomes on Gaia? Is that why so many creatures appear so alien on earth?
Something happened in our distant past. Religions say the "angels" slept with the mortals. The New Age philosophy claims that "aliens" from outer space bred with Earth hominoids.
Try...the angels and aliens where actually Gaians, not Earthlings or ET!
It's always bothered me to consider the possibility that "aliens" would be physically able to reproduce with the organic hominoid on Earth. But it COULD be possible if the "alien" was from the same "planet".
It would also explain the "giants". Giants would be far more likely to exist on a larger planet.
If we're Sulpicius Gallus M (SG...Star Gate?), what star represents "earth" on the blown up representation of Gaia?
How about...Sirius, the brightest star in the sky. It would have to be the brightest star, as it would be the closest "reflection" in the sky.
Let's revisit the book The Sirius Mystery by Robert Temple.
The Dogon people of Africa claim to have been visited by beings from "Sirius" and that they imparted intimate knowledge of the Sirius "star system."
I submit that the visitors were telling the Dogons WHERE they were in the sky. The Dogons interpreted this as the origin of the "aliens", when the aliens were trying to tell the Dogon their own location!
Here's an image of Sulpicius Gallus M, aka Sirius, aka "Earth".
Creator godgevlamste has compared satellite images of Sirius and has noticed similarities with the shape of SGM. Even the names "S ulpici US" "S iri US" are similar.
Has any of this information been encoded in movies? Watch Dark City from 1998. Also from 1998 (curious...) is a must see: The Truman Show.
What's the moment that Truman starts to question his reality, which is an ocean surrounded by a fake wall? When a "satellite" falls down to "earth" called "Sirius".
This is perhaps the most revealing moment in all cinema.
So let me get this straight..."Sirius" falls to "Earth" and Truman realizes his reality is not what it seems? SIRIUS=EARTH. That's why the satellite falls. It's us.
And what of the Breakaway Civilization? Where the heck are they? We know UNTOLD TRILLIONS have been funneled away. Are they colonizing outside our crater?
Is the nascent space tourism program going to be tours of GAIA instead?
Do some celebrities that "disappear" merely leave our crater?
There's a million and a half logistical issues with setting up "secret bases on Mars." How could they possibly launch all that material without notice? Unless...Mars is a nearby crater (possibly "Hadley C").
Is there a passage through Antarctica? Is that why Operation Highjump happened? Is that why Admiral Byrd spoke of a "vast land" beyond Antarctica? Does it open to a larger world? Could this be one of the most heavily guarded secrets among secret societies throughout history?
Did a flood and other natural disasters cause the residents of another crater to colonize "earth", breed with the local ape species, and jump start civilization using the tools and methods of the lost biosphere?
And the missing children. Where the fuck are they going?
Could the millions of missing kids over the years be used to seed the colonization efforts outside our crater?
Did whatever "colonize" our crater come here with good intentions, or is it potentially parasitic in nature?
What is the sun cult? Who is behind the sun cult? What is the sun? Who were the Proselenes? Was there a time before the moon was in the sky?
Why has the "alien" meme become such an important feature of the New Age Religion?
If the entire medical establishment is a fraud, as proven by the COVID hoax, couldn't this extreme degree of deception extend to the scientifically accepted orthodoxy of "space" and our planet?
What are the limits of the lies? The sky, unironically.
To be continued...
At the very least, stars are demonstrably not light years away. You can't have an Oort cloud, Keiper Belt, and trillions of rogue planets cruising the cosmos and still have uninterrupted starlight. At that distance, the molecules in our own atmosphere would block them from site. If stars are nearby, what else have they lied about? And what are stars?
Good comment. He located the Kuiper belt on the moon...it's a mountain range, like the "asteroid belt".
You kept me up all night going down this rabbit hole, lol. Very interesting. Thanks for posting.
Thanks for giving me a new rabbit hole. I have been blocked from society since covid bs took over, so having new dives to go into are much appreciated!
And that's why we didn't go to the moon.
Leedskalnin new something very important! I don't know what, but he was a legend.
Have you read Sheldrake’s “The Science Delusion”?
Ahh, interesting book that outlines ~15 things that just do not fit in any of the current paradigms, that could very well lead to revolutions when better understood.
Here’s an interview with him from around its release:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/feb/05/rupert-sheldrake-interview-science-delusion
My theory is super earth with small moving habitable zone. Similar to Saturn with a black sun that emanates from the core, and reflects off the firmament.
It's the only thing that makes sense to me given this video:
The Lost History Of The Flat Earth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFvelQHn16k
The section on ancient buildings-as-resonators in that film is worthy of its own documentary and honestly can be considered separately from the other claims made.
I think we are looking at some sort of synthesis of this and crater earth.
Great stuff.
Maybe a diagram would help on the reflections and things, trying to understand.
Seems like it would explain the size synchronicity, but not sure how it describes eclipses or the phases. Random thoughts:
Could the water ripples be some type of atmospheric disturbances as one possibility?
Could the moon also be a hole in the "sky".
I did witness that the 'face' or craters of the moon appeared upside-down in Australia and the southern hemisphere compared to in North America or South Korea or Europe.
Why can't "as above so below" be literal?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baphomet
Because there was never a half man, half woman, half goat with a kaduceus for a spine.
Solve et coagula. It's about maintaining balance. Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. The lord's prayer can be read like a chakra tuning from the base.
Exactly why we need an occult subdomain. I'm a big proponent of Robert Temples work. I've seen dark city and it's great. There may be aliens controlling everything but there certainly isn't a disk that they out everyone to sleep and change stuff.
The light from Sirius is observable and repeatable. We'll see the same result as the guy who went up in the rocket to prove FE.
You should ask in c/meta for an occult.win, I think it could help centralize what has so far been spread out over a ton of .wins, and allow for deeper, less reactionary discussions to occur. You might even get support from places like GA and Christianity, I know plenty of people here and on ConsumeProduct who would be interested
I don't know what shape our Earth is, I've already mentioned in a previous comment recently which you will find near the top of my post history. I use the globe Earth in my book, but I know gravity and many other things defy all logic.
All the many experiments, the horizon all make more sense on a Flat Earth, and Einstein bringing in mathematics to overrule relative experiments. Einstein did a real number on humanity with his garbage.
But no Flat Earth model can explain the 4 seasons/4 ages of Milky Way And the 7 other suns that effect our tree of life, as they are the main cause of our 4 seasons alongside the four elements.
Just like how globe Earth can't explain many things, same thing applies to flat Earth. I have to tackle the science books to find out which ones are written by the magicians. No flat/globe/concave/crater Earth has hit the nail yet. Because they create theories, what you must understand is that the elite (magicians) encode the truth over and over in many things. The only way to learn the truth is to find out where they hide it in science books, which ones are written by the magicians.
All religious text about flat earth however is actually talking about the Milky Way.
Just like you see in my work, I turn many stories into the same stories. Movies, artwork, religion, mythology, ancient artifacts, carvings, entertainment. My work is no theory, it is the Occult Magic Science where you defeat the elites illusion to get a key to the universe. But I still have a lot to discover, it is extremely time consuming.
have you actually read who built the moon? It's a great book but does not suggest crater earth as a theory at all.
Yes of course...I didn't attribute crater moon theory to the book. They fall into the "it's a spaceship" category that I explained in my OP.
I cited the book because it's a good resource for moon anomalies, including the fact that it shouldn't be there.
Ah ok I misunderstood. Now I'm going to have to read through your post and skim back through the book to see if the anomalies about the moon would make more sense in line with this crater earth idea. I dismissed flat earth as disinfo years ago mainly on a gut feeling but now feel like I need to give that some headspace too. Thanks
np! I really appreciate you keeping an open mind!
I'm definitely not convinced by this theory, but the more I research, the more it seems that the current model is faulty, and that "flat earth" seems to be a convenient distraction from some of these valid concerns. The "truth" may be somewhere in the middle. I love this stuff!
I disliked how they kept using fake evidence from the Apollo missions to justify some of their claims. Still a good book though
Indeed! I disagree with some of their conclusions, but some of the info is extraordinary and impossible to dismiss.
Great post! Provides a nice introduction to this idea and covers a lot. Looking forward to seeing more of your findings.
Zodiac / Zoo-Di-Arc / Arc of the Zoo / The stars showing where the "arc" came from?
I've been going down some other really deep rabbit holes this week, but been diving into some research related to this in between. The more I learn about this theory, the more compelling it becomes.
Now we are talking. Great post.
"Whilst we casually take it for granted that the two main bodies seen in Earth's skies look the same size, it is actually something of a miracle. To be precise, the moon is 400 times smaller than the sun, yet it is also just 1/400th of the distance between the Earth and the sun."
It is called magnetism. Any type of magnetic body will naturally align to its position based on its........ size. :D Yes, basic magnitism explains it clearly. No need to go overboard with some ridiculous theories of a crater or whatever. Somehow, your theory doesn't even explain how would these images will be accurately reflected - it doesn't stand to any scientific theory that such things will be reflected in the way we observe them. However, feel free to investigate this crater nonsense. At least, once you remove this idea only the obvious one will remain.
Furthermore, the sun also has magnetic properties. A sun flower always faces the sun regardless of having no motor functions by itself. People get tan because of a high expulsion of oxygen on the skin. That's the reason for red skin initially when out in the sun. Actual particles bounce off the skin and actual magnetic field is attracting the majority of flora.
Furtherermorer, the sun is attracting any moving star a.k.a. plane(t) to itself (small planets have a slight variation of this). What is called a retrograde movement is the movement of a plane(t) seemingly moving backwards to its original path - all based on our position. Now, check this out if you are not able to imagine it - https://www.theplanetstoday.com/geocentric_orrery.html (use the options to speed up the sun's movement and observe how every planet is attracted to the position of the sun).
6000 years of occult knowledge is only describing ethereal beings, not physical. You're probably waiting for that cgi crap that will show aliens as some little grey beings or whatever, but for 6000 years every single philosopher/magician will describe those "beings from Sirius" as demons/spirits. Yeah, wouldn't hurt to read a book. At a specific time of the year, with the help of a specific sigil, the magician and his group can call upon or summon the being from the specific constellation. Literally, all books on the occult describe this and they never mention or theorize the nonsense that Mars, for example, is an actual physical place.
NASA is obviously lying, your post seems a bit deluded in that regard, so just putting it plain sight for everyone to see. Just study a bit the NASA theory and you will always come to obvious errors that shouldn't happen by the laws of physics. Still, you can believe whatever you want - hollow earth, some grey aliens, other planets as physical things... :D While you do that NASA, DARPA, HAARP, US Air Force, CERN are all working on weather modification.
No, Sirius is not Earth by any extension. Sirius is called the Dog star and it means all the things that dogs usually represent in the occult - death/the afterlife. Anubis, Set, Cerberus, etc. They all meant Sirius. Also, the star Sirius is part of the constellation big dog or Canis Majoris. Sirius is also the brightest star in the night sky for 6000 years or written history about it. Study religion to confirm that this is true. "Its name is derived from the Greek word Σείριος (Seirios, lit. 'glowing' or 'scorching')." - that's why the satelite was named Sirius because you have to be enlighten to contact it. I guess you didn't bother with the apartment number above Jim Carry's head just seconds before the satelite scene? Don't just take any scene and interpret it the way you feel like it, all scenes from masons connected to occult knowledge have their proper number shared as well. Or the number of the radio station just after the satelite scene? Would that number relate to the previous number in some way? Regardless of your mathematical knowledge, Sirius means Osiris or the king that was killed and went to the afterlife to rule there. Not Earth in the slightest bit.
Earth is an anagram for heart. The sky or Anu or Nut or whatever you want to call it is the actual visual representation of the mind. Not your mind or anyone elses - mind is a collective thing and we have a tiny antenna that picks up the signals that we are in tune with. It is called a pineal gland and it is the weirdest thing inside the human brain. Study it to understand that dreams are closely connected to the pineal gland and its functions. Moreover, memory is not actually stored in any cell of the human brain, rather they are creating a specific electromagnetic field that is specific to each person. Alright, that being said, we can move to air or Shu which is between Nut and Geb. If you've studied chakras, you'll notice the obvious correlation with the ones we have and the fact that the voice chakra is between the heart and mind chakras. This should quite obviously pinpoint where Sirius is and remove the confusion that Sirius is our planet while we actually see Sirius FROM OUR PLANET.
"Watch Dark City from 1998." - You mean the movie about the beings that influence dreams??? You mean Arachni spinning her web? You mean Saturn molding our dreams? You mean the queen bee - Beelzebub that controls the hive-mind? Yes, study a bit on those and this movie will finally make sense to you. Perhaps you'd even go further to see how they use this specific demon for MK Ultra victims a.k.a. the major "star" in the movie. Perhaps its involvement with memory is explaining why they "the illuminated" can see dreams of people who died so long ago - Assassin's creed, Cloud Atlas, the Matrix, etc.
No, we are not colonized... However, our bodies and minds are manifactured with the help of the primal 9 (same ones from the Lord of the Rings). In contrast to the book/movie, these 9 would look so crooked that it is said that a person would go mad upon seeing them. More information comes from the Necronomicon a.k.a. Al Azif which was interpreted by Manly P. Hall. These beings look primarily as many eyes with tentacles to put it lightly. They have actually created, or so it is said, the human body and conscienceness. However, these 9 are also etherical beings and they don't live on a planet or whatever. That's why magicians use poisonous plants to reach a near-death experience thus getting them closer to lifting the veil. The veil is the physical aspect of life and it shows how many will cling to it regardless of any other proven non-physical energies surrounding us. For example, how your post is only grasping the physical crater or aliens as physical beings... Just reminding you that I cannot collect a jar full of love to show it to you, but it exists nonetheless.
Here's what has been happening to put it in the most obvious form so it is clear based on everything we've seen so far and everything that remains to happen:
But I am available for a free discussion as well and I recommend any occult book to help you understand the world beyond the obvious physical features. If you are done with this crater nonsense, let me know if anything of the above needs further clarification or else. Here's a little easter egg matching the egg-shape of our universe to help those who understand perspective - https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2F2.bp.blogspot.com%2F-VboOY9CQb5I%2FVb-ZYnOm7II%2FAAAAAAAAQFE%2FbuiVnpyFW-I%2Fs400%2Fhot-spot.jpg&f=1&nofb=1 .
The millions of missing children are being drained in underground factories and consumed unfortunately.
The planets and stars are existinital beings communicating to us through vibrational energy.
Projected onto us through the firmament.
The stars are reflections of craters and features on a larger planet.
so how would we see these planets/craters in the sky then? are they all reflecting on the moon? is this the new flat earth theory because it got debunked hard? lol
No, no, no, no and no.
yawn
If we represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka choice responding to balance; then why use something that hasn't been concluded yet to work backwards from; instead of adhering to the origin of choice (balance)?
Since life isn't concluded yet; why choose to evaluate suggested conclusions over what concludes?
What if those who suggest "mainstream" also conspire to suggest the contradiction thereof to those who consent to suggestions?
GRAV'ITY, noun [Latin gravitas, from gravis, heavy. See Grave.] - "weight; heaviness". What if weight is contained within the momentum of push/pull? What if motion (velocity) pushes forward; while within its momentum (resistance) it pulls the form (life) within flow (inception towards death)?
What if choice within balance of movement is both pushed into existence (flow to form aka inception) and pulled back in (form to flow aka death)...a transmutation out of base?
What if NASA suggested contradictions to those who consent to believe in suggested truths? Does nature offer lies? Could it be that we ignore what nature offers for what those within nature suggest it means; which when consented to allows them to define; redefine and contradict meaning at will?
Is this wonder based on want of suggested information or need for perceived inspiration?
WONDER, noun [Gr., to show; and hence a sight; a panic.] - "emotion which is excited by novelty, or the presentation to the sight or mind, of something new, unusual, strange, great, extraordinary, or not well understood"...does that sound more like inspiration (need) or temptation (want)?
A'LIEN, adjective alyen, [Latin alienus, from alius, another.] aka another ONE within ALL offered.
Yet creation implies out of nothing. Try to create new without shaping out of all already perceived...what if it's transmutation (out of everything)?
What if distance of form within the moment(um) of flow represents lack of comprehension towards representing separated ONEs out of united ALL? DISTANT, adjective [Latin , standing apart.] - "separate" + U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness"
SIR'IUS, noun [Latin the sun.] aka the accumulation of heat; caused by the communication of velocity (flow) and resistance (form). Also; referred to as the "dog star"; which inverted reads the "rats god" aka form ignoring to resist; while falling for the temptation of flows velocity aka ignorance of balancing between push/pull.
AKA mother earth; which represents female form (magnetic); which implies male flow (electric).
Evaluation represents the highest value in existence...choice represents evaluation responding to the value of balance. Trillions are suggested by the few to deceive the many from comprehending being ONE within ALL aka choice within balance aka evaluation within value. Money is suggested as substitute value towards choice of evaluation, and consenting to it; devalues choice of evaluation.
SE'CRET, adjective. [Latin secretus. This is given as the participle of secerno, but is radically a different word. The radical sense of seg is to separate.] Flow segregates form internally within its momentum; and it doesn't guard information; it offers ALL to each ONE within as inspiration for choice to react to.
The few can only suggest secret information; if the many ignore needed inspiration for wanted information. Information represents idolized meaning (words); Inspiration represents expressed meaning (flow/form) aka balance/choice aka value/evaluation.
A parasite represents the response to a weakness within the host. Flow offers all to each one within flow; choice to ignore offered by flow for suggestions by other form represents the host weakness that is getting parasitically exploited.
Using suggestion to steer form back into flow aka deceiving resistance to ignore balancing within velocity aka making a burned offering (holocaust) by transmuting form back to base flow. Why? To allow the few control over the many who ignore both the power they represent (resistance) and the power that presents them (velocity).
The ignorance of the many tempts the parasitic exploitation thereof by the few...a response to ignorance.
Flow/form aka velocity/resistance communicating with each other causes friction; vibration; resonance and thereby heat accumulation.
a) whatever those who suggest them choose to want them to be for those who consent to believe them and b) ONE within ALL and ALL in ONE as energy.
Within motion there can only be momentum aka the ever changing moment all form exists in aka the balance for the choice of form to shape itself through response.
Because it deceives the ONE to ignore sustenance of self within ALL; for consent to contemplate about a suggested another (alienus; alius) ONE.
ONE for ALL; ALL for ONE...we are alone aka ALL(in)ONE (as energy). All others represent inspiration (need) and temptation (want) for each ONE to sustain self within ALL.
In other words...nature differentiates itself to inspire growth (form) within loss (flow); and we are tricked to ignore being differentiated by those who suggest us to collectivize (equality aka miscegenation of differences); which they suggest represents unity (aka agreement among choices to unify under a suggested meaning).
Meanwhile in reality...U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness."
Consent to believe in affixed truth; while ignoring being within constant change.
No.
No implies a) conflict of reason against yes and b) consent to believe in suggested "no; not; nothing; nothingness" while ignoring perceived everything.
What if I didn't suggest a "yes"?
Well then... Carry on!
We’re living through the great reset, and all the CFR, Rothschild, etc shit getting exposed and we’re talking about this shit? Lol
Yeah, so what?
He thinks everyone should keep being distracted by the never ending fake conflict manufactured by the establishment, which they allow us to know about, and never for a moment consider the possibility of anything bigger. Totally not the kind of thing the controllers would want you to do.
I would say if you watch the whole 38 part video series about it, you would see how it ties into the Illuminati / CFR / conspiracy.
Then you have both?
yap. i think people should seriously use their energy for stuff that's REAL in front of them . not just some nonsense bullshit . that's always been the damper and weakness of conspiracy theorists and the movement . intstead of dealing with what is in FRONT of the majority of them, they would rather not deal with it at all
Yeah totally. Keep eating up all the petty bullshit the establishment and media feeds you all day every day, and never for a moment consider the possibility of anything else that they would not want you to know about.
The moon clearly shouldn't be there, and it's right in FRONT of your face.
Wake up dude.