It happened in Stalin where elites are PARTYING even as people in Ukraine are Starving.
It happened in Cambodia where Pol Pot looked like "he never worked for a long time" and Cadres had "All sorts of luxuries like gold and silk and chosen marriage" as you are starving to DEATH.
And this scenario is escalating against you for a reason: The Masks are there to stay because you will be mentally conditioned to seek DEATH.
Elite (aka selection; choice) implies one using free will of choice to select others as the "chosen ones"; while ignoring that oneself represents the one with the choice.
The suggested rhetoric of "elite" represents a sleight of hand for those who resist the choice ignorance; and a vetting process for those ignorant enough to brand others as the chosen ones (elites). When the few hear the many call them "elite"; they comprehend that it translates to "I ignore my free will of choice". "elite" tricks the ignorant to flash their impotence aka their ignored potential.
As for suffering...choice represents reaction to balance, and choosing by choice to react to balance over ignoring it (need over want) represents self sustenance through adaptation by choice of reaction to balance. This is why those who wield choice (elites) suffer less than those who ignore to wield choice.
Parasitic behavior represents a reaction to a weakness within the host. They suggest by choice; we consent by choice. That's the weakness of ignoring to use choice in reaction to balance, to instead submit to the suggested choices of others. This choice of ignorance is what tempts others to use suggestion to parasitically exploit it, and ignorance also tempts insolence towards the ignorant; because they rather blame others (calling them parasites) then to question their own choice of ignorance.
Notice how the parasitic few both suggest the many to blame each other; while also utilizing blame directed at themselves for protection by claiming persecution?
Next time any of these fuckers try to tell you to wear a mask and take a vaccine, remember that they are speaking to you like you're retarded cattle. They do not see themselves as a part of the hoi polloi.
AOC alone should be tarred and feathered for having the audacity to show up at a $30,000/plate event in a dress that costs a year's salary unmasked with "Tax the Rich" written on it. The sheer fucking audacity.
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...aka constant movement.
Could it be that you choose to hold onto what others are suggesting you to consent to, which you now don't want anymore? Since "I wish" also represents want...how about choosing need over want?
Nah he's actually pretty smart. I actually understand some of his stuff and independently came to similar conclusions on some of it. When you translate it into regular English it makes sense: https://conspiracies.win/p/12kFdqhFoO/x/c/4JEVhGJcSZC
Its abstract stuff and he gives no context at all before jumping into the deep end. And he does that in his own dialect. So I don't blame you at all, lol.
Does flow (inception towards death) use words to express form (life)?
"I wish we could move on" is an inaccurate phrase to describe my thoughts and I could have used better phrasing.
If we are moving aka being moved aka in response to movement; and movement doesn't use words to brand itself, then do you think in reaction to the movement that offers everything to your perception or to the suggested words of others, who want you to believe what they mean?
it would be nice if things were not as bad as they are, but they are going to get worse (more difficult) before they get better.
What if the few suggest the many to consent to believe in "order out of chaos"; hence tempting them to wait for balance; when as temporary form within ongoing flow we represent "chaos out of order" hence our need to struggle for self sustenance by adaptation through choice to balance.
Could it be that the natural order of movement represents the balance our free will of choice responses to, and that the suggested choices of others deceive us to ignore balance/choice for choice vs choice?
What if adherence to balance/choice represents our choice of need over want; and choice versus choice represents our choice of want over need?
What I am trying to express...
What if you (form) represent the choice based expression of flow? Would you then need to express yourself to other form or react to flow?
I have to ask myself, do I really want
The former implies "need"; which you then use to question "want"; thereby contradicting each other. Does form need to ask form or does it need to adapt to flow?
life to be easy
What if life moving form inception towards death represents a constant struggle to balance by choice for self sustenance? What if the choice of want over need tempts us to the easy path of ignoring the demanded struggle as form within flow?
Where is the growth in that?
What if temporary form within ongoing flow represents ONEs temporary growth potential within the ongoing loss of ALL potentiality? What if balance/choice represents loss/growth? What if temporary chaos represents the reaction to ongoing order?
I should be grateful to be alive now
Towards whom? What if form in response to flow represents choice of responsibility within balance? If self sustenance is demanded for form within flow (hence need for adaptation), then doesn't gratefulness imply ignorance of responsibility to demanded adaptation by choice of reaction?
such a pivotal point in human history and progression
What if existence within ongoing progression (flow) represents being within the ever changing moment(um) of motion aka the balance where form can sustain itself by choice based reaction?
Furthermore...what if others suggest his-story to deceive humans to ignore using their choice in reaction to balance within that pivotal moment (um)? Can choice react to balance if choice consents to suggested "his-story" by the choices of others?
so that I can be an agent of positive change
A'GENT, adjective -"acting; sustaining action". What if you represent reaction within ongoing change? What if your choice to adhere to it (need) represents resonance and your choice to ignore it (want) represents dissonance?
make the world a more peaceful, loving, creative place.
What if balance is within the natural order of forward movement (flow) and the resulting form within represents temporary chaos utilized for growth potential to balance the loss of potentiality through flow?
Creation implies out of nothing, yet what if we can only transmute out of everything? Can you create "new" without reacting to what inspired you before? Try to create a new thought without transmuting it out of what you already perceive...
Neo (new) cannot exist within the Matrix (the cavity in which any thing is formed).
I haven't worn a mask yet. Somehow I've survived this liberal hellhole of Chicago. I'm starting to see others out in stores with no mask finally. Feels good.
Elites don't need to suffer, only you do.
It happened in Stalin where elites are PARTYING even as people in Ukraine are Starving.
It happened in Cambodia where Pol Pot looked like "he never worked for a long time" and Cadres had "All sorts of luxuries like gold and silk and chosen marriage" as you are starving to DEATH.
And this scenario is escalating against you for a reason: The Masks are there to stay because you will be mentally conditioned to seek DEATH.
Elite (aka selection; choice) implies one using free will of choice to select others as the "chosen ones"; while ignoring that oneself represents the one with the choice.
The suggested rhetoric of "elite" represents a sleight of hand for those who resist the choice ignorance; and a vetting process for those ignorant enough to brand others as the chosen ones (elites). When the few hear the many call them "elite"; they comprehend that it translates to "I ignore my free will of choice". "elite" tricks the ignorant to flash their impotence aka their ignored potential.
As for suffering...choice represents reaction to balance, and choosing by choice to react to balance over ignoring it (need over want) represents self sustenance through adaptation by choice of reaction to balance. This is why those who wield choice (elites) suffer less than those who ignore to wield choice.
Parasitic behavior represents a reaction to a weakness within the host. They suggest by choice; we consent by choice. That's the weakness of ignoring to use choice in reaction to balance, to instead submit to the suggested choices of others. This choice of ignorance is what tempts others to use suggestion to parasitically exploit it, and ignorance also tempts insolence towards the ignorant; because they rather blame others (calling them parasites) then to question their own choice of ignorance.
Notice how the parasitic few both suggest the many to blame each other; while also utilizing blame directed at themselves for protection by claiming persecution?
Next time any of these fuckers try to tell you to wear a mask and take a vaccine, remember that they are speaking to you like you're retarded cattle. They do not see themselves as a part of the hoi polloi.
AOC alone should be tarred and feathered for having the audacity to show up at a $30,000/plate event in a dress that costs a year's salary unmasked with "Tax the Rich" written on it. The sheer fucking audacity.
it's power display and ritual humiliation
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...aka constant movement.
Could it be that you choose to hold onto what others are suggesting you to consent to, which you now don't want anymore? Since "I wish" also represents want...how about choosing need over want?
don't get confused by his pseudo philosophical mumble jumble, all it is retarded navel gazing
Nah he's actually pretty smart. I actually understand some of his stuff and independently came to similar conclusions on some of it. When you translate it into regular English it makes sense: https://conspiracies.win/p/12kFdqhFoO/x/c/4JEVhGJcSZC
Its abstract stuff and he gives no context at all before jumping into the deep end. And he does that in his own dialect. So I don't blame you at all, lol.
He occasionally breaks character and speaks normally: https://conspiracies.win/p/13zMZPm8Ub/x/c/4JEWwcElXEc
u/Zap_Powerz
it's a bot.
Does flow (inception towards death) use words to express form (life)?
If we are moving aka being moved aka in response to movement; and movement doesn't use words to brand itself, then do you think in reaction to the movement that offers everything to your perception or to the suggested words of others, who want you to believe what they mean?
What if the few suggest the many to consent to believe in "order out of chaos"; hence tempting them to wait for balance; when as temporary form within ongoing flow we represent "chaos out of order" hence our need to struggle for self sustenance by adaptation through choice to balance.
Could it be that the natural order of movement represents the balance our free will of choice responses to, and that the suggested choices of others deceive us to ignore balance/choice for choice vs choice?
What if adherence to balance/choice represents our choice of need over want; and choice versus choice represents our choice of want over need?
What if you (form) represent the choice based expression of flow? Would you then need to express yourself to other form or react to flow?
The former implies "need"; which you then use to question "want"; thereby contradicting each other. Does form need to ask form or does it need to adapt to flow?
What if life moving form inception towards death represents a constant struggle to balance by choice for self sustenance? What if the choice of want over need tempts us to the easy path of ignoring the demanded struggle as form within flow?
What if temporary form within ongoing flow represents ONEs temporary growth potential within the ongoing loss of ALL potentiality? What if balance/choice represents loss/growth? What if temporary chaos represents the reaction to ongoing order?
Towards whom? What if form in response to flow represents choice of responsibility within balance? If self sustenance is demanded for form within flow (hence need for adaptation), then doesn't gratefulness imply ignorance of responsibility to demanded adaptation by choice of reaction?
What if existence within ongoing progression (flow) represents being within the ever changing moment(um) of motion aka the balance where form can sustain itself by choice based reaction?
Furthermore...what if others suggest his-story to deceive humans to ignore using their choice in reaction to balance within that pivotal moment (um)? Can choice react to balance if choice consents to suggested "his-story" by the choices of others?
A'GENT, adjective -"acting; sustaining action". What if you represent reaction within ongoing change? What if your choice to adhere to it (need) represents resonance and your choice to ignore it (want) represents dissonance?
What if balance is within the natural order of forward movement (flow) and the resulting form within represents temporary chaos utilized for growth potential to balance the loss of potentiality through flow?
Creation implies out of nothing, yet what if we can only transmute out of everything? Can you create "new" without reacting to what inspired you before? Try to create a new thought without transmuting it out of what you already perceive...
Neo (new) cannot exist within the Matrix (the cavity in which any thing is formed).
fuck off bot.
fuck off bot.
lol NPCs triggered in the twitter comments. These can't be actual people right?
No, farm accounts.
There is a reason why we call them NPCs
Except no one does, because they been doing this since last year
Their slaves still had masks. The press was in disguise masks
I haven't worn a mask yet. Somehow I've survived this liberal hellhole of Chicago. I'm starting to see others out in stores with no mask finally. Feels good.
Who deserves the apostrophes more...the celebs or those who despite everything are still consenting to those who suggest celebrities?
Follow up question: who empowers an idol...those who suggested it or those who consent to it?