He did not write any of the books of the bible. And from my searching can not find anything indicating that he translated any of the manuscripts from the original Hebrew and Aramaic text into Latin.

My point is though that none of the authors of the bible ever mentioned Lucifer, and where they left the name Lucifer from the Latin translations are pretty clearly NOT directed at any ruler of Hell.

In revelation Jesus says 'I am the morning star' which is ' I am Lucifer's in Latin, (except the ' I am' part).

In Isaiah when you read the verse where Isaiah speaks for God calling someone the name 'Morning Star' in the context it is clear he is talking to a human who is the king of Babylon, not a fallen angel.

The context of that, is it is one of 10 or more chapters where Isaiah is told to taunt and rebuke all of the kings of the neighboring nations around Israel

In that particular chapter he is told to go to Babylon and taunt it's king.

He even says clearly that ' you are just a MAN' and that everyone will say ' is this the MAN who compared himself to the most high?'

In those days it was common for kings to believe that they were God incarnate. The prime example of that is the Pharos of Egypt who thought they were God.

So that chapter of Isaiah is actually about a man thinking he was God, not a fallen Angel.

I can see though why the Catholic church would prefer to read it the way they did to the illiterate masses who had no bibles of their own. Because they (the govt.) appropriated the religion and it's text to weild power over the people, and they did similarly like the Pharos And king of Babylon saying they were conduits of God, and none could have a personal relationship with God except through them.

They myth created by the cathic church stuck by being passed down through informal oral traditions. Due to the fact that very few people read the Bible except throughsnippets and excerpts it has never been officially reevaluated and many publishers of the bible actually super impose that myth in its place. Some bibles even add title s to the verses to control how the reader perceives that area probably because the religion has grown to depend on that myth.

But the myth that Lucifer was the name of Gods favorite angel who led a rebellion against God is not found anywhere in the bible.

Once you niece that myth it is easy to project it is easy to project it on to certain passages but it's not there.

It is just another example of the govt trying to control the narrative.

Before the bible was canonized the only real mention of anything like a ruler of fallen angels was in the book of Enoch which was dismissed as false, misleading apocrypha. That was references to angels that were created for good purposes becoming harmful, but not a rebellion or attempt to over throw God