Funnily enough I took this route with Reddit and reported a ton of normie shit. I'm not sure if the mods can see your username or not, but the admins banned me within a few days of doing it.
I dunno. How about we all start flagging the "safe and effective" videos as misinformation? Perhaps the vaccine mandate ones go as racist too because it affects people of color disproportionately.
There is much worse thing nobody care about for a long time in Chrome and Firefox. It named Goolge Safe Browsing. And it is not an extension you have to install, it is a feature turned on by default. Both browsers and all their forks without exception have that feature in its code.
There is another censorship tool in browsers - the system of "Trusted CA". It declared to provide "privacy" and "protection", however that is not true at all. Formally, there are some "Trusted CA"'s that sign sites certificates and that should be some kind of guarantee that certificate belongs to that site. Of course "Trusted CA" is mostly big companies and government
institutions. So, if site have HTTPS ceritficate signed by one of that "Trusted CA", then it is assumed that it is good valid site. That system could be working if any "Trusted CA" who sign a certificate of some site for a third-party immidiately and forever removed from list of "Trusted CA". However, episode with China Trusted CA CNNIC, who was caught by hand for sigining popular sites certificates for some murky organizations and China surveillance agencies, absolutely proves that declared system does not work at all, since CNNIC is still in list of that "Trusted CA". It is also interesting, that if such "Trusted CA" sign a certificate for, say, conspiracies.win for third-patry and that third-party do a MitM attack using that certificate, user will not be notified at all, since that "Trusted CA" is in browser "Trusted CA" list. On the same time both Google and Mozilla overcomplicated use of self-signed certificates, they show scary warning and there are no easy for regular user way to allow visiting sites with self-signed certificates. Interesting, that if you turn that crap off and add self-signed certificate to "known", there will be no way for third-paty to make a MitM unnoticed, browser will show a warning that certificate changed and you will know that something goes wrong. Also, that dumb fraudulent warning about plain HTTP sites without any form fields that "could steal your password" is also kind of censoship.
They tie every site to some bigmoney or government "Trusted CA" that could revoke site certificate at any moment without any reason and if you want to use self-signed certificate, or don't want to use engryption at all, most users will see scary fraudlent warning that pose your site as malicious.
So, some stupid extension is the least problem with modern browsers.
However, there is attempts to create independent browaser without all that bigbrother crap, and that is not any Crome or Firefox forks. However, the task of full HTML5 support is not very easy, so that projects is far from perfect. Most advanced independent browser is NetSurf. It is hardly could be used to hang on facebook, even conspiracy.win looks weird, but it could be useful if you really concerned about privacy and censorship.
Chromium have same codebase as Chrome, it is basically public version of its code. Here one winner gave a good list of nearly all derivatives of Google and Mozilla code.
Google code seem to be worse than Mosilla, since Google removed an ability to disable so named "service workers", i.e. site scripts that continue to run even if you close visited web-page. You could check running service workers in about:serviceworkers in Mozilla browser and chrome://serviceworker-internals/ in Google browser (browser://serviceworker-internals/ in Chromium based Opera). You will be amased how much surveillance crap you gathered during browsing. In Firefox you still could disable that insane crap via the dom.serviceWorkers.enabled=false in about:config
In chrome based browsers there are no way to disable them at all.
The way they are phrasing this is telling. By using the phrase "conspiracies and hate" they are deliberately placing "conspiracies" next to "hate." This technique is known as juxtaposition. They do this to psychologically anchor the two ideas together in people's minds.
What they are doing is literally paying people to infiltrate forums such as this one to mix hate speech with discourse that questions government policies. The goal is to conflate discussions about actual conspiracies with racism, misogyny, antisemitism, homophobia and transphobia. Don't fall for it!
The important thing to remember is that they are NOT actually trying to fight hate speech, but rather censoring political speech that could in any way motivate people to vote against the one-party in America (Democrats). You may be aware of Facebook hiding the image that reads "stand up for what you believe in, even if you stand alone". The algorithm did not examine the sentence for meaning! The algorithm analyzed who was sharing and their political views along with how virally the image was trending. They are stifling speech likely to persuade people to vote non-Democrat.
This tool was created to allow government tech to do this more effectively and interfere with upcoming American elections.
Or you could pollute their data pool and report normie shit.
Funnily enough I took this route with Reddit and reported a ton of normie shit. I'm not sure if the mods can see your username or not, but the admins banned me within a few days of doing it.
Probably for "abuse of the report system".
If you download this extension you deserve to lose everything, have nowhere left to go and be happy.
I dunno. How about we all start flagging the "safe and effective" videos as misinformation? Perhaps the vaccine mandate ones go as racist too because it affects people of color disproportionately.
They do care, or they wouldn't attempt to leverage you to collect data.
There is much worse thing nobody care about for a long time in Chrome and Firefox. It named Goolge Safe Browsing. And it is not an extension you have to install, it is a feature turned on by default. Both browsers and all their forks without exception have that feature in its code.
Google Safe Browsing already fully used to limit access to alternative news sites - f.e. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1319310
There is another censorship tool in browsers - the system of "Trusted CA". It declared to provide "privacy" and "protection", however that is not true at all. Formally, there are some "Trusted CA"'s that sign sites certificates and that should be some kind of guarantee that certificate belongs to that site. Of course "Trusted CA" is mostly big companies and government institutions. So, if site have HTTPS ceritficate signed by one of that "Trusted CA", then it is assumed that it is good valid site. That system could be working if any "Trusted CA" who sign a certificate of some site for a third-party immidiately and forever removed from list of "Trusted CA". However, episode with China Trusted CA CNNIC, who was caught by hand for sigining popular sites certificates for some murky organizations and China surveillance agencies, absolutely proves that declared system does not work at all, since CNNIC is still in list of that "Trusted CA". It is also interesting, that if such "Trusted CA" sign a certificate for, say, conspiracies.win for third-patry and that third-party do a MitM attack using that certificate, user will not be notified at all, since that "Trusted CA" is in browser "Trusted CA" list. On the same time both Google and Mozilla overcomplicated use of self-signed certificates, they show scary warning and there are no easy for regular user way to allow visiting sites with self-signed certificates. Interesting, that if you turn that crap off and add self-signed certificate to "known", there will be no way for third-paty to make a MitM unnoticed, browser will show a warning that certificate changed and you will know that something goes wrong. Also, that dumb fraudulent warning about plain HTTP sites without any form fields that "could steal your password" is also kind of censoship.
They tie every site to some bigmoney or government "Trusted CA" that could revoke site certificate at any moment without any reason and if you want to use self-signed certificate, or don't want to use engryption at all, most users will see scary fraudlent warning that pose your site as malicious.
So, some stupid extension is the least problem with modern browsers.
However, there is attempts to create independent browaser without all that bigbrother crap, and that is not any Crome or Firefox forks. However, the task of full HTML5 support is not very easy, so that projects is far from perfect. Most advanced independent browser is NetSurf. It is hardly could be used to hang on facebook, even conspiracy.win looks weird, but it could be useful if you really concerned about privacy and censorship.
Chromium have same codebase as Chrome, it is basically public version of its code. Here one winner gave a good list of nearly all derivatives of Google and Mozilla code.
Google code seem to be worse than Mosilla, since Google removed an ability to disable so named "service workers", i.e. site scripts that continue to run even if you close visited web-page. You could check running service workers in about:serviceworkers in Mozilla browser and chrome://serviceworker-internals/ in Google browser (browser://serviceworker-internals/ in Chromium based Opera). You will be amased how much surveillance crap you gathered during browsing. In Firefox you still could disable that insane crap via the dom.serviceWorkers.enabled=false in about:config In chrome based browsers there are no way to disable them at all.
In its marketing materials for the RegretsReporter extension, the Mozilla Foundation literally asks, "Have you tumbled down rabbit holes of conspiracies and hate?" https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/campaigns/regrets-reporter/
The way they are phrasing this is telling. By using the phrase "conspiracies and hate" they are deliberately placing "conspiracies" next to "hate." This technique is known as juxtaposition. They do this to psychologically anchor the two ideas together in people's minds.
What they are doing is literally paying people to infiltrate forums such as this one to mix hate speech with discourse that questions government policies. The goal is to conflate discussions about actual conspiracies with racism, misogyny, antisemitism, homophobia and transphobia. Don't fall for it!
The important thing to remember is that they are NOT actually trying to fight hate speech, but rather censoring political speech that could in any way motivate people to vote against the one-party in America (Democrats). You may be aware of Facebook hiding the image that reads "stand up for what you believe in, even if you stand alone". The algorithm did not examine the sentence for meaning! The algorithm analyzed who was sharing and their political views along with how virally the image was trending. They are stifling speech likely to persuade people to vote non-Democrat.
This tool was created to allow government tech to do this more effectively and interfere with upcoming American elections.
Meanwhile, the online "fact checkers" suggest that it is because of a difficult-to-see (read impossible-to-see, because this is an unbelievable level of horseshit) image of a blood-stained knife in the image. Yes, really. No, I am not exaggerating. https://www.truthorfiction.com/stand-up-for-what-you-believe-in-even-if-facebook-marks-it-sensitive-content/
For what it's worth, the extension is also available on Chrome. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/regretsreporter/obpoeflheeknapimliioeoefbfaakefn
What browser do you guys suggest for my pc and android that will allow adblock extension?
Tor Browser https://www.torproject.org/download/
Android: bromite.
I use LibreWolf.
o.O the fuck?!